ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07766967Updated Aug 17, 2026

Alveolar Recruitment Maneuver-Induced Hypotension: A Dynamic Consequence and Intraoperative Indicator of Fluid Responsiveness

An interventional study of Alveolar Recruitment Maneuver (ARM) and Passive Leg Raising (PLR) Test in Hypotension Drug-Induced, General Anesthesia Using Endotracheal Intubation and Atelectasis, sponsored by University of Health Sciences Balikesir Hospital Eduation and Research. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-17.

Sponsored by University of Health Sciences Balikesir Hospital Eduation and Research · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
70
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study investigates whether two simple bedside tests - the Passive Leg Raising (PLR) test and the Pleth Variability Index (PVI) - can predict a drop in blood pressure that sometimes occurs during a lung-opening procedure called an Alveolar Recruitment Maneuver (ARM).

ARM is routinely performed during general anesthesia to prevent lung collapse and improve oxygen levels. However, in some patients - particularly those with low fluid levels - ARM can cause a temporary but significant drop in blood pressure (hypotension), which may require immediate treatment.

In this prospective observational study, adult patients scheduled for elective non-cardiac, non-thoracic surgery under general anesthesia will be enrolled. Before each ARM is performed, PLR test and PVI values will be measured. We will then evaluate how well these measurements predict whether the patient will develop ARM-induced hypotension.

If PLR and PVI can reliably identify patients at risk, clinicians may be able to take preventive steps before performing ARM, making the procedure safer for vulnerable patients.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hypotension Drug-Induced
  • General Anesthesia Using Endotracheal Intubation
  • Atelectasis
  • Fluid Responsiveness
  • Mechanical Ventilation

Keywords

  • Alveolar Recruitment Maneuver
  • Passive Leg Raising
  • Pleth Variability Index
  • hypotension
  • Fluid responsiveness
  • Dynamic preload indicators
  • Intraoperative monitoring
  • General anesthesia
  • Lung-protective ventilation
  • Perioperative hemodynamics
03

In context

Hypotension

885 studies on the registry are indexed under Hypotension; 195 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 70 is below the median of 87 across 590 interventional studies indexed under Hypotension.

Browse Hypotension studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Health Sciences Balikesir Hospital Eduation and Research is the lead sponsor of 8 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:Age 18 years or older I or II Scheduled for elective non-cardiac, non-thoracic surgery under general anesthesia Able to provide written -

Exclusion Criteria:Cardiac or thoracic surgery Hemodynamic instability at baseline (MAP \<65 mmHg or requirement for vasopressors) Severe valvular heart disease or known cardiac dysfunction (EF \<40%) (COPD) or severe respiratory disease Atrial fibrillation or other significant arrhythmias Peripheral vascular disease affecting PVI signal quality (BMI) >40 kg/m² Emergency surgery Refusal to participate or inability to provide informed consent Pregnancy

-

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe out, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
70 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    ARM-Induced Hypotension Prediction Group

    Adult patients scheduled for elective non-cardiac, non-thoracic surgery under general anesthesia. Before each alveolar recruitment maneuver (ARM), a passive leg raising (PLR) test is performed and pleth variability index (PVI) is recorded. Blood pressure changes during ARM are monitored to evaluate whether pre-ARM PLR and PVI values can predict ARM-induced hypotension.

    Device: Alveolar Recruitment Maneuver (ARM) · Behavioral: Passive Leg Raising (PLR) Test

Interventions

  • DeviceAlveolar Recruitment Maneuver (ARM)

    ARM is performed using a stepwise increase in positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in pressure-controlled ventilation mode until peak inspiratory pressure reaches 40 cmH₂O, then stepwise decrease back to baseline. Hemodynamic parameters are continuously monitored throughout the maneuver.

  • BehavioralPassive Leg Raising (PLR) Test

    With the patient in supine position under general anesthesia, both legs are raised to 45 degrees for 60 seconds. The change in mean arterial pressure (ΔMAP) is recorded as an indicator of preload responsiveness. The test is performed immediately before each ARM.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Prediction of ARM-Induced Hypotension by PLR Test and PVI

    Area under the ROC curve (AUC) of pre-ARM passive leg raising test (PLR-ΔMAP) for predicting ARM-induced hypotension (defined as MAP decrease ≥20% from baseline or MAP \<65 mmHg during ARM).

    Time frame: From induction of general anesthesia until 5 minutes after completion of the alveolar recruitment maneuver, assessed intraoperatively.

  2. AUC of PVI for Predicting ARM-Induced Hypotension

    Area under the ROC curve (AUC) of pre-ARM pleth variability index (PVI) for predicting ARM-induced hypotension (defined as MAP decrease ≥20% from baseline or MAP \<65 mmHg during ARM)

    Time frame: Measured continuously from induction of general anesthesia until completion of the alveolar recruitment maneuver, assessed intraoperatively.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Correlation Between ARM-Induced ΔMAP% and Post-ARM Fluid Responsiveness

    Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficient between the maximum MAP decrease during ARM (ΔMAP%) and fluid responsiveness after ARM. Fluid responsiveness is defined as MAP increase ≥10% following 250 mL crystalloid bolus.

    Time frame: From onset of ARM until 10 minutes after completion of ARM, assessed intraoperatively.

  2. Comparative Diagnostic Accuracy of PLR Test versus PVI for Predicting ARM-Induced Hypotension

    The difference in AUC values between PLR-ΔMAP and PVI will be compared using the DeLong method.

    Time frame: From induction of general anesthesia until 5 minutes after completion of the alveolar recruitment maneuver, assessed intraoperatively.

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Desebbe O, Vallier S, Gergele L, Alexander B, Marx A, Ben Jaoude E, Kato H, Toubal L, Berna A, Duranteau J, Vincent JL, Joosten A. Diagnostic accuracy of the peripheral venous pressure variation induced by an alveolar recruitment maneuver to predict fluid responsiveness during high-risk abdominal surgery. BMC Anesthesiol. 2023 Jul 22;23(1):249. doi: 10.1186/s12871-023-02194-x. PubMed 37481588 ↗
  • Doughan A, Adingo W, Salifu SP. RNA-seq research landscape in Africa: systematic review reveals disparities and opportunities. Eur J Med Res. 2023 Jul 22;28(1):244. doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-01206-3. PubMed 37480073 ↗
  • Lovas A, Szakmany T. Haemodynamic Effects of Lung Recruitment Manoeuvres. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:478970. doi: 10.1155/2015/478970. Epub 2015 Nov 22. PubMed 26682219 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Jul 2026; primary completion for Sep 2026, 2 months later.

Of 210 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Hypotension, half reached primary completion within 12 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 22. This study's planned 2 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 217 studies reached it within 12 months; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 22.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 16, 2026
First posted
Aug 17, 2026
StartEst.
Jul 15, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Sep 15, 2026
CompletionEst.
Sep 29, 2026
Last update
Aug 17, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 17, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07766967
Lead sponsor
University of Health Sciences Balikesir Hospital Eduation and Research
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 17, 2026
Start date
Jul 15, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Sep 15, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 29, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 17, 2026

Study contacts

Hasan Duman, M.D.
Contact
hasanduman.1991@gmail.com
+905547317716

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion