ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07772284Updated Aug 19, 2026

Repetitive Action Simulation Circuit Training to Reduce Arm Weakness After a Stroke

An interventional study of Upper Extremity Action Simulation Circuit Training in Stroke and Hemiparesis of the Upper Limb Following Stroke, sponsored by Towson University. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-19.

Sponsored by Towson University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 10 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Sep 2024, registered Aug 2026).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
5
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aims to examine the effect of an action simulation circuit training for individuals who have experienced upper extremity weakness following a stroke. The study will also examine the feasibility of the intervention as an occupational therapy rehabilitation approach.

Participants will:

  • Engage in four workstations within the circuit training format: mental practice, action observation, virtual reality, and repetitive task-specific practice.
  • Participate in training 2x/week for 6 weeks (12 sessions).
Read the detailed description

Action simulation therapies are particularly advantageous for individuals with upper extremity hemiparesis, by providing opportunities for repetitive practice of functional tasks, that might otherwise be impossible to perform. This research will examine the use of upper extremity action simulation in a circuit training group, to address the unique therapeutic needs and therapy structure deficiencies for upper extremity hemiparesis following a stroke.

Project Objectives:

- Explore the effect of a six-week action simulation upper extremity circuit training group on upper extremity impairments and quality of life for individuals with upper extremity hemiparesis after a stroke.

Upper extremity impairments and quality of life will be assessed before the circuit training and after completion. Additionally, participants will provide information about their overall perceptions of each the intervention through a survey.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stroke
  • Hemiparesis of the Upper Limb Following Stroke

Keywords

  • Stroke
  • Hemiparesis
  • Weakness
  • Upper Extremity
  • Occupational Therapy
  • Arm
03

In context

Stroke

8,255 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,056 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 5 is below the median of 49 across 6,024 interventional studies indexed under Stroke.

Browse Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

Towson University is the lead sponsor of 11 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of stroke
  • Hemiparesis of one upper extremity

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe spasticity
  • Severe aphasia
  • Low English proficiency
  • Severe hearing impairment
  • History of severe upper extremity comorbidities (neurological and/or orthopedic)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
5 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    RASP Group

    Other: Upper Extremity Action Simulation Circuit Training

Interventions

  • OtherUpper Extremity Action Simulation Circuit Training

    Participants rotate between four workstations: 1. Mental Practice: participants listen to an audio-guided recording that promotes the cognitive rehearsal of performing a task with their affected upper extremity. 2. Virtual Reality: participants perform virtual reality activities or games involving the use of their upper extremities. 3. Action Observation: participants watch video clips of individuals performing upper extremity tasks. 4. Repetitive-Task Specific Practice: participants physically rehearse various upper extremity tasks with the assistance of an occupational therapist.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The Acceptability of Intervention Measure

    The Acceptability of Intervention Measure is a survey that measures the participants' perceived acceptability of the intervention. Participants rate their perceptions on a 5-point Likert scale, from completely disagree to completely agree.

    Time frame: Following the 6-week circuit training group.

  2. Feasibility of Intervention Measure

    The Feasibility of Intervention Measure assesses the participants' perceptions of how feasible the intervention is for stroke rehabilitation. Participants rate their perceptions on a 5-point Likert scale, from completely disagree to completely agree.

    Time frame: Following the 6-week circuit training group.

  3. Intervention Appropriateness Measure

    The Intervention Appropriateness Measure assesses the participants' perception of how appropriate the intervention is to address upper extremity hemiparesis after a stroke. Participants rate their perceptions on a 5-point Likert scale, from completely disagree to completely agree.

    Time frame: Following the 6-week circuit training group.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Fugl-Meyer Assessment

    The Fugl-Meyer Assessment is a standardized quantitative measure of upper extremity impairment that includes 33 items. Upper extremity movements are rated on a three-point ordinal scale. Cumulative scores range from 0-66 where a higher score indicates lower impairment.

    Time frame: Before the circuit training group and following the circuit training group.

  2. Stroke Impact Scale

    The Stroke Impact Scale is a self-report questionnaire of health-related quality of life following a stroke. It includes 59 items assessing strength, hand function, activities of daily living, mobility, communication, emotion, memory, and participation.

    Time frame: Before the circuit training group and following the circuit training group.

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Institute for Well-Being
    Towson, Maryland 21252, United States
  • The Institute for Well-Being (IWB)
    Towson, Maryland 21252, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 19, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07772284
Lead sponsor
Towson University
Responsible party
Teresa M. Green (Assistant Professor, Towson University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 19, 2026
Start date
Sep 17, 2024
Primary completion
Dec 20, 2024
Completion
Dec 20, 2024
Last update
Aug 19, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion