ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07346066Updated Aug 5, 2026

IS-001 Injection in Patients Undergoing Robotic-Assisted Colorectal Surgery

A Phase 3 interventional study of filricianine in Ureter Injury, sponsored by Intuitive Surgical. Recruiting at 9 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 16 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-05.

Sponsored by Intuitive Surgical · Phase 3, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Started May 2026; still recruiting 5 months later.
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
146
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
16 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of intravenous injection of IS-001 to aid in intraoperative ureter structure delineation

Read the detailed description

Injury to the ureter, the duct by which urine passes from the kidney into the bladder, is a well-known and serious complication of pelvic and abdominal surgery that frequently goes unrecognized intraoperatively. This study seeks to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intravenous IS-001 injection to improve surgeon ureter visualization during robotic-assisted colorectal surgery with the da Vinci® Surgical System and Firefly® imaging.

02

Conditions studied

  • Ureter Injury
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Intuitive Surgical is the lead sponsor of 62 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Of its 7 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 1 (14%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
16 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Male and female participants between the ages of 16 and 75, inclusive
  2. Participant is scheduled to undergo robotic-assisted colectomy using the da Vinci X/Xi Surgical System with SFF Fluorescence Imaging Exclusion Criteria

1. Participant is pregnant or nursing 2. Participant has known current acute or chronic virus (HBV) or virus (HCV) infection 3. Participant has any of the following screening laboratory values: \< 30 mL/min/1.73 m2

  1. (AST) ≥ 2.5 ×
  2. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≥ 2.5 × ULN
  3. Total > 2mg/dL 4. Participant has any concomitant non-colorectal cancer 5. Participant has any circumstances that, in the judgment of the Investigator, might make them not a suitable candidate for the study 6. Participants have already been enrolled in another drug or device study within the past 6 months 7. Participants with known or suspected to indocyanine green (ICG) or any components of the formulation used 8. Participant is expected to receive or has received other methods for ureter identification during the surgery (e.g., ureteral stent placement, illuminated catheters, retrograde ICG injections) before the administration of IS-001 9. The duration of the surgery is expected to be less than 90 minutes as determined during preoperative planning.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(8)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

Hepatitis C tests

Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.

After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
146 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Other
    IS-001 Injection

    Ureter visualization and delineation will be compared between white light (standard of care) and near-infrared (NIR) imaging mode after each of the two single intravenous injections of IS-001.

    Drug: filricianine

Interventions

  • Drugfilricianine

    IV injection of IS-001 filricianine with near infrared (NIR) imaging

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Independent reader assessment of ureter visualization by 1-5 Likert visualization rating scale from 1 not visible, 2 questionably visible, 3 low visibility, 4 visible, 5 clearly visible.

    Evaluate ureter visualization by each independent reader at (a) the pelvic brim (PB) and (b) Inferior Mesenteric Artery (IMA) locations in Sensitive Firefly (SFF) mode compared to white light mode up to 30 minutes after the first IS-001 injection.

    Time frame: 10 minutes after first injection

Secondary outcomes

  1. Independent reader assessment of ureter length delineation by line drawing on recorded frame measured in arbitrary unit length

    Evaluate ureter length delineation at (a) the PB and (b) IMA locations in SFF mode compared to white light mode up to 30 minutes after the first IS-001 injection

    Time frame: 30 minutes after the first injection

  2. Independent reader assessment of ureter visualization by 1-5 Likert visualization rating scale from 1 not visible, 2 questionably visible, 3 low visibility, 4 visible, 5 clearly visible

    Evaluate ureter visualization by each independent reader at (a) PB and (b) IMA locations in SFF mode compared to white light mode up to 30 minutes after the second IS-001 injection

    Time frame: 30 miinutes after second injection

  3. Independent reader assessment of ureter length delineation by line drawing on recorded frame measured in arbitrary unit length

    Evaluate ureter length delineation at (a) the PB and (b) IMA locations in SFF mode compared to white light mode up to 30 minutes after the second IS-001 injection

    Time frame: 30 minutes after second injection

  4. Ureter visualization based on intraoperative surgeon's rating by 1-5 Likert visualization rating scale from 1 not visible, 2 questionably visible, 3 low visibility, 4 visible, 5 clearly visible

    Evaluate ureter visualization based on the intra-operative surgeon's rating at (a) the PB and (b) IMA locations in SFF mode compared to white light mode up to 30 minutes after the first IS-001 injection

    Time frame: 30 minutes after first IS-001 injection

  5. Independent reader assessment of ureter visualization by 1-5 Likert visualization rating scale from 1 not visible, 2 questionably visible, 3 low visibility, 4 visible, 5 clearly visible.

    Evaluate ureter visualization by each independent reader at (a) the PB and (b) IMA locations in SFF mode compared to white light mode up to 45 minutes after the first and second IS-001injection

    Time frame: 45 minutes after first injection

  6. Independent reader assessment of ureter visualization by 1-5 Likert visualization rating scale from 1 not visible, 2 questionably visible, 3 low visibility, 4 visible, 5 clearly visible

    Evaluate ureter visualization by each independent reader at (a) the PB and (b) IMA locations in SFF mode compared to white light mode up to 45 minutes after the first and second IS-001injection

    Time frame: 45 minutes after second injection

  7. Concordance of ureter visualization between independent readers

    Determine degree of concordance of ureter visualization between independent readers at (a) the pelvic brim and (b) the IMA location

    Time frame: 10 minutes after first injection

  8. Concordance of ureter visualization between independent readers

    Determine degree of concordance of ureter visualization between independent readers at (a) the pelvic brim and (b) the IMA location

    Time frame: 30 minutes after first injection

  9. Concordance of ureter visualization between independent readers

    Determine degree of concordance of ureter visualization between independent readers at (a) the pelvic brim and (b) the IMA location

    Time frame: 45 minutes after first injection

  10. Concordance of ureter visualization between independent readers

    Determine degree of concordance of ureter visualization between independent readers at (a) the pelvic brim and (b) the IMA location

    Time frame: 10 minutes after second injection

  11. Concordance of ureter visualization between independent readers

    Determine degree of concordance of ureter visualization between independent readers at (a) the pelvic brim and (b) the IMA location

    Time frame: 30 minutes after second injection

  12. Concordance of ureter visualization between independent readers

    Determine degree of concordance of ureter visualization between independent readers at (a) the pelvic brim and (b) the IMA location

    Time frame: 45 minutes after second injection

  13. Concordance between intra-operative ureter visualization assessment and independent reader ureter visualization assessment

    Determine the degree of concordance between the intra-operative ureter visualization assessment and the independent reader ureter visualization assessment

    Time frame: 10 minutes after first injection

  14. Concordance between intra-operative ureter visualization assessment and independent reader ureter visualization assessment

    Determine the degree of concordance between the intra-operative ureter visualization assessment and the independent reader ureter visualization assessment

    Time frame: 30 minutes after first injection

  15. Concordance between intra-operative ureter visualization assessment and independent reader ureter visualization assessment

    Determine the degree of concordance between the intra-operative ureter visualization assessment and the independent reader ureter visualization assessment

    Time frame: 45 minutes after first injection

  16. Concordance between intra-operative ureter visualization assessment and independent reader ureter visualization assessment

    Determine the degree of concordance between the intra-operative ureter visualization assessment and the independent reader ureter visualization assessment

    Time frame: 10 minutes after second injection

  17. Concordance between intra-operative ureter visualization assessment and independent reader ureter visualization assessment

    Determine the degree of concordance between the intra-operative ureter visualization assessment and the independent reader ureter visualization assessment

    Time frame: 30 minutes after second injection

  18. Concordance between intra-operative ureter visualization assessment and independent reader ureter visualization assessment

    Determine the degree of concordance between the intra-operative ureter visualization assessment and the independent reader ureter visualization assessment

    Time frame: 45 minutes after second injection

  19. Degree of concordance of ureter visualization within independent readers

    Determine degree of concordance of ureter visualization within independent readers at (a) the pelvic brim and (b) IMA location

    Time frame: 10 minutes after first injection

  20. Degree of concordance of ureter visualization within independent readers

    Determine degree of concordance of ureter visualization within independent readers at (a) the pelvic brim and (b) IMA location

    Time frame: 30 minutes after first injection

  21. Degree of concordance of ureter visualization within independent readers

    Determine degree of concordance of ureter visualization within independent readers at (a) the pelvic brim and (b) IMA location

    Time frame: 45 minutes after first injection

  22. Degree of concordance of ureter visualization within independent readers

    Determine degree of concordance of ureter visualization within independent readers at (a) the pelvic brim and (b) IMA location

    Time frame: 10 minutes after second injection

  23. Degree of concordance of ureter visualization within independent readers

    Determine degree of concordance of ureter visualization within independent readers at (a) the pelvic brim and (b) IMA location

    Time frame: 30 minutes after second injection

  24. Degree of concordance of ureter visualization within independent readers

    Determine degree of concordance of ureter visualization within independent readers at (a) the pelvic brim and (b) IMA location

    Time frame: 45 minutes after second injection

  25. Ureter signal-to-background ratio evaluating contrast of fluorescent signal in NIR imaging mode

    Evaluate ureter signal-to-background ratio in Firefly imaging at (a) the pelvic brim and (b) the IMA location

    Time frame: 10 minutes after first injection

  26. Ureter signal-to-background ratio evaluating contrast of fluorescent signal in NIR imaging mode

    Evaluate ureter signal-to-background ratio in Firefly imaging at (a) the pelvic brim and (b) the IMA location

    Time frame: 30 minutes after first injection

  27. Ureter signal-to-background ratio evaluating contrast of fluorescent signal in NIR imaging mode

    Evaluate ureter signal-to-background ratio in Firefly imaging at (a) the pelvic brim and (b) the IMA location

    Time frame: 45 minutes after first injection

  28. Ureter signal-to-background ratio evaluating contrast of fluorescent signal in NIR imaging mode

    Evaluate ureter signal-to-background ratio in Firefly imaging at (a) the pelvic brim and (b) the IMA location

    Time frame: 10 minutes after second injection

  29. Ureter signal-to-background ratio evaluating contrast of fluorescent signal in NIR imaging mode

    Evaluate ureter signal-to-background ratio in Firefly imaging at (a) the pelvic brim and (b) the IMA location

    Time frame: 30 minutes after second injection

  30. Ureter signal-to-background ratio evaluating contrast of fluorescent signal in NIR imaging mode

    Evaluate ureter signal-to-background ratio in Firefly imaging at (a) the pelvic brim and (b) the IMA location

    Time frame: 45 minutes after second injection

07

Study locations

6 of 9 sites recruiting
  • Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian
    Newport Beach, California 92663, United States
    Recruiting
  • Yale New Haven Hospital
    New Haven, Connecticut 06510, United States
    Recruiting
    • Kyra Jersey · Contactkyra.jersey@yale.edu · 203-688-4242
    • Haddon Pantel, MD · Principal investigator
  • Orlando Health
    Orlando, Florida 32806, United States
    Recruiting
    • Patty Camacho · ContactPatty.Camacho@orlandohealth.com · 321-842-4130
    • Marco Ferrara, MD · Principal investigator
    • Antonio Caycedo, MD · Sub investigator
  • Mountain View Hospital
    Las Vegas, Nevada 89128, United States
    Recruiting
  • The Ohio State Unversity
    Columbus, Ohio 43210, United States
    Not yet recruiting
    • Chandler Lowe · Contactchandler.lowe@osumc.edu · (614) 293-9955
    • Emily Huang, MD · Principal investigator
    • Philip Bauer, MD · Sub investigator
  • Kettering Health
    Kettering, Ohio 45429, United States
    Not yet recruiting
    • Clinical Research Coordinator · Contact855-500-2873
    • Minia Hellan, MD · Principal investigator
  • St David's North Austin Medical Center
    Austin, Texas 78758, United States
    Recruiting
  • HCA Houston Healthcare Medical Center
    Houston, Texas 77004, United States
    Recruiting
    • Jimena Alcocer-Barrios · Contactjalcocerbarrios@houstoncolon.com · 713-527-5000
    • Eric Haas, MD · Principal investigator
    • Jean-Paul LeFave, MD · Sub investigator
  • MultiCare Tacoma General Hospital
    Tacoma, Washington 98405, United States
    Not yet recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started May 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Apr 2027, 11 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 14, 2026
First posted
Jan 16, 2026
StartActual
May 14, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Apr 30, 2027
CompletionEst.
Aug 31, 2027
Last update
Aug 5, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 5, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07346066
Lead sponsor
Intuitive Surgical
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 16, 2026
Start date
May 14, 2026
Primary completion
Apr 30, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 5, 2026

Study contacts

Clinical Project Manager
Contact
info.is-001@intusurg.com
4085232100

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion