ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07797361INSIGHTUpdated Sep 1, 2026

Evaluation of Versatile Intelligent Staining Technology (VIST) and Spectral Flexible Imaging (SFI) for Detection and Optical Characterization of Colorectal Lesions: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study

An interventional study of White Light Endoscopy and Versatile Intelligent Staining Technology in Colorectal Neoplasms, Colonic Polyps and Adenoma, sponsored by Alexandre Vontobel Padoin. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Brazil. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-01.

Sponsored by Alexandre Vontobel Padoin · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
990
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This prospective randomized controlled study aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of Versatile Intelligent Staining Technology (VIST) and Spectral Flexible Imaging (SFI) for detection and optical characterization of colorectal lesions during colonoscopy. The performance of VIST and SFI will be compared with high-definition white light endoscopy (WLE), using histopathology as the reference standard and established endoscopic classifications (Paris, Kudo, and JNET). The study will also assess adenoma detection rate, serrated lesion detection, inter- and intraobserver agreement, and procedure-related metrics.

Read the detailed description

This prospective randomized controlled study will compare high-definition white light endoscopy (WLE), Versatile Intelligent Staining Technology (VIST), and Spectral Flexible Imaging (SFI) for the detection and optical characterization of colorectal lesions during colonoscopy.

Participants will be randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to one of the three imaging modalities. During the first-look withdrawal phase, the colon will be examined using the allocated modality. Detected lesions will be documented and characterized in vivo according to their location, size, morphology, and established endoscopic classification systems, including the Paris, Kudo, and JNET classifications. Lesions will subsequently be biopsied or resected as clinically appropriate and submitted for histopathological evaluation, which will serve as the reference standard for diagnostic performance analyses.

Standardized recordings of colorectal lesions will also be used for blinded review to assess interobserver and intraobserver agreement in optical diagnosis and endoscopic classification. In addition to evaluating lesion detection and characterization, the study will compare procedural quality metrics and safety across the imaging modalities.

The study is designed to determine whether VIST or SFI can improve colorectal lesion detection and optical characterization compared with conventional high-definition white light endoscopy.

02

Conditions studied

  • Colorectal Neoplasms
  • Colonic Polyps
  • Adenoma
  • Serrated Polyps
  • Colorectal Cancer Screening

Keywords

  • Colonoscopy
  • Adenoma Detection Rate
  • Optical Diagnosis
  • Image-Enhanced Endoscopy
  • Electronic Chromoendoscopy
  • Versatile Intelligent Staining Technology (VIST)
  • Spectral Flexible Imaging (SFI)
  • White Light Endoscopy
  • JNET Classification
  • Kudo Pit Pattern
03

In context

Colorectal Neoplasms

6,541 studies on the registry are indexed under Colorectal Neoplasms; 1,667 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 990 is above the median of 76 across 4,800 interventional studies indexed under Colorectal Neoplasms.

Browse Colorectal Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Alexandre Vontobel Padoin as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Undergoing screening or surveillance colonoscopy
  • Adequate bowel preparation (Boston Bowel Preparation Scale ≥6, with ≥2 per segment)
  • Ability to understand and sign

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of inflammatory bowel disease (Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis)
  • Prior colorectal resection
  • Colorectal stenosis preventing scope progression
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Inadequate bowel preparation
  • Clinical to colonoscopy
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
990 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    White Light Endoscopy (WLE)

    Participants randomized to this arm will undergo colonoscopy using high-definition white light endoscopy (WLE) during the first-look withdrawal phase. Colorectal lesions detected during this phase will be documented and optically characterized according to the study protocol. Detected lesions will be biopsied or resected as clinically appropriate and submitted for histopathological evaluation.

    Device: White Light Endoscopy

  • Experimental
    Versatile Intelligent Staining Technology (VIST)

    Participants randomized to this arm will undergo colonoscopy using Versatile Intelligent Staining Technology (VIST) during the first-look withdrawal phase. Colorectal lesions detected during this phase will be documented and optically characterized according to the study protocol. Detected lesions will be biopsied or resected as clinically appropriate and submitted for histopathological evaluation.

    Device: Versatile Intelligent Staining Technology

  • Experimental
    Spectral Flexible Imaging (SFI)

    Participants randomized to this arm will undergo colonoscopy using Spectral Flexible Imaging (SFI) during the first-look withdrawal phase. Colorectal lesions detected during this phase will be documented and optically characterized according to the study protocol. Detected lesions will be biopsied or resected as clinically appropriate and submitted for histopathological evaluation.

    Device: Spectral Flexible Imaging

Interventions

  • DeviceWhite Light Endoscopy

    Colonoscopy performed using high-definition white light imaging.

    Also known as: WLE

  • DeviceVersatile Intelligent Staining Technology

    Colonoscopy performed using Versatile Intelligent Staining Technology (VIST).

    Also known as: VIST

  • DeviceSpectral Flexible Imaging

    Colonoscopy performed using Spectral Flexible Imaging (SFI).

    Also known as: SFI

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Adenoma Detection Rate (ADR)

    Proportion of participants with ≥1 colorectal polyp detected during the first-look withdrawal phase using the allocated imaging modality.

    Time frame: During index colonoscopy.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Serrated Lesion Detection Rate

    Proportion of participants with ≥1 serrated lesion (e.g., sessile serrated lesion or hyperplastic polyp) detected during the first-look withdrawal phase using the allocated imaging modality, with histopathology confirmation when available.

    Time frame: During index colonoscopy.

  2. Diagnostic Accuracy for Optical Characterization (Neoplastic vs Non-neoplastic)

    Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and overall accuracy of optical diagnosis for neoplastic versus non-neoplastic colorectal lesions, using histopathology as the reference standard.

    Time frame: During index colonoscopy with post-procedure histopathology results.

  3. Agreement Between Optical Diagnosis and Histopathology

    Agreement (Cohen's kappa) between in vivo optical diagnosis and histopathology for colorectal lesions.

    Time frame: During index colonoscopy with post-procedure histopathology results.

  4. Concordance of Endoscopic Classifications With Histopathology

    Agreement (Cohen's kappa) between endoscopic classifications (Paris, Kudo pit pattern, and JNET) assigned in vivo and histopathology.

    Time frame: During index colonoscopy with post-procedure histopathology results.

  5. Interobserver and Intraobserver Agreement From Blinded Video Review

    Interobserver and intraobserver agreement (Cohen's kappa) for optical diagnosis and classification based on standardized video recordings of lesions reviewed independently and blinded to group allocation and histopathology.

    Time frame: Up to 12 months after index colonoscopy (video-based assessment).

  6. Procedure Quality Metrics

    Withdrawal time (minutes), total procedure time (minutes), and cecal intubation rate.

    Time frame: During index colonoscopy.

  7. Safety (Procedure-related Adverse Events)

    Incidence of colonoscopy-related adverse events (e.g., bleeding, perforation, post-polypectomy complications).

    Time frame: Up to 24 hours after colonoscopy.

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — The individual participant data (IPD) sharing plan has not yet been determined. Any future sharing of de-identified participant data will be subject to applicable ethical and institutional requirements, participant confidentiality protections, and relevant data protection regulations.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Oct 2026; primary completion for Jan 2027, 3 months later.

Of 898 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Colorectal Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 32 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 62. This study's planned 3 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 955 studies reached it within 32 months; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 60.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 26, 2026
First posted
Sep 1, 2026
StartEst.
Oct 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jan 31, 2027
CompletionEst.
Aug 31, 2028
Last update
Sep 1, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 1, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07797361
Lead sponsor
Alexandre Vontobel Padoin
Collaborators
Hospital Sao Lucas da PUCRS
Responsible party
Alexandre Vontobel Padoin (Professor, Pontificia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Sep 1, 2026
Start date
Oct 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jan 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 31, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 1, 2026

Study contacts

Ari Ben Hur Stefani Leão, MD
Contact
gpeg.pucrs@gmail.com
+55 51 3195 2843

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion