ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07764315COOLDECIDEUpdated Aug 13, 2026

EEG-Based Decision-Support Algorithm for Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy in Term Newborns

An observational study in Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy, Perinatal Asphyxia and Neonatal Brain Injury, sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 0 Days to 1 Day. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-13.

Sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
310
Ages
0 Days to 1 Day
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This retrospective, multicenter, observational study evaluates how well a decision-support algorithm can tell apart mild forms of hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) from moderate or severe forms in full-term newborns born after a lack of oxygen around birth (perinatal asphyxia). The algorithm reads the raw (non-compressed) EEG signal. Its output is compared with the reference reading of the full conventional EEG made by a panel of pediatric neurophysiologists together with the baby's clinical information. The study uses only medical data that already exists and asks nothing of the babies or their families.

Read the detailed description

The algorithm under investigation was developed in a previous retrospective clinical study (registered as NCT05114070; French CNIL/ethics ref CER-2021-023; approved by the Sorbonne University ethics committee) and is based on background-rhythm analysis of EEG. Newborns are analyzed in two subgroups: those who received a treatment liable to modify the EEG tracing, and those who did not. Conventional EEG recordings are collected from the neurophysiology departments of participating level-3 maternity hospitals over the period 01 January 2016 to 30 April 2026. No follow-up or sampling is performed.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy
  • Perinatal Asphyxia
  • Neonatal Brain Injury

Keywords

  • conventional EEG
  • therapeutic hypothermia
  • decision-support software
  • term newborn
  • diagnostic accuracy
  • medical device software
03

In context

Hypoxia-Ischemia, Brain

261 studies on the registry are indexed under Hypoxia-Ischemia, Brain; 94 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 310 is above the median of 89 across 92 observational studies indexed under Hypoxia-Ischemia, Brain.

Browse Hypoxia-Ischemia, Brain studies →

Lead sponsor

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris is the lead sponsor of 3,596 studies on the registry; 1,037 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
0 Days to 1 Day
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Term newborns ≥ 36 weeks gestational age, birth weight ≥ 1800 g, with suspected hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy in a context of perinatal asphyxia, whose non-compressed conventional EEG recordings are available in participating centers.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • No parental opposition to the use of the child's medical data within 1 month of the mailed information notice
  • Gestational age ≥ 36 weeks of amenorrhea
  • Birth weight ≥ 1800 g
  • Born in a context of perinatal asphyxia (any cause) leading to suspected HIE, with EITHER biological signs of metabolic acidosis (pH ≤ 7 or base deficit ≥ 16 mmol/L or lactate ≥ 11 mmol/L within the first hour of life, any blood sample) OR a history of asphyxia with Apgar ≤ 5 at 10 minutes or need for ventilatory resuscitation continued at 10 minutes of life
  • Non-compressed conventional EEG (EEGc) recorded before the 6th hour of life
  • EEG including the signal of active electrodes Fp1, Fp2, T3 and T4

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participation in a therapeutic biomedical research liable to modify the EEG tracing
  • Fewer than 20 minutes of artifact-free EEG recording
  • Signal from active electrodes Fp1, Fp2, T3 and T4 not exploitable
05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
310 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Term newborns with suspected HIE

    Single study population: term newborns (≥ 36 weeks, ≥ 1800 g) with suspected hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy in a context of perinatal asphyxia, with an available non-compressed conventional EEG. This is a diagnostic-accuracy validation study (STARD), not a comparative two-arm design. The treated / untreated distinction is a pre-specified analysis subgroup only, not a study group.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Sensitivity and specificity of the algorithm versus the gold standard for discriminating mild vs moderate/severe HIE

    Diagnostic performance computed against the reference EEG reading by pediatric neurophysiologists complemented by clinical data; 95% confidence intervals by the exact (Clopper-Pearson) method.

    Time frame: Within the first 6 hours of life

Secondary outcomes

  1. PPV, NPV, false-alarm ratio, accuracy, balanced accuracy and F1-score of the algorithm vs gold standard (overall and by subgroup)

    Secondary diagnostic-performance metrics computed overall and within the treated / untreated subgroups.

    Time frame: Within the first 6 hours of life

  2. Proportion of transfers not leading to therapeutic hypothermia

    Share of included newborns not treated by therapeutic hypothermia at the time, including those transferred from a level 1/2a/2b maternity or managed within the same facility.

    Time frame: During the initial hospitalization (up to 28 days of life)

  3. Evaluate the inter-rater agreement between the first two expert neurophysiologists

    Inter-rater agreement will be assessed using Cohen's kappa coefficient (κ), with a 95% confidence interval.

    Time frame: EEG recordings from the first 6 hours of life

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — AP-HP is the sole owner of the data. Individual participant data are not planned to be shared; any use or transmission to a third party requires the sponsor's prior authorization, under conditions ensuring confidentiality and a level of protection equivalent to EU legislation.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Sep 2026; primary completion for Jan 2027, 4 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 3, 2026
First posted
Aug 13, 2026
StartEst.
Sep 16, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jan 16, 2027
CompletionEst.
Feb 16, 2027
Last update
Aug 13, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 13, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07764315
Collaborators
BPI
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 13, 2026
Start date
Sep 16, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jan 16, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 16, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 13, 2026

Study contacts

Mathilde LETOUZEY, M.D
Contact
mathilde.letouzey@aphp.fr
+ 33171738599

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion