ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07776561PuSHUpdated Aug 20, 2026

Short-Stay Aggressive Hydration to Prevent Post-ERCP Pancreatitis

An interventional study of Short-Stay Aggressive Hydration and Standard Peri-procedural Hydration in Post-ERCP Pancreatitis and Pancreatitis, sponsored by Westmead Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in Australia. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-20.

Sponsored by Westmead Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jun 2026; still recruiting 5 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,300
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) is the most common serious adverse event after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), occurring in roughly 7-15% of patients. Rectal non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and peri-procedural aggressive intravenous hydration each reduce PEP, but published hydration regimens are delivered over 8-24 hours and require an overnight hospital stay, which is impractical where ERCP is increasingly performed as a same-day procedure.

This multicentre, prospective, randomised controlled trial tests whether a short (under 4 hours) aggressive hydration regimen with Lactated Ringer's solution, combined with rectal indomethacin, is superior to standard care (rectal indomethacin plus low-volume hydration) for preventing PEP, while supporting same-day discharge. Adults undergoing ERCP are randomised 1:1. The primary outcome is the incidence of PEP defined by consensus (Cotton) criteria. A total of 1300 participants (650 per arm) will be enrolled.

Read the detailed description

Design: multicentre, parallel-group, superiority RCT with 1:1 allocation, conducted in high-volume tertiary academic endoscopy units.

Interventions: All participants receive 100 mg indomethacin per rectum within 30 minutes before or after ERCP. Participants randomised to aggressive hydration receive a peri-procedural bolus of Lactated Ringer's 20 mL/kg over \~1 hour, then 3 mL/kg/hour for 3 hours (post-procedure infusion capped at 1000 mL). Participants randomised to standard care receive low-volume Lactated Ringer's at the discretion of the endoscopist/anaesthetist (up to 1.5 mL/kg/hour, max 500 mL over 3 hours). For BMI > 40 kg/m2, infusion rates are capped assuming a BMI of 40. Pancreatic duct stenting is permitted in both arms at the proceduralist's discretion per guidelines. Aggressive hydration is discontinued if signs of fluid overload develop.

Follow-up: pre-discharge assessment (fluid-overload exam, pain), a 24-hour telephone follow-up (bloods if symptomatic), and a 30-day telephone follow-up for delayed events and hospitalisation.

Analysis: primary analysis by intention-to-treat; per-protocol analysis also performed. Statistical analysis is conducted blinded to allocation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Post-ERCP Pancreatitis
  • Pancreatitis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • ERCP
  • Post-ERCP pancreatitis
  • Aggressive hydration
  • Lactated Ringer's solution
  • Rectal indomethacin
  • Fluid resuscitation
  • Same-day discharge
03

In context

Pancreatitis

557 studies on the registry are indexed under Pancreatitis; 164 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 1,300 is above the median of 100 across 349 interventional studies indexed under Pancreatitis.

Browse Pancreatitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Westmead Hospital is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age over 18 years
  • Undergoing ERCP
  • Able to provide

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to give consent
  • Clinical signs/symptoms of congestive cardiac failure (pitting oedema, class ≥ 2, or oxygen saturation ≤ 90%)
  • Respiratory failure (pre-procedure SpO2 \< 90% on room air, or requirement for non-invasive/mechanical ventilation)
  • to rectal NSAIDs (allergy; active gastrointestinal bleeding)
  • Estimated (MDRD) ≤ 30 mL/min
  • Altered biliary or duodenal anatomy (e.g. prior biliary/pancreatic surgery, Roux-en-Y reconstruction)
  • Known hypo- or hypernatraemia (serum sodium \< 130 or > 150 mmol/L)
  • Pregnancy
  • Severe liver disease (cirrhosis with ascites)
  • Previous sphincterotomy (unless undergoing pancreatic duct intervention)
  • Acute pancreatitis
  • Chronic pancreatitis (unless undergoing a pancreatic duct intervention)
  • Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction
  • Pancreatic mass causing biliary obstruction
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
1,300 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Aggressive Hydration

    Rectal indomethacin 100 mg plus short-stay aggressive hydration: Lactated Ringer's bolus 20 mL/kg over \~1 hour, then 3 mL/kg/hour for 3 hours (post-procedure infusion capped at 1000 mL).

    Other: Short-Stay Aggressive Hydration · Drug: Rectal Indomethacin

  • Active comparator
    Standard Care

    Rectal indomethacin 100 mg plus standard low-volume hydration at proceduralist/anaesthetist discretion (Lactated Ringer's up to 1.5 mL/kg/hour, max 500 mL over 3 hours).

    Other: Standard Peri-procedural Hydration · Drug: Rectal Indomethacin

Interventions

  • OtherShort-Stay Aggressive Hydration

    Lactated Ringer's bolus 20 mL/kg over \~1 hour then 3 mL/kg/hour x 3 hours (cap 1000 mL post-procedure); rate capped at BMI 40 if BMI \> 40.

  • OtherStandard Peri-procedural Hydration

    Low-volume Lactated Ringer's at operator discretion, up to 1.5 mL/kg/hour, max 500 mL over 3 hours.

  • Indomethacin 100 mg per rectum within 30 minutes before, during or after ERCP.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP)

    PEP defined by consensus (Cotton) criteria, requiring ALL of: new or worsened upper abdominal pain; serum amylase or lipase at least 3x the upper limit of normal; pain and enzyme elevation persisting for at least 24 hours; and hospitalisation (or prolongation) of at least 2 days attributable to pancreatitis.

    Time frame: Within 72 hours after ERCP (onset within 24 hours)

Secondary outcomes

  1. PEP not fulfilling full Cotton criteria

    Post-ERCP pancreatitis not meeting full Cotton criteria.

    Time frame: Within 72 hours after ERCP (onset within 24 hours)

  2. Delayed PEP

    Post-ERCP pancreatitis (by Cotton criteria) with onset more than 24 hours after ERCP, identified after initial discharge.

    Time frame: 24 hours to 30 days after ERCP

  3. Severity of PEP

    Severity graded by Cotton criteria and the Revised Atlanta Classification

    Time frame: Within 30 days after ERCP

  4. ERCP associated adverse events

    ERCP-associated adverse events graded by consensus (Cotton) criteria as mild, moderate, or severe: bleeding, perforation, and infection (cholangitis).

    Time frame: Within 30 days after ERCP

  5. Signs of fluid overload

    Pulmonary oedema, peripheral (pitting) oedema, or exacerbation of congestive cardiac failure.

    Time frame: Peri-procedural to 24 hours after ERCP

  6. Hospitalization for any reason within 30 days

    Proportion of participants hospitalised (including unplanned admission or readmission) for any reason within 30 days of ERCP. Ascertained from medical records and the 30-day follow-up call.

    Time frame: Within 30 days after ERCP

  7. Cost effectiveness

    Cost-effectiveness of short-stay aggressive hydration versus standard care, comparing total cost of healthcare resource use (intravenous fluids and consumables, procedure/recovery time, length of stay, and PEP-related admissions or readmissions) in relation to PEP cases avoided. Reported as incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) for post-ERCP pancreatitis cases avoided.

    Time frame: Within 30 days after ERCP

  8. Hospitalization Length of Stay

    In participants hospitalised (including unplanned admission or readmission) for any reason within 30 days of ERCP, the length of hospital stay measured in days. Ascertained from medical records and the 30-day follow-up call.

    Time frame: Within 30 days of ERCP

  9. Hospitalization for PEP Length of Stay

    In participants hospitalised (including unplanned admission or readmission) for PEP within 30 days of ERCP, the length of hospital stay measured in days. Ascertained from medical records and the 30-day follow-up call.

    Time frame: Within 30 days of ERCP

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C, Gooszen HG, Johnson CD, Sarr MG, Tsiotos GG, Vege SS; Acute Pancreatitis Classification Working Group. Classification of acute pancreatitis--2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut. 2013 Jan;62(1):102-11. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302779. Epub 2012 Oct 25. PubMed 23100216 ↗
  • Cotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes J, Geenen JE, Russell RC, Meyers WC, Liguory C, Nickl N. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc. 1991 May-Jun;37(3):383-93. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(91)70740-2. PubMed 2070995 ↗
  • Tenner S, Vege SS, Sheth SG, Sauer B, Yang A, Conwell DL, Yadlapati RH, Gardner TB. American College of Gastroenterology Guidelines: Management of Acute Pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2024 Mar 1;119(3):419-437. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002645. Epub 2023 Nov 7. PubMed 38857482 ↗
  • Kochar B, Akshintala VS, Afghani E, Elmunzer BJ, Kim KJ, Lennon AM, Khashab MA, Kalloo AN, Singh VK. Incidence, severity, and mortality of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a systematic review by using randomized, controlled trials. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Jan;81(1):143-149.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.06.045. Epub 2014 Aug 1. PubMed 25088919 ↗
  • Dumonceau JM, Kapral C, Aabakken L, Papanikolaou IS, Tringali A, Vanbiervliet G, Beyna T, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Hritz I, Mariani A, Paspatis G, Radaelli F, Lakhtakia S, Veitch AM, van Hooft JE. ERCP-related adverse events: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy. 2020 Feb;52(2):127-149. doi: 10.1055/a-1075-4080. Epub 2019 Dec 20. PubMed 31863440 ↗
  • Hattori A, Yamada R, Murabayashi T, Sugimoto S, Imai H, Nojiri K, Kuroda N, Tano S, Tanaka H, Matsusaki S, Nishikawa K, Naota H, Moritani I, Kurata K, Fukui T, Tanaka K, Nakagawa H. The safety and efficacy of Ringer's solution loading with rectal diclofenac for prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: The RESOLUTION-PEP study. DEN Open. 2023 Apr 26;3(1):e236. doi: 10.1002/deo2.236. eCollection 2023 Apr. PubMed 37125072 ↗
  • Wang RC, Jiang ZK, Xie YK, Chen JS. Aggressive hydration compared to standard hydration with lactated ringer's solution for prevention of post endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis. Surg Endosc. 2021 Mar;35(3):1126-1137. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07477-9. Epub 2020 Mar 5. PubMed 32140860 ↗
  • Wu M, Jiang S, Lu X, Zhong Y, Song Y, Fan Z, Kang X. Aggressive hydration with lactated ringer solution in prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Apr 23;100(16):e25598. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000025598. PubMed 33879722 ↗
  • Patel R, Bertran-Rodriguez C, Kumar A, Brady P, Gomez-Esquivel R, Changela K, Niknam N, Taunk P. Efficacy of aggressive hydration with normal saline versus lactated Ringer's solution for the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis in high-risk patients: a randomized controlled trial. Endosc Int Open. 2022 Jul 15;10(7):E933-E939. doi: 10.1055/a-1834-6568. eCollection 2022 Jul. PubMed 35845031 ↗
  • Buxbaum J, Yan A, Yeh K, Lane C, Nguyen N, Laine L. Aggressive hydration with lactated Ringer's solution reduces pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Feb;12(2):303-7.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.07.026. Epub 2013 Aug 3. PubMed 23920031 ↗
  • Cho E, Kim SH, Park CH, Yoon JH, Lee SO, Kim TH, Chon HK. Tailored Hydration With Lactated Ringer's Solution for Postendoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis Prevention: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2024 Dec 1;119(12):2426-2435. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002903. Epub 2024 Jun 24. PubMed 38912692 ↗
  • Sperna Weiland CJ, Smeets XJNM, Kievit W, Verdonk RC, Poen AC, Bhalla A, Venneman NG, Witteman BJM, da Costa DW, van Eijck BC, Schwartz MP, Romkens TEH, Vrolijk JM, Hadithi M, Voorburg AMCJ, Baak LC, Thijs WJ, van Wanrooij RL, Tan ACITL, Seerden TCJ, Keulemans YCA, de Wijkerslooth TR, van de Vrie W, van der Schaar P, van Dijk SM, Hallensleben NDL, Sperna Weiland RL, Timmerhuis HC, Umans DS, van Hooft JE, van Goor H, van Santvoort HC, Besselink MG, Bruno MJ, Fockens P, Drenth JPH, van Geenen EJM; Dutch Pancreatitis Study Group. Aggressive fluid hydration plus non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs versus non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs alone for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis (FLUYT): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 May;6(5):350-358. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(21)00057-1. Epub 2021 Mar 19. PubMed 33740415 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 20, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07776561
Lead sponsor
Westmead Hospital
Responsible party
Nicholas Burgess (Coordinating Principal Investigator, Westmead Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 20, 2026
Start date
Jun 1, 2026
Primary completion
Dec 1, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 1, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 20, 2026

Study contacts

Nicholas Burgess
Contact
nicholas.burgess@health.nsw.gov.au
+61288905555
Nicholas Burgess
principal investigator · Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion