CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07770308Updated Aug 18, 2026

Comparison of the Efficacy of Kinesio Taping and TENS Therapy in Patients With Cervical Myofascial Pain Syndrome

An interventional study of home-based exercises and TENS in Myofascial Pain Syndrome, sponsored by Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Research and Training Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-18.

Sponsored by Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Research and Training Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
45
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Cervical MPS is a condition of pain, weakness and loss of function caused by trigger points located in the tense bands in the muscles in the neck and upper back. Pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments are used in the treatment of MPS. Although different treatment methods are used for MPS today, there is no proven treatment method to be superior to others. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of exercise therapy, kinesiology taping and TENS therapy on pain, muscle strength and functional status in patients with cervical myofascial pain syndrome.

Read the detailed description

Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is a non-inflammatory musculoskeletal disease characterized by the presence of hyperirritable palpable trigger points accompanied by pain and muscle stiffness. Main signs and symptoms of MPS; pain, spasm, decrease in joint range of motion, difficulty in daily living activities and deterioration in quality of life. Pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments are used in the treatment of MPS. Among non-pharmacological treatments, postural and mechanical modifications, exercises, stress reduction, electrotherapy methods, regional cold and hot application, local anesthetic injections, kinesiological taping, acupuncture and dry needling can be preferred. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of exercise therapy, kinesiology taping and TENS therapy on pain, muscle strength and functional status in patients with cervical myofascial pain syndrome.

02

Conditions studied

  • Myofascial Pain Syndrome

Keywords

  • myofascial pain syndrome
  • TENS therapy
  • kinesiology taping
  • exercise
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Being between the ages of 18-65 and diagnosed with cervical MAS according to the major and minor diagnostic criteria defined by Travel and Simons.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Those diagnosed with myofascial syndrome and receiving medical treatment and physical therapy
  • Those diagnosed with myofascial syndrome and taking an exercise program
  • Those diagnosed with fibromyalgia syndrome
  • Skin disease and edema in the area to be applied
  • Kinesiology tape allergy
  • Neurological diseases (Epilepsy, stroke, upper motor neuron lesions)
  • People using pacemakers
  • Hypertension and diabetes that cannot be controlled with medication
  • Any fracture pathology involving the upper extremity and cervical region,
  • Other cervical pathologies that may cause neck pain other than MAS
  • Pregnancy
  • Cognitive dysfunction and poor cooperation
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Investigator)
Enrollment
45 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Group One (Group of Exercise)

    Patients in the first group will be given trunk stabilization training, scapular adductor muscle strengthening, cervical posterior tilt, and stretching exercises for neck rotators, scalene muscles, levator scapula muscle, upper trapezius muscle, posterior cervical and suboccipital muscles. Among these exercises, it will be said that the strengthening exercises should be done in 2 sets of 30 repetitions a day, and the stretching exercises should be done in 2 sets of 10 repetitions. These exercises will be given as a home program and you will be asked to practice them every day for 4 weeks.

    Other: home-based exercises

  • Active comparator
    Group Two ( Group of TENS Therapy and Exercise)

    TENS is an electric current applied with superficial electrodes placed on the skin and used to relieve pain. It is also used in the treatment of cervical MAS. It can be applied together with other treatment methods. It has a pain relieving effect. The total duration of the application will be 20 minutes and 1 session will be applied every day for two weeks, a total of 10 sessions. In addition to this treatment, patients will also be given exercise therapy.

    Other: home-based exercises · Device: TENS

  • Active comparator
    Group Three (Group of Kinesiology Taping and Exercise)

    Kinesiology taping is one of the treatment methods used in various musculoskeletal system diseases. It does not restrict daily activities. It supports the person's movement and ensures that muscle functions return to normal. Kinesiology tape is made of 100% cotton and has an elastic structure that can extend up to 30-40% of its length. The tape is water resistant and can stay on the skin for about 1 week. In this study, kinesiology taping will be applied twice a week for three weeks. In addition to this treatment, patients will also be given exercise therapy.

    Other: home-based exercises · Device: kinesiology taping

Interventions

  • Otherhome-based exercises

    Exercise therapy is one of the most commonly used conservative treatment methods in the cervical MAS treatment protocol. Patients in the first group will be given trunk stabilization training, scapular adductor muscle strengthening, cervical posterior tilt, and stretching exercises for neck rotators, scalene muscles, levator scapula muscle, upper trapezius muscle, posterior cervical and suboccipital muscles. Among these exercises, it will be said that the strengthening exercises should be done in 2 sets of 30 repetitions a day, and the stretching exercises should be done in 2 sets of 10 repetitions. These exercises will be given as a home program and you will be asked to practice them every day for 4 weeks.

  • DeviceTENS

    TENS is an electric current applied with superficial electrodes placed on the skin and used to relieve pain. Conventional (Traditional) TENS is the most commonly used type. It affects the transmission of pain on the gate control theory by affecting the thick, myelinated, afferent A alpha and beta fibers. The effect of conventional TENS begins in 30 minutes and disappears within approximately 2 hours after treatment is stopped. TENS will be applied to the patients in the second group with a Bio-Stim brand VH-1000 model TENS device in the form of symmetrical, biphasic quadrilateral pulses for 100 msec. Frequency is 60 Hertz (Hz), intensity will be adjusted according to the patient's perception of paresthesia. The negative electrode will be placed on the active trigger point on the upper trapezius muscle and the positive electrode on the acromial tendon. The total duration of the application will be 20 minutes and 1 session will be applied every day for two weeks, a total of 10 sessions.

  • Devicekinesiology taping

    Kinesiology taping has a wide range of indications, especially in the musculoskeletal system. It is used to protect against tissue damage in the musculoskeletal system and to treat existing injuries, injuries, pain and dysfunctions. Patients who receive kinesiology taping treatment will receive treatment six times in total for three weeks, with 3-day intervals. After the patient is allowed to sit comfortably on the chair, taping will be performed between the acromioclavicular joint and the C7 spinous process using the upper trapezius inhibition technique. In addition, a small kinesiological taping test will be applied to the patient's volar forearm as a rapid allergy screening test to prevent any dermatological allergic reaction.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. VAS (Visual Analogue Scale)

    Pain intensity was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale. Participants rated their pain separately at rest and during activity on a 10-cm horizontal line ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 represents "no pain" and 10 represents "the worst imaginable pain." Higher scores indicate greater pain intensity and therefore a worse outcome.

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately after treatment, and 4 weeks after treatment completion

  2. Ultrasound Elastography

    The last step of the high development rate in ultrasonography technology is ultrasound elastography (UE). UE is a technological advance that can directly measure the mechanical properties of tissue, including muscle stiffness. Elasticity; It is the ability of a tissue to be deformed by an external force and to return to its previous shape and size when this force is removed.

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately after treatment, and 4 weeks after treatment completion

Secondary outcomes

  1. Range of Motion (ROM)

    Cervical ROM, flexion, extension, right rotation, left rotation, right lateral flexion, left lateral flexion measurements during active movement will be measured with a goniometer device and recorded in degrees.

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately after treatment, and 4 weeks after treatment completion

  2. Neck Disability Index (NDI)

    Neck Disability Index is a scale consisting of 10 questions and used to evaluate how and to what extent neck pain affects the patient's daily life activities. Scale; It includes pain severity, self-care, lifting, reading, headache, concentration, driving, sleep and social activity parameters. Patients were asked to mark the one that was most suitable for them among the 6 options given for each parameter. Each topic is scored from 0 (no disability) to 5 (complete disability). The total score ranges from 0 (no disability) to 50 (total disability). After the total score is obtained, the value calculated according to the formulation is finalized as % deficiency. As the score increases, disability increases, and as the score decreases, disability decreases.

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately after treatment, and 4 weeks after treatment completion

06

Study locations

1 site
  • Bakırkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Hospital
    Istanbul, Bakırköy 34147, Turkey (Türkiye)
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Hong CZ. Treatment of myofascial pain syndrome. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2006 Oct;10(5):345-9. doi: 10.1007/s11916-006-0058-3. PubMed 16945250 ↗
  • De Meulemeester KE, Castelein B, Coppieters I, Barbe T, Cools A, Cagnie B. Comparing Trigger Point Dry Needling and Manual Pressure Technique for the Management of Myofascial Neck/Shoulder Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2017 Jan;40(1):11-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2016.10.008. PubMed 28017188 ↗
  • Borg-Stein J, Iaccarino MA. Myofascial pain syndrome treatments. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2014 May;25(2):357-74. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2014.01.012. Epub 2014 Mar 17. PubMed 24787338 ↗
  • Ziaeifar M, Arab AM, Mosallanezhad Z, Nourbakhsh MR. Dry needling versus trigger point compression of the upper trapezius: a randomized clinical trial with two-week and three-month follow-up. J Man Manip Ther. 2019 Jul;27(3):152-161. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2018.1530421. Epub 2018 Oct 15. PubMed 30935341 ↗
  • Saxena A, Chansoria M, Tomar G, Kumar A. Myofascial pain syndrome: an overview. J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2015 Mar;29(1):16-21. doi: 10.3109/15360288.2014.997853. Epub 2015 Jan 5. PubMed 25558924 ↗
  • Borg-Stein J, Simons DG. Focused review: myofascial pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002 Mar;83(3 Suppl 1):S40-7, S48-9. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2002.32155. PubMed 11973695 ↗
  • Ardic F, Sarhus M, Topuz O. Comparison of two different techniques of electrotherapy on myofascial pain. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2002 Jan 1;16(1):11-6. doi: 10.3233/bmr-2002-16103. PubMed 22387359 ↗
  • Graff-Radford SB, Reeves JL, Baker RL, Chiu D. Effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on myofascial pain and trigger point sensitivity. Pain. 1989 Apr;37(1):1-5. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(89)90146-2. PubMed 2786179 ↗
  • Kalron A, Bar-Sela S. A systematic review of the effectiveness of Kinesio Taping--fact or fashion? Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2013 Oct;49(5):699-709. Epub 2013 Apr 5. PubMed 23558699 ↗
  • Paoloni M, Bernetti A, Fratocchi G, Mangone M, Parrinello L, Del Pilar Cooper M, Sesto L, Di Sante L, Santilli V. Kinesio Taping applied to lumbar muscles influences clinical and electromyographic characteristics in chronic low back pain patients. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2011 Jun;47(2):237-44. Epub 2011 Mar 24. PubMed 21430611 ↗
  • Kaya E, Zinnuroglu M, Tugcu I. Kinesio taping compared to physical therapy modalities for the treatment of shoulder impingement syndrome. Clin Rheumatol. 2011 Feb;30(2):201-7. doi: 10.1007/s10067-010-1475-6. Epub 2010 Apr 30. PubMed 20443039 ↗
  • Gennisson JL, Deffieux T, Fink M, Tanter M. Ultrasound elastography: principles and techniques. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2013 May;94(5):487-95. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2013.01.022. Epub 2013 Apr 22. PubMed 23619292 ↗
  • Domenichini R, Pialat JB, Podda A, Aubry S. Ultrasound elastography in tendon pathology: state of the art. Skeletal Radiol. 2017 Dec;46(12):1643-1655. doi: 10.1007/s00256-017-2726-2. Epub 2017 Aug 1. PubMed 28765991 ↗
  • Vernon H. The Neck Disability Index: state-of-the-art, 1991-2008. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2008 Sep;31(7):491-502. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.08.006. PubMed 18803999 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Results of the study will be written as a manuscript. In Turkey, we do not have a system sharing data to other researchers.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07770308
Lead sponsor
Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Research and Training Hospital
Responsible party
Sibel Caglar Okur (Principal Investigator, Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Research and Training Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 18, 2026
Start date
Dec 1, 2023
Primary completion
Mar 15, 2024
Completion
Apr 15, 2024
Last update
Aug 18, 2026

Study contacts

Sibel Çağlar
study director

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion