An interventional study of Intuitive Eating Intervention in Excessive Gestational Weight Gain, Pregnancy and INTUITIVE EATING, sponsored by San Diego State University. Recruiting at 2 sites in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-06.
Sponsored by San Diego State University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention
Among 11 studies in Obesity by San Diego State University — 6 open to participants now, 6 under way, none of them phase 3. Obesity · San Diego State University.
Among the 11 studies in Obesity by San Diego State University, this one is the 4th largest by planned enrollment, is the only one that started in 2026, is one of 11 with no phase, and was the 10th registered.
11,522 studies on the registry are indexed under Obesity; 2,033 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 80 is above the median of 67 across 9,006 interventional studies indexed under Obesity.
Browse Obesity studies →6 of the 11 studies in Obesity by San Diego State University are open now, in 1 country. Each count lists the studies.
Of the 1,336 Obesity studies recruiting now, 377 (28%) set no upper age limit and 856 (64%) stop at 75 or younger; 168 take children under 18; 491 take healthy volunteers.
This study: 18 Years and older · female · no healthy volunteers.
The full table on the hub →11 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.
First in 2010; this study’s year is marked. 1 started in 2026.
Median enrollment 74 across the 11 interventional studies. Of the 5 that completed or were terminated, 0 (0%) have results posted.
San Diego State University is the lead sponsor of 149 studies on the registry; 43 are open to participants now.
1 of the studies in Obesity by San Diego State University that are under way reach primary completion within a year, 0 of them phase 3. Phase 3 first, then by date:
| Study | Primary completion |
|---|---|
| NCT07792837San Diego State UniversityAn Online Intuitive Eating Program for Pregnant Women With Obesity to Support Well-Being | 2027-08 |
Among the 11 studies in Obesity by San Diego State University, from their registry updates:
The goal of this feasibility randomized controlled trial is to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and demand, as well as preliminary effects of an evidence-based Intuitive Eating (IE) intervention among pregnant women who have obesity. The main research questions are:
RQ1: What is the feasibility (acceptability and demand) of implementing an Intuitive Eating Intervention among pregnant and postpartum women? RQ2: How does participation in the Pregnancy Intuitive Eating Intervention (PIE-I) impact key maternal health outcomes (i.e., gestational weight gain, intuitive eating behaviors, dietary quality, body image, and mental health) compared to a wait-list control?
Researchers will compare the Pregnancy Intuitive Eating Intervention (PIE-I) intervention group with the wait-list control to see what impact the PIE-I has on maternal well-being.
Participants randomized to the intervention group will complete the 8 week asynchronous IE intervention and have an opportunity to interview at the end of the study.
This study is designed as a pilot feasibility trial with a target enrollment of 80 participants (40 per group; 1:1 randomization).
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and preliminary effects of an evidence-based Intuitive Eating (IE) intervention, adapted from the Tribole and Resch framework, among pregnant individuals with obesity. Feasibility will be determined based on acceptability and demand scores. Acceptability will be assessed through satisfaction, perceived appropriateness, burden, and intent to continue use. Demand will be defined as retention and adherence to the intervention and participant engagement. Preliminary effects of the IE intervention will be explored in relation to the prevention of excessive gestational weight gain, intuitive eating behaviors, dietary quality, mental health, body image, and perceived stress.
11,522 studies on the registry are indexed under Obesity; 2,033 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 80 is above the median of 67 across 9,006 interventional studies indexed under Obesity.
Browse Obesity studies →San Diego State University is the lead sponsor of 149 studies on the registry; 43 are open to participants now.
Compared within Obesity, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Anxiety Disorders. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.
What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
BMI (body mass index)
Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.
What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
The (PIE-I) will be based on the IE Book \& Workbook published by RDNs Evelyn Tribole \& Elyse Resch. Each week, participants will be asked to watch 20 minute online modules and complete 1-2 workbook pages (workbook provided for free). Optional weekly office hours will be held by Certified Intuitive Eating Counselors. Participants in the PIE-I will complete two online surveys - one at baseline (upon enrollment) and one after 8 weeks (the same surveys and time schedules as the intervention group). Each completed survey will earn participants an e-gift card as compensation for their time. Participants will also have an opportunity to complete a virtual interview at the end of the 8-week study.
Other: Intuitive Eating Intervention
Participants assigned to the Wait-List Control Group will continue their usual daily habits and routines during the 8-week study period. They will not receive access to the Intuitive Eating modules or workbook materials until the completion of their participation. During the 8-week study period, control participants will complete two online surveys - one at baseline (upon enrollment) and one after 8 weeks (the same surveys and time schedules as the intervention group). Each completed survey will earn participants an e-gift card as compensation for their time. Control participants may contact the study team via the study email at any time with questions or concerns.
The (PIE-I) will be based on the IE Book \& Workbook published by RDNs Evelyn Tribole \& Elyse Resch. Each week, participants will be asked to watch 20 minute online modules and complete 1-2 workbook pages. Optional office hours will be held by Certified Intuitive Eating Counselors. The online modules are as follows: Week 1: Orientation of IE framework, overview of 10 Intuitive Eating Principles, and Principle 1-Reject Diet Culture Week 2: Principle 2-Honor Hunger \& Principle 3-Make Peace with Food Week 3: Principle 4-Discover the Satisfaction Factor Week 4: Principle 5-Feel Fullness Week 5: Principle 6-Challenge the Food Police Week 6: Principle 7-Cope with Emotions with Kindness Week 7: Principle 8-Respect Body\& Principle 9 -Movement: Feel the Difference Week 8: Principle 10-Honor Health with Gentle Nutrition, wrap-up and conclusion of modules
Intervention Acceptability as Assessed by the Post-Intervention Satisfaction Survey at 8 Weeks
Intervention acceptability will be assessed using a post-intervention satisfaction survey administered at 8 weeks. Participants will rate satisfaction with the intervention, intention to continue using intuitive eating principles, and perceived appropriateness of the intervention content for pregnancy on a 1-5 scale. The feasibility benchmark will be met if ≥70% of participants provide a rating of ≥4 for each indicator.
Time frame: 8 weeks
Burden of the Intervention at 8 Weeks
Perceived intervention burden will be assessed using a post-intervention survey on a 1-5 scale, with higher scores indicating greater perceived burden. The feasibility benchmark will be a mean burden rating of ≤2.5.
Time frame: 8 Weeks
Participant Retention Through the 8-Week Intervention
Retention will be calculated as the proportion of enrolled participants who complete the intervention and 8-week post-intervention assessment. The feasibility benchmark is ≥80% retention (≥64 of 80 enrolled participants).
Time frame: Baseline through 8 weeks
Participant Adherence to the Intervention During the 8-Week Intervention
Intervention adherence will be assessed using Moodle analytics. Participants will be considered adherent if they complete at least 6 of the 8 intervention modules. The feasibility benchmark will be met if ≥70% of participants meet this adherence criterion.
Time frame: Baseline through 8 weeks
Participant Engagement with the Intervention During the 8-Week Intervention
Participant engagement will be assessed using Moodle and Zoom analytics. Platform interactions will include logins, module views, and attendance at weekly Zoom office hours. The feasibility benchmark will be a median of ≥1 platform interaction per participant per week during the 8-week intervention.
Time frame: Baseline through 8 weeks
Change from Baseline in Intuitive Eating Scale-3 (IES-3) Score at 8 Weeks
Intuitive eating will be assessed using the Intuitive Eating Scale-3 (IES-3). The IES-3 assesses individuals' tendency to eat in response to physiological hunger and satiety cues rather than external or emotional cues. Higher scores indicate greater levels of intuitive eating. Change in IES-3 score from baseline to the 8-week post-intervention assessment will be compared between the intervention and wait-list control groups.
Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks
Change from Baseline Health Eating Index (HEI) Score at 8-weeks
Diet quality will be assessed using the Healthy Eating Index (HEI), calculated from dietary intake data collected using the Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour (ASA24) Dietary Assessment Tool. The HEI assesses alignment with the Dietary Guidelines for Americans, with total scores ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate greater adherence to dietary recommendations and better overall diet quality.
Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks
Proportion of Participants Exceeding Recommended Gestational Weight Gain Guidelines
Gestational weight gain will be evaluated relative to recommended ranges based on pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) using Institute of Medicine (IOM) gestational weight gain guidelines. Excessive gestational weight gain (EGWG) will be defined as total gestational weight gain exceeding the recommended range for the participant's pre-pregnancy BMI category. The proportion of participants with EGWG will be compared between the intervention and wait-list control groups.
Time frame: From baseline through delivery
Change from Baseline in Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) Score at 8 Weeks
Perceived stress will be assessed using the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10), which measures the degree to which situations in one's life are perceived as stressful. The PSS-10 produces a total score ranging from 0 to 40. Higher scores indicate greater perceived stress. Change in PSS score from baseline to the 8-week post-intervention assessment will be compared between the intervention and wait-list control groups.
Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks
Change from Baseline in Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, United States Version (EPDS-US) Score at 8 Weeks
Depressive symptoms will be assessed using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, United States version (EPDS-US). The EPDS is a self-report measure designed to assess symptoms of depression during the perinatal period. The 10-item scale produces a total score ranging from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating greater depressive symptom severity. Change in EPDS-US score from baseline to the 8-week post-intervention assessment will be compared between the intervention and wait-list control groups.
Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks
Change from Baseline in Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) Score at 8 Weeks
Anxiety symptoms will be assessed using the 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7). Each item is scored from 0 to 3, resulting in a total score ranging from 0 to 21. Higher scores indicate greater anxiety symptom severity. Change in GAD-7 score from baseline to the 8-week post-intervention assessment will be compared between the intervention and wait-list control groups.
Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks
Change from Baseline in Body Appreciation Scale-2 (BAS-2) Score at 8 Weeks
Body appreciation will be assessed using the Body Appreciation Scale-2 (BAS-2), a 10-item measure assessing acceptance of, favorable opinions toward, and respect for one's body. Items are rated on a 5-point scale, and an overall score is calculated by averaging item responses, resulting in scores ranging from 1-5. Higher scores indicate greater body appreciation. Change in BAS-2 score from baseline to the 8-week post-intervention assessment will be compared between the intervention and wait-list control groups.
Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks
Plan to share: No — There is no plan to share individual participant-level data. Study results will be reported and disseminated in aggregate form only, with identifying information removed to protect participant confidentiality.
From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.