ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07787416Updated Aug 26, 2026

Comparison of Four Different Methods Used To Relieve Postoperarive Thirst-Related Discomforts

An interventional study of Group 1: 5 ml slush slush (30 people) and Group 2: 5 ml stick ice stick ice (30 people) in Thirst and Dehydration-related Disorders in Postoperative Patients, sponsored by Ege University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-26.

Sponsored by Ege University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 10 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Nov 2022, registered Oct 2023).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
150
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study was conducted to compare four different methods applied to relieve thirst-related discomfort after surgery. The study is a prospective, randomized controlled, experimental research conducted at Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University Health Practice and Research Center General Surgery Clinic. The study took place between November 2022 and April 2023. 150 patients divided into control and intervention groups were included. The study aimed to investigate the effects of four different methods of quenching thirst after surgery on patient outcomes. Data collection tools include Patient Introduction and Follow-up Form, Numerical Verbal Scale (0 10) to measure thirst intensity, Safe Protocol for the Management of Early Post-Operative Thirst, Surgical Period Thirst-Related Discomfort Scale (CDSBRÖ), Perianesthesia Comfort Scale (PCS) and satisfaction level. Numerical Verbal Scale (0-10) was used to determine. The focus of the data study between groups was on postoperative thirst management, patient comfort, and satisfaction with different interventions. The significance level of 0.05 was taken as the criterion in interpreting the results.

02

Conditions studied

  • Thirst
  • Dehydration-related Disorders in Postoperative Patients

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • thirst
  • nursing care
  • ice
  • water spray
  • satisfaction
  • comfort
03

In context

Personal Satisfaction

541 studies on the registry are indexed under Personal Satisfaction; 93 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 150 is above the median of 93 across 416 interventional studies indexed under Personal Satisfaction.

Browse Personal Satisfaction studies →

Lead sponsor

Ege University is the lead sponsor of 377 studies on the registry; 48 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients between the ages of 18-60
  • General anesthesia for at least 1 hour
  • Absence of open wounds in the mouth and lips
  • Patients who can express their thirst verbally and score 4 or more on the numerical verbal scale
  • Patients who voluntarily agreed to participate in our study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of pain, nausea and vomiting at the time of data collection
  • Those with DM and Chronic Kidney Failure
  • Patients who need intensive care after surgery
  • Those who have absolute oral intake restriction for more than 24 hours before and after surgery
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
150 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Group 1: 5 ml slush

    Data were collected from patients as follows: at 20 minutes using the Safe Protocol for Early Postoperative Dehydration Management; at 30-50-60-80-120-140 minutes using the Numerical Verbal Scale and the Surgical Dehydration-Related Discomfort Scale (CDSBRÖ) to measure the severity of thirst; at 3 and 8 hours using the Perianesthesia Comfort Scale (PCS); and at 50-80-140 minutes using the Numerical Verbal Scale to determine satisfaction level.

    Other: Group 1: 5 ml slush slush (30 people)

  • Experimental
    Group 2: 5 ml stick ice

    Data were collected from patients as follows: at 20 minutes using the Safe Protocol for Early Postoperative Dehydration Management; at 30-50-60-80-120-140 minutes using the Numerical Verbal Scale and the Surgical Dehydration-Related Discomfort Scale (CDSBRÖ) to measure the severity of thirst; at 3 and 8 hours using the Perianesthesia Comfort Scale (PCS); and at 50-80-140 minutes using the Numerical Verbal Scale to determine satisfaction level.

    Other: Group 2: 5 ml stick ice stick ice (30 people)

  • Experimental
    Group 3: 4 C cold water spray

    Data were collected from patients as follows: at 20 minutes using the Safe Protocol for Early Postoperative Dehydration Management; at 30-50-60-80-120-140 minutes using the Numerical Verbal Scale and the Surgical Dehydration-Related Discomfort Scale (CDSBRÖ) to measure the severity of thirst; at 3 and 8 hours using the Perianesthesia Comfort Scale (PCS); and at 50-80-140 minutes using the Numerical Verbal Scale to determine satisfaction level.

    Other: Group 3: 4 C cold water spray cold water spray (30 people)

  • Experimental
    Group 4: 40 C hot water spray

    Data were collected from patients as follows: at 20 minutes using the Safe Protocol for Early Postoperative Dehydration Management; at 30-50-60-80-120-140 minutes using the Numerical Verbal Scale and the Surgical Dehydration-Related Discomfort Scale (CDSBRÖ) to measure the severity of thirst; at 3 and 8 hours using the Perianesthesia Comfort Scale (PCS); and at 50-80-140 minutes using the Numerical Verbal Scale to determine satisfaction level.

    Other: Group 4: 40 C hot water spray hot water spray (30 people)

  • No intervention
    Group 5: Control group

    Data were collected from patients as follows: at 20 minutes using the Safe Protocol for Early Postoperative Dehydration Management; at 30-50-60-80-120-140 minutes using the Numerical Verbal Scale and the Surgical Dehydration-Related Discomfort Scale (CDSBRÖ) to measure the severity of thirst; at 3 and 8 hours using the Perianesthesia Comfort Scale (PCS); and at 50-80-140 minutes using the Numerical Verbal Scale to determine satisfaction level.

Interventions

  • OtherGroup 1: 5 ml slush slush (30 people)

    Interventions were made on the number of people in the groups at the 30th minute, 50th minute, 60th minute, 80th minute, 120th minute and 140th minute after the surgery.

  • OtherGroup 2: 5 ml stick ice stick ice (30 people)

    Interventions were made on the number of people in the groups at the 30th minute, 50th minute, 60th minute, 80th minute, 120th minute and 140th minute after the surgery.

  • OtherGroup 3: 4 C cold water spray cold water spray (30 people)

    Interventions were made on the number of people in the groups at the 30th minute, 50th minute, 60th minute, 80th minute, 120th minute and 140th minute after the surgery.

  • OtherGroup 4: 40 C hot water spray hot water spray (30 people)

    Interventions were made on the number of people in the groups at the 30th minute, 50th minute, 60th minute, 80th minute, 120th minute and 140th minute after the surgery.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Numerical-verbal scale for measuring thirst intensity

    The thirst intensity of the patients was determined using a numerical verbal scale. There are numbers between 0 and 10 on the scale. For example; '0' means I am not thirsty at all, '10' means I am very thirsty. Scores of the patients' discomfort experiences were obtained by asking the patients which number corresponded to the severity of their discomfort between 0 and 10.

    Time frame: 30th minute, 50th minute, 60th minute, 80th minute, 120th minute and 140th minute after surgery

  2. Safety Protocol for Thirst Management in The İmmediate Postoperative Period

    It is a protocol that determines whether oral water/ice can be administered to patients as a result of evaluating the patients' level of consciousness, airway patency, and nausea and vomiting in the early post-anesthesia period.

    Time frame: 20 minutes after surgery

  3. Surgical Period Thirst-Related Discomfort Scale

    The lowest possible score from the scale can be 0, and the highest score can be 12. The scale consists of 6 items. Each item is rated as 0 (did not bother at all), 1 (bothered a little), or 2 (bothered a lot).

    Time frame: 30th minute, 50th minute, 60th minute, 80th minute, 120th minute and 140th minute after surgery

  4. Perianesthesia Comfort Scale

    The scale consists of 24 items. It questions the individual's self-conception and feelings, which reflect the general thought process before and after surgery.

    Time frame: 3rd hour and 8th hour after surgery

  5. Numerical-verbal scale for evaluating satisfaction

    Scale numbered from 0 to 10 to measure satisfaction. 0 = dissatisfied, 10 = very satisfied.

    Time frame: 50th minute, 80th minute and 140th minute after surgery

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University
    Afyonkarahisar, 03300, Turkey (Türkiye)
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Adams, J. D., Darcy, C., DeGrasse, A. G., Jordan, R., Boscia, C. S. (2021). Crosstalk of Pain and Thirst Perception: A Brief Review. Chemosensory Perception, 14(2), s. 75-78.
  • Ahmad, Intessar Mohamed. (2019). Comparison between Effect of Using Cold Water Oral Swap and Cold Saline Oral Swab to Relieve Thirst Intensity and Oral Condition of Mechanically Ventilated Patient. American Journal of Nursing Research, 7(1), (s. 8-13). doi: 10.12691/ajnr-7-1-2.
  • Seyhan Ak E, Turkmen A, Sinmaz T, Bicer OS. Evaluation of Thirst in the Early Postoperative Period in Patients Undergoing Orthopedic Surgery. J Perianesth Nurs. 2023 Jun;38(3):448-453. doi: 10.1016/j.jopan.2022.08.007. Epub 2022 Dec 30. PubMed 36586782 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Nov 2022 to primary completion in Apr 2023, 4 months.

Of 248 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Personal Satisfaction, half reached primary completion within 9 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 3 and three quarters within 21. This study's 4 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 255 studies reached it within 9 months; a quarter within 3 and three quarters within 21.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 15, 2023
First posted
Aug 26, 2026
StartActual
Nov 22, 2022
Primary completionActual
Apr 4, 2023
CompletionActual
Apr 4, 2023
Last update
Aug 26, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 26, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07787416
Lead sponsor
Ege University
Responsible party
Zeynep GÜREŞ (PHD Nurse, Ege University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 26, 2026
Start date
Nov 22, 2022
Primary completion
Apr 4, 2023
Completion
Apr 4, 2023
Last update
Aug 26, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion