ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07781033StimHAVUpdated Aug 24, 2026

Impact of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation on the Autonomic Nervous System in the Treatment of Overactive Bladder

An interventional study of heart rate variability assement in Overactive Bladder (OAB), sponsored by Centre Hospitalier de Roubaix. Not yet recruiting. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-24.

Sponsored by Centre Hospitalier de Roubaix · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
70
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The goal of this observational study is to evaluate the impact of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation on the autonomic nervous system in adults women with overactive bladder.

The main question it aims to answer is :

Does Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation to treat overactive bladder have an impact on the autonomic nervous system ?

To answer this question, the primary outcome measure will be heart rate variability (HRV) during transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation therapy

Participants will:

  • Receive their first and last sessions of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in the hospital.
  • Complete questionnaires during their first and last transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation sessions.
  • Have their heart rate variability measured during their first and last transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation sessions.
Read the detailed description

Rationale :

Overactive bladder (OAB) is a common condition that can have a major impact on quality of life. Transcutaneous peripheral electrical stimulation therapies are a recognized treatment option, but their mechanisms of action are still not fully understood.

Recent data suggest that their effectiveness may be related to changes in the autonomic nervous system. However, no study has yet evaluated this effect in patients with non-neurogenic overactive bladder. This study aims to better understand the physiological mechanisms involved, improve knowledge about these treatments, and contribute to their better use in clinical practice.

Objectives :

Primary objective:

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of transcutaneous electrical stimulation therapies on the overall balance of the autonomic nervous system in patients with overactive bladder.

Secondary objectives:

  1. To assess the impact of transcutaneous electrical stimulation on autonomic nervous system function in patients with overactive bladder.
  2. To assess the clinical effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical stimulation in patients with overactive bladder.
  3. To assess the clinical effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical stimulation on associated pelvic floor dysfunctions, including anal incontinence, constipation, and genitosexual disorders.
  4. To assess the tolerability of transcutaneous electrical stimulation in patients with overactive bladder.

Study design :

This is a prospective, single-center, observational study conducted in routine clinical practice. It will include female patients with overactive bladder who are receiving transcutaneous peripheral electrical stimulation as part of their usual care.

Study procedure :

After confirmation of the diagnosis of overactive bladder by a specialist physician, patients will be prescribed transcutaneous peripheral electrical stimulation, transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) or interferential stimulation (IF). They will then be referred to the study investigator for an inclusion visit.

At the initial visit (Week 0), after checking the eligibility criteria and obtaining informed consent, participants will receive pelvic health education and their first electrical stimulation session. Heart rate variability will be recorded using an ECG Holter monitor. Clinical data and study questionnaires will also be collected.

Participants will receive two 72-hour bladder diaries. The first will be completed at the beginning of the study and the second before the final visit.

Treatment will continue for 12 weeks according to the prescribed method: TTNS will be performed at home, IF will be performed in a physiotherapy clinic. A follow-up telephone call will be made at 6 weeks (± 1 week) to assess treatment adherence.

At 12 weeks (± 1 week), participants will attend a final visit. This visit will include an electrical stimulation session with HRV measurement, completion of the follow-up questionnaires, and collection of the final bladder diary.

Data collected at baseline and at 12 weeks will be compared to assess the impact of electrical stimulation therapies on the autonomic nervous system and overactive bladder symptoms.

02

Conditions studied

  • Overactive Bladder (OAB)

Keywords

  • overactive bladder
  • transcutaneous electrical stimulation therapies
  • TTNS
  • AOB
03

In context

Urinary Bladder, Overactive

858 studies on the registry are indexed under Urinary Bladder, Overactive; 127 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 70 is close to the median of 70 across 649 interventional studies indexed under Urinary Bladder, Overactive.

Browse Urinary Bladder, Overactive studies →

Lead sponsor

Centre Hospitalier de Roubaix is the lead sponsor of 9 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Female
  • Adult patient aged 18 years or older
  • Clinical diagnosis of overactive bladder made by a urologist or gynecologist with no identified cause
  • Eligible for transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) or interferential stimulation (IF) as part of the management of non-neurogenic overactive bladder
  • (BMI) ≤ 30 kg/m²
  • Able to understand and complete the study questionnaires independently
  • No objection to participating in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Neurogenic overactive bladder.
  • Local irritative factors, such as bladder stones, bladder tumors, or urinary tract infection.
  • Previous treatment with transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS).
  • Previous treatment with interferential stimulation (IF).
  • to electrical stimulation, including: cancer, Pacemaker, Pregnancy, Conductive prosthetic material in the area of stimulation, Heart disease, Epilepsy, Active phlebitis or thrombophlebitis, Skin lesions in the treatment area
  • Use of anticholinergic medication during the previous three weeks
  • Objection to participating in the study.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
70 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Women with overactive bladder who have been prescribed transcutaneous electrical stimulation

    Other: heart rate variability assement

Interventions

  • Otherheart rate variability assement

    Participants will: * Receive their first and last sessions of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in the hospital. * Complete questionnaires during their first and last transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation sessions. * Have their heart rate variability measured during their first and last transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation sessions. These interventions are performed specifically as part of the study and are not part of routine care.

    Also known as: Questionnaires completion, visits in hospital

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Heart rate variability

    The primary outcome measure is the change in SDNN (Standard Deviation of Normal-to-Normal intervals, expressed in ms), a time marker of heart rate variability , between the initial measurement session (Week 0) and the final measurement session (Week 12)

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Secondary outcomes

  1. To assess the impact of transcutaneous electrical stimulation on autonomic nervous system function in patients with overactive bladder.

    Change in the low-frequency power (LF, 0.04-0.15 Hz) of heart rate variability between Week 0 and Week 12, assessed for each of the three evaluation phases: * 1 resting phase * 2 active stimulation * 3 post-stimulation resting phase

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  2. To assess the impact of transcutaneous electrical stimulation on autonomic nervous system function in patients with overactive bladder.

    Change in the High-frequency power (HF, 0.15-0.40 Hz) of heart rate variability between Week 0 and Week 12, assessed for each of the three evaluation phases: * 1 resting phase * 2 active stimulation * 3 post-stimulation resting phase

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  3. To assess the impact of transcutaneous electrical stimulation on autonomic nervous system function in patients with overactive bladder.

    Low Frequency /High Frequency ratio : is calculated by dividing the low-frequency power by the high-frequency power.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  4. To assess the impact of transcutaneous electrical stimulation on autonomic nervous system function in patients with overactive bladder.

    Root Mean Square of Successive Difference (RMSSD) : it is calculated as the average of the time intervals between successive heartbeats. It is expressed in milliseconds (ms).

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  5. To assess the clinical effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical stimulation in patients with overactive bladder.

    Change in bladder diary parameters between Week 0 and Week 12. The bladder diary is a detailed record completed by the patient, which serves to assess the patient's bladder function.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  6. To assess the clinical effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical stimulation in patients with overactive bladder.

    Change in the total score and subscale scores of the ICIQ-OAB (International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Overactive Bladder) self-administered questionnaire between Week 0 and Week 12. The overall score ranges from 0 to 16, where higher values indicate increased symptom severity.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  7. To assess the clinical effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical stimulation in patients with overactive bladder.

    Change in the total score and subscale scores of the ICIQ-LUTSqol (International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Quality of Life) self-administered questionnaire between Week 0 and Week 12. The overall score ranges from 19 to 76. A score of 19 indicates the absolute lowest possible impact. A score of 76 indicates the highest possible level of impact.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  8. To assess the clinical effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical stimulation on anal incontinence.

    Change in the total score and subscale scores of the anal incontinence questionnaires (Jorge and Wexner) between Week 0 and Week 12. The overall score ranges from 0 to 20. Score of 0: represents perfect continence Score of 20: represents complete incontinence

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  9. To assess the clinical effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical stimulation on constipation.

    Change in the total score and subscale scores of the ODS (Obstructed Defecation Score) constipation questionnaire between Week 0 and Week 12. The overall score ranges from 0 to 20. Score of 0 : represents normal defecation Score of 20 : represents severe obstructed defecation

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  10. To assess the clinical effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical genitosexual disorders.

    Change in the total score and subscale scores of the FSFI (Female Sexual Function Index) self-administered questionnaire between Week 0 and Week 12. The overall score ranges from 2.0 to 36.0 Score of 2.0 : represents absence of sexual activity or the maximum possible degree of sexual difficulty and pain Score of 36.0 : represents perfect sexual function and total freedom from sexual pain or difficulties

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  11. To assess the tolerability of transcutaneous electrical stimulation in patients with overactive bladder.

    Assessment of treatment tolerability using a Likert scale at Week 0 and Week 12. The total score ranges from 1 to 5. A score of 1 represents the highest level of discomfort experienced by the patient. A score of 5 represents the highest level of comfort experienced by the patient.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  12. To assess the tolerability of transcutaneous electrical stimulation in patients with overactive bladder.

    Pain assessment related to the treatment using a visual analog scale at Week 0 and Week 12. A score of 0 represents no pain experienced by the patient. A score of 10 represents the maximum level of pain experienced by the patient.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 24, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07781033
Lead sponsor
Centre Hospitalier de Roubaix
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 24, 2026
Start date
Oct 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Oct 1, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 1, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 24, 2026

Study contacts

Camille Trouillet, Clinical research associate
Contact
camille.trouillet@ch-roubaix.fr
00320993131
Maxence Mokeddem, Clinical research associate
Contact
maxence.mokeddem@ch-roubaix.fr
00320993131
Guillaume Carnaux, physiotherapist specialized in
principal investigator · Centre Hospitalier Roubaix

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion