ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07793617SPARKUpdated Aug 28, 2026

Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block for Pain Relief After Pediatric Adenotonsillectomy

A Phase 4 interventional study of Sphenopalatine ganglion block (Ropivacaine) and Sham sphenopalatine ganglion block (Saline) in Postoperative Pain, Tonsillectomy and Adenotonsillectomy, sponsored by Vinícius C Quintão, MD, MSc, PhD. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 2 Years to 13 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-28.

Sponsored by Vinícius C Quintão, MD, MSc, PhD · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
145
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
2 Years to 13 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this clinical trial is to discover whether sphenopalatine ganglion block (SPGB) reduces postoperative pain in children aged 2 to 13 years undergoing tonsil surgery (with or without adenoid removal).

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does SPGB reduce postoperative pain in children undergoing throat surgery?
  • Do children who receive SPGB require less pain medication after surgery?
  • Do children who receive SPGB experience less nausea and vomiting after surgery?
  • Do children who receive SPGB experience less bleeding during and after surgery?
  • Do children who received SPGB experience fewer complications after surgery?

Researchers will perform SPGB after the child has been placed under general anesthesia, before the surgeon begins the tonsil surgery. Each child will be randomly assigned to receive the SPGB with either a local anesthetic (ropivacaine) or a placebo (saline solution, which looks the same but contains no active medication). This allows researchers to compare pain outcomes between the two groups.

To perform the SPGB, a long cotton-tipped applicator soaked in either the anesthetic or the saline solution is gently placed in each of the child's nostrils and left in place for 5-10 minutes before being removed.

Read the detailed description

Tonsillectomy, with or without adenoidectomy, is one of the most common surgical procedures performed in children. Despite being frequent, it is associated with significant postoperative morbidity, particularly severe pain, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and bleeding. Current pain management relies heavily on opioids and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, both of which carry risks in this population: opioids are associated with respiratory depression, of particular concern in children with obstructive sleep apnea, and increased postoperative nausea and vomiting, while NSAIDs raise concerns about postoperative bleeding.

The sphenopalatine ganglion block is a simple, minimally invasive technique that has shown promising analgesic effects in adults undergoing sinonasal and other otorhinolaryngologic surgeries, with evidence suggesting reduced postoperative pain, reduced opioid consumption, and reduced intraoperative bleeding. However, evidence supporting the safe and effective use of sphenopalatine ganglion block specifically in children undergoing adenotonsillectomy remains limited.

This study is designed to evaluate whether sphenopalatine ganglion block reduces postoperative pain compared with a sham block in children undergoing tonsillectomy or tonsillotomy, with or without adenoidectomy, for indications such as obstructive sleep apnea or recurrent tonsillitis.

Eligible participants will be randomized 1:1 using a web-based block randomization system managed by a person external to the clinical team. An unblinded team member, not otherwise involved in the child's anesthetic or surgical care, will prepare the study medication (ropivacaine or saline) according to the randomization result. All other members of the clinical and research team, as well as the participants and their families, will remain blinded to group allocation.

Based on an alpha of 0.05, a statistical power of 95%, and a medium effect size (Cramer's V = 0.3 for the chi-square test; d = 0.6 for the Mann-Whitney test), a total sample size of 145 participants was determined to provide adequate power for both the primary and key secondary outcomes.

This is the first randomized clinical trial to evaluate the effect of sphenopalatine ganglion block specifically on postoperative pain control after adenotonsillectomy in children, and its findings are intended to help inform evidence-based perioperative pain management guidelines for this common pediatric surgical population.

02

Conditions studied

  • Postoperative Pain
  • Tonsillectomy
  • Adenotonsillectomy

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • sphenopalatine ganglion block
  • Pediatric anesthesia
  • Postoperative pain management
  • Regional anesthesia
03

In context

Pain, Postoperative

5,640 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain, Postoperative; 1,230 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 145 is above the median of 75 across 4,821 interventional studies indexed under Pain, Postoperative.

Browse Pain, Postoperative studies →

Lead sponsor

Vinícius C Quintão, MD, MSc, PhD is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
2 Years to 13 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Children aged 2 to 13 years admitted for tonsillectomy/tonsillotomy with or without adenoidectomy;
  • Patients classified as Physical Status I and II according to the (ASA);
  • Otolaryngologists responsible for the patient according to the study and willing to report the data necessary for this study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Children with or allergy to the drugs used in the study protocol for AG and/or BGEP;
  • Use of concomitant medications for anesthesia or pain control that are not in the study protocol in the pre or intraoperative period;
  • Children with a history of chronic orofacial pain;
  • Failure to provide written Form (ICF) or Informed Assent form (IAF) to participate in the study.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
145 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intraoperative sphenopalatine ganglion block with Ropivacaine

    Intraoperative sphenopalatine ganglion block performed after anesthetic induction and orotracheal intubation, before the start of surgery, with a swab and 1% ropivacaine, maximum 10 mg.

    Drug: Sphenopalatine ganglion block (Ropivacaine)

  • Sham comparator
    Sham intraoperative sphenopalatine ganglion block with saline

    Sham intraoperative sphenopalatine ganglion block performed after anesthetic induction and orotracheal intubation, before the start of surgery, with a swab and saline.

    Drug: Sham sphenopalatine ganglion block (Saline)

Interventions

  • Following induction of general anesthesia and orotracheal intubation, prior to the start of surgery, the study intervention will be performed. The patient will be in a supine position with the neck extended. Extension can be facilitated with a pillow or a folded sheet under both shoulders. A long applicator with a cotton swab at the tip is soaked with ropivacaine 1% anesthetic (maximum dose 10 mg). It is then inserted parallel to the floor of the nose until resistance is felt. The swab will be positioned at the posterior pharyngeal wall superior to the middle turbinate. The applicator will be retained in the nostril for 5-10 minutes and then removed. The procedure is repeated similarly in the other nostril. The swab does not come into direct contact with the ganglion, but the local anesthetic infiltrates the surrounding tissue. The connective tissue and mucous membrane covering the ganglion facilitate the spread and penetration of the drug.

  • DrugSham sphenopalatine ganglion block (Saline)

    Following induction of general anesthesia and orotracheal intubation, prior to the start of surgery, the study intervention will be performed. The patient will be in a supine position with the neck extended. Extension can be facilitated with a pillow or a folded sheet under both shoulders. A long applicator with a cotton swab at the tip is soaked with Saline (sham block). It is then inserted parallel to the floor of the nose until resistance is felt. The swab will be positioned at the posterior pharyngeal wall superior to the middle turbinate. The applicator will be retained in the nostril for 5-10 minutes and then removed. The procedure is repeated in the same manner in the other nostril. The swab does not come into direct contact with the ganglion, but the saline infiltrates the surrounding tissue. The connective tissue and mucous membrane covering it facilitate the spread and penetration of the saline.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of postoperative pain in the Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) after adenotonsillectomy

    Comparison of the incidence of immediate postoperative pain in the PACU between children who received sphenopalatine ganglion block (SPGB) with ropivacaine 1% and children who received sham block (0.9% NaCl). Pain will be measured using the highest pain score recorded in the PACU, using an age-appropriate scale: * \< 4 years: Revised FLACC Scale * \> 4 and \< 6 years: Revised FACES Scale * ≥ 6 years: Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) A score ≥ 4 on any of these scales will be considered as presence of pain. The analysis will compare the proportion of patients with pain (score ≥4) between the two groups, with estimation of the risk difference and 95% confidence interval.

    Time frame: From admission to the PACU until PACU discharge, assessed at admission and every 20 minutes, up to an estimated 60 minutes

Secondary outcomes

  1. Use of rescue opioids and/or analgesics in the PACU (Post-Anesthesia Care Unit)

    Use of rescue opioids and/or analgesics in the PACU (Post-Anesthesia Care Unit): yes or no.

    Time frame: From admission to the PACU until PACU discharge, up to an estimated 60 minutes

  2. Use of rescue opioids and/or analgesics at the time of hospital discharge

    Use of rescue opioids and/or analgesics at the time of hospital discharge: yes or no.

    Time frame: At hospital discharge, assessed up to an estimated 24 hours after surgery

  3. Postoperative pain at the time of hospital discharge

    Postoperative pain at the time of hospital discharge: yes or no.

    Time frame: At hospital discharge, assessed up to an estimated 24 hours after surgery

  4. Nausea and vomiting in the PACU

    Nausea and vomiting in the PACU? yes or no.

    Time frame: From admission to the PACU until PACU discharge, up to an estimated 60 minutes

  5. Nausea and vomiting at the time of hospital discharge

    Nausea and vomiting at the time of hospital discharge: yes or no.

    Time frame: At hospital discharge, assessed up to an estimated 24 hours after surgery

  6. Consumption of rescue antiemetics in the PACU

    Consumption of rescue antiemetics in the PACU: yes or no.

    Time frame: From admission to the PACU until PACU discharge, up to an estimated 60 minutes

  7. Consumption of rescue antiemetics at the time of hospital discharge

    Consumption of rescue antiemetics at the time of hospital discharge: yes or no.

    Time frame: At hospital discharge, assessed up to an estimated 24 hours after surgery

  8. Intraoperative bleeding

    Surgeon's opinion on perioperative bleeding: very reduced, reduced, usual, increased, or very increased.

    Time frame: Assessed intraoperatively, at the end of the surgical procedure

  9. Postoperative bleeding

    Postoperative bleeding: yes or no The surgeon will inform you if bleeding resulting from the surgical procedure occurs up to 30 days after the surgery.

    Time frame: From the end of surgery up to 30 days after surgery

  10. Surgical reintervention

    Surgical reintervention: yes or no Need for surgical re-intervention.

    Time frame: From the end of surgery up to 30 days after surgery

  11. Medical consultations outside the scheduled

    Medical consultations outside the scheduled postoperative control due to complications within the first 30 days of surgery: 1. Consultations only. 2. Readmission for observation. 12. Critical perioperative respiratory events: laryngospasm, stridor, bronchial aspiration, hypoxia (O2 saturation \< 90% for 2 minutes), use of supplemental oxygen in the PACU.

    Time frame: From the end of surgery up to 30 days after surgery

  12. Morbidity in the first 30 days after surgery

    Morbidity in the first 30 days after surgery: admission to intensive care unit or ICU, readmission due to: NGO infection, dehydration, pulmonary infection, pulmonary complications, seizure.

    Time frame: From the end of surgery up to 30 days after surgery

  13. Mortality in the first 30 days after surgery

    Mortality: yes or no

    Time frame: From the end of surgery up to 30 days after surgery

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Myles Hollander and Douglas A. Wolfe (1973). Nonparametric Statistical Methods. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Pages 68-75
  • Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91. doi: 10.3758/bf03193146. PubMed 17695343 ↗
  • Lin C, Abboud S, Zoghbi V, Kasimova K, Thein J, Meister KD, Sidell DR, Balakrishnan K, Tsui BCH. Suprazygomatic Maxillary Nerve Blocks and Opioid Requirements in Pediatric Adenotonsillectomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Jul 1;150(7):564-571. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2024.1011. PubMed 38780948 ↗
  • Albazee E, AlRajhi B, Alfadhli A, Alharran AM, Al-Qudah M. Sphenopalatine ganglion block for pain control after septoplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis. Rhinology. 2024 Dec 1;62(6):642-651. doi: 10.4193/Rhin24.225. PubMed 39323198 ↗
  • Horiguchi CLF, Horiguchi CHV, Bittencourt LG et al. Complicações possivelmente relacionadas ao bloqueio do gânglio esfenopalatino para tratamento de cefaleia pós-punção dural: série de casos. Revista Medica de Minas Gerais 2019;29 (supl 11): S12-S15 Volume: 29. (Suppl.11).
  • Nair AS, Rayani BK. Sphenopalatine ganglion block for relieving postdural puncture headache: technique and mechanism of action of block with a narrative review of efficacy. Korean J Pain. 2017 Apr;30(2):93-97. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2017.30.2.93. Epub 2017 Mar 31. PubMed 28416992 ↗
  • Windsor RE, Jahnke S. Sphenopalatine ganglion blockade: a review and proposed modification of the transnasal technique. Pain Physician. 2004 Apr;7(2):283-6. PubMed 16868606 ↗
  • Lauder G, Emmott A. Confronting the challenges of effective pain management in children following tonsillectomy. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 Nov;78(11):1813-27. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2014.08.011. Epub 2014 Aug 27. PubMed 25241379 ↗
  • Riggin L, Ramakrishna J, Sommer DD, Koren G. A 2013 updated systematic review & meta-analysis of 36 randomized controlled trials; no apparent effects of non steroidal anti-inflammatory agents on the risk of bleeding after tonsillectomy. Clin Otolaryngol. 2013 Apr;38(2):115-29. doi: 10.1111/coa.12106. PubMed 23448586 ↗
  • Kelly LE, Sommer DD, Ramakrishna J, Hoffbauer S, Arbab-Tafti S, Reid D, Maclean J, Koren G. Morphine or Ibuprofen for post-tonsillectomy analgesia: a randomized trial. Pediatrics. 2015 Feb;135(2):307-13. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-1906. PubMed 25624387 ↗
  • Tan GX, Tunkel DE. Control of Pain After Tonsillectomy in Children: A Review. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Sep 1;143(9):937-942. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2017.0845. PubMed 28662233 ↗
  • Windfuhr JP, Chen YS, Remmert S. Hemorrhage following tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy in 15,218 patients. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005 Feb;132(2):281-6. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2004.09.007. PubMed 15692542 ↗
  • Bolton CM, Myles PS, Nolan T, Sterne JA. Prophylaxis of postoperative vomiting in children undergoing tonsillectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2006 Nov;97(5):593-604. doi: 10.1093/bja/ael256. Epub 2006 Sep 26. PubMed 17005507 ↗
  • Stanko D, Bergesio R, Davies K, Hegarty M, von Ungern-Sternberg BS. Postoperative pain, nausea and vomiting following adeno-tonsillectomy - a long-term follow-up. Paediatr Anaesth. 2013 Aug;23(8):690-6. doi: 10.1111/pan.12170. Epub 2013 May 13. PubMed 23668258 ↗
  • Stewart DW, Ragg PG, Sheppard S, Chalkiadis GA. The severity and duration of postoperative pain and analgesia requirements in children after tonsillectomy, orchidopexy, or inguinal hernia repair. Paediatr Anaesth. 2012 Feb;22(2):136-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2011.03713.x. Epub 2011 Oct 25. PubMed 22023485 ↗
  • Cote CJ, Posner KL, Domino KB. Death or neurologic injury after tonsillectomy in children with a focus on obstructive sleep apnea: houston, we have a problem! Anesth Analg. 2014 Jun;118(6):1276-83. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e318294fc47. PubMed 23842193 ↗
  • Subramanyam R, Varughese A, Willging JP, Sadhasivam S. Future of pediatric tonsillectomy and perioperative outcomes. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Feb;77(2):194-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2012.10.016. Epub 2012 Nov 16. PubMed 23159321 ↗
  • von Ungern-Sternberg BS, Boda K, Chambers NA, Rebmann C, Johnson C, Sly PD, Habre W. Risk assessment for respiratory complications in paediatric anaesthesia: a prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2010 Sep 4;376(9743):773-83. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61193-2. PubMed 20816545 ↗
  • Habre W, Disma N, Virag K, Becke K, Hansen TG, Johr M, Leva B, Morton NS, Vermeulen PM, Zielinska M, Boda K, Veyckemans F; APRICOT Group of the European Society of Anaesthesiology Clinical Trial Network. Incidence of severe critical events in paediatric anaesthesia (APRICOT): a prospective multicentre observational study in 261 hospitals in Europe. Lancet Respir Med. 2017 May;5(5):412-425. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(17)30116-9. Epub 2017 Mar 28. PubMed 28363725 ↗
  • Mahrose R, Shorbagy MS, Kasem AA. Opioid Free Ptyregopalatine Ganglion Block Based Multimodal Anesthesia Versus Conventional Opioid Based Multimodal Anesthesia for Tonsillectomy Operations: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Anesth Pain Med. 2024 Jul 10;14(3):e146617. doi: 10.5812/aapm-146617. eCollection 2024 Jun. PubMed 39416797 ↗
  • Bucard BM, Cavalcanti IL, Assad A, Vercosa N et al.. Emprego do bloqueio do gânglio esfenopalatino para analgesia pós-operatória em acessos transesfenoidais: Estudo prospectivo, aleatório, duplamente encoberto. Instituto estadual do Cérebro Paulo Niemeyer - Rio de Janeiro - Brasil. 69º Congresso Brasileiro de Anestesiologia (CBA) 2024 como apresentação oral.
  • Rezaeian A, Hashemi SM, Dokhanchi ZS. Effect of Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block With Bupivacaine on Postoperative Pain in Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Sinus Surgery. Allergy Rhinol (Providence). 2019 Jan 23;10:2152656718821282. doi: 10.1177/2152656718821282. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec. PubMed 30719401 ↗
  • Al-Qudah M. Endoscopic sphenopalatine ganglion blockade efficacy in pain control after endoscopic sinus surgery. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2016 Mar;6(3):334-8. doi: 10.1002/alr.21644. Epub 2015 Sep 15. PubMed 26370724 ↗
  • DeMaria S Jr, Govindaraj S, Chinosorvatana N, Kang S, Levine AI. Bilateral sphenopalatine ganglion blockade improves postoperative analgesia after endoscopic sinus surgery. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2012 Jan-Feb;26(1):e23-7. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2012.26.3709. PubMed 22391074 ↗
  • Cho DY, Drover DR, Nekhendzy V, Butwick AJ, Collins J, Hwang PH. The effectiveness of preemptive sphenopalatine ganglion block on postoperative pain and functional outcomes after functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2011 May-Jun;1(3):212-8. doi: 10.1002/alr.20040. Epub 2011 Apr 13. PubMed 22287376 ↗
  • Wormald PJ, Athanasiadis T, Rees G, Robinson S. An evaluation of effect of pterygopalatine fossa injection with local anesthetic and adrenalin in the control of nasal bleeding during endoscopic sinus surgery. Am J Rhinol. 2005 May-Jun;19(3):288-92. PubMed 16011136 ↗
  • Cohen S, Levin D, Mellender S, Zhao R, Patel P, Grubb W, Kiss G. Topical Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block Compared With Epidural Blood Patch for Postdural Puncture Headache Management in Postpartum Patients: A Retrospective Review. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Nov;43(8):880-884. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000840. PubMed 30063655 ↗
  • Furtado I, Lima IF, Pedro S. [Ropivacaine use in transnasal sphenopalatine ganglion block for post dural puncture headache in obstetric patients - case series]. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2018 Jul-Aug;68(4):421-424. doi: 10.1016/j.bjan.2017.11.007. Epub 2018 Feb 3. PubMed 29402441 ↗
  • Cardoso JM, Sa M, Graca R, Reis H, Almeida L, Pinheiro C, Machado D. [Sphenopalatine ganglion block for postdural puncture headache in ambulatory setting]. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2017 May-Jun;67(3):311-313. doi: 10.1016/j.bjan.2017.02.003. Epub 2017 Mar 30. Portuguese. PubMed 28364968 ↗
  • Kent S, Mehaffey G. Transnasal sphenopalatine ganglion block for the treatment of postdural puncture headache in obstetric patients. J Clin Anesth. 2016 Nov;34:194-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.04.009. Epub 2016 May 11. PubMed 27687372 ↗
  • Cohen S, Sakr A, Katyal S, Chopra D. Sphenopalatine ganglion block for postdural puncture headache. Anaesthesia. 2009 May;64(5):574-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2009.05925.x. No abstract available. PubMed 19413836 ↗
  • Cohen S, Trnovski S, Zada Y. A new interest in an old remedy for headache and backache for our obstetric patients: a sphenopalatine ganglion block. Anaesthesia. 2001 Jun;56(6):606-7. No abstract available. PubMed 11412202 ↗
  • BYRD H. Sphenopalatine phenomena. Arch Intern Med [Internet]. 1930 Dec 1;46(6):1026. Available
  • Robbins MS, Robertson CE, Kaplan E, Ailani J, Charleston L 4th, Kuruvilla D, Blumenfeld A, Berliner R, Rosen NL, Duarte R, Vidwan J, Halker RB, Gill N, Ashkenazi A. The Sphenopalatine Ganglion: Anatomy, Pathophysiology, and Therapeutic Targeting in Headache. Headache. 2016 Feb;56(2):240-58. doi: 10.1111/head.12729. Epub 2015 Nov 30. PubMed 26615983 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Sep 2026; primary completion for Aug 2028, 23 months later.

Of 531 non-industry phase 4 interventional studies under Pain, Postoperative, half reached primary completion within 16 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 32. This study's planned 23 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 541 studies reached it within 16 months; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 32.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 24, 2026
First posted
Aug 28, 2026
StartEst.
Sep 15, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Aug 30, 2028
CompletionEst.
Dec 30, 2028
Last update
Aug 28, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 28, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07793617
Lead sponsor
Vinícius C Quintão, MD, MSc, PhD
Responsible party
Vinícius C Quintão, MD, MSc, PhD (Attending Anesthesiologist, University of Sao Paulo General Hospital) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Aug 28, 2026
Start date
Sep 15, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Aug 30, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 30, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 28, 2026

Study contacts

Vinicius C Quintao, MD, MSc, PhD Investigator
Contact
vinicius.quintao@fm.usp.br
+ 55 11 971273950
Claudia L F Horiguchi, Local Investigator
Contact
claudialeal.anestesia@gmail.com
+ 55 31 984788884
Vinicius C Quintao, MD, MSc, PhD Investigator
principal investigator · Hospital das clinicas da Universidade de Sao Paulo

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Ropivacaine

Start the discussion