ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07761351ENCOMPASSUpdated Sep 25, 2026

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Percutaneous CT-Guided Biopsy and Shape-Sensing Robotic-Assisted Bronchoscopy

A Phase 4 interventional study of Shape-Sensing Robotic-Assisted Bronchoscopy with Cone-Beam CT (ssRAB with CBCT) and CT-guided percutaneous lung nodule biopsy in Lung Cancer (Diagnosis) and Lung Nodule, sponsored by Intuitive Surgical. Recruiting at 3 sites in 3 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-25.

Sponsored by Intuitive Surgical · Phase 4, Interventional, and Diagnostic

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Aug 2026; still recruiting 2 months later.
Updated Sep 25, 2026First site in Germany1 site addedGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
550
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The ENCOMPASS study is a post-market, multicenter, randomized controlled trial comparing two established approaches for obtaining a biopsy of small pulmonary nodules (≤2 cm): CT-guided percutaneous lung nodule biopsy and shape-sensing robotic-assisted bronchoscopy with cone-beam CT (ssRAB with CBCT).

Read the detailed description

CT-guided percutaneous biopsy and ssRAB with CBCT are two types of lung nodule biopsy procedures routinely used in clinical practice. The study is designed to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy and safety of ssRAB with CBCT compared with CT-guided percutaneous lung nodule biopsy in adults requiring diagnostic evaluation of a pulmonary nodule. The co-primary objectives are to assess non-inferiority of diagnostic efficacy and superiority of safety.

The primary endpoints are diagnostic efficacy and the rate of peri-procedural pneumothorax (with or without intervention) associated with the assigned biopsy approach.

Eligible participants will be randomized 1:1 to either ssRAB with CBCT or CT-guided percutaneous lung nodule biopsy. If the clinical team determines that the assigned procedure is not suitable, the participant will receive the most appropriate standard of care instead. Both biopsy procedures will be performed according to routine clinical practice, and no experimental devices or procedures will be used.

Participants will be followed for up to 12 months through medical record review and routine clinical follow-up. Patient-reported quality of life and, optionally, work status will be assessed using questionnaires at multiple time points. No research-specific assessments, burdensome tests, or advanced imaging outside of standard care will be performed. A chest X-ray will be required following the biopsy procedure, consistent with routine clinical practice.

02

Conditions studied

  • Lung Cancer (Diagnosis)
  • Lung Nodule

Keywords

  • Lung Biopsy
  • CT-Guided Percutaneous Biopsy
  • Robotic-Assisted Bronchoscopy
  • Shape-Sensing Robotic-Assisted Bronchoscopy (ssRAB)
  • Transthoracic Needle Aspiration (TTNA)
  • Bronchoscopy
  • Pulmonary Nodules
03

In context

Lung Neoplasms

5,422 studies on the registry are indexed under Lung Neoplasms; 1,346 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 550 is above the median of 60 across 3,656 interventional studies indexed under Lung Neoplasms.

Browse Lung Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Intuitive Surgical is the lead sponsor of 62 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Of its 7 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 1 (14%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patient is aged 18 years or older at time of consent.
  2. Diagnostic nodule (s) indicated per multidisciplinary team (or equivalent).
  3. Target pulmonary nodule ≤2 cm in largest diameter.
  4. Patient is willing and able to give written for clinical study participation.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient has previously undergone a procedure of the target nodule by any approach.
  2. Patient was previously randomized in this study but did not undergo biopsy.
  3. Patient is participating in an interventional research study or research study with agents with an unknown safety profile that would interfere with participation in this study or study results.
  4. Patient is pregnant or breastfeeding as determined by standard site practices.
  5. Patient lacks the capacity to provide for themselves, or is a vulnerable patient whose ability to protect their own interests or to consent freely may be diminished, including but not limited to, patients who may be unduly influenced through dependency on the sponsor, the hospital, or the study doctor.
  6. Patient is not willing to comply with study participation requirements.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
550 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Shape-Sensing Robotic-Assisted Bronchoscopy with Cone-Beam CT (ssRAB with CBCT)

    Participants randomized to pulmonary nodule biopsy using shape-sensing robotic-assisted bronchoscopy with cone-beam CT.

    Procedure: Shape-Sensing Robotic-Assisted Bronchoscopy with Cone-Beam CT (ssRAB with CBCT)

  • Active comparator
    CT-Guided Percutaneous Lung Nodule Biopsy

    Participants randomized to pulmonary nodule biopsy using a CT-guided percutaneous biopsy approach.

    Procedure: CT-guided percutaneous lung nodule biopsy

Interventions

  • ProcedureShape-Sensing Robotic-Assisted Bronchoscopy with Cone-Beam CT (ssRAB with CBCT)

    A bronchoscopic lung nodule biopsy procedure performed using shape-sensing robotic-assisted bronchoscopy with cone-beam CT guidance as clinically indicated and according to standard clinical practice.

    Also known as: ssRAB, Ion endoluminal system

  • ProcedureCT-guided percutaneous lung nodule biopsy

    A percutaneous lung nodule biopsy procedure performed under CT imaging guidance according to standard clinical practice.

    Also known as: Transthoracic Needle Aspiration (TTNA), Transthoracic Needle Biopsy (TTNB)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Diagnostic Efficacy of the Assigned Biopsy Procedure

    Diagnostic efficacy will be calculated as the proportion of patients who receive their assigned treatment multiplied by diagnostic yield of their assigned treatment.

    Time frame: At the index procedure

  2. Peri-Procedural Pneumothorax Rate

    Rate of peri-procedural pneumothorax related to the assigned index biopsy procedure, including pneumothorax identified on routine post-procedure imaging and clinically relevant pneumothorax requiring intervention or escalation of care.

    Time frame: From procedure to 7 days (or until subsequent intervention, whichever occurs first).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Diagnostic Yield

    Diagnostic yield of the index biopsy procedure, defined according to American Thoracic Society (ATS) and American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) guidance

    Time frame: At the index procedure

  2. Sensitivity for Malignancy

    Sensitivity of the index biopsy procedure for the diagnosis of malignancy, based on final diagnosis established through 1-year follow-up

    Time frame: Through 1 year post-procedure

  3. Negative Predictive Value

    Negative predictive value of the index biopsy procedure based on final diagnosis established through 1-year follow-up

    Time frame: Through 1 year post-procedure

  4. Diagnostic accuracy

    Diagnostic accuracy of the index biopsy procedure based on final diagnosis established through 1-year follow-up.

    Time frame: Through 1 year post-procedure

  5. Adequacy of Specimen for Molecular and/or Immunohistochemistry Testing

    Proportion of biopsy specimens considered adequate for molecular profiling and/or immunohistochemistry (IHC) testing.

    Time frame: At the index procedure

  6. Procedure-Related Adverse Events

    Incidence of procedure-related adverse events.

    Time frame: Through 30 days post-procedure or until the first invasive diagnostic or therapeutic intervention, whichever occurs first

  7. Procedure-related serious adverse events.

    Incidence of procedure-related serious adverse events.

    Time frame: Through 30 days post-procedure or until the first invasive diagnostic or therapeutic intervention, whichever occurs first

  8. All-Cause Mortality

    Incidence of all-cause mortality among study participants.

    Time frame: Through study exit

  9. Length of Stay for Procedure-Related Adverse Events

    Duration of hospitalization attributable to procedure-related adverse events

    Time frame: From the date of hospitalization for a procedure-related adverse event until hospital discharge, for events occurring up to 30 days following the index procedure

07

Study locations

3 of 3 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Aug 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Apr 2028, 20 months after the start.

Of 28 phase 4 interventional studies under Lung Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 35 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 24 and three quarters within 67. This study's planned 20 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 30, 2026
First posted
Aug 12, 2026
StartActual
Aug 28, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Apr 30, 2028
CompletionEst.
Apr 30, 2029
Last update
Sep 25, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Sites
1 site added — first site in Germany
Show site
  • Thoraxklinik Heidelberg · Heidelberg, Germany
Sep 25, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Sep 25, 2026
    1 site added — first site in Germany
    Show site
    • Thoraxklinik Heidelberg · Heidelberg, Germany

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07761351
Lead sponsor
Intuitive Surgical
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 12, 2026
Start date
Aug 28, 2026
Primary completion
Apr 30, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 30, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 25, 2026

Study contacts

Carine Van den Abeele
Contact
Encompass@intusurg.com
+41 21 821 2000
Martha Bean
Contact
Encompass@intusurg.com
+41 21 821 2000
Ricky Thakrar, MD
principal investigator · University College London Hospitals
Neal Navani, MD
principal investigator · University College London Hospitals

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion