ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07773740PRGFUpdated Aug 25, 2026

Autologous Plasma Rich in Growth Factors for Severe Dry Eye Disease

An interventional study of PRGF and Balanced Salt Solution (BSS®) in Dry Eye Disease With Severe Keratitis, sponsored by Gladys Lucia Silva Linares. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-25.

Sponsored by Gladys Lucia Silva Linares · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the change in dry eye symptoms after the treatment with Plasma Rich in Growth Factors (PRGF) in patients with severe dry eye. The main question it aims to answer is:

Are dry eye simptoms less after the treatment with PRGF?

Researchers will compare standard topical treatment and PRGF with standard topical treatment and placebo to see if there is a difference in dry eye symptoms between arms. Secondary outcomes include changes in tear meniscus height, non invasive tear break-up time, conjunctival hyperemia, meibomian gland dropout and Ocular Staining Score (OSS) scale for corneal and conjunctival damage.

Participants will be asked to use standard treatment and PRGF or placebo for 1 month.

Read the detailed description

Dry eye disease is a multifactorial condition that significantly affects patients' quality of life and, in many cases, shows a limited response to conventional topical treatment. PRGF has demonstrated anti-inflammatory and regenerative properties on the ocular surface, with favorable clinical outcomes in previous studies conducted primarily in foreign populations. However, there is limited evidence in Latin American populations, which justifies conducting this study.

A prospective, randomized, masked study will be conducted, including 100 patients over 18 years of age with a diagnosis of severe dry eye disease. Participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to one of two treatment groups. The control group will receive standard topical treatment, including eyelid hygiene, artificial tears, cyclosporine, topical corticosteroids with a tapering regimen, and balanced saline solution as a placebo. The intervention group will receive the same standard treatment, with topical PRGF replacing the placebo, administered four times daily for a period of one month.

All patients will be evaluated at a baseline visit and at a follow-up visit four weeks after treatment initiation. All patients will receive a follow-up telephone call two weeks after treatment initiation, and follow-up of each patient after completion of the study will be conducted according to the treating physician's judgment. The primary objective of the study is to determine the change in dry eye symptoms using the Ocular Surface Disease Index 6 (OSDI-6) questionnaire. Secondary objectives will include evaluation of changes in clinical signs of the ocular surface, including tear quantity and stability, conjunctival hyperemia, Meibomian gland dysfunction, corneal and conjunctival staining, as well as the occurrence of treatment-related adverse events.

In both groups, the treating physician may add medications to the standard treatment at their discretion, as well as other therapies such as punctal plugs. Other non-invasive therapies, such as intense pulsed light, low-level light therapy, quantum molecular resonance, thermal pulsation therapy, or laser/plasma technology, may not be performed while the patient is participating in the study.

The risks associated with the study are considered minimal and are primarily related to the blood draw required for PRGF preparation and the topical use of the product, which may result in mild and transient local adverse events.

The study will be conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki, the Good Clinical Practice Guidelines, and Ministerial Agreement 206-2021 of the Ministry of Public Health and Social Assistance of Guatemala. All participants will provide written informed consent prior to enrollment in the study. The confidentiality of personal data will be ensured through the coding of information, and the study will have civil liability insurance covering any harm directly resulting from participation in the research.

02

Conditions studied

  • Dry Eye Disease With Severe Keratitis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • PRGF, Dry Eye Disease
03

In context

Dry Eye Syndromes

1,367 studies on the registry are indexed under Dry Eye Syndromes; 208 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is above the median of 60 across 1,129 interventional studies indexed under Dry Eye Syndromes.

Browse Dry Eye Syndromes studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Gladys Lucia Silva Linares as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Any male or female patient over 18 years of age with severe dry eye disease who is prescribed PRGF treatment and presents for consultation between august 2026 and august 2027.
  • Acceptance to participate in the study and signing of the form

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • disorders or coagulation abnormalities.
  • Active systemic infection.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Placebo comparator
    control group

    Standard topical treatment will include: eyelid hygiene once daily with a preservative-free foaming solution; preservative-free 3% sodium hyaluronate eye drops as needed; preservative-free 0.05% cyclosporine twice daily; loteprednol 0.2% twice daily for 15 days, followed by once daily for 7 days; polyacrylic acid 0.2% as needed.

    Other: PRGF

  • Experimental
    PRGF group

    Standard topical treatment will include: eyelid hygiene once daily with a preservative-free foaming solution; preservative-free 3% sodium hyaluronate eye drops as needed; preservative-free 0.05% cyclosporine twice daily; loteprednol 0.2% twice daily for 15 days, followed by once daily for 7 days; polyacrylic acid 0.2% as needed.

    Other: Balanced Salt Solution (BSS®)

Interventions

  • OtherPRGF

    PRGF eyedrops four times a day for 1 month

  • OtherBalanced Salt Solution (BSS®)

    Balanced salt solution 0.09% eyedrops four times a day for 1 month

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Dry eye symptoms

    Difference in Ocular Surface Disease Index - 6 (OSDI-6) questionnaire, scale is from 0 to 24. Higher scores mean worst symptoms

    Time frame: 4 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Tear meniscus height

    Difference in tear film quantity measured in milimiters

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  2. Non invasive tear break-up time (NiBUT)

    Difference in tear break-up meassured in seconds

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  3. Conjunctival hyperemia score (ocular redness)

    Difference in conjunctival hyperemia score. Scale is 0-4. Lower scores mean less inflammation

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  4. Meibomian gland drop-out (meibography)

    Difference in meibomian gland drop-out. Scale is 0-3. Higher score indicate more severe structural loss of the meibomian glands

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  5. Ocular Straining Score (OSS) scale

    Difference in corneal and conjunctival damage. Scale is 0-12. Higher value correlates with grater severity of the disease

    Time frame: 4 weeks

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — According to local law we are unable to share individual participant data

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Aug 2026; primary completion for Aug 2027, 12 months later.

Of 199 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Dry Eye Syndromes, half reached primary completion within 12 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 25. This study's planned 12 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 312 studies reached it within 10 months; a quarter within 4 and three quarters within 18.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 14, 2026
First posted
Aug 19, 2026
StartEst.
Aug 25, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Aug 2027
CompletionEst.
Aug 2027
Last update
Aug 25, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 25, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07773740
Lead sponsor
Gladys Lucia Silva Linares
Collaborators
Lansier
Responsible party
Gladys Lucia Silva Linares (Medical Director, Visualiza) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Aug 19, 2026
Start date
Aug 25, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Aug 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 25, 2026

Study contacts

Mario R. Papa, MD
Contact
mario.papa@visualiza.org.gt
502 24140800
Daniela Chavarria, MD
Contact
daniela.chavarria@visualiza.org.gt
502 49419108
Kieran S. O´brien, MD
study chair · Seva Foundation

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion