ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT07805044TRU-OMNIBODYUpdated Sep 4, 2026

Truway Whole-Body Digital Twin and Physiologic Resilience Study (TRU-OMNIBODY)

An observational study in PHYSIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA, Homeostasis and Physical Functional Performance, sponsored by Truway Health, Inc.. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-04.

Sponsored by Truway Health, Inc. · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
450
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

TRU-OMNIBODY is a prospective observational study designed to develop and independently validate a research-only whole-body digital twin. The digital twin will combine measurements from multiple body systems to create a participant-specific representation of physiologic state, resilience, and recovery.

The study plans to enroll approximately 450 adults between 18 and 80 years of age. Participants will include generally healthy adults and adults with stable cardiometabolic, respiratory, or mobility-related conditions. Study measurements may include wearable-sensor data, heart rate and rhythm, blood pressure, oxygen saturation, autonomic responses, body composition, mobility, muscle function, sleep, activity, cognitive performance, point-of-care imaging, laboratory measurements, and optional biospecimens.

Participants will complete a standardized resilience assessment consisting of rest, active standing, a six-minute walk, a cognitive dual task, and monitored recovery. Selected measurements will also be collected during home monitoring and follow-up visits for up to 12 months.

The primary objective is to determine how accurately a locked digital-twin model predicts Whole-Body Recovery Burden, a research measure derived from the timing and magnitude of recovery across several physiologic systems. Model development and testing will be separated so that the final evaluation is performed in an independent validation cohort.

This study does not assign participants to a medical treatment. Digital-twin outputs will not be used to diagnose disease, recommend treatment, or replace evaluation by a qualified health care professional.

Read the detailed description

Human physiologic resilience depends on coordinated responses across the cardiovascular, respiratory, autonomic, metabolic, musculoskeletal, sensory, immune, behavioral, and environmental domains. Conventional clinical measurements generally evaluate these systems separately and at isolated points in time. TRU-OMNIBODY will investigate whether multimodal longitudinal measurements can be integrated into a participant-specific digital twin that represents whole-body physiologic reserve and recovery dynamics.

The study is designed as a prospective observational development-and-external-validation cohort. Approximately 450 adults aged 18 through 80 years will be enrolled across three planned cohorts: a reference-health cohort, a stable cardiometabolic cohort, and a stable respiratory or mobility-related cohort. Approximately 300 participants will contribute to model development, internal resampling, and model selection. Approximately 150 participants will be reserved for independent external validation. Validation data will remain separated from model-development activities until the digital-twin model, preprocessing procedures, model parameters, missing-data rules, and evaluation methods have been locked.

The whole-body measurement architecture may include continuous or episodic wearable-sensor measurements, electrocardiography, heart rate, blood pressure, pulse oximetry, respiratory measurements, autonomic testing, body composition, mobility and gait measurements, muscle strength, balance, sleep, physical activity, cognitive performance, point-of-care imaging, standard laboratory measurements, and optional biospecimen or multiomic assessments. Device identity, firmware, measurement quality, timing, and data provenance will be recorded when applicable.

At baseline, participants will complete a standardized resilience challenge. The planned sequence includes a resting stabilization period, transition from a monitored resting position to standing, a functional walking assessment, a validated cognitive dual task, and monitored recovery. Measurements collected before, during, and after the challenge will be used to characterize the magnitude, timing, coordination, and completeness of recovery across physiologic domains. A subset of participants may repeat the assessment within approximately 7 to 14 days to evaluate test-retest reliability.

Participants may also complete scheduled home monitoring, symptom and activity reporting, quarterly assessments, and final follow-up for up to 12 months. Longitudinal data will be used to establish participant-specific baselines, quantify within-person variation, and examine whether persistent deviations from personal baseline are associated with subsequently adjudicated health events or clinically meaningful changes. Health events will be evaluated according to prespecified adjudication procedures rather than inferred solely from digital-twin output.

The primary analysis will evaluate prediction error for Whole-Body Recovery Burden in the independent validation cohort. Whole-Body Recovery Burden is a prespecified research outcome representing integrated recovery delay or incomplete recovery across measured physiologic domains. The primary performance measure will compare the locked model prediction with the observed outcome following the standardized challenge. Secondary analyses will evaluate reliability, calibration, discrimination, uncertainty, missingness, domain-specific recovery, participant burden, protocol feasibility, and performance across demographic and clinical subgroups.

Exploratory analyses will evaluate cross-organ coupling, multimodal recovery phenotypes, individual resilience trajectories, change-point patterns, and the relationship between deviations from personal baseline and adjudicated health-state changes. Participant-level uncertainty estimates or abstention rules will be used when input quality is inadequate or measurements fall outside the model's supported range.

TRU-OMNIBODY is observational and does not assign a drug, biologic, device treatment, or therapeutic strategy. Investigational digital-twin outputs will remain separated from routine clinical decision-making and will not independently diagnose disease, recommend treatment, or direct participant care. Clinically significant observations obtained through validated conventional measurements will be managed according to the approved protocol, safety procedures, informed-consent document, and site-specific clinical escalation plan.

02

Conditions studied

  • PHYSIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA
  • Homeostasis
  • Physical Functional Performance
  • Cardiorespiratory Fitness
  • Cardiometabolic Risk Factors
  • Mobility Limitation

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Whole-Body Digital Twin
  • Physiologic Resilience
  • Whole-Body Recovery Burden
  • Patient-Specific Modeling
  • Computer Simulation
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Machine Learning
  • Predictive Learning Models
  • Digital Health
  • Wearable Electronic Devices
  • Monitoring, Physiologic
  • Monitoring, Ambulatory
  • Multimodal Phenotyping
  • Cross-Organ Physiology
  • Recovery Dynamics
  • Allostasis
  • Physiologic Adaptation
03

In context

Mobility Limitation

381 studies on the registry are indexed under Mobility Limitation; 108 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 450 is above the median of 75 across 57 observational studies indexed under Mobility Limitation.

Browse Mobility Limitation studies →

Lead sponsor

Truway Health, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 16 studies on the registry; 16 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The study will enroll approximately 450 community-dwelling adults aged 18 through 80 years from outpatient practices, research registries, community outreach, and digital recruitment channels. Approximately 150 participants will be enrolled in each of three cohorts: a Reference Health Cohort, a Stable Cardiometabolic Cohort, and a Stable Respiratory or Mobility Cohort. Recruitment will seek representation across age, sex, race, ethnicity, socioeconomic background, and functional status. Participants must be clinically stable and able to complete protocol assessments. Declining optional biospecimen collection will not preclude participation.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 through 80 years at enrollment.
  • Able and willing to provide written .
  • Able to understand study instructions and comply with protocol assessments.
  • Able to complete the standardized physiologic resilience challenge safely, with a customary assistive device or protocol-permitted accommodation when needed.
  • Clinically stable at screening, with no significant acute change in health status or prescribed medication regimen during the preceding 30 days, unless determined by the investigator not to affect participant safety or study measurements.
  • Willing to undergo multimodal physiologic monitoring and use study-provided or compatible wearable equipment.
  • Meets the criteria for one of the following prespecified cohorts:

    1. Reference Health Cohort: Generally healthy adult without an unstable or condition expected to prevent safe completion of the protocol or materially impair interpretation of the reference measurements.
    2. Stable Cardiometabolic Cohort: Adult with one or more stable cardiometabolic conditions or risk factors, which may include controlled hypertension, dyslipidemia, obesity, prediabetes, or stable type 2 diabetes, without recent acute cardiometabolic decompensation.
    3. Stable Respiratory or Mobility Cohort: Adult with a stable chronic respiratory condition or mobility-related functional limitation, without a recent exacerbation, acute injury, or acute functional decline that would make protocol assessments unsafe.
  • Participants meeting criteria for more than one clinical cohort will be assigned according to the prespecified cohort-classification hierarchy.
  • Participation in optional biospecimen collection requires separate consent; declining optional biospecimen collection will not otherwise exclude an eligible participant.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability or unwillingness to provide .
  • Acute illness, febrile illness, or suspected communicable infection at the time of assessment.
  • Hospitalization, major surgery, or acute medical event within 30 days before enrollment, unless reviewed and cleared by the investigator.
  • Unstable cardiovascular disease, including recent acute coronary syndrome, decompensated heart failure, uncontrolled clinically significant arrhythmia, or symptomatic severe valvular disease.
  • Acute respiratory exacerbation, unstable oxygen requirement, or resting respiratory status that the investigator determines would make the challenge unsafe.
  • Resting blood pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation, or other screening measurement outside the protocol-defined safety limits after repeat assessment.
  • Recent syncope, recurrent unexplained falls, acute musculoskeletal injury, or another condition that would prevent safe standing, walking, or recovery monitoring.
  • Neurologic, cognitive, psychiatric, visual, hearing, or communication impairment that would prevent informed consent or reliable completion of study procedures despite reasonable accommodation.
  • Known intolerance to required wearable sensors, electrodes, adhesives, or monitoring procedures that cannot be addressed using an approved alternative.
  • Participation in another clinical study or exposure to an intervention that, in the investigator's judgment, could confound study measurements or increase risk.
  • Any medical, functional, or behavioral condition that the investigator or designated medical monitor determines would create an unacceptable risk or compromise the scientific validity of the collected data.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
450 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Reference Health Cohort

    Approximately 150 generally healthy adults will be observed to establish reference patterns of whole-body physiology, cross-organ coordination, functional capacity, and recovery following a standardized physiologic challenge. Participants will undergo the same research assessments and longitudinal monitoring as the other cohorts. No treatment will be assigned or modified by the study.

    Procedure: Standardized Physiologic Resilience Challenge · Other: Multimodal Whole-Body Physiologic Monitoring · Other: Research-Only Whole-Body Digital Twin Analysis

  • Stable Cardiometabolic Cohort

    Approximately 150 adults with stable cardiometabolic conditions or risk factors, which may include controlled hypertension, dyslipidemia, obesity, prediabetes, or stable type 2 diabetes, will be observed. The study will characterize physiologic response, cross-system coordination, and recovery in comparison with the reference cohort. No treatment will be assigned or modified by the study.

    Procedure: Standardized Physiologic Resilience Challenge · Other: Multimodal Whole-Body Physiologic Monitoring · Other: Research-Only Whole-Body Digital Twin Analysis

  • Stable Respiratory or Mobility Cohort

    Approximately 150 adults with stable chronic respiratory conditions or mobility-related functional limitations will be observed. Eligible participants must be clinically stable and able to complete the study assessments safely, with protocol-permitted accommodations when needed. The study will characterize functional reserve, physiologic response, and recovery in comparison with the other cohorts. No treatment will be assigned or modified by the study.

    Procedure: Standardized Physiologic Resilience Challenge · Other: Multimodal Whole-Body Physiologic Monitoring · Other: Research-Only Whole-Body Digital Twin Analysis

Interventions

  • ProcedureStandardized Physiologic Resilience Challenge

    Participants will complete a standardized, nontherapeutic sequence that may include baseline rest and stabilization, active standing, a six-minute walk, a cognitive dual task, and monitored recovery. Synchronized physiologic and functional measurements will be collected before, during, and after the challenge to quantify response magnitude, cross-system coordination, and recovery kinetics. This procedure is performed for observational research and does not assign treatment.

  • OtherMultimodal Whole-Body Physiologic Monitoring

    Participants will undergo multimodal longitudinal monitoring using research assessments that may include wearable sensors, electrocardiography, blood pressure, pulse oximetry, respiratory measurements, body composition, sleep and activity monitoring, mobility testing, symptom assessments, and point-of-care imaging. Measurements will be synchronized when feasible to characterize whole-body physiologic state and change over time. Study-generated measurements are observational and will not be used to direct treatment.

  • OtherResearch-Only Whole-Body Digital Twin Analysis

    A version-controlled computational model will integrate each participant's longitudinal physiologic, functional, clinical, imaging, wearable, and optional biospecimen-derived data. The model will estimate whole-body resilience, organ-system interactions, physiologic reserve, and recovery trajectories. Model development will use a prespecified training sample, followed by locked validation in an independent sample. Digital-twin outputs are investigational, research-only, and will not be used for diagnosis or clinical decision-making.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean Absolute Prediction Error of the Locked Digital Twin for the 30-Minute Whole-Body Resilience Index

    In the independent validation cohort, the locked digital-twin model will predict each participant's Whole-Body Resilience Index at 30 minutes after completion of the standardized physiologic resilience challenge. The observed index is a prespecified score ranging from 0 to 100 that integrates normalized recovery across cardiovascular, respiratory, autonomic, mobility, and cognitive domains. The primary outcome is the mean absolute difference, expressed in index points, between the predicted and observed scores. Lower prediction error indicates greater model accuracy.

    Time frame: During the primary assessment visit, from pre-challenge baseline through 30 minutes after completion of the resilience challenge.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Whole-Body Resilience Index at 30 Minutes After the Physiologic Challenge

    The observed Whole-Body Resilience Index will be calculated using the prespecified and locked scoring algorithm. The index ranges from 0 to 100 and integrates recovery in heart rate, blood-pressure stabilization, oxygen saturation, respiratory rate, gait performance, and cognitive response performance relative to the participant's pre-challenge baseline. Higher scores indicate greater whole-body physiologic recovery. Scores will be summarized overall and by cohort.

    Time frame: Thirty minutes after completion of the resilience challenge during the primary assessment visit.

  2. Time to Multisystem Physiologic Recovery

    Time to recovery is the number of minutes from completion of the resilience challenge until heart rate, systolic blood pressure, and respiratory rate are within 10% of the participant's stabilized pre-challenge values and oxygen saturation is within 2 percentage points of its pre-challenge value at two consecutive protocol-specified measurements. Participants who do not meet all recovery criteria within 60 minutes will be classified as not recovered within the observation window.

    Time frame: From completion of the resilience challenge through 60 minutes of monitored recovery.

  3. Change in Multisystem Coordination Index From Baseline to 30-Minute Recovery

    The Multisystem Coordination Index is a prespecified unitless score ranging from 0 to 1 derived from synchronized temporal relationships among cardiovascular, respiratory, autonomic, oxygenation, and mobility signals. Higher values indicate stronger coordinated physiologic coupling. The outcome is the 30-minute recovery score minus the pre-challenge baseline score. The computational method and signal-processing parameters will be locked before analysis of the independent validation cohort.

    Time frame: From the stabilized pre-challenge baseline through 30 minutes after completion of the resilience challenge.

  4. Six-Minute Walk Distance

    Total distance walked during the standardized six-minute walk test will be measured in meters using a protocol-defined course and standardized instructions. Greater distance indicates greater functional exercise capacity. Results will be summarized overall and separately for each cohort.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), during the primary assessment visit.

  5. Cognitive-Motor Dual-Task Cost

    Cognitive-motor dual-task cost will be calculated as the percentage reduction in gait speed during the cognitive dual-task condition relative to the participant's single-task walking speed: \[(single-task gait speed - dual-task gait speed) / single-task gait speed\] × 100. Higher positive percentages indicate greater cognitive-motor interference.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), during the primary assessment visit.

  6. Calibration Slope of the Locked Digital-Twin Prediction Model

    Model calibration will be evaluated in the independent validation cohort by estimating the slope relating the observed 30-minute Whole-Body Resilience Index to the index predicted by the locked digital-twin model. A calibration slope of 1 indicates agreement between predicted and observed variation. The slope and its 95% confidence interval will be reported.

    Time frame: At each scheduled study assessment, from initiation of the assessment through 24 hours after completion.

Other outcomes

  1. Participants Experiencing a Study-Procedure-Related Adverse Event

    Number and percentage of participants experiencing one or more adverse events assessed by the investigator as related or possibly related to the standardized physiologic challenge, wearable monitoring, biospecimen collection, imaging, or other study procedures. Events will be categorized by severity and relationship to the research procedure.

    Time frame: From initiation of each study assessment through 24 hours after completion of that assessment.

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Bent B, Wang K, Grzesiak E, Jiang C, Qi Y, Jiang Y, Cho P, Zingler K, Ogbeide FI, Zhao A, Runge R, Sim I, Dunn J. The digital biomarker discovery pipeline: An open-source software platform for the development of digital biomarkers using mHealth and wearables data. J Clin Transl Sci. 2020 Jul 14;5(1):e19. doi: 10.1017/cts.2020.511. PubMed 33948242 ↗
  • Holland AE, Spruit MA, Troosters T, Puhan MA, Pepin V, Saey D, McCormack MC, Carlin BW, Sciurba FC, Pitta F, Wanger J, MacIntyre N, Kaminsky DA, Culver BH, Revill SM, Hernandes NA, Andrianopoulos V, Camillo CA, Mitchell KE, Lee AL, Hill CJ, Singh SJ. An official European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society technical standard: field walking tests in chronic respiratory disease. Eur Respir J. 2014 Dec;44(6):1428-46. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00150314. Epub 2014 Oct 30. PubMed 25359355 ↗
  • ATS Committee on Proficiency Standards for Clinical Pulmonary Function Laboratories. ATS statement: guidelines for the six-minute walk test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Jul 1;166(1):111-7. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.166.1.at1102. No abstract available. PubMed 12091180 ↗
  • Bandeen-Roche K, Zhu J, Xue QL, Buta B, Laskow T, Walston JD, Varadhan R. Characterization of Dynamic Adaptation to Stressors Using Multisystem Stimulus-Response Data: The Study of Physical Resilience in Aging Pilot. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2025 May 5;80(6):glaf056. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glaf056. PubMed 40088116 ↗
  • Varadhan R, Seplaki CL, Xue QL, Bandeen-Roche K, Fried LP. Stimulus-response paradigm for characterizing the loss of resilience in homeostatic regulation associated with frailty. Mech Ageing Dev. 2008 Nov;129(11):666-70. doi: 10.1016/j.mad.2008.09.013. Epub 2008 Sep 30. PubMed 18938195 ↗
  • Thangaraj PM, Benson SH, Oikonomou EK, Asselbergs FW, Khera R. Cardiovascular care with digital twin technology in the era of generative artificial intelligence. Eur Heart J. 2024 Dec 1;45(45):4808-4821. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae619. PubMed 39322420 ↗
  • Corral-Acero J, Margara F, Marciniak M, Rodero C, Loncaric F, Feng Y, Gilbert A, Fernandes JF, Bukhari HA, Wajdan A, Martinez MV, Santos MS, Shamohammdi M, Luo H, Westphal P, Leeson P, DiAchille P, Gurev V, Mayr M, Geris L, Pathmanathan P, Morrison T, Cornelussen R, Prinzen F, Delhaas T, Doltra A, Sitges M, Vigmond EJ, Zacur E, Grau V, Rodriguez B, Remme EW, Niederer S, Mortier P, McLeod K, Potse M, Pueyo E, Bueno-Orovio A, Lamata P. The 'Digital Twin' to enable the vision of precision cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2020 Dec 21;41(48):4556-4564. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa159. PubMed 32128588 ↗
  • Bjornsson B, Borrebaeck C, Elander N, Gasslander T, Gawel DR, Gustafsson M, Jornsten R, Lee EJ, Li X, Lilja S, Martinez-Enguita D, Matussek A, Sandstrom P, Schafer S, Stenmarker M, Sun XF, Sysoev O, Zhang H, Benson M; Swedish Digital Twin Consortium. Digital twins to personalize medicine. Genome Med. 2019 Dec 31;12(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s13073-019-0701-3. PubMed 31892363 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Deidentified individual participant data underlying the published primary and secondary results will be made available. Shared data may include demographic variables, cohort classification, clinical characteristics, derived physiologic measurements, summarized wearable data, functional assessments, Whole-Body Resilience Index components and scores, digital-twin predictions, outcome measures, and adverse-event data. Direct identifiers, free-text clinical records, facial images, raw data presenting an unacceptable reidentification risk, and biospecimen-derived data not covered by participant consent will not be shared.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Analytic code

Time frame: Data will become available beginning 12 months after publication of the primary study results or 24 months after study completion, whichever occurs first. Approved datasets and supporting materials will remain available for five years.

Access criteria: Access may be granted to qualified researchers who submit a methodologically sound scientific proposal. Requests will be reviewed for scientific merit, participant-consent compatibility, privacy risk, data-security safeguards, and consistency with applicable law and ethics requirements. Approved requesters must execute a data-use agreement, use the data solely for the approved purpose, protect confidentiality, refrain from attempting reidentification, and acknowledge the original study. Data will be provided through a controlled-access repository or other secure transfer mechanism. Requests may be submitted to [gavin@truwayhealth.com](mailto:gavin@truwayhealth.com).

Data sharing details ↗ · truwayhealth.com

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Aug 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Mar 2039, 151 months after the start.

Of 25 observational studies under Mobility Limitation, half reached primary completion within 14 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 3 and three quarters within 42. This study's planned 151 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 31, 2026
First posted
Sep 4, 2026
StartActual
Aug 31, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Mar 31, 2039
CompletionEst.
Jun 30, 2041
Last update
Sep 4, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 4, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07805044
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 4, 2026
Start date
Aug 31, 2026
Primary completion
Mar 31, 2039 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 30, 2041 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 4, 2026

Study contacts

Gavin C Solomon, MD
principal investigator · Truway Health, Inc.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion