ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07783529Updated Aug 26, 2026

Elastic Nailing With Kirschner Wires Versus Plate Fixation for Distal Tibial Fractures in Adolescents

An interventional study of Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nailing Supplemented by Kirschner Wires and Plate fixation in Distal Tibial Fracture, Tibial Fracture and Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary, sponsored by Sohag University. Recruiting at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 10 Years to 16 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-26.

Sponsored by Sohag University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jul 2026; still recruiting 4 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
10 Years to 16 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This prospective randomized controlled trial will compare two surgical methods for treating distal tibial metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction fractures in adolescents aged 10 to 16 years. Participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either elastic stable intramedullary nailing supplemented by Kirschner wires or plate fixation. The study will compare fracture healing, radiological alignment, time to full weight-bearing, functional outcomes, and treatment-related complications. Participants will be followed at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery.

Read the detailed description

Distal tibial metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction fractures in adolescents can be difficult to treat because of the short distal fragment, proximity to the growth plate, and tendency toward displacement and malalignment. Elastic stable intramedullary nailing is minimally invasive and preserves the fracture biology, but fixation of the short distal fragment may be less stable. Supplementary Kirschner wires may improve rotational and angular stability. Plate fixation provides stable fixation and good control of alignment but may require greater soft-tissue dissection.

This study will be conducted at the Department of Orthopaedics Surgery, Sohag University Hospital. Eligible adolescents with displaced or unstable distal tibial metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction fractures requiring surgical fixation will be randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. Group A will undergo elastic stable intramedullary nailing supplemented by one or two Kirschner wires. Group B will undergo plate fixation using a distal tibial locking compression plate. Randomization will be performed using a computer-generated sequence in a 1:1 ratio.

Patients will undergo clinical and radiological follow-up at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months. The primary outcomes are time to radiological union and fracture union rate. Secondary outcomes include coronal and sagittal alignment, time to full weight-bearing, AOFAS Ankle-Hindfoot Score, Lower Extremity Functional Scale, and complications including malunion, delayed union, nonunion, infection, implant irritation or failure, and reoperation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Distal Tibial Fracture
  • Tibial Fracture
  • Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary
  • Fracture Fixation, Internal
  • Bone Plates
  • Adolescents

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Distal tibial fracture
  • Metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction
  • Adolescent fractures
  • Elastic stable intramedullary nailing
  • Kirschner wires
  • Plate fixation
03

In context

Tibial Fractures

135 studies on the registry are indexed under Tibial Fractures; 37 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 60 is close to the median of 65 across 91 interventional studies indexed under Tibial Fractures.

Browse Tibial Fractures studies →

Lead sponsor

Sohag University is the lead sponsor of 1,232 studies on the registry; 638 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
10 Years to 16 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 10-16 years.
  • Patients diagnosed with distal tibial metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction (DTDMJ) fractures.
  • Closed fractures or Gustilo-Anderson type I open fractures.
  • Acute fractures presenting within two weeks of injury.
  • Displaced or unstable fractures requiring surgical fixation.
  • Open or partially open physis, as assessed on preoperative radiographs.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients younger than 10 years or older than 16 years.
  • Fractures involving the distal tibial physis (Salter-Harris fractures).
  • Intra-articular distal tibial fractures.
  • Gustilo-Anderson type II and III open fractures.
  • Pathological fractures.
  • Fractures associated with metabolic bone disease or congenital skeletal disorders.
  • Polytrauma patients requiring alternative treatment priorities.
  • Previous fracture, deformity, or surgical intervention involving the affected tibia.
  • Neurovascular injury requiring repair.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    ESIN Supplemented by Kirschner Wires

    Participants assigned to this arm will undergo elastic stable intramedullary nailing using two appropriately sized elastic titanium nails inserted through medial and lateral proximal tibial metaphyseal entry points. One or two supplementary Kirschner wires will then be inserted percutaneously across the distal fragment under fluoroscopic guidance to improve rotational and angular stability.

    Procedure: Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nailing Supplemented by Kirschner Wires

  • Active comparator
    Plate Fixation

    Participants assigned to this arm will undergo fixation with a distal tibial locking compression plate using a minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis technique or a limited open approach according to fracture characteristics. The plate will be positioned on the medial aspect of the tibia and fixed with appropriate locking and cortical screws under fluoroscopic guidance.

    Procedure: Plate fixation

Interventions

  • ProcedureElastic Stable Intramedullary Nailing Supplemented by Kirschner Wires

    Closed reduction will be performed under fluoroscopic guidance. Two appropriately sized titanium elastic nails will be inserted through medial and lateral entry points in the proximal tibial metaphysis and advanced across the fracture into the distal fragment. One or two supplementary Kirschner wires will then be inserted percutaneously across the distal fragment under fluoroscopic guidance to enhance rotational and angular stability.

  • ProcedurePlate fixation

    Following fracture reduction, fixation will be performed using a distal tibial locking compression plate through a minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis technique or a limited open approach according to fracture characteristics. The plate will be positioned on the medial aspect of the tibia and secured with appropriate locking and cortical screws under fluoroscopic guidance.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time to Radiological Union

    Time from surgery to radiographic evidence of fracture union as assessed on follow-up anteroposterior and lateral radiographs.

    Time frame: From surgery through 6 months

  2. Fracture Union Rate

    Proportion of participants demonstrating radiological fracture union during postoperative follow-up.

    Time frame: At 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Coronal and Sagittal Alignment

    Radiographic assessment of coronal and sagittal alignment of the distal tibia during postoperative follow-up.

    Time frame: At 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months

  2. Time to Full Weight-Bearing

    Time from surgery until the participant is allowed to progress to full weight-bearing based on fracture stability and radiographic evidence of healing.

    Time frame: From surgery through 6 months

  3. AOFAS Ankle-Hindfoot Score

    Functional outcome assessed using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Score. The total score ranges from 0 to 100 points, including pain, function, and alignment, with higher scores indicating better outcome.

    Time frame: During postoperative follow-up through 6 months

  4. Lower Extremity Functional Scale

    Functional outcome assessed using the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS), a patient-reported measure evaluating difficulty with daily activities such as walking, running, and climbing stairs. The maximum score is 80 points, with higher scores indicating better lower-extremity function.

    Time frame: During postoperative follow-up through 6 months

  5. Treatment-Related Complication Rate

    Proportion of participants experiencing treatment-related complications, including malunion, delayed union, nonunion, superficial infection, deep infection, implant irritation, implant failure, or reoperation.

    Time frame: From surgery through 6 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jul 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2027, 11 months after the start.

Of 39 interventional studies with no phase under Tibial Fractures, half reached primary completion within 45 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 23 and three quarters within 80. This study's planned 11 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 20, 2026
First posted
Aug 24, 2026
StartActual
Jul 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jun 30, 2027
CompletionEst.
Jun 30, 2027
Last update
Aug 26, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 26, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07783529
Lead sponsor
Sohag University
Responsible party
Mohamed Sabry Farghaly (Orthopaedics Resident, Sohag University Hospitals, Sohag University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 24, 2026
Start date
Jul 1, 2026
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 30, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 26, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion