ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07764250Updated Sep 1, 2026

Comparative Evaluation of Immediate vs Progressive Standing Dual Task Training in Elderly With Mild and Moderate Cognitive Impairment

An interventional study of Immediate standing dual task training and progressive standing dual task training in Cognitive Impairment, Cognitive Impairment, Mild and Moderate Cognitive Impairment, sponsored by Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University. Recruiting at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to participants aged 55 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-01.

Sponsored by Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jun 2026; still recruiting 4 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
96
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
55 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

older adults with mild and moderate cognitive impairment. compare immediate vs progressive standing dual-task training. assess balance, cognition, executive function, mobility, and quality of life.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cognitive Impairment
  • Cognitive Impairment, Mild
  • Moderate Cognitive Impairment

Keywords

  • CI
  • MCI
  • DTT
  • ISDTT
  • PSDDT
03

In context

Cognitive Dysfunction

3,872 studies on the registry are indexed under Cognitive Dysfunction; 1,119 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 96 is above the median of 64 across 2,794 interventional studies indexed under Cognitive Dysfunction.

Browse Cognitive Dysfunction studies →

Lead sponsor

Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University is the lead sponsor of 27 studies on the registry; 10 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
55 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥55 years
  • Mild or moderate cognitive impairment
  • 10-25
  • MMSE 10-23
  • Able to participate
  • Provides

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe cognitive impairment
  • Severe sensory or musculoskeletal impairments
  • Unstable medical conditions
  • Participation in another intervention study
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

MMSE and MoCA

Short tests of memory and thinking, each scored out of 30. Lower scores suggest more difficulty; criteria give a range, either to include people with memory problems or to leave them out.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
96 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Immediate Standing Dual-Task Training (Mild Cognitive Impairment)

    Other: Immediate standing dual task training

  • Experimental
    Progressive Standing Dual-Task Training (Mild Cognitive Impairment)

    Other: progressive standing dual task training

  • Experimental
    Immediate Standing Dual-Task Training (Moderate Cognitive Impairment)

    Other: Immediate standing dual task training

  • Experimental
    Progressive Standing Dual-Task Training (Moderate Cognitive Impairment)

    Other: progressive standing dual task training

Interventions

  • OtherImmediate standing dual task training

    Motor-cognitive dual-task training is a rehabilitation intervention delivered by a physiotherapist over 8 weeks, with three sessions per week, each lasting 45 minutes. Every session consists of a 5-minute warm-up, 30-35 minutes of dual-task training, and a 5-minute cool-down. It simultaneously combines motor and cognitive tasks. Motor components include marching in place, finger tapping, hand transfer activities, side stepping, weight shifting, heel raises, heel-toe stepping, and balance challenges. Cognitive components include naming animals or fruits, counting forward, and months, serial subtraction by threes, backward digit span, alternate naming, and word recall. Participants allocated to the Immediate Standing intervention perform all dual-task activities in standing from the first treatment session.

  • Otherprogressive standing dual task training

    Motor-cognitive dual-task training is a rehabilitation intervention delivered by a physiotherapist over 8 weeks, with three sessions per week, each lasting 45 minutes. Every session consists of a 5-minute warm-up, 30-35 minutes of dual-task training, and a 5-minute cool-down. It simultaneously combines motor and cognitive tasks. Motor components include marching in place, finger tapping, hand transfer activities, side stepping, weight shifting, heel raises, heel-toe stepping, and balance challenges. Cognitive components include naming animals or fruits, counting forward, and months, serial subtraction by threes, backward digit span, alternate naming, and word recall. Participants allocated to the Progressive Standing intervention initially perform dual-task activities sitting and progressively transition to standing during the intervention period.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mini-Mental State Examination

    The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) is a 30-point measure of global cognitive function. Scores range from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better cognitive function

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 8

  2. Berg Balance Scale

    The Berg Balance Scale (BBS) is a 14-item clinical measure of static and dynamic balance. Total scores range from 0 to 56, with higher scores indicating better balance performance.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 8

  3. Timed Up and Go

    The Timed Up and Go Test measures functional mobility. The outcome is the time (seconds) required to stand from a chair, walk 3 meters, turn, return, and sit. Lower completion times indicate better mobility.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 8

  4. Trail Making Test

    The Trail Making Test Part assesses executive function and cognitive flexibility. The outcome is the time (seconds) required to complete the test. Lower completion times indicate better executive function.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 8

Secondary outcomes

  1. Quality of Life in Alzhiemer's Disease Scale

    The Quality of Life in Alzheimer's Disease (QoL-AD) questionnaire consists of 13 items, with total scores ranging from 13 to 52. Higher scores indicate better quality of life.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 8

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 1, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07764250
Lead sponsor
Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University
Responsible party
Fouzia Batool (Assistant Professor, Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 13, 2026
Start date
Jun 25, 2026
Primary completion
Aug 25, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 30, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 1, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion