An interventional study of Music Listening with Attentional prompts and Music Listening in Music Listening, Auditory Processing and Attention, sponsored by Northeastern University. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 60 Years to 101 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-07.
Sponsored by Northeastern University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science
The proposed study will enroll healthy older adult participants to examine the effectiveness of music listening activities to promote hearing and cognition. Participants will be randomized into one of four experimental groups and can expect to participate for up to 21 hours of research distributed over 20 weeks.
Northeastern University is the lead sponsor of 55 studies on the registry; 19 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.
Short tests of memory and thinking, each scored out of 30. Lower scores suggest more difficulty; criteria give a range, either to include people with memory problems or to leave them out.
Clinically significant
Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
MMSE and MoCA
Short tests of memory and thinking, each scored out of 30. Lower scores suggest more difficulty; criteria give a range, either to include people with memory problems or to leave them out.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Behavioral: Music Listening with Attentional prompts
Behavioral: Music Listening
Behavioral: Tone listening with Attentional prompts
Participants will listen to musical excerpts, and guided instructions will be provided to tell the participants what aspect of the music to pay attention to and how to respond. Participants will log responses on an interactive tablet-based interface.
Participants will listen to musical excerpts and will be provided with guided instructions directing their attention to specific aspects of the music. Participants will report when they perceive a noticeable change in the music (e.g., changes in instrumentation, rhythm, texture, or intensity). Participants will log responses on an interactive tablet-based interface.
Participants will be asked to attend to auditory stimuli and respond to them according to guided instructions. Participants will log responses on an interactive tablet-based interface.
Digits-in-Noise Task
The Digits-in-Noise (DIN) test presents trials of three sequential spoken digits against a broad-band, speech-shaped masker. Signal/noise ratio is varied adaptively to track 50% correct. The dependent variable is the threshold noise tolerance in dB. Lower scores indicate better performance.
Time frame: Pre-test (week 1), Mid-test (week 5), Post-test (week 10), Follow-up (week 18)
Spatial Release From Masking Task
Tests the ability to distinguish speech from competing speech. Collocated condition uses target and two competing maskers all located directly in front of the listener, and spatially separated condition uses two masking sentences sent from 45 degrees to the left and right of center. Sentences are correctly identified as part of a series of test trials in which TMR progressively reduced every two trials. The dependent variable is the threshold target-to-masker ratio (TMR) as estimated based on the number of sentences correctly identified. Lower scores indicate better performance.
Time frame: Pre-test (week 1), Mid-test (week 5), Post-test (week 10), Follow-up (week 18)
Dichotic Sentence Identification Task
The DSI test simultaneously presents two nonsense sentences, one to each ear. Participants indicate two sentences heard from a list of alternatives. DSI sentences are presented at a comfortable listening level, usually 50 dB above pure-tone average of each ear. The dependent variable is the percentage of sentences correctly identified. Higher scores indicate better performance.
Time frame: Pre-test (week 1), Mid-test (week 5), Post-test (week 10), Follow-up (week 18)
Revised Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly (RHHI)
Survey that assesses the perceived level of hearing ability under different environmental or social situations, and participants also self-report ear surgeries or known ear pathologies. The dependent variable is total score (summed). Higher scores indicate greater perceived handicap.
Time frame: Pre-test (week 1), Post-test (week 10), Follow-up (week 18)
Speech Recognition Threshold using Coordinate Response Measure
SRT stimuli from the Coordinate Response Measure are sentences that participants hear that contain a color and number (e.g., "Ready Charlie, go to blue three now"). Participants select one of 36 colored/numbered squares that matches the color-number combination of the sentence. The dependent variable is the threshold target-to-masker ratio (TMR) as estimated based on the number of sentences correctly identified as part of a series of 20 test trials in which TMR progressively reduced every two trials. Lower scores indicate better performance.
Time frame: Pre-test (week 1), Mid-test (week 5), Post-test (week 10), Follow-up (week 18)
Gap Detection Task
Temporal sensitivity to silent gaps between pairs of brief (4 ms) bandlimited stimuli. The gap duration will start at 6 ms, and be reduced from there using a staircase procedure. The dependent variable is the threshold (in ms) at which participants stop responding accurately. Lower scores indicate better performance.
Time frame: Pre-test (week 1), Post-test (week 10)
Spectrotemporal Sensitivity Task
Stimuli are either unmodulated or are spectrotemporally modulated in amplitude using two cycles/octave for the spectral modulation and 4 Hz for the temporal modulation. Modulation depth in decibels (dB) will be adaptively varied to estimate threshold. The dependent variable is the threshold (in dB) at which participants stop responding accurately. Lower scores indicate better performance.
Time frame: Pre-test (week 1), Post-test (week 10)
Monaural and Binaural Sensitivity to Frequency Modulation Task
The stimulus is a pure tone that is modulated sinusoidally and varies at a rate of 2 Hz. The task is to detect differences between modulated and unmodulated tones, and the modulated "depth" in Hz is tracked adaptively. The BFM stimuli are identical to MFM except for presentation to both ears with increasing frequency in one ear and decreasing in the other. The dependent variable is the threshold (in Hz) at which participants stop responding accurately. Lower scores indicate better performance.
Time frame: Pre-test (week 1), Post-test (week 10)
Audio Visual Divided Attention Task
Participants are presented with auditory sequences of spoken digits and visual sequences of written letters. Participants will be instructed to recall a particular sequence either in advance (assesses selective attention) or only afterwards (assesses divided attention). The dependent variable is the fall-off of reaction time and accuracy across a the single-stream task. Higher scores indicate better performance.
Time frame: Pre-test (week 1), Mid-test (week 5), Post-test (week 10), Follow-up (week 18)
Paced Serial Addition Task
Participants are shown a series of numbers one at a time. Their goal is to add the last two numbers presented and select the answer that correctly adds the two numbers. Participants are shown single digit numbers and are required to answer on a number pad . The dependent variable is the total number of correct responses. Higher scores indicate better performance.
Time frame: Pre-test (week 1), Post-test (week 10), Follow-up (week 18)
Letter-Number Sequencing Task
The participant is presented with a mixed order of letters and numbers and must remember and sort them numerically and alphabetically. Set size starts at 2 and increases until the participants fail to recall both trials at a given set size. The dependent variable is Score (total number of correct trials). Higher scores indicate better performance.
Time frame: Pre-test (week 1), Post-test (week 10), Follow-up (week 18)
Auditory N-back Task
Participants are presented with a consecutive stream of tones through headphones, and are asked to tap on the screen every time the currently presented item matches the one presented N items earlier. The dependent variable consists of accuracy on each of the levels calculated as hits/(hits+misses+false alarms). Higher scores indicate better performance.
Time frame: Pre-test (week 1), Post-test (week 10), Follow-up (week 18)
POMS 2-A
Self report measure assessing current mood states in adults. Participants rate descriptive mood words according to how they feel during the specified assessment timeframe using a 5-point response scale. The dependent variable is Total Mood Disturbance (TMD) score, with higher values indicating greater overall mood disturbance.
Time frame: Pre-test (week 1), Post-test (week 10), Follow-up (week 18)
Ryff's Scale of Psychological Well-being Score
Self-report questionnaire that assesses six domains of well-being (self-acceptance, environmental mastery, positive relations, purpose in life, personal growth, and autonomy). Higher scores indicate greater perceived well-being.
Time frame: Pre-test (week 1), Follow-up (week 18), Follow-up (week 18)
Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (SWEMWBS)
A 7-item self-report measure assessing positive mental well-being. Participants rate statements about their thoughts and feelings over the specified assessment period using a 5-point response scale. The dependent variable is the total well-being score, with higher values indicating greater mental well-being.
Time frame: Pre-test (week 1), Follow-up (week 18), Follow-up (week 18)
Musicality Survey
Self-report survey of participants' past musical experiences, with items including the Active Engagement, Perceptual Abilities, and Emotions factors from the Goldsmith's Music Sophistication Index, the Absorption factor from the Extended Barcelona Music Reward Questionnaire, and selected items from the Ollen Music Sophistication Index. Higher scores indicate greater self-reported musical involvement and ability.
Time frame: Pre-test (week 1), Follow-up (week 18)
Short-Musical Ear Test
Participants will listen to a series of short rhythmic and melodic sequences and determine whether each pair is identical or different from one another. The dependent variable is percentage correct. Higher scores indicate better performance.
Time frame: Pre-test (week 1), Post-test (week 10), Follow-up (week 18)
Older Adult Cognitive Battery
This digitally administered battery includes a word list learning and complex figure drawing task, a revised version of the Boston Naming Task, a vocabulary task (Shipley), the Trail Making Task (parts A and B), and an older-adult version of the University of California Matrix Reasoning Task. The dependent variables are percentage correct for Boston Naming Shipley, and Matrix Reasoning where, higher scores indicate better performance. For the Trail Making Task, the dependent variable is the time difference between parts A and B, and lower scores indicate better performance. For the word-list learning task, the dependent variable is the total number of words correctly recalled across the learning trials, with higher values indicating better performance. For the complex figure task, the dependent variable is the total accuracy score based on correctly reproduced figure elements, with higher values indicating better performance.
Time frame: Pre-test (week 1), Post-test (week 10), Follow-up (week 18)
Plan to share: Yes — All individual participant data (anonymized)
Supporting information: Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form
Time frame: Data will be available persistently at the conclusion of the study.
Access criteria: There are no access criteria.
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Northeastern University