CClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT07800767RNIVATSUpdated Sep 2, 2026

Anesthesia Management, Inflammatory Response and Recovery After Non-intubated VATS Pericardial Window

An observational study in Pericardial Effusion, Inflammatory Response After Surgery and Postoperative Complications, sponsored by Koşuyolu Kartal Heart Training and Research Hospital. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-02.

Sponsored by Koşuyolu Kartal Heart Training and Research Hospital · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
120
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Non-intubated video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (NIVATS) is performed under spontaneous ventilation and avoids tracheal intubation and one-lung mechanical ventilation. It is increasingly used for the surgical management of pericardial effusion, where a pericardial window is created thoracoscopically. Because NIVATS avoids airway instrumentation and positive-pressure ventilation, it has been proposed to blunt the perioperative inflammatory and stress response and to support enhanced recovery after surgery targets. Within NIVATS, anaesthetic management is not uniform. In routine institutional practice, some patients are managed with procedural sedation plus systemic opioid analgesia, while others receive procedural sedation plus a thoracic regional analgesia technique. Whether this difference in analgesic strategy translates into a measurable difference in the systemic inflammatory response or in early recovery outcomes has not been established. This single-centre retrospective cohort study will review the records of adult patients who underwent NIVATS pericardial window creation for pericardial effusion at a tertiary hospital.

Read the detailed description

This single-centre retrospective cohort study will review the records of adult patients who underwent NIVATS pericardial window creation for pericardial effusion at a tertiary cardiovascular training and research hospital. Patients will be classified into two predefined groups according to the anaesthesia management module documented in their perioperative records. The primary outcome is the change in the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) from before surgery to the morning of postoperative day 1. Secondary outcomes address ERAS-related endpoints, including discharge within postoperative day 1, intensive care admission, hospital length of stay, analgesic and antiemetic requirements, and postoperative complications. The ability of each anaesthesia management module to sustain the planned non-intubated technique through to the end of surgery is also assessed. No intervention is assigned by the investigators. All data are obtained from existing clinical records, and no additional test, procedure, or contact with patients is involved.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pericardial Effusion
  • Inflammatory Response After Surgery
  • Postoperative Complications
  • Procedural Sedation and Analgesia
  • Video Assisted Thoracic Surgery (VATS)
  • Non-intubated Anesthesia

Keywords

  • Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio
  • Non-intubated video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery
  • NIVATS
  • Pericardial window
  • pericardial effusion
  • Procedural Sedation
  • Enhanced recovery after surgery
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Consecutive adult patients who underwent non-intubated (spontaneous ventilation) video-assisted thoracoscopic creation of a pericardial window for pericardial effusion at a single tertiary cardiovascular training and research hospital. All eligible cases identified in the hospital records within this period will be included; no sampling or selection beyond the eligibility criteria will be applied.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged 18 to 80 years
  • Underwent non-intubated video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery with spontaneous ventilation for creation of a pericardial window for pericardial effusion at the study centre
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I to IV
  • Available preoperative complete blood count within 24 hours before surgery and routine morning complete blood count on postoperative day 1
  • Anaesthesia management module classifiable as Group A or Group B from the perioperative records

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age under 18 years or over 80 years
  • Pregnancy
  • Documented poor general condition or haemodynamic instability before surgery
  • Requirement for inotropic or vasopressor support before surgery
  • Intensive care unit stay exceeding 24 hours before surgery
  • Missing preoperative or postoperative day 1 complete blood count
  • Haematological malignancy, active systemic infection, or ongoing corticosteroid or immunosuppressive therapy at the time of surgery
  • Anaesthesia management not classifiable into either predefined module
04

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
120 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Sedation with systemic opioid analgesia

    Patients whose documented anaesthesia management module consisted of procedural sedation combined with systemic opioid analgesia, without a thoracic regional analgesia technique. Patients are assigned to this group according to the module planned and initiated at the start of the procedure.

    Procedure: Thoracic regional analgesia during NIVATS

  • Sedation with thoracic regional analgesia

    Patients whose documented anaesthesia management module consisted of procedural sedation combined with a thoracic regional analgesia technique: paravertebral block, erector spinae plane block, or serratus anterior/intercostal plane block. Patients are assigned to this group according to the module planned and initiated at the start of the procedure.

    Other: Systemic opioid-based analgesia during NIVATS

Interventions

  • OtherSystemic opioid-based analgesia during NIVATS

    Procedural sedation with systemic opioid analgesia, administered as part of routine clinical care. No intervention was assigned by the investigators.

  • ProcedureThoracic regional analgesia during NIVATS

    Procedural sedation combined with paravertebral block, erector spinae plane block, or serratus anterior/intercostal plane block, administered as part of routine clinical care. No intervention was assigned by the investigators.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (delta NLR)

    NLR is calculated from the routine complete blood count as the absolute neutrophil count divided by the absolute lymphocyte count (dimensionless ratio). Delta NLR is calculated for each patient as postoperative NLR minus preoperative NLR. The preoperative value is taken from the complete blood count closest to and within 24 hours before surgery. The postoperative value is taken from the routine morning complete blood count on postoperative day 1, sampled between 06:00 and 10:00. A larger positive value indicates a greater postoperative inflammatory response. Delta NLR will be compared between the two anaesthesia management groups.

    Time frame: From within 24 hours before surgery to the morning of postoperative day 1 (06:00-10:00)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Postoperative respiratory support requirement

    Proportion of patients requiring facemask ventilation, non-invasive mechanical ventilation, or invasive mechanical ventilation after surgery, recorded as yes or no.

    Time frame: From end of surgery to hospital discharge, up to 30 days

  2. Failure to sustain the planned non-intubated technique

    Proportion of patients in whom the anaesthesia management module initiated at the start of the procedure could not be sustained to the end of surgery. Defined hierarchically: (a) conversion to tracheal intubation; (b) any airway or ventilatory support, comprising facemask ventilation, supraglottic airway placement, or tracheal intubation.

    Time frame: From induction of sedation to end of surgery

  3. Early postoperative change in neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio

    Delta NLR calculated using the first postoperative day 0 complete blood count instead of the postoperative day 1 sample, restricted to samples drawn within 0-6 hours after the end of surgery.

    Time frame: From the end of surgery to the 6th hour postoperatively

  4. C-reactive protein on postoperative day 1

    Serum C-reactive protein concentration in mg/L, from the routine morning biochemistry panel on postoperative day 1.

    Time frame: Up to the morning of postoperative day 1

  5. Intensive care unit length of stay

    Duration of intensive care unit stay in days, for patients admitted to intensive care.

    Time frame: From end of surgery to hospital discharge, up to 30 days

  6. Hospital length of stay

    Total duration of hospital stay in days, from the day of surgery to the day of discharge.

    Time frame: From day of surgery to hospital discharge, up to 30 days

06

Study locations

1 site
  • Kosuyolu Heart Training and Research Hospital
    Istanbul, Kartal 34862, Turkey (Türkiye)
07

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified individual participant data underlying the published results may be made available following completion of the study. The dataset will contain no direct identifiers. Dates will be provided as intervals rather than calendar dates and age will be provided in bands, to limit re-identification risk in this single-centre cohort.

Supporting information: Sap, Csr

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07800767
Lead sponsor
Koşuyolu Kartal Heart Training and Research Hospital
Responsible party
Ebru Girgin Dinc (MD, Koşuyolu Kartal Heart Training and Research Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 2, 2026
Start date
Aug 30, 2026
Primary completion
Nov 30, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 30, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 2, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion