ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07798752Updated Sep 1, 2026

Comparison of Primary Closure Vs Open Wound in Pilonidal Sinus Excision.

An interventional study of Primary Closure Technique and Open Technique in Wound Infection, Primary Closure and Sacrococcygeal Pilonidal Sinus, sponsored by Hayatabad Medical Complex. Completed at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-01.

Sponsored by Hayatabad Medical Complex · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 7 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2025, registered Aug 2026).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
76
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to compare wound infection rates after two surgical techniques for treating pilonidal sinus in adults.

The main question this study aims to answer is:

Is wound infection less common after primary closure than after the open technique? Researchers will compare patients who receive primary closure with patients who receive the open technique after removal of the pilonidal sinus. The study will include 68 men and women between 18 and 75 years of age. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the two treatment groups.

Participants will:

Undergo surgery using either primary closure or the open technique. Attend follow-up visits after surgery. Have the surgical wound examined 7 days after the procedure. Provide information about their health, medical history, and recovery. The study will record whether participants develop wound infection, including swelling, redness, or pus or clear fluid coming from the wound. The study will be conducted in the General Surgery Department at Medical Institute Haytabad Medical Complex, Peshawar.

Read the detailed description

Detailed Description

Pilonidal sinus is a chronic condition involving the skin and subcutaneous tissue in the sacrococcygeal or natal cleft region. It commonly presents with one or more midline openings, local pain, redness, swelling, or discharge. Surgical treatment is frequently required for symptomatic disease. However, the most appropriate method of wound management after excision remains uncertain. Primary closure may allow faster wound healing and reduce the period of open wound care, whereas the open technique may reduce tension on the wound but requires healing by secondary intention and regular dressing care.

This randomized controlled trial will compare two surgical approaches for the treatment of pilonidal sinus: primary closure and open healing. The study will be conducted in the General Surgery Department of Hayatabad Medical COmplex, Peshawar, after approval from the relevant institutional ethical review board and the research department of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan, Karachi.

Eligible participants who provide written informed consent will be assigned to one of two treatment groups using blocked randomization:

Group A: Excision of the pilonidal sinus followed by primary closure. Group B: Excision of the pilonidal sinus followed by open wound management and healing by secondary intention.

Before surgery, the research team will record relevant demographic and clinical information. Participants will undergo a clinical examination and routine preoperative assessment according to institutional practice. The surgical procedures will be performed under appropriate anesthesia by, or under the supervision of, a qualified general surgeon.

For participants in Group A, the sinus and surrounding diseased tissue will be excised down to the level of the sacral fascia. Any secondary tracts identified during surgery will also be removed. After achieving hemostasis, the wound will be closed in layers using polypropylene sutures. The closure will include approximation of the deeper tissues and skin. A suction drain may be placed when clinically indicated. The wound will then be covered with an appropriate sterile dressing.

For participants in Group B, the sinus and surrounding diseased tissue will be excised down to the sacral fascia. After hemostasis, the resulting cavity will be packed with povidone-iodine-soaked gauze. The initial packing will be removed approximately 48 hours after surgery. The wound will then remain open and will be managed with regular dressings until healing is complete. Participants in this group will attend outpatient follow-up visits, generally on a weekly basis or as clinically required.

Participants in both groups will receive postoperative care according to the hospital's standard practice. This may include analgesics, wound-care instructions, advice regarding hygiene, and instructions to return to the hospital if they develop worsening pain, fever, swelling, redness, or discharge. Follow-up assessment will be performed by the research team under the supervision of a consultant surgeon.

Information collected during the study will be recorded on a structured data-collection proforma. Each participant will be assigned a study identification number. Personal information will be kept confidential and will be accessed only by authorized members of the research team. The study findings will be analyzed to compare the postoperative wound outcomes of the two surgical techniques.

The study is intended to provide local clinical evidence regarding the choice between primary closure and open wound management after pilonidal sinus excision. The findings may help surgeons and healthcare professionals make evidence-based decisions about postoperative management and patient counseling.

02

Conditions studied

  • Wound Infection
  • Primary Closure
  • Sacrococcygeal Pilonidal Sinus
  • Pilonidal Sinus Treatment

Keywords

  • Sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus
  • pilonidal sinus
  • Pilonidal sinus Treatment
  • Primary Closure flaps
  • Wound Infection
  • Pilonidal Sinus Infections
03

In context

Wound Infection

270 studies on the registry are indexed under Wound Infection; 33 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 76 is below the median of 141 across 228 interventional studies indexed under Wound Infection.

Browse Wound Infection studies →

Lead sponsor

Hayatabad Medical Complex is the lead sponsor of 13 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male \&Female
  • Age between (18-75) Years
  • Patients with pilonidal sinus as defined in the operational definition.

Exclusion criteria

EXCLUSION CRITERIA:

  • Patients with debilitating disease
  • Patients with state like , and tuberculosis.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
76 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Primary Closure Technique

    Patients undergo excision of the pilonidal sinus and surrounding tissue down to the sacral fascia, followed by closure with polypropylene sutures. A suction drain (Radivac system) is placed, and vertical mattress sutures are used to approximate skin and subcutaneous tissue.

    Procedure: Primary Closure Technique

  • Active comparator
    Open Technique

    Patients undergo excision of the pilonidal sinus with surrounding tissue down to sacral fascia. The wound is left open and packed with pyodine-soaked gauze. Patients return for weekly outpatient follow-up until complete healing.

    Procedure: Open Technique

Interventions

  • ProcedurePrimary Closure Technique

    Excision of sinus tract with closure using Prolene sutures and placement of suction drain.

    Also known as: Primary Closure

  • ProcedureOpen Technique

    Excision of sinus tract with open wound packing and secondary healing.

    Also known as: Surgical excision with open wound management

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Wound Infection

    Frequency of wound infection within 30 days post-surgery

    Time frame: From surgery to 30 days post-operation

Secondary outcomes

  1. Wound healing time

    Healing assessed weekly until closure.

    Time frame: From date of Surgery until 90 days.

  2. Surgery time

    Duration of intervention recorded in minutes.

    Time frame: During surgical procedure.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar
    Peshawar, KPK 25000, Pakistan
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Jabbar MS, Bhutta MM, Puri N. Comparison between primary closure with Limberg Flap versus open procedure in treatment of pilonidal sinus, in terms of frequency of post-operative wound infection. Pak J Med Sci. 2018 Jan-Feb;34(1):49-53. doi: 10.12669/pjms.341.13929. PubMed 29643877 ↗
  • Kober MM, Alapati U, Khachemoune A. Treatment options for pilonidal sinus. Cutis. 2018 Oct;102(4):E23-E29. PubMed 30489572 ↗
  • Iesalnieks I, Ommer A. The Management of Pilonidal Sinus. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2019 Jan 7;116(1-2):12-21. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2019.0012. PubMed 30782310 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified participant data (demographics, wound infection outcomes, healing times) will be shared upon reasonable request to the principal investigator after study completion. Access will be granted to qualified researchers for academic purposes only.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form

Time frame: IPD and supporting information will be available beginning 6 months after publication of primary results and remain accessible for 5 years.

Access criteria: Qualified researchers with a methodologically sound proposal may request access. Requests will be reviewed by the principal investigator. Data will be shared through secure institutional data repositories upon approval.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 1, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07798752
Lead sponsor
Hayatabad Medical Complex
Responsible party
Yousaf Jan (Principal Investigator, Hayatabad Medical Complex) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 1, 2026
Start date
Jan 1, 2025
Primary completion
Aug 5, 2026
Completion
Aug 10, 2026
Last update
Sep 1, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion