ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07777562BELPSUpdated Sep 9, 2026

Retrospective Analysis of Performance and Safety of MED-EL Cochlear Implants.

An observational study in Severe to Profound Hearing Loss, sponsored by MED-EL Elektromedizinische Geräte GesmbH. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Switzerland. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-09.

Sponsored by MED-EL Elektromedizinische Geräte GesmbH · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
700
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is a single center, non-interventional, retrospective, post-market observational study. Data will be extracted retrospectively from the local clinical database of the site and will be fully anonymized. The data extraction is performed as a one-time process. Following the analysis of the extracted dataset, the study is considered complete.

The study does not foresee any active participation of patients or seeking for consent.

This retrospective anonymized database analysis is performed on all MED-EL cochlear implants registered in the local database of the Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Audiology, Inselspital, University of Bern.

The aim of this project is to generate evidence on the clinical effectiveness of cochlear implants based on long term real-world data gathered from clinical routine across a large and diverse population.

Assessed performance outcome measures include word test in quiet results, speech perception in noise results, and patient related outcome measures/questionnaires, as available. Safety assessment is based on data related to revision surgeries, explantations, reimplantations, and any other recorded device related complications. Imaging data (X-ray, CT, MRI) are not used in this study.

Read the detailed description

This study is a single center, non-interventional, retrospective, post-market observational study. Data will be extracted retrospectively from the local clinical database of the site and will be fully anonymized. The data extraction is performed as a one-time process. Following the analysis of the extracted dataset, the study is considered complete.

The study does not foresee any active participation of patients or seeking for consent.

This retrospective anonymized database analysis is performed on all MED-EL cochlear implants registered in the local database of the Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Audiology, Inselspital, University of Bern.

The aim of this project is to generate evidence on the clinical effectiveness of cochlear implants based on long term real-world data gathered from clinical routine across a large and diverse population.

Assessed performance outcome measures include word test in quiet results, speech perception in noise results, and patient related outcome measures/questionnaires, as available. Safety assessment is based on data related to revision surgeries, explantations, reimplantations, and any other recorded device related complications. Imaging data (X-ray, CT, MRI) are not used in this study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Severe to Profound Hearing Loss

Keywords

  • hearing loss
  • deafness
  • cochlear implant
03

In context

Hearing Loss

796 studies on the registry are indexed under Hearing Loss; 193 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 700 is above the median of 100 across 192 observational studies indexed under Hearing Loss.

Browse Hearing Loss studies →

Lead sponsor

MED-EL Elektromedizinische Geräte GesmbH is the lead sponsor of 35 studies on the registry; 10 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The study population includes all patients registered in the sites local database who were implanted with an approved MED-EL cochlear implant at the investigational site since 01st January 1996. To be included for analysis data from the pre-operative assessment and from at least one post-operative assessment must be available.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Implanted with a MED-EL cochlear implant
  • First implantation at Inselspital Bern
  • Implanted later than 31st December 1995

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Lack of compliance with any inclusion criteria
  • Patients implanted with either a custom-made device or with a study device prior CE-marking
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
700 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • MED-EL cochlear implant recipients

    The cohort includes all patients registered in the sites local database who were implanted with an approved MED-EL cochlear implant at the investigational site since 01st January 1996. To be included for analysis data from the pre-operative assessment and from at least one post-operative assessment must be available.

    Device: Cochlear implantation

Interventions

  • DeviceCochlear implantation

    The cochlear implant (CI) is one of the most successful neural prostheses developed to date. It offers artificial hearing to individuals with profound sensorineural hearing loss and with insufficient benefit from conventional hearing aids. The first implants provided a limited sensation of sound. The benefit for users of these early systems was mostly a facilitation of lip-reading based communication rather than an understanding of speech. Considerable progress has been made since then. Today, cochlear implantation is the recommended treatment for subjects presenting with a permanent sensorineural hearing loss. Modern, multichannel implant systems feature complex speech processing strategies, high stimulation rates and multiple sites of stimulation in the cochlea. Equipped with such a state-of-the-art system, the majority of recipients today can communicate orally without visual cues and can even use the telephone.

    Also known as: CI, Hearing implant

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Word Recognition Score in % correct over time

    The primary objective of this retrospective observational study is to evaluate speech performance in quiet over time of MED-EL cochlear implant users, measured as the percentage of words recognized correctly.

    Time frame: Outcome measures will be assessed based on availablity of the respective data from pre-operative assessment through the following post-implantation follow-up periods: 6 weeks, 6 months, 1-, 2-, 5-, 10-, 15-, 20-years and last available follow-up.

Other outcomes

  1. Speech Recognition Threshold in noise (SRT 50) measured in dB SNR over time

    SRT in noise is defined as the level difference in decibels (dB SNR) between speech signal and noise at which 50% (SRT50) of the words presented can be correctly identified. SNR is a measure of the relative levels of a desired signal (such as speech) compared to background noise. It is expressed in decibels (dB SNR) and indicates how much louder the signal is than the noise.

    Time frame: Outcome measures will be assessed based on availablity of the respective data from pre-operative assessment through the following post-implantation follow-up periods: 6 weeks, 6 months, 1-, 2-, 5-, 10-, 15-, 20-years and last available follow-up.

  2. Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) 12

    The Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ12) questionnaire is a 12 item sensitive and specific measure to assess the impact of hearing loss on speech perception, sound localization, and QoL. The SSQ12 minimum score is 0, the maximum score is 120. The higher the score obtained, the lower the difficulty experienced by the patient.

    Time frame: Outcome measures will be assessed based on availablity of the respective data from pre-operative assessment through the following post-implantation follow-up periods: 6 weeks, 6 months, 1-, 2-, 5-, 10-, 15-, 20-years and last available follow-up.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Inselspital, Universitätsspital Bern, Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Audiology
    Bern, 3010, Switzerland
    • Martin Kompis, Prof. Dr. med. Dr. sc. techn. · Contactmartin.kompis@insel.ch · +41316323300
    • Christoph Schmid · Contactchristoph.schmid@insel.ch · +41316323383
    • Martin Kompis, Prof. Dr. med. Dr. sc. techn. · Principal investigator
    • Christoph Schmid · Sub investigator
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 9, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07777562
Collaborators
Inselspital, Universitätsspital Bern, Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Audiology
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 20, 2026
Start date
Oct 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Nov 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 9, 2026

Study contacts

Martin Eisendle
Contact
martin.eisendle@medel.com
+43577881694
Jasmine Rinnofner
Contact
jasmine.rinnofner@medel.com
+43577881694

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion