ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07759180BLEPH-GAUZEUpdated Aug 12, 2026

Sterile Plant-Based Gauze for Eyelid Hygiene in Anterior Blepharitis

An interventional study of Plant-Based Sterile Eyelid Gauze and Sterile Cotton Gauze Moistened with Saline Solution in Blepharitis, sponsored by Azienda Ospedaliera OO.RR. S. Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi D'Aragona. Completed at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-12.

Sponsored by Azienda Ospedaliera OO.RR. S. Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi D'Aragona · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 3 years 6 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Feb 2023, registered Aug 2026).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
38
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether a sterile gauze containing natural plant extracts can lower the number of bacteria on the eyelid margin in people with bilateral anterior blepharitis. The study will also evaluate whether the product is safe and well tolerated after a single application.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does the sterile gauze containing natural plant extracts reduce the bacterial load on the eyelid margin more than a standard sterile gauze?
  • Does the treatment improve eyelid comfort without causing unwanted side effects?

Researchers will compare the study gauze with a sterile gauze without active ingredients. Each participant will receive both treatments: the right eye will be treated with the study gauze, while the left eye will be treated with the control gauze. This allows each participant to serve as their own control.

Participants will:

  • Attend one study visit.
  • Undergo an eye examination to confirm the diagnosis of bilateral anterior blepharitis.
  • Have samples collected from the upper and lower eyelid margins of both eyes before treatment.
  • Receive eyelid cleansing with the assigned gauze for each eye.
  • Have eyelid samples collected again 20 minutes after treatment.
  • Complete a short questionnaire about treatment comfort and tolerability.

The study will compare the change in bacterial growth between the two eyes to determine whether the natural plant-based gauze provides additional microbiological benefits beyond mechanical eyelid cleansing alone. Safety and participant comfort will also be assessed.

Read the detailed description

Anterior blepharitis is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the eyelid margin characterized by erythema, scaling, crusting, and ocular discomfort. The condition is frequently associated with increased bacterial colonization of the eyelid margin, particularly by Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci, which contribute to chronic inflammation through the production of lipases, proteases, and other virulence factors. Bacterial biofilm formation further promotes microbial persistence and recurrent disease, making eyelid hygiene a fundamental component of long-term management.

Although mechanical cleansing of the eyelid margin is widely recommended, limited clinical evidence is available regarding the immediate microbiological efficacy of sterile eyelid cleansing devices containing natural plant-derived compounds. Leniben® Gauze is a sterile single-use cotton gauze impregnated with sodium hyaluronate, Echinacea angustifolia extract, Ananas sativus extract (bromelain), ammonium glycyrrhizate, and tocopherol. The device is intended to combine the mechanical removal of eyelid debris and microbial biofilm with the moisturizing and soothing properties of its active ingredients.

This prospective, randomized, paired-eye controlled clinical trial is designed to evaluate the microbiological efficacy of Leniben® Gauze in adults with bilateral anterior blepharitis. Each participant serves as his or her own control: the right eye receives treatment with Leniben® Gauze, while the contralateral eye is treated with an identical sterile cotton gauze moistened with sterile saline solution. This paired-eye design minimizes inter-individual variability in eyelid microbiota and allows direct comparison between the active formulation and mechanical cleansing alone.

Microbiological samples are collected from the upper and lower eyelid margins of both eyes immediately before treatment and 20 minutes after the cleansing procedure. Samples are cultured using standard microbiological techniques, and bacterial growth is quantified as colony-forming units (CFU). Changes in bacterial load and bacterial eradication rates are compared between treatments. Participant-reported tolerability and any treatment-related adverse events are also assessed.

The results of this study will provide evidence on the ability of a plant-based sterile eyelid cleansing device to reduce periocular bacterial colonization and may support its use as a non-antibiotic adjunctive strategy for eyelid hygiene in anterior blepharitis and for reducing bacterial burden before ophthalmic procedures.

02

Conditions studied

  • Blepharitis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Anterior blepharitis
  • eyelid hygiene
  • eyelid microbiota
  • eyelid wipes
03

In context

Blepharitis

73 studies on the registry are indexed under Blepharitis; 9 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 38 is below the median of 60 across 65 interventional studies indexed under Blepharitis.

Browse Blepharitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Azienda Ospedaliera OO.RR. S. Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi D'Aragona is the lead sponsor of 5 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged 18 years or older.
  • Clinical diagnosis of bilateral anterior blepharitis confirmed by slit-lamp examination.
  • Presence in both eyes of eyelid-margin inflammation associated with at least two of the following clinical signs: eyelid-margin hyperemia; eyelash crusting or collarettes; scaling or debris at the base of the eyelashes; lash abnormalities; mucocutaneous inflammation.
  • Presence of at least one associated symptom, including burning, itching, foreign-body sensation, tearing, or ocular irritation.
  • Ability and willingness to provide written .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Active ocular infection other than anterior blepharitis.
  • Predominantly posterior blepharitis requiring specific treatment.
  • Clinically evident Demodex infestation.
  • Ocular surgery within the previous 3 months.
  • Contact lens wear.
  • Use of topical or systemic antibiotics, antiseptics, or within the previous 4 weeks.
  • Ocular trauma.
  • disease or immunodeficiency.
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
  • Known to any component of the study products.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
38 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Leniben

    A sterile single-use 100% cotton gauze impregnated with a solution containing sodium hyaluronate, Echinacea angustifolia extract, Ananas sativus extract (bromelain), ammonium glycyrrhizate, and tocopherol.

    Device: Plant-Based Sterile Eyelid Gauze

  • Sham comparator
    Control

    A sterile single-use 100% cotton gauze moistened with sterile saline solution and containing no active ingredients.

    Device: Sterile Cotton Gauze Moistened with Saline Solution

Interventions

  • DevicePlant-Based Sterile Eyelid Gauze

    Participants received eyelid hygiene using Leniben® Gauze, a sterile single-use cotton gauze impregnated with a solution containing sodium hyaluronate, Echinacea angustifolia extract, Ananas sativus extract (bromelain), ammonium glycyrrhizate, and tocopherol. One eye of each participant was randomly assigned to the intervention. The upper and lower eyelid margins were cleansed using five standardized strokes, and microbiological samples were collected before treatment and 20 minutes after application to evaluate changes in bacterial colonization.

  • DeviceSterile Cotton Gauze Moistened with Saline Solution

    Participants received eyelid hygiene using an identical sterile single-use cotton gauze moistened with sterile saline solution, without active ingredients. The contralateral eye of each participant was randomly assigned to the control treatment. The upper and lower eyelid margins were cleansed using the same standardized procedure as the experimental arm (five standardized strokes). Microbiological samples were collected before treatment and 20 minutes after application to evaluate changes in bacterial colonization attributable to mechanical cleansing alone

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Difference in Post-Treatment Eyelid Bacterial Load Adjusted for Baseline

    Baseline-adjusted difference in total eyelid-margin bacterial load 20 minutes after cleansing between eyes treated with a sterile gauze containing natural plant extracts and contralateral eyes treated with sterile saline-moistened gauze. Total bacterial load is defined as the sum of colony-forming units per milliliter (CFU/mL) of all bacterial species isolated from each eye and analyzed after log₁₀(CFU/mL + 1) transformation.

    Time frame: Baseline and 20 minutes after a single treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Culture-Negative Conversion

    Proportion of eyes with a positive baseline culture that convert to no detectable bacterial growth 20 minutes after treatment. Culture-negative conversion is defined as the transition from a positive baseline culture to no detectable bacterial growth after cleansing.

    Time frame: 20 minutes after a single treatment

  2. Percentage Reduction in Eyelid Bacterial Load

    Percentage reduction in total bacterial load from baseline to 20 minutes after treatment, calculated only for eyes with a positive baseline culture. Total bacterial load is expressed as colony-forming units per milliliter (CFU/mL).

    Time frame: Baseline and 20 minutes after a single treatment

  3. Changes in Eyelid Microbiological Profile

    Qualitative and quantitative changes in bacterial species isolated from eyelid-margin cultures, including persistence, clearance, or changes in polymicrobial colonization after treatment. Species-specific analyses are exploratory.

    Time frame: Baseline and 20 minutes after a single treatment

  4. Treatment Comfort and Tolerability

    Participant-reported ocular comfort, treatment tolerability, and overall acceptability assessed immediately after treatment using 5-point Likert scales, where 1 = very uncomfortable, 2 = uncomfortable, 3 = neutral, 4 = comfortable, and 5 = very comfortable. Higher scores indicate greater treatment comfort and tolerability.

    Time frame: Immediately after treatment

  5. Treatment-Related Adverse Events

    Incidence of ocular or periocular adverse events, including burning, stinging, itching, tearing, blurred vision, conjunctival hyperemia, eyelid erythema or edema, and corneal epithelial abnormalities occurring after treatment.

    Time frame: From treatment administration until completion of the study visit (20 minutes)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria OO.RR. S. Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi D'Aragona
    Salerno, Campania 84125, Italy
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Guillon M, Maissa C, Wong S. Eyelid margin modification associated with eyelid hygiene in anterior blepharitis and meibomian gland dysfunction. Eye Contact Lens. 2012 Sep;38(5):319-25. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0b013e318268305a. PubMed 22890229 ↗
  • Shi R, Guo Y, Li A, Tian L, Jie Y. Comparative efficacy of eyelid cleansing wipes, hypochlorous acid, and saline for blepharitis-associated ocular surface disease: a randomized trial. Sci Rep. 2026 Jul 11. doi: 10.1038/s41598-026-62115-z. Online ahead of print. PubMed 42436201 ↗
  • Sung J, Wang MTM, Lee SH, Cheung IMY, Ismail S, Sherwin T, Craig JP. Randomized double-masked trial of eyelid cleansing treatments for blepharitis. Ocul Surf. 2018 Jan;16(1):77-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2017.10.005. Epub 2017 Nov 8. PubMed 29128682 ↗
  • Peral A, Alonso J, Garcia-Garcia C, Nino-Rueda C, Calvo Del Bosque P. Importance of Lid Hygiene Before Ocular Surgery: Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Eyelid and Conjunctiva Microbiota. Eye Contact Lens. 2016 Nov;42(6):366-370. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000221. PubMed 26657662 ↗
  • Stroman DW, Mintun K, Epstein AB, Brimer CM, Patel CR, Branch JD, Najafi-Tagol K. Reduction in bacterial load using hypochlorous acid hygiene solution on ocular skin. Clin Ophthalmol. 2017 Apr 13;11:707-714. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S132851. eCollection 2017. PubMed 28458509 ↗
  • Giannaccare G, Vagge A, Pellegrini M, Buzzi M, Mencucci R, Lorusso M, Massimino M, Rossi C, Celandroni F, Calvigioni M, Mazzantini D, Nicolo M, Scorcia V, Traverso CE, Ghelardi E. In vitro and in vivo antimicrobial activity of medicated wipes containing biosecur on the microbial Flora of the eyelid and conjunctiva. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2025 Sep;35(5):1810-1817. doi: 10.1177/11206721251332758. Epub 2025 Apr 15. PubMed 40232251 ↗
  • Mencucci R, Morelli A, Favuzza E, Galano A, Roszkowska AM, Cennamo M. Hypochlorous acid hygiene solution in patients affected by blepharitis: a prospective randomised study. BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2023 Dec 7;8(1):e001209. doi: 10.1136/bmjophth-2022-001209. PubMed 38088255 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified individual participant data underlying the results reported in the published article will be shared. This will include demographic characteristics, baseline clinical findings, microbiological culture results, quantitative bacterial load (CFU/mL), treatment allocation, outcome measures, and adverse event data necessary to reproduce the published analyses.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Clinical study report

Time frame: Beginning in August 2026 and available indefinitely.

Access criteria: De-identified individual participant data, the study protocol, statistical analysis plan, and statistical code will be available to qualified researchers upon reasonable request to the corresponding author. Access will be granted following review and approval by the study investigators and execution of a data-sharing agreement to ensure participant confidentiality and compliance with institutional and applicable data protection regulations.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 12, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07759180
Lead sponsor
Azienda Ospedaliera OO.RR. S. Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi D'Aragona
Responsible party
Mario Troisi (Dr, Azienda Ospedaliera OO.RR. S. Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi D'Aragona) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 12, 2026
Start date
Feb 2, 2023
Primary completion
Nov 26, 2025
Completion
Dec 12, 2025
Last update
Aug 12, 2026

Study contacts

Mario Troisi, MD
principal investigator · Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria OO.RR. S. Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi D'Aragona, Salerno, Italy

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion