ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07803848SPACE-TUpdated Oct 26, 2026

Study to Confirm Efficacy and Feasibility of Tarlatamab Treatment in Patients With Extensive Stage Small-cell Lung Cancer With Poor Performance Status

A Phase 2 interventional study of Tarlatamab in Small-cell Lung Cancer, sponsored by AIO-Studien-gGmbH. Recruiting at 8 sites in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-26.

Sponsored by AIO-Studien-gGmbH · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 7 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2025, registered Aug 2026).
  • Started Jan 2025; still recruiting 1 year 10 months later.
Updated Oct 26, 2026Primary completion movedGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
57
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The SPACE-T study is a clinical trial for people with advanced small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) whose cancer has returned or spread despite previous treatment and whose general health is reduced (ECOG performance status 2). The study will include 57 participants at about 15 sites in Germany.

The study is testing tarlatamab, a treatment that helps the immune system recognize and attack cancer cells. Participants will receive tarlatamab through a vein, starting with a lower dose of 1 mg, followed by doses of 10 mg. Treatment will then generally be given every two weeks.

The main purpose of the study is to find out how effective tarlatamab is in this group of patients by assessing how many participants are alive 12 months after starting the study. The study will also examine how well the treatment controls the cancer, including cancer that has spread to the brain, how well participants tolerate the treatment, its side effects, and its impact on quality of life.

Patients with poorer general health are often not included in clinical trials, even though they represent an important part of the people treated for SCLC in everyday clinical practice. The SPACE-T study aims to provide more information about whether tarlatamab is effective and feasible for these patients.

Read the detailed description

The SPACE-T study is a phase II clinical trial investigating the treatment tarlatamab in people with advanced small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). The study focuses specifically on patients whose cancer has returned or spread after previous treatment and whose general health and ability to carry out everyday activities are reduced (ECOG performance status 2). This patient group is often underrepresented in clinical trials, although it represents an important part of patients treated for SCLC in routine clinical practice.

A total of 57 patients are planned to participate at approximately 15 study sites in Germany. To take part, patients must be at least 18 years old and have confirmed small-cell lung cancer that has returned or spread to other parts of the body. They must have received at least one previous treatment for recurrent or metastatic disease. In general, previous treatment should have included platinum-based chemotherapy, etoposide and a PD-L1 inhibitor. Patients must also have cancer that can be measured on imaging examinations.

Patients with brain metastases may also participate in the study. However, patients cannot take part if brain metastases are causing new or worsening neurological symptoms. There are also other eligibility requirements relating, for example, to blood counts, liver and kidney function, breathing problems and previous cancer treatments. Patients who have previously received a treatment targeting DLL3 cannot participate.

All participants in the study will receive tarlatamab; there is no placebo or comparison group. Tarlatamab is a type of immunotherapy designed to bring the body's T cells into contact with cancer cells that carry a protein called DLL3. This is intended to help the immune system recognize and attack the cancer cells.

Tarlatamab is given through a vein. To reduce the risks associated with starting treatment, patients first receive a lower dose of 1 mg on the first day of treatment. They then receive the full 10 mg dose one week later and again one week after that. Afterwards, tarlatamab is generally given every two weeks.

The main aim of the SPACE-T study is to determine how effective tarlatamab is in this patient population. The main measure used for this assessment is the proportion of patients who are alive 12 months after starting the study. Other assessments will look at how long patients live overall, how long the cancer remains under control, how many patients have a reduction in the size of their cancer, and how long it takes before another cancer treatment is needed. For patients with brain metastases, the study will also examine how well the treatment controls cancer in the brain.

Another important aim is to understand whether tarlatamab can be given safely and practically to patients whose general health is reduced. The study will therefore closely assess side effects and how well patients tolerate treatment. It will also evaluate patients' quality of life and symptoms using questionnaires completed by the patients themselves. In addition, the study will investigate whether palliative radiotherapy, for example for symptomatic cancer lesions, can be incorporated into treatment with tarlatamab.

Blood samples and, where available as part of routine care, tumor tissue samples will also be collected for research. These samples will be used to study changes in the immune system during treatment and to investigate whether early immune responses may be related to how well a patient's cancer responds to tarlatamab.

Tarlatamab can cause specific immune-related side effects. These include cytokine release syndrome (CRS), an inflammatory reaction caused by activation of the immune system, and neurological side effects such as immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). One reason for conducting the SPACE-T study is to obtain more information about the feasibility, safety and effectiveness of tarlatamab in patients with poorer general health, for whom there is currently limited clinical evidence.

Overall, the SPACE-T study aims to determine whether tarlatamab is an effective and feasible treatment option for patients with advanced small-cell lung cancer and reduced performance status, a population that more closely reflects many patients seen in everyday clinical practice.

02

Conditions studied

  • Small-cell Lung Cancer

Keywords

  • poor performance status
  • ECOG 2
  • tarlatamab
03

In context

Small Cell Lung Carcinoma

1,301 studies on the registry are indexed under Small Cell Lung Carcinoma; 367 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 57 is close to the median of 56 across 1,077 interventional studies indexed under Small Cell Lung Carcinoma.

Browse Small Cell Lung Carcinoma studies →

Lead sponsor

AIO-Studien-gGmbH is the lead sponsor of 62 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Written obtained from the subject prior to performing any protocol-related procedures.
  2. Age ≥ 18 years
  3. performance status 2
  4. confirmed small-cell lung cancer (initial mixed histology / combined SCLC permitted if re- of current progression shows SCLC)
  5. Recurrent or disease. In case of local-only recurrence, availability of local treatment options must have been excluded
  6. Has received at least one in the recurrent or metastatic setting
  7. Has received a prior treatment line with platinum, etoposide, and a antibody. Treatment with chemotherapy only is acceptable if the patient had a for CPI treatment
  8. according to v1.1

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. performance status 0, 1, 3 or 4
  2. less than three months
  3. Active with unstable symptoms (new or progressive neurological symptoms within the last 3 weeks)
  4. Bone marrow insufficiency:

    1. \< 1.5/nl or
    2. \<8 mg/dl or
    3. \<100/nl
  5. Advanced liver disease:

    1. Subjects with pre-existing chronic liver disease:

      iii. Total > 1.5xULN or iv. or AST > 3xULN

    2. Subjects with no relevant prior chronic liver disease and elevated liver parameters due to liver :

    v. Total bilirubin > 3xULN or vi. ALT or AST > 10xULN c. (INR) > 2.0 and partial thromboplastin time (PTT) or activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) ≥ 1.5 x , except for subjects undergoing new class anticoagulant therapy (eg, Apixaban, Rivaroxaban, Edoxaban) with stable dose for 2 weeks prior to enrollment

  6. Advanced kidney disease:

    GFR \<20 ml/min/1.73m²

  7. Heart failure with reduced (EF \< 40%, assessed by echochardiography performed within 3 months prior to C1D1)
  8. Hemodynamically significant pericardial effusion
  9. pleural effusion (Clinically significant pleural effusions must be managed by drainage. Re-check within 3 days prior to initiation of treatment.)
  10. Respiratory compromise leading to an unjustifiable risk in case of higher-grade CRS, in the judgment of the investigator (possible criteria leading to such judgment: oxygen support at rest >2l/min, active pneumonia or pneumonitis)
  11. Prior DLL3-directed treatment
  12. Prior systemic therapy (chemotherapy, CPI) within 14 days prior to first dose of study treatment
  13. Previous treatment in the present study (does not include screening failure)
  14. History of immune-mediated encephalitis
  15. Concurrent other than SCLC requiring active treatment
  16. infection not on stable antiviral treatment
  17. Women of or men with partners of childbearing potential who are not adhering to measures
  18. Female subjects of childbearing potential

    1. unwilling to use appropriate method(s) of contraception. WOCBP should use an adequate method to avoid pregnancy for 60 days after the last dose of tarlatamab
    2. who are breastfeeding or who plan to breastfeed while on study through 60 days after the last dose of tarlatamab
    3. planning to become pregnant or donate eggs while on study through 60 days after the last dose of tarlatamab
    4. with a positive pregnancy test at screening
  19. Male subjects

    1. with a female partner of childbearing potential who are unwilling to practice sexual abstinence (refrain from heterosexual intercourse) or use contraception during treatment and for an additional 60 days after the last dose of tarlatamab
    2. with a pregnant partner who are unwilling to practice abstinence or use a condom during treatment and for an additional 60 days after the last dose of tarlatamab
    3. unwilling to abstain from donating sperm during treatment and for an additional 60 days after the last dose of tarlatamab
  20. Patient who has been incarcerated or involuntarily institutionalized by court order or by the authorities [§ 40 Abs. 1 S. 3 Nr. 4 AMG].
  21. Patients who are unable to consent because they do not understand the nature, significance and implications of the clinical trial and therefore cannot form a rational intention in the light of the facts [§ 40 Abs. 1 S. 3 Nr. 3a AMG].
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(26)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

Histologically or cytologically confirmed

The diagnosis was confirmed by looking at a sample under a microscope: tissue from a biopsy or surgery (histology), or cells from a fluid or needle sample (cytology).

Your pathology report is the document that shows this.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

Line of therapy

A line of therapy is one course of treatment, which may combine several drugs. First-line is the first course given; second-line follows when that stops working or is not tolerated.

“Two prior lines” means two courses that count separately under the study’s rules — not simply two drugs. Ask the study team if you are unsure how yours are counted.

PD-1, PD-L1 and checkpoint inhibitors

PD-1, PD-L1 and CTLA-4 are proteins that act as brakes on the immune system. Checkpoint inhibitors, such as pembrolizumab or nivolumab, block them so the immune system can attack a cancer.

PD-L1 can also be measured in a tumour sample. Some scores count stained tumour cells only (TPS); others also count certain immune cells (CPS). The study names the score and the minimum it uses.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Measurable disease

The amount of disease can be tracked with a defined measurement, so the study can see whether it shrinks or grows. It might be a tumour measured on a scan or, in some blood cancers such as myeloma, a marker measured in blood or urine.

The criteria or the study team say which measurement counts — having no tumour visible on a scan does not by itself rule you out.

RECIST

The standard rules for measuring tumours on CT or MRI scans, to tell whether a cancer is shrinking, stable or growing during treatment.

“Measurable disease per RECIST 1.1” usually means at least one tumour 10 mm or more at its longest on a CT scan, or a lymph node 15 mm or more across its short axis.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

Brain metastases

Cancer deposits in the brain from a cancer that started elsewhere in the body (CNS metastases include the spinal cord).

Studies differ: some leave out any brain metastases, some accept ones treated and stable for some weeks. Check what this study allows.

Absolute neutrophil count (ANC)

The number of neutrophils, white blood cells that help fight infection, in a given amount of blood. Too few raises the risk of infection.

It is a count, not a percentage of the white cells. Limits are written in units that mean the same: ≥ 1.5 × 10⁹/L is ≥ 1,500 per mm³ (µL). Each lab has its own reference range.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

INR, PT and aPTT (clotting tests)

Blood tests of how long blood takes to clot. The INR is the prothrombin time (PT) put on a common scale; about 1 is usual for someone not taking a blood thinner.

Criteria often make an exception for people on a blood thinner such as warfarin, whose INR is raised on purpose.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)

The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
57 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Tarlatamab

    Participants receive tarlatamab intravenously at a step dose of 1 mg on Cycle 1 Day 1, followed by the target dose of 10 mg on Cycle 1 Day 8 and Cycle 1 Day 15, and every two weeks thereafter.

    Drug: Tarlatamab

Interventions

  • Tarlatamab is administered intravenously at a step dose of 1 mg on Cycle 1 Day 1, followed by a target dose of 10 mg on Cycle 1 Day 8 and Cycle 1 Day 15, and every two weeks thereafter.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Overall Survival Rate at 12 Months

    Percentage of participants who are alive 12 months after initiation of study treatment.

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Overall Survival (OS)

    Time from initiation of study treatment to death from any cause.

    Time frame: From initiation of study treatment until death from any cause, assessed up to 48 months

  2. Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

    (PFS) Time from initiation of study treatment to disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs first.

    Time frame: From initiation of study treatment until the date of first documented disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs first, assessed up to 48 months

  3. Objective Response Rate (ORR)

    Percentage of participants with an objective tumor response according to RECIST v1.1.

    Time frame: From initiation of study treatment until documented disease progression, assessed up to 48 months

  4. Intracranial Objective Response Rate (iORR)

    Percentage of participants with brain metastases who achieve an objective intracranial tumor response.

    Time frame: From initiation of study treatment until documented intracranial disease progression, assessed up to 48 months

  5. Rate of Participants Tolerating Tarlatamab Until First Disease Assessment

    percentage of participants who are able to continue tarlatamab treatment until the first scheduled disease assessment

    Time frame: From first dose until first scheduled disease assessment after 2 months

  6. Safety and Tolerability of Tarlatamab

    Incidence and severity of adverse events during treatment with tarlatamab.

    Time frame: rom first dose of tarlatamab through the protocol-defined safety follow-up period, assessed up to 48 months

  7. Time to Next-Line Systemic Therapy

    Time from initiation of study treatment to initiation of the next systemic anticancer therapy.

    Time frame: From initiation of study treatment until initiation of the next-line systemic anticancer therapy, assessed up to 48 months

  8. Quality of Life - EORTC QLQ-C30

    Changes in patient-reported quality of life as assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire. Scores are transformed to a scale ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores on the global health status/quality of life scale and functional scales indicate better quality of life and functioning, respectively, whereas higher scores on symptom scales indicate greater symptom burden and worse outcomes.

    Time frame: From baseline through treatment and follow-up, assessed up to 48 months

  9. Patient-Reported Symptoms - PRO-CTCAE

    Patient-reported symptomatic adverse events assessed using the PRO-CTCAE questionnaire. Individual items are scored on a scale from 0 to 4 for symptom frequency, severity, amount, and interference with daily activities, or from 0 to 1 for symptom presence (absence/presence). Higher scores indicate more frequent or severe symptoms, greater symptom burden, or greater interference with daily activities, reflecting worse outcomes.

    Time frame: From baseline through treatment and follow-up, assessed up to 48 months

07

Study locations

8 of 8 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedDate before it movedWhere the date was before it movedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jan 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jul 2027, 30 months after the start.

Of 150 non-industry phase 2 interventional studies under Small Cell Lung Carcinoma, half reached primary completion within 53 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 36 and three quarters within 87. This study's planned 30 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 203 studies reached it within 47 months; a quarter within 29 and three quarters within 84.

Primary completion moved once since we started tracking on Sep 25, 2026: Dec 2027 → Jul 2027, on Oct 26, 2026.

Earlier changes are on the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 19, 2026
First posted
Sep 4, 2026
StartActual
Jan 1, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Jul 29, 2027was Dec 2027
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2028
Last update
Oct 26, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2027→Jul 29, 2027
Oct 26, 2026
Secondary outcomes
2 description edited
What changed in the outcomes
  • DescriptionPatient-Reported Symptoms - PRO-CTCAE: how it is measured was reworded
  • DescriptionQuality of Life - EORTC QLQ-C30: how it is measured was reworded
Oct 26, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 26, 2026
    Primary completion Dec 31, 2027→Jul 29, 2027
    Secondary outcomes 2 description edited
    What changed in the outcomes
    • DescriptionPatient-Reported Symptoms - PRO-CTCAE: how it is measured was reworded
    • DescriptionQuality of Life - EORTC QLQ-C30: how it is measured was reworded
    + 1 other change: verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07803848
Lead sponsor
AIO-Studien-gGmbH
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 4, 2026
Start date
Jan 1, 2025
Primary completion
Jul 29, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 26, 2026

Study contacts

Marcel Wiesweg, MD
Contact
marcel.wiesweg@uk-essen.de
+49 30 8145344 ext. 31
Tim Overkamp, PhD
Contact
SPACE-T@aio-studien-ggmbh.de
+49 30 8145344 ext. 42

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: AMG 757

Start the discussion