ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07758036Updated Aug 13, 2026

Group CBT for Paternal Perinatal Depression

An interventional study of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Paternal Perinatal Depression in Perinatal Depression and Fathers, sponsored by McMaster University. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Canada. Open to male participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-13.

Sponsored by McMaster University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
112
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Male
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-13

Among 14 studies in Depression by McMaster University — 1 open to participants now, 2 under way, none of them phase 3. Depression · McMaster University.

Started
2026
the only one that year
No phase
9 of 14
1 open now
Registered
14th of 14
by date

Among the 14 studies in Depression by McMaster University, this one is the only one that started in 2026, is one of 9 with no phase, and was the 14th registered.

Depression

8,582 studies on the registry are indexed under Depression; 1,723 are open to participants now.

Browse Depression studies →

Open to participants now

1 of the 14 studies in Depression by McMaster University is open now, in 1 country.

By country, each count listing its studies:

Where they have run

Who these studies take

Of the 1,089 Depression studies recruiting now, 470 (43%) set no upper age limit and 519 (48%) stop at 75 or younger; 203 take children under 18; 311 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years and older · male · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 14 studies in Depression by McMaster University, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

The purpose of the proposed study is to determine the effectiveness of an online, 9-week group cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) intervention for paternal perinatal depression (PND) in fathers and fathers-to-be. Fathers or fathers-to-be living in Ontario, Canada who have depression symptoms while their partner has been pregnant and/or during the first 18 months of their child's life will be assigned with a 50/50 chance (like flipping a coin) to receive online group CBT in addition to usual care, or to receive usual care only.

Read the detailed description

This study will involve a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to determine the effectiveness of a 9-week group CBT intervention added to treatment as usual (TAU) compared to TAU alone for improving paternal perinatal depression symptoms. The primary objective is to determine the effectiveness of the intervention for treating paternal perinatal depression symptoms, and secondary objectives will assess whether the intervention leads to improvements in common comorbidities (anxiety) and complications (parenting stress, social isolation, partner relationship quality, parent-infant attachment, and offspring behaviour) and whether it is cost-effective.

112 participants will be assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the experimental or control group. Participants in both groups will complete online questionnaires and structured telephone interviews at baseline (T1), 9 weeks later (T2 - immediately post-intervention in the experimental group) and 6 months post-enrollment (T3). Those assigned to receive the 9-week CBT group will also be asked questions about their satisfaction with the program and recommendations for improvement.

03

Conditions studied

  • Perinatal Depression
  • Fathers

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • cognitive behavioral therapy
  • paternal depression
  • perinatal depression
  • fathers
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Non-birthing individuals identifying as fathers-to-be (i.e., have a pregnant partner) or fathers who have an infant \<18 months at recruitment
  • Fluent in written/spoken English
  • Have an EPDS score ≥9
  • Live in Ontario

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Free of bipolar, psychotic, borderline personality and current substance use disorders
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
112 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    9-Week Group Cognitive Behavioural Therapy Intervention

    The experimental group will receive a 9-week group CBT intervention in addition to receiving treatment as usual.

    Behavioral: Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Paternal Perinatal Depression

  • No intervention
    Control/Usual Care

    Participants randomized to the No Intervention group will continue to receive treatment as usual (standard care). A list of resources will be emailed.

Interventions

  • BehavioralCognitive Behavioral Therapy for Paternal Perinatal Depression

    Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) is a type of psychotherapy (talk therapy). The weekly group sessions will be two hours long and take place once a week for 9 consecutive weeks. The first hour of the session will involve teaching and practice of CBT skills, followed by one hour of unstructured discussion around topics relevant to participants with paternal perinatal depression. Each group will be delivered online via Zoom and guided by our intervention manual.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Paternal Perinatal Depression (PND) Symptoms - Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS)

    The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) is a 10-item gold standard measure of perinatal depression (PND). Total scores range from 0-30 with higher scores indicating worse depressive symptoms. A score of ≥10 is consistent with possible PND, ≥13 is consistent with probable PND and changes in scores \>4 are accepted as being indicative of clinically significant change.

    Time frame: 9 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Paternal Perinatal Depression Symptoms - Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS)

    The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) is a 10-item gold standard measure of PND. Total scores range from 0-30 with higher scores indicating worse depressive symptoms. A score of ≥10 is consistent with possible PND, ≥13 is consistent with probable PND and changes in scores \>4 are accepted as being indicative of clinically significant change.

    Time frame: 6 months post enrollment

  2. Major Depressive Disorder

    DSM-5-defined current major depressive disorder (MDD) using the Diagnostic Assessment Research Tool (DART), a structured diagnostic interview.

    Time frame: 9 weeks

  3. Major Depressive Disorder

    DSM-5-defined current major depressive disorder (MDD) using the Diagnostic Assessment Research Tool (DART), a structured diagnostic interview.

    Time frame: 6 months post enrollment

  4. Anxiety Symptoms - GAD-7

    The Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-Item Scale (GAD-7) will be used to assess anxiety symptoms. The GAD-7 is a 7-item self-report scale that assesses the symptoms of generalized anxiety disorder, the most common comorbidity of PND. Items are scored on a 0-3 point scale with total scores ranging from 0-21. Higher scores indicate more severe anxiety symptoms.

    Time frame: 9 weeks

  5. Anxiety Symptoms - GAD-7

    The Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-Item Scale (GAD-7) will be used to assess anxiety symptoms. The GAD-7 is a 7-item self-report scale that assesses the symptoms of generalized anxiety disorder, the most common comorbidity of PND. Items are scored on a 0-3 point scale with total scores ranging from 0-21. Higher scores indicate more severe anxiety symptoms.

    Time frame: 6 months post enrollment

  6. Parenting Stress - Parenting Stress Index Short Form (PSI-SF)

    A 36-item self-report measure of parenting stress. Items are scored on a 1-5 point scale with total scores ranging from 36-180. Higher scores indicate greater parenting stress.

    Time frame: 9 weeks

  7. Parenting Stress - Parenting Stress Index Short Form (PSI-SF)

    A 36-item self-report measure of parenting stress. Items are scored on a 1-5 point scale with total scores ranging from 36-180. Higher scores indicate greater parenting stress.

    Time frame: 6 months post enrollment

  8. Partner Relationship Quality - Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS)

    A 32-item self-report measure assessing partner relationship quality. Items are rated on a 5-, 6-, or 7-point scale or yes/no response. Total scores range from 0-151, with higher scores indicating better relationship adjustment and quality.

    Time frame: 9 weeks

  9. Partner Relationship Quality - Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS)

    A 32-item self-report measure assessing partner relationship quality. Items are rated on a 5-, 6-, or 7-point scale or yes/no response. Total scores range from 0-151, with higher scores indicating better relationship adjustment and quality.

    Time frame: 6 months post enrollment

  10. Parent-Infant Bonding - Postpartum Bonding Questionnaire (PBQ)

    A 25-item self-report measure; each item is scored on a 0-5-point scale. Total scores range from 0-125 with higher scores indicating greater impairment in bonding. Subscales include: Impaired Boding, Rejection and Anger, Infant-Focused Anxiety, Risk of Abuse.

    Time frame: 9 weeks

  11. Parent-Infant Bonding - Postpartum Bonding Questionnaire (PBQ)

    A 25-item self-report measure; each item is scored on a 0-5-point scale. Total scores range from 0-125 with higher scores indicating greater impairment in bonding. Subscales include: Impaired Boding, Rejection and Anger, Infant-Focused Anxiety, Risk of Abuse.

    Time frame: 6 months post enrollment

  12. Infant Temperament - Infant Behaviour Questionnaire Revised Very Short Form (IBQ-R)

    A 37 self-report measure. Each item is scored on a 7-point likert scale, with 'does not apply' option available. Mean scores of items responded to are generated for each subscale. Higher scores indicate higher levels of the measured temperament trait. Subscales assessed include Positive Affectivity/Surgency, Negative Emotionality, Orienting/Regulatory Capacity.

    Time frame: 9 weeks

  13. Infant Temperament - Infant Behaviour Questionnaire Revised Very Short Form (IBQ-R)

    A 37 self-report measure. Each item is scored on a 7-point likert scale, with 'does not apply' option available. Mean scores of items responded to are generated for each subscale. Higher scores indicate higher levels of the measured temperament trait. Subscales assessed include Positive Affectivity/Surgency, Negative Emotionality, Orienting/Regulatory Capacity.

    Time frame: 6 months post enrollment

  14. Depression Symptoms - Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

    A 9-item self-report measure assessing depression symptoms. Each item is scored on a 0-3-point scale with total scores ranging from 0-27. Higher scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms.

    Time frame: 9 weeks

  15. Depression Symptoms - Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

    A 9-item self-report measure assessing depression symptoms. Each item is scored on a 0-3-point scale with total scores ranging from 0-27. Higher scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms.

    Time frame: 6 months post enrollment

  16. Cost-effectiveness - Healthcare Resource Utilization

    To inform cost-effectiveness analysis, healthcare resource utilization data will be collected using a questionnaire used in prior work and adapted for the postpartum period (based on the Canadian Community Health Survey and Service Use and Resources Form). Participants will provide information on all healthcare service and medication use over the trial period.

    Time frame: 9 weeks

  17. Cost-effectiveness - Healthcare Resource Utilization

    To inform cost-effectiveness analysis, healthcare resource utilization data will be collected using a questionnaire used in prior work and adapted for the postpartum period (based on the Canadian Community Health Survey and Service Use and Resources Form). Participants will provide information on all healthcare service and medication use over the trial period.

    Time frame: 6 months post enrollment

  18. Cost-effectiveness analysis - Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALY)

    To inform cost-effectiveness analysis, the EQ-5D-5L will be collected. This is a utility-based health-related quality of life instrument assessing five domains (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain, depression/anxiety) and will be administered at T1-T3. The Canadian algorithm will be used to convert responses to health utility. QALYs will be calculated by multiplying the health utility for the corresponding time period (i.e., area under the curve approach).

    Time frame: 9 weeks

  19. Cost-effectiveness analysis - Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALY)

    To inform cost-effectiveness analysis, the EQ-5D-5L will be collected. This is a utility-based health-related quality of life instrument assessing five domains (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain, depression/anxiety) and will be administered at T1-T3. The Canadian algorithm will be used to convert responses to health utility. QALYs will be calculated by multiplying the health utility for the corresponding time period (i.e., area under the curve approach).

    Time frame: 6 months post enrollment

Other outcomes

  1. Satisfaction with the intervention - Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8)

    Intervention participants only. Satisfaction with the intervention will be assessed using the eight-item Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8). The CSQ-8 consists of eight items assessing the level of satisfaction with the intervention on a 4-point Likert-type scale, as well as one open-ended question. Responses to the open-ended question will be analyzed using content analysis to inform acceptability of the intervention.

    Time frame: 9 weeks (immediately post treatment in intervention group)

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Sep 2026; primary completion for Dec 2029, 39 months later.

Of 3,471 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Depression, half reached primary completion within 21 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 41. This study's planned 39 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 3,569 studies reached it within 21 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 41.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 6, 2026
First posted
Aug 11, 2026
StartEst.
Sep 15, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2029
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2029
Last update
Aug 13, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 13, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07758036
Collaborators
Ottawa Public Health
Responsible party
Ryan Van Lieshout, MD, PhD (Professor, McMaster University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 11, 2026
Start date
Sep 15, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 13, 2026

Study contacts

Ryan J Van Lieshout, MD, PhD
Contact
vanlierj@mcmaster.ca
(905) 522-1155 ext. 35123

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion