ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07783412TRIUMPHUpdated Oct 9, 2026

Topical Ruxolitinib in the Treatment of Adults With Pyoderma Gangrenosum

A Phase 2 interventional study of topical ruxolitinib 1.5% cream in Pyoderma Gangrenosum, sponsored by Oregon Health and Science University. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 99 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-09.

Sponsored by Oregon Health and Science University · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Sep 2026; still recruiting 2 months later.
Updated Oct 9, 2026Now RecruitingFirst site in United States+1 moreGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
12
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 99 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a single-center, open-label, single-arm pilot study evaluating topical ruxolitinib (OPZELURA) as a treatment for adults with Pyoderma Gangrenosum (PG), a chronic inflammatory skin condition that causes painful ulcers. Approximately 12 participants will apply ruxolitinib cream twice daily for 24 weeks while continuing standard wound care, with the goal of determining whether the drug helps target ulcers heal completely without the need for systemic immunosuppressive therapy. Participants will be followed for a total of 28 weeks, with the option to continue treatment in a 48-week open-label extension if they respond well and remain safe on the drug. The study is sponsored by Oregon Health \& Science University and funded by Incyte Corporation.

Read the detailed description

Pyoderma Gangrenosum is a rare, ulcerative inflammatory skin condition most commonly treated with systemic corticosteroids or cyclosporine, both of which carry significant long-term toxicity risks. Topical therapy has shown effectiveness for smaller lesions, but existing topical options (corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors) also carry risks with prolonged use and lack robust long-term safety data. Emerging evidence implicates the JAK-STAT signaling pathway in PG pathogenesis, with JAK1/2/3 and TYK2 found to be overexpressed in PG lesions and several PG-associated inflammatory cytokines (IFN-γ, IL-6, IL-12, IL-15, IL-23) acting through JAK-STAT-dependent mechanisms. Ruxolitinib, a selective JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor already FDA-approved as a topical cream for atopic dermatitis, has not previously been studied for PG in a clinical trial; prior evidence is limited to case reports of oral JAK inhibitors used off-label for PG.

This investigator-initiated trial will enroll approximately 12 adults (ages 18-99) with a PARACELSUS score >10 and a target ulcer ≤10 cm². Participants will apply ruxolitinib cream twice daily via a Topi-Click applicator for 24 weeks, continuing standard-of-care wound care throughout (cleansing, antimicrobial and hyper-absorbent dressings, compression, and debridement as needed). No additional systemic immunosuppressive therapy will be introduced during the study, though participants may remain on a stable pre-existing dose of a biologic for an associated autoimmune comorbidity.

The study includes 10 scheduled visits over 28 weeks (Screening, Weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28), with select later visits available via telemedicine for participants living more than 30 miles from OHSU. Assessments include full body skin exams with ulcer measurement, high-frequency ultrasound imaging at Weeks 0, 6, 12, and 24, blood draws for safety labs (CBC, CMP, eGFR, ESR, CRP, G6PD, lipid panel) and infectious disease screening (HIV, HBV, HCV, TB), wound fluid collection for cytokine analysis, and patient-reported outcome measures (Skindex Mini, pain NRS, PHQ-9, GAD-7).

The primary endpoint is the proportion of participants achieving complete re-epithelialization of the target ulcer at Week 24. Secondary endpoints assessed by the investigator include Physician Global Assessment (PGA) scores, percent reduction in ulcer area, time to healing, time to recurrence, and treatment failure rate; secondary endpoints assessed by the participant include quality-of-life measured by Skindex Mini and pain reduction measured by NRS. Exploratory/mechanistic endpoints include changes in pro-inflammatory cytokine and chemokine expression in blood and lesional tissue, and ultrasound-based assessment of tissue remodeling during healing.

Participants who complete the study through Week 24 with a PGA score of 1-3 and no significant safety concerns will be eligible to enroll in a 48-week open-label extension, with continued dosing for as long as clinical benefit is observed, re-evaluated annually.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pyoderma Gangrenosum

Keywords

  • pyoderma gangrenosum
  • pg
  • wounds
  • chronic non-healing wounds
  • non-healing ulcers
  • topical ruxolitinib
03

In context

Pyoderma Gangrenosum

36 studies on the registry are indexed under Pyoderma Gangrenosum; 7 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 12 is above the median of 10 across 26 interventional studies indexed under Pyoderma Gangrenosum.

Browse Pyoderma Gangrenosum studies →

Lead sponsor

Oregon Health and Science University is the lead sponsor of 696 studies on the registry; 131 are open to participants now.

Of its 52 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 39 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 99 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Willingness to comply with study procedures/requirements
  • Capable of giving
  • Diagnosis of at least one PG ulcer by clinical, histological and laboratory assessments with a maximum wound size of 10 cm2.
  • Male age 18-99 who agree to not father a child or donate sperm while on study and at least 1 week following last dose of the study drug. If subject is a sexually active male and could cause a pregnancy, subject must be sure that female partner(s) are using that works well or not have sex.
  • Female age 18-99; either of non- or of childbearing potential who test negative for pregnancy and agree to use at least two reliable methods of birth control or remain abstinent during the study and for at least 1 week following the last dose of ruxolitinib.
  • Classic type of PG defined with PARACELSUS score >10
  • Are candidates for topical therapy. Subjects on existing for managing underlying comorbidities associated with PG will be considered for trial and allowed to continue these medications while on trial
  • Patients on potent immunosuppressants (azathioprine, cyclosporine) or Janus kinase inhibitors will not be considered in the study
  • Patients may be on stable dose of prednisone 10 mg or less
  • Undergoing at least once a week standard of care wound care at home or wound care facility.
  • Willingness to travel to OHSU for all study visits, or living >30 miles from OHSU and willing/able to participate in remote videoconferencing visits with access to a computer with internet and webcam capabilities.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with pyoderma gangrenosum who have more than 3 ulcers measuring total >30 cm2
  • Have history of or lymphoproliferative disease; or have signs or symptoms suggestive of possible lymphoproliferative disease, including lymphadenopathy or splenomegaly; or have active primary or recurrent malignant disease; or have been in remission from malignancy for \< 5years.
  • Patients with cervical carcinoma in situ, basal cell carcinoma or squamous cell carcinomas who have had active disease within 3 years of screening for this study.
  • Active, untreated, acute or chronic infection (such as untreated tuberculosis), or to an extent that such that participation in the study would pose an unacceptable risk to the subject. (Treated infections such as latent tuberculosis after completion of the appropriate therapy are not excluded.)
  • Clinically serious infection or received intravenous antibiotics for an infection, within 4 weeks of randomization.
  • Active viral infection that, based on the investigator's clinical assessment, makes the subject and unsuitable candidate for the study.
  • Positive for , virus, or virus.
  • Symptomatic herpes zoster infection within 12 weeks of screening or recurrent or disseminated (even a single episode) herpes zoster.
  • Symptomatic herpes simplex at the time of randomization or disseminated (even a single episode) herpes simplex
  • History of disseminated opportunistic infections (e.g., listeriosis and histoplasmosis).
  • Have a history of VTE, or are considered at high risk for VTE as deemed by the investigator, or have 2 or more of the following risk factors for VTE:

    1. Aged >65 years.
    2. >35 kg/m2.
    3. Oral use and current smoker.
  • Wound care debridement of any PG ulcer within 2 weeks
  • Patients receiving regular intralesional treatment to manage PG or underlying comorbidities associated with PG will be allowed to continue intralesional corticosteroid treatment during screening and while on study
  • Previous exposure to a systemic JAK inhibitor (ruxolitinib, tofacitinib, upadacitinib, filgotinib) or topical JAK inhibior.
  • Clinically significant (per investigator's judgement) drug or alcohol abuse within the last 6 months preceding the Baseline Visit.
  • Had any major surgery within 8 weeks prior to baseline or will require major surgery during the study, which in the opinion of the investigator would pose an unacceptable risk to the subject.
  • Recent (within past 6 months) cerebrovascular accident, myocardial infarction, coronary stenting. Uncontrolled hypertension - confirmed systolic blood pressure >160 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure >100 mm Hg.
  • Presence of significant uncontrolled respiratory, hepatic, renal, endocrine, hematologic, neurologic, or neuropsychiatric disorders, or abnormal laboratory screening values that, in the opinion of the investigator, pose an unacceptable risk to the subject if participating in the study or of interfering with the interpretation of the data.
  • Have clinical laboratory test results at screening that are outside the normal reference range of the population and are considered clinically significant, or have any of the following specific abnormalities:
  • \<1500 cells/µL
  • lymphocyte count \<500 cells/µL
  • count \<100,000 cells/µL,
  • or ALT > 2.5 Women who are lactating or breastfeeding.
  • Have any other condition that precludes the subject from following and completing the protocol, in the opinion of the investigator.
  • Are investigator site personnel directly affiliated with this study and/or their immediate families (spouse, parent, child, or sibling).
  • Are currently enrolled in, or discontinued from a clinical trial involving an product or non-approved use of a drug or device within the last 4 weeks or a period of at least 5 half-lives of the last administration of the drug, whichever is longer, or concurrently enrolled in any other type of medical research judged not to be scientifically or medically compatible with this study
  • Have and/or are managing a substance use disorder involving opioids and/or cannabinoids
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(15)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

Hepatitis C tests

Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.

After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Absolute neutrophil count (ANC)

The number of neutrophils, white blood cells that help fight infection, in a given amount of blood. Too few raises the risk of infection.

It is a count, not a percentage of the white cells. Limits are written in units that mean the same: ≥ 1.5 × 10⁹/L is ≥ 1,500 per mm³ (µL). Each lab has its own reference range.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
12 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Treatment

    Treated with topical ruxolitinib thin laywer twice daily for 24 weeks.

    Drug: topical ruxolitinib 1.5% cream

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Complete healing of target ulcer

    The proportion of patients with complete re-epithelization, defined as 100% re-epithelialization without any drainage, of the target ulcer at week 24.

    Time frame: Up to 24 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. PGA between 0-1

    1\. Assessing the proportion of patients that show target ulcer healing in response to study treatment as measured by achieving PGA between 0 and 1 after treatment with baricitinib at week-24. This scale has been used in previous trials: 0 = total resolution of target ulcer with no signs of active PG 1= almost completely healed target ulcer with only minimal signs of active PG 2 = evidence of target ulcer healing which involves at least 50% of ulcer/ulcer margin 3 = evidence of target ulcer healing which involves less than 50% of ulcer/margin 4 = no evidence of target healing ulcer

    Time frame: Through week 24

  2. Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v4.0

    To determine the safety of ruxolitinib for the treatment of subjects with PG who are candidates for systemic therapy, by the number of participants who experienced treatment-related adverse events while on study.

    Time frame: Through week 24

  3. Impact of skin disease on quality of life using Skindex Mini

    A 3-item questionnaire assessing three domains of quality of life impact; symptoms, emotions, and function related to skin disease on a scale of 0 (never bothered) to 5 (always bothered)

    Time frame: By week 28

  4. Quality of life via Participant Global Assessment

    Measures an individual's overall impression of their health, disease severity, or treatment response on a scale of clear to severe.

    Time frame: By week 28

  5. Quality of life via Participant Physical Function Assessment

    Evaluates an individual's ability to perform daily activities, mobility, strength, balance, and overall functional capacity on a scale from "no difficulty at all" to "can't do because of ulcer"

    Time frame: By week 28

  6. Patient Health Questionnaire-9

    Measures the presence and severity of depressive symptoms over the past two weeks in 9 questions ranking on a scale of "Not at all" to "Nearly every day".

    Time frame: By week 28

  7. Generalized Anxiety Disorder Assessment

    Measures the severity of generalized anxiety disorder symptoms over the past two weeks in 7 questions ranking on a scale of "not at all" to "nearly every day".

    Time frame: By week 28

  8. Pain improvement determined by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)

    To determine the improvement in pain by NRS scale in the last 7 days and the peak pain by NRS scale in the last 24 hours from 0 (no pain/sensation) to 10 (worst possible pain/sensation)

    Time frame: Through week 24

  9. Time to healing

    Determine time to healing

    Time frame: Through week 24

  10. Time to recurrence

    Determine time to recurrence, appearance of new ulcer after complete closure

    Time frame: Through week 24

Other outcomes

  1. Cytokine markers changed due to treatment

    Evaluation of cytokine gene expression before and after treatment in skin and blood samples

    Time frame: Through week 24

  2. Evaluate imaging structures using HFUS

    Use high-frequency ultrasound imaging to predict healing via the presence of hyperechoic oval structures, hair tracts, and U-shaped vessels.

    Time frame: Through week 24

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Lowe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006 May 22;166(10):1092-7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092. PubMed 16717171 ↗
  • Ortega-Loayza AG, Friedman MA, Reese AM, Liu Y, Greiling TM, Cassidy PB, Marzano AV, Gao L, Fei SS, Rosenbaum JT. Molecular and Cellular Characterization of Pyoderma Gangrenosum: Implications for the Use of Gene Expression. J Invest Dermatol. 2022 Apr;142(4):1217-1220.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2021.08.431. Epub 2021 Sep 15. No abstract available. PubMed 34536481 ↗
  • Orfaly VE, Kovalenko I, Tolkachjov SN, Ortega-Loayza AG, Nunley JR. Tofacitinib for the treatment of refractory pyoderma gangrenosum. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2021 Aug;46(6):1082-1085. doi: 10.1111/ced.14683. Epub 2021 May 29. PubMed 33864685 ↗
  • Rosmarin D, Pandya AG, Lebwohl M, Grimes P, Hamzavi I, Gottlieb AB, Butler K, Kuo F, Sun K, Ji T, Howell MD, Harris JE. Ruxolitinib cream for treatment of vitiligo: a randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet. 2020 Jul 11;396(10244):110-120. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30609-7. PubMed 32653055 ↗
  • Kim BS, Howell MD, Sun K, Papp K, Nasir A, Kuligowski ME; INCB 18424-206 Study Investigators. Treatment of atopic dermatitis with ruxolitinib cream (JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor) or triamcinolone cream. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020 Feb;145(2):572-582. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2019.08.042. Epub 2019 Oct 17. PubMed 31629805 ↗
  • Sedano R, Jairath V. Tofacitinib for the Treatment of Three Immune-mediated Conditions in One Patient: Ulcerative Colitis, Pyoderma Gangrenosum, and Alopecia Areata. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2021 Apr 15;27(5):e65. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izab005. No abstract available. PubMed 33484124 ↗
  • Ortega-Loayza AG, Nugent WH, Lucero OM, Washington SL, Nunley JR, Walsh SW. Dysregulation of inflammatory gene expression in lesional and nonlesional skin of patients with pyoderma gangrenosum. Br J Dermatol. 2018 Jan;178(1):e35-e36. doi: 10.1111/bjd.15837. Epub 2017 Dec 5. No abstract available. PubMed 28734003 ↗
  • Palanivel JA, Macbeth AE, Levell NJ. Pyoderma gangrenosum in association with Janus kinase 2 (JAK2V617F) mutation. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2013 Jan;38(1):44-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2230.2012.04375.x. Epub 2012 May 21. PubMed 22607468 ↗
  • Kochar B, Herfarth N, Mamie C, Navarini AA, Scharl M, Herfarth HH. Tofacitinib for the Treatment of Pyoderma Gangrenosum. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Apr;17(5):991-993. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.10.047. Epub 2018 Nov 4. PubMed 30404036 ↗
  • Nasifoglu S, Heinrich B, Welzel J. Successful therapy for pyoderma gangrenosum with a Janus kinase 2 inhibitor. Br J Dermatol. 2018 Aug;179(2):504-505. doi: 10.1111/bjd.16468. Epub 2018 May 21. No abstract available. PubMed 29451690 ↗
  • Shanmugam VK, McNish S, Shara N, Hubley KJ, Kallakury B, Dunning DM, Attinger CE, Steinberg JS. Chronic leg ulceration associated with polycythemia vera responding to ruxolitinib (Jakafi((R))). J Foot Ankle Surg. 2013 Nov-Dec;52(6):781-5. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2013.07.003. Epub 2013 Aug 14. PubMed 23953278 ↗
  • Alves de Medeiros AK, Speeckaert R, Desmet E, Van Gele M, De Schepper S, Lambert J. JAK3 as an Emerging Target for Topical Treatment of Inflammatory Skin Diseases. PLoS One. 2016 Oct 6;11(10):e0164080. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164080. eCollection 2016. PubMed 27711196 ↗
  • Siegfried EC, Jaworski JC, Kaiser JD, Hebert AA. Systematic review of published trials: long-term safety of topical corticosteroids and topical calcineurin inhibitors in pediatric patients with atopic dermatitis. BMC Pediatr. 2016 Jun 7;16:75. doi: 10.1186/s12887-016-0607-9. PubMed 27267134 ↗
  • Del Rosso J, Friedlander SF. Corticosteroids: options in the era of steroid-sparing therapy. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2005 Jul;53(1 Suppl 1):S50-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2005.04.030. PubMed 15968264 ↗
  • Thomas KS, Ormerod AD, Craig FE, Greenlaw N, Norrie J, Mitchell E, Mason JM, Johnston GA, Wahie S, Williams HC; UK Dermatology Clinical Trials Network's STOP GAP Team. Clinical outcomes and response of patients applying topical therapy for pyoderma gangrenosum: A prospective cohort study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016 Nov;75(5):940-949. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2016.06.016. Epub 2016 Aug 5. PubMed 27502313 ↗
  • Braswell SF, Kostopoulos TC, Ortega-Loayza AG. Pathophysiology of pyoderma gangrenosum (PG): an updated review. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015 Oct;73(4):691-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2015.06.021. Epub 2015 Aug 5. PubMed 26253362 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Sep 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Sep 2029, 36 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 29, 2026
First posted
Aug 24, 2026
StartActual
Sep 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Sep 2029
CompletionEst.
Dec 2029
Last update
Oct 9, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Status
Not yet recruiting→Recruiting
changed Oct 9, 2026
Sites
1 site added — first site in United States
Show site
  • Oregon Health & Science University, Department of Dermatology · Portland, United States
Oct 9, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 9, 2026
    Not yet recruiting→Recruiting
    1 site added — first site in United States
    Show site
    • Oregon Health & Science University, Department of Dermatology · Portland, United States
    + 2 other changes: verification date and date precision

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07783412
Collaborators
Incyte Corporation
Responsible party
Alex Ortega Loayza (Principal Investigator, Oregon Health and Science University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 24, 2026
Start date
Sep 1, 2026
Primary completion
Sep 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 9, 2026

Study contacts

Alexandra Shinde, MSc
Contact
shindea@ohsu.edu
971-442-1620
Chloe Vignola
Contact
vignola@ohsu.edu
503-418-9045 ext. 8-9045

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Ruxolitinib

Start the discussion