ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT07762144Updated Aug 13, 2026

Clinical Cohort Construction Program of Peking University Third Hospital

An observational study in Post-Cardiac Arrest Syndrome, sponsored by Peking University Third Hospital. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in China. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-13.

Sponsored by Peking University Third Hospital · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
500
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Cardiac arrest is one of the leading life-threatening emergencies, with approximately 540,000 cases occurring annually in China. Among patients who experience cardiac arrest, active cardiopulmonary resuscitation can achieve return of spontaneous circulation in 40% of cases; however, only 1-2% ultimately survive with favorable neurological outcomes. The primary contributor to mortality and morbidity is post-cardiac arrest syndrome (PCAS). PCAS represents a distinct pathophysiological process resulting from systemic ischemia/reperfusion injury, involving multiple systems and organs, and thus requires comprehensive, systematic evaluation. At present, numerous challenges remain in the field of PCAS, including the optimal targeted temperature, additional interventions that may improve neurological prognosis, post-resuscitation myocardial dysfunction and its protective strategies, characteristics and management of dysfunction in other organs, and accurate neurological prognostication after resuscitation. Therefore, in-depth research on PCAS is urgently needed to improve outcomes in cardiac arrest survivors.

This study is initiated by the Department of Emergency Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, and involves a total of six tertiary hospitals across China, constituting a multicenter investigation. The study aims to explore the effects of different targeted temperature management strategies on mortality and neurological outcomes, and to actively investigate other interventions that may ameliorate post-resuscitation brain injury, cardiac injury, and microcirculatory dysfunction, thereby reducing mortality and improving neurological prognosis in cardiac arrest patients. Furthermore, we aim to develop a neurological prediction model for cardiac arrest patients to enable accurate prognostication of neurological outcomes, which will assist emergency physicians in providing precise prognostic information to families and facilitate shared decision-making regarding subsequent treatment plans.

Read the detailed description

For patients with cardiac arrest, brain injury is the leading cause of mortality and disability, followed by cardiac dysfunction and microcirculatory disorders. Therefore, post-resuscitation cerebral protection, myocardial protection, and the prevention and treatment of microcirculatory failure are key to the management of post-cardiac arrest syndrome (PCAS). This cohort study aims to observe exposure factors related to the cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) process and the subsequent treatment of post-resuscitation syndrome, in order to explore the factors contributing to the low quality of CPR in China and to provide evidence for improving prehospital emergency care. Simultaneously, it aims to investigate exposure factors during in-hospital treatment and to identify effective interventions for improving brain function, cardiac function, and microcirculatory dysfunction.

③ Prognostic factor exploration and prognostic model establishment (may be broken down into multiple sub-questions).

For patients with cardiac arrest, neurological assessment, i.e., the evaluation of the severity of brain injury, represents both a major challenge and a key priority in the field of CPR, and it remains a current research hotspot. Accurate neurological assessment can prevent premature withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy in patients with potential for cerebral recovery-early withdrawal being a primary cause of death in cardiac arrest patients in the ICU. Conversely, it also enables early identification of patients without hope of neurological recovery, thereby providing families with more accurate prognostic information, facilitating shared decision-making regarding subsequent treatment, and reasonably optimizing the utilization of medical resources. The objective of this cohort is to establish a predictive model for mortality and poor neurological outcomes in patients with cardiac arrest, based on multimodal data incorporating clinical assessments, imaging, neuroelectrophysiology, and biomarkers.

02

Conditions studied

  • Post-Cardiac Arrest Syndrome

Keywords

  • Cardiac Arrest
03

In context

Post-Cardiac Arrest Syndrome

31 studies on the registry are indexed under Post-Cardiac Arrest Syndrome; 11 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 500 is close to the median of 500 across 14 observational studies indexed under Post-Cardiac Arrest Syndrome.

Browse Post-Cardiac Arrest Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

Peking University Third Hospital is the lead sponsor of 752 studies on the registry; 273 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

This study will enroll all eligible patients presenting to the emergency departments of the six centers who satisfy the following inclusion and exclusion criteria

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patients who have achieved return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) after cardiac arrest;
  2. With accessible intravenous or intraosseous vascular access;
  3. Clinical manifestations meeting any one of the following criteria: presenting with post-resuscitation brain injury, post-resuscitation cardiac dysfunction, manifestations of systemic ischemia-reperfusion injury, or other ongoing deteriorating pathological changes.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients who have not achieved return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) after cardiac arrest;
  2. Patients who have declined cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) (or whose legally authorized representative has refused CPR).
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
500 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
1 Year
Patient registry
Yes
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Whether death has occurred

    Death: any death, regardless of cause (i.e., all-cause mortality)

    Time frame: 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Assessment of neurological prognosis

    CPC (Cerebral Performance Category) Score: CPC grades 1-2 indicate favorable neurological outcome, while grades 3-5 indicate unfavorable outcome. CPC 1: Good cerebral function; patient is conscious, alert, and able to work and live a normal life. CPC 2: Moderate cerebral disability; patient is conscious and able to work part-time in a sheltered environment or perform independent activities of daily living. CPC 3: Severe cerebral disability; patient is conscious but requires daily assistance from others and retains limited cognitive function. CPC 4: Coma or vegetative state; patient is unaware, unresponsive to the environment, and has no cognitive function. CPC 5: Death; patient is declared brain-dead or dead according to traditional criteria.

    Time frame: 1year

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Emergency Dept of Peking University Third Hospital
    Beijing, Beijing Municipality 100191, China
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Belbasis L, Bellou V. Introduction to Epidemiological Studies. Methods Mol Biol. 2018;1793:1-6. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7868-7_1. PubMed 29876887 ↗
  • Jentzer JC, Chonde MD, Dezfulian C. Myocardial Dysfunction and Shock after Cardiac Arrest. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:314796. doi: 10.1155/2015/314796. Epub 2015 Sep 2. PubMed 26421284 ↗
  • Lundin A, Djarv T, Engdahl J, Hollenberg J, Nordberg P, Ravn-Fischer A, Ringh M, Rysz S, Svensson L, Herlitz J, Lundgren P. Drug therapy in cardiac arrest: a review of the literature. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2016 Jan;2(1):54-75. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvv047. Epub 2015 Nov 26. PubMed 27533062 ↗
  • Shao F, Li CS, Liang LR, Qin J, Ding N, Fu Y, Yang K, Zhang GQ, Zhao L, Zhao B, Zhu ZZ, Yang LP, Yu DM, Song ZJ, Yang QL. Incidence and outcome of adult in-hospital cardiac arrest in Beijing, China. Resuscitation. 2016 May;102:51-6. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.02.002. Epub 2016 Feb 23. PubMed 26924514 ↗
  • Trzeciak S, Jones AE, Kilgannon JH, Milcarek B, Hunter K, Shapiro NI, Hollenberg SM, Dellinger P, Parrillo JE. Significance of arterial hypotension after resuscitation from cardiac arrest. Crit Care Med. 2009 Nov;37(11):2895-903; quiz 2904. doi: 10.1097/ccm.0b013e3181b01d8c. PubMed 19866506 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 13, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07762144
Responsible party
Qingbian Ma, MD (Director of the Emergency Department, Peking University Third Hospital, Peking University Third Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 13, 2026
Start date
Jan 1, 2014
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2030 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 13, 2026

Study contacts

Qing bian Ma, Doctor of Medicine
study chair · Peking University Third Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion