An interventional study of Sulcular flap elevation for wisdom tooth removal and Three-cornered flap elevation for wisdom tooth removal in Surgical Flaps, Oral Surgical Procedures and Regional Blood Flow, sponsored by Betül Taş Özyurtseven. Completed at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years to 40 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-11.
Sponsored by Betül Taş Özyurtseven · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Wisdom teeth in the lower jaw are frequently buried in bone and must be taken out surgically. To reach the tooth, the surgeon lifts the gum away from the bone as a flap, and the shape of that flap is left to the surgeon's judgement. Two outlines are in everyday use. The first runs only along the necks of the teeth, so the gum is lifted without any additional cut. The second adds a short downward cut in front, which opens the field more widely but also divides some of the small vessels that run within the gum.
Because the tissues around a wound rely on a rich network of tiny vessels while they repair themselves, it is worth knowing whether these two outlines leave the local circulation in a different state. This project measured that circulation directly. A laser probe was placed against the tooth in front of the extraction site and against three points on the cheek-side gum, and the amount of moving blood beneath the probe was recorded. To make sure the probe returned to exactly the same spots at every visit, a thin clear plastic guide with prepared openings was made for each participant from a plaster model of the mouth.
Measurements were taken before the operation and again on the third and the seventh day afterwards. Facial swelling and how widely the mouth could be opened were recorded on the same occasions. Participants were assigned to one of the two flap outlines in turn, and every operation was carried out by the same surgeon so that the comparison depended on the flap outline alone.
Fifty-six systemically healthy adults presenting for surgical removal of a single fully bone-impacted mandibular wisdom tooth were assigned to one of two mucoperiosteal flap outlines by an alternating (non-random) sequence, giving twenty-eight participants per arm. Assignment was stratified by angulation according to Winter's scheme, so that each of the four angulation categories contributed seven cases to each arm.
Microvascular perfusion was quantified in perfusion units using a laser Doppler flowmeter (Perimed, Järfälla, Sweden). One recording site lay on the mid-buccal aspect of the tooth immediately anterior to the extraction site, at the crossing of its mesiodistal and occlusocervical axes, and served as an index of pulp circulation; three further sites were distributed over the adjacent buccal mucosa. Probe position was reproduced across visits by a 2 mm transparent acrylic stent carrying prepared probe housings, constructed individually on a stone model. Each site was sampled for 30 seconds.
Swelling was derived from three facial reference distances (gonion to labial commissure, tragus to labial commissure, and gonion to lateral canthus), averaged to a single value. Mouth opening was taken as the greatest interincisal distance. Every assessment was carried out immediately before surgery and repeated on the third and seventh postoperative days, sutures being removed at the final visit.
All operations were performed by one operator with a standard armamentarium under inferior alveolar, lingual and buccal block anaesthesia, using no more than two cartridges of articaine 40 mg/mL with epinephrine 1:100,000. Bone was removed and the tooth divided with a physiodispenser and steel burs under saline cooling, and the socket was closed with 3/0 silk. All participants received amoxicillin-clavulanate, paracetamol and a benzydamine-chlorhexidine mouthrinse after the procedure. Group means were compared by repeated-measures analysis of variance with Tukey HSD pairwise testing.
122 studies on the registry are indexed under Tooth, Impacted; 15 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 56 is below the median of 70 across 88 interventional studies indexed under Tooth, Impacted.
Browse Tooth, Impacted studies →This is the only study on the registry with Betül Taş Özyurtseven as lead sponsor.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
The mucoperiosteum is raised through an incision confined to the gingival sulcus, carried from the mesial aspect of the first molar back to the distal aspect of the second molar and then along the external oblique ridge. No vertical cut is made.
Procedure: Sulcular flap elevation for wisdom tooth removal
The same sulcular and posterior incision is used, with the addition of a vertical relieving cut placed anterior to the second molar and kept clear of the interdental papilla.
Procedure: Three-cornered flap elevation for wisdom tooth removal
The mucoperiosteum is raised through an incision confined to the gingival sulcus, carried from the mesial aspect of the first molar back to the distal aspect of the second molar and then along the external oblique ridge.
Also known as: Intervention 1
The same sulcular and posterior incision is used, with the addition of a vertical relieving cut placed anterior to the second molar and kept clear of the interdental papilla
Change in mucosal microcirculation adjacent to the operative field
Perfusion in perfusion units (PU) at three buccal mucosal sites recorded by laser Doppler flowmetry through the same stabilising stent, 30 seconds per site. The most anterior site lies in the region traversed by the vertical relieving cut of the three-cornered outline.
Time frame: Immediately before surgery, and on postoperative days 3 and 7
Change in pulp microcirculation of the tooth adjacent to the extraction site
Perfusion recorded in perfusion units (PU) by laser Doppler flowmetry over the mid-buccal aspect of the neighbouring second molar, with probe position reproduced by an individually made acrylic stent. Each recording lasts 30 seconds. A higher value indicates greater circulation.
Time frame: Immediately before surgery, and on postoperative days 3 and 7
Change in facial swelling
Mean of three facial reference distances measured in centimetres: gonion to labial commissure, tragus to labial commissure, and gonion to lateral canthus. A higher value indicates more swelling.
Time frame: Immediately before surgery, and on postoperative days 3 and 7
Change in maximum mouth opening
Greatest interincisal distance in millimetres, used as an index of restricted opening. A lower value indicates greater restriction.
Time frame: Immediately before surgery, and on postoperative days 3 and 7
Duration of the operation
Elapsed time in minutes from the first cut to placement of the final suture.
Time frame: Day of surgery (day 0), intraoperative
Plan to share: No — available from the corresponding author on reasonable request
This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.