ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07807930INSightUpdated Sep 30, 2026

Individual Narratives of Stimulation (ECT and TMS)

An observational study in Major Depression, sponsored by University of Nottingham. Not yet recruiting at 2 sites in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-30.

Sponsored by University of Nottingham · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
12
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) are two evidence-based treatments for major depressive disorder. Both work by stimulating the brain (a process known as neuromodulation), but they differ markedly in invasiveness. ECT requires a general anaesthetic, whereas TMS is delivered while a person is awake and alert and they can go home immediately afterwards. TMS has been proposed as an alternative to ECT for some people. However, TMS is not as effective as ECT in all cases, is generally slower acting, and remains less widely available.

In Nottingham and Liverpool, there are a small number of individuals who have experienced both ECT and TMS across different episodes of depression. Whilst previous studies have explored experiences of ECT and TMS separately, often using relatively superficial methods, none have examined the perspectives of people who have received both treatments. This study addresses that gap through an in-depth exploration of their experiences.

The investigators will use a narrative inquiry approach that encourages participants to tell the story of their experiences of ECT and TMS in their own words. Eligible participants will be adults who have previously received both treatments for depression. Participation involves four sessions: a structured discussion to map the timeline of their depression and treatments, two in-depth open-ended interview sessions (narrative inquiry), and a follow-up discussion about the researchers' reconstruction of their story. Recruitment will take place through services in Nottingham and Liverpool.

This study will help to understand how patients relate to, and make sense of, ECT and TMS, which contextual factors shape their experiences, and how these treatments fit into broader recovery journeys. The findings will inform the development of patient-centred services, support shared decision-making, and help healthcare professionals deepen compassionate understanding of treatment experiences.

02

Conditions studied

  • Major Depression

Keywords

  • Narrative inquiry
  • Qualitative interviews
  • Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)
  • Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT)
  • Lived experience
03

In context

Depressive Disorder, Major

3,041 studies on the registry are indexed under Depressive Disorder, Major; 588 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 12 is below the median of 131 across 400 observational studies indexed under Depressive Disorder, Major.

Browse Depressive Disorder, Major studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Nottingham is the lead sponsor of 465 studies on the registry; 80 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Adults who have received at least one session of TMS in Nottingham or Liverpool, who have also received at least one session of ECT, both intended to treat an episode of major depression

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • 18 years or older
  • Previously received at least one TMS and one ECT session as treatment for major depression
  • Conversational in the English language
  • Capacity to give to take part in this study
  • Feels fully informed and well enough to be able to share potentially distressing past experiences

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants may be excluded at the judgement of the PI if it is felt that the participant is at high risk of significant emotional distress from taking part in the interviews at this time
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
12 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • People with lived experience of both ECT and TMS for treating major depression

    Other: There is no intervention in this observation study (qualitative interviews about past treatment experiences)

Interventions

  • OtherThere is no intervention in this observation study (qualitative interviews about past treatment experiences)

    There is no intervention in this observation study (qualitative interviews about past treatment experiences)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Co-created narratives and associated themes

    Time frame: From enrollment to the completion of the follow-up feedback sesson

07

Study locations

2 sites
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Nov 2026; primary completion for Oct 2027, 11 months later.

Of 121 non-industry observational studies under Depressive Disorder, Major, half reached primary completion within 46 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 29 and three quarters within 73. This study's planned 11 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 150 studies reached it within 38 months; a quarter within 21 and three quarters within 67.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 1, 2026
First posted
Sep 8, 2026
StartEst.
Nov 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Oct 31, 2027
CompletionEst.
Oct 31, 2027
Last update
Sep 30, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Minor edits
Nothing that changes what the study is or who can join. Edited: description
1 update, last Sep 30, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Sep 30, 2026
    Minor edits only
    + 1 other change: description

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07807930
Collaborators
Mersey Care NHS Trust
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 8, 2026
Start date
Nov 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Oct 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 30, 2026

Study contacts

Sarah Research Assistant (Nottingham)
Contact
sarah.ottahal@nottingham.ac.uk
+44
Peggy Research Assistant (Liverpool)
Contact
yue.peng@merseycare.nhs.uk
+44
Paul M Briley
principal investigator · University of Nottingham
Jade Thai
principal investigator · Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion