ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07782099AIM-CNPUpdated Aug 24, 2026

Accessory Inspiratory Muscles in Chronic Neck Pain

An observational study in Chronic Neck Pain and Healthy (Controls), sponsored by Kocaeli Sağlık ve Teknoloji Üniversitesi. Recruiting at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-24.

Sponsored by Kocaeli Sağlık ve Teknoloji Üniversitesi · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jun 2026; still recruiting 5 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
10
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This cross-sectional case-control study aims to investigate the ultrasonographic structural and functional characteristics of accessory inspiratory muscles in individuals with chronic non-specific neck pain and compare them with healthy controls. In addition, the relationships between accessory inspiratory muscle characteristics, diaphragm function, respiratory muscle strength, and pulmonary function parameters will be examined. The findings may improve understanding of the respiratory involvement associated with chronic neck pain and contribute to more comprehensive assessment strategies.

Read the detailed description

Chronic non-specific neck pain is a prevalent musculoskeletal disorder associated with pain, disability, and reduced quality of life. Emerging evidence suggests that its effects may extend beyond the cervical region and involve respiratory dysfunction. Previous studies have reported reductions in respiratory muscle strength, pulmonary function, and diaphragm function in individuals with chronic neck pain.

The diaphragm plays an important role not only in respiration but also in postural control and spinal stabilization. Ultrasonographic studies have demonstrated alterations in diaphragm thickness and mobility in individuals with chronic neck pain. However, little is known about potential compensatory adaptations occurring in accessory inspiratory muscles, including the sternocleidomastoid, anterior scalene, and upper trapezius muscles.

The purpose of this observational case-control study is to investigate the ultrasonographic characteristics of accessory inspiratory muscles in individuals with chronic non-specific neck pain and to compare these characteristics with those of healthy controls. Additionally, the relationships between accessory inspiratory muscle characteristics, diaphragm function, respiratory muscle strength, and pulmonary function will be examined.

Participants with chronic non-specific neck pain and age-matched healthy controls will undergo ultrasonographic assessment of the diaphragm and accessory inspiratory muscles, pulmonary function testing, and respiratory muscle strength evaluation. Associations among ultrasonographic, respiratory, and functional variables will be analyzed to improve understanding of respiratory involvement in chronic neck pain and to identify potential clinical assessment targets.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Neck Pain
  • Healthy (Controls)

Keywords

  • Chronic Non-Specific Neck Pain
  • Accessory Inspiratory Muscles
  • Respiratory Function
  • Ultrasonography
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Kocaeli Sağlık ve Teknoloji Üniversitesi is the lead sponsor of 12 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The study population will consist of adults aged 18 to 65 years. The case group will include individuals with chronic non-specific neck pain lasting at least 3 months, while the control group will consist of age-matched healthy volunteers without neck pain during the previous 3 months. Participants will be recruited from the Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation outpatient clinic and the surrounding community.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Chronic Non-Specific Neck Pain Group:

  • Age between 18 and 65 years
  • Presence of chronic non-specific neck pain for at least 3 months
  • Non-traumatic origin of neck pain
  • Pain intensity ≥ 3 on the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) or Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
  • Neck Disability Index (NDI) score ≥ 15
  • Willingness to participate and provide

Healthy Control Group:

  • Age between 18 and 65 years
  • No neck pain during the previous 3 months
  • Not receiving any treatment related to the cervical region
  • Willingness to participate and provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria (Both Groups):

  • History of whiplash injury or cervical trauma
  • Previous cervical spine surgery
  • Cervical radiculopathy or neurological deficits
  • Chronic respiratory diseases (e.g., , asthma)
  • Active respiratory tract infection
  • Thoracic or abdominal surgery within the previous 6 months
  • Rheumatologic, neuromuscular, or systemic inflammatory disorders
  • Pregnancy
  • Physiotherapy treatment for neck pain within the previous 3 months
  • Regular respiratory muscle training or breathing exercises within the previous 3 months
  • Inability to comply with study procedures or assessments
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe out, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
10 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
1 Day
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • Chronic Non-Specific Neck Pain

    Participants aged 18-65 years with chronic non-specific neck pain lasting at least 3 months.

    Diagnostic Test: Diaphragm Ultrasonography · Diagnostic Test: Anterior Scalene Muscle Ultrasonography · Diagnostic Test: Upper Trapezius Muscle Ultrasonography · Device: Maximal Inspiratory Pressure Measurement · Device: Maximal Expiratory Pressure Measurement · Device: Pulmonary Function Testing

  • Healthy Control

    Age-matched healthy individuals without neck pain during the previous 3 months.

    Diagnostic Test: Diaphragm Ultrasonography · Diagnostic Test: Anterior Scalene Muscle Ultrasonography · Diagnostic Test: Upper Trapezius Muscle Ultrasonography · Device: Maximal Inspiratory Pressure Measurement · Device: Maximal Expiratory Pressure Measurement · Device: Pulmonary Function Testing

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testDiaphragm Ultrasonography

    Diaphragm thickness was assessed by ultrasonography while the participant was in a standardized position. Measurements were obtained at the end of expiration and during maximal inspiration.

  • Diagnostic testAnterior Scalene Muscle Ultrasonography

    Anterior scalene muscle thickness was assessed by ultrasonography while the participant was in a standardized position. Measurements were obtained at rest and during maximal inspiratory effort.

  • Diagnostic testUpper Trapezius Muscle Ultrasonography

    Upper trapezius muscle thickness was assessed by ultrasonography while the participant was in a standardized position. Measurements were obtained at rest and during maximal inspiratory effort.

  • DeviceMaximal Inspiratory Pressure Measurement

    Maximal inspiratory pressure was measured using a respiratory pressure measurement device. The participant performed a maximal inspiratory effort against an occluded airway after complete expiration. Repeated measurements were performed with appropriate rest intervals.

  • DeviceMaximal Expiratory Pressure Measurement

    Maximal expiratory pressure was measured using a respiratory pressure measurement device. The participant performed a maximal expiratory effort against an occluded airway after maximal inspiration. Repeated measurements were performed with appropriate rest intervals.

  • DevicePulmonary Function Testing

    Pulmonary function testing was performed using spirometry while the participant was in a standardized seated position. The participant completed maximal forced expiratory maneuvers following standardized instructions, and technically acceptable measurements were recorded.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Diaphragm Thickening Ratio

    Diaphragm thickening ratio measured using ultrasonography.

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. Sternocleidomastoid Muscle Thickness

    Sternocleidomastoid muscle thickness measured using ultrasonography.

    Time frame: Baseline

Secondary outcomes

  1. Anterior Scalene Muscle Thickness

    Anterior scalene muscle thickness measured using ultrasonography.

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. Upper Trapezius Muscle Thickness

    Upper trapezius muscle thickness measured using ultrasonography.

    Time frame: Baseline

  3. Maximal Inspiratory Pressure (MIP)

    Maximal inspiratory pressure will be measured using a respiratory pressure measurement device. Participants will perform a maximal inspiratory effort against an occluded airway after complete expiration. The highest technically acceptable value will be recorded in cmH₂O. Higher values indicate greater inspiratory muscle strength.

    Time frame: Baseline

  4. Forced Vital Capacity (L)

    Forced vital capacity will be measured using spirometry during a maximal forced expiratory maneuver performed after maximal inspiration.

    Time frame: Baseline

  5. Maximal Expiratory Pressure (MEP)

    Maximal expiratory pressure will be measured using a respiratory pressure measurement device. Participants will perform a maximal expiratory effort against an occluded airway after maximal inspiration. The highest technically acceptable value will be recorded in cmH₂O. Higher values indicate greater expiratory muscle strength.

    Time frame: Baseline

  6. Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (L)

    Forced expiratory volume in the first second will be measured using spirometry during a maximal forced expiratory maneuver performed after maximal inspiration.

    Time frame: Baseline

  7. FEV1/FVC Ratio (%)

    The ratio of forced expiratory volume in the first second to forced vital capacity will be determined from spirometry measurements.

    Time frame: Baseline

  8. Peak Expiratory Flow (L/sn)

    Peak expiratory flow will be measured using spirometry during a maximal forced expiratory maneuver performed after maximal inspiration.

    Time frame: Baseline

  9. Forced Expiratory Flow at 25-75%

    Forced expiratory flow during the middle 50% of the forced vital capacity maneuver will be measured using spirometry.

    Time frame: Baseline

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Derince Training and Research Hospital
    Kocaeli, Derince 41000, Turkey (Türkiye)
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Colak GY, Ozyurek S, Sengul YS, Kalemci O. Differences of diaphragmatic muscle contraction between female patients with chronic neck pain and asymptomatic controls: A case-control study based on ultrasonography. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2024 Feb;69:102894. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2023.102894. Epub 2023 Dec 8. PubMed 38109804 ↗
  • Hii EY, Kuo YL, Cheng KC, Hung CH, Tsai YJ. Ultrasonographic measurement indicated patients with chronic neck pain had reduced diaphragm thickness and mobility along with declined respiratory functions. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2024 Aug;72:102951. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2024.102951. Epub 2024 Apr 2. PubMed 38615408 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be made publicly available because the study involves sensitive health-related information and participant confidentiality cannot be fully guaranteed despite de-identification procedures. Aggregate study findings will be reported in scientific publications.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Jun 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Sep 2026, 2 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 20, 2026
First posted
Aug 24, 2026
StartActual
Jun 10, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Sep 1, 2026
CompletionEst.
Dec 1, 2026
Last update
Aug 24, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 24, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07782099
Lead sponsor
Kocaeli Sağlık ve Teknoloji Üniversitesi
Responsible party
Sena Çınarlı (PhD, PT, Kocaeli Sağlık ve Teknoloji Üniversitesi) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 24, 2026
Start date
Jun 10, 2026
Primary completion
Sep 1, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 1, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 24, 2026

Study contacts

Hatice Sena Çınarlı, assisstant professor
Contact
haticesena.cinarli@kocaelisaglik.edu.tr
05436093619

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion