ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07755592Updated Aug 11, 2026

miRNA Panel for PCa Diagnosis

An observational study in Prostate Cancer (Diagnosis), sponsored by RenJi Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to male participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-11.

Sponsored by RenJi Hospital · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Apr 2026; still recruiting 6 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
500
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

This is a single-center, prospective diagnostic accuracy trial conducted at Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, led by a team of urology and molecular medicine researchers. A total of 500 male participants aged 18 years or older who meet clinical indications for prostate biopsy will be enrolled between May 2026 and May 2027. All participants have suspected prostate cancer (PCa) based on abnormal prostate-specific antigen (PSA), abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE), suspicious multiparametric MRI (mpMRI), positive family history of prostate cancer, pathogenic gene mutations, or other high-risk clinical findings. Men with confirmed treated prostate cancer, recent prostate-related procedures, active other malignancies, severe organ dysfunction, coagulation disorders, or cognitive impairment that prevents informed consent will be excluded.

The core goal of this study is to test the diagnostic performance of a novel non-invasive blood test using a panel of circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) from serum, and compare it with the standard PSA-based screening tools to distinguish prostate cancer from benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). The gold standard for judging true disease status will be pathology results from transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy. Researchers will calculate key diagnostic metrics including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the ROC curve (AUC) for the miRNA panel. Secondary analyses will evaluate whether combining the miRNA signature with PSA or mpMRI improves diagnostic accuracy, especially for men with PSA levels in the ambiguous "gray zone" of 4-10 ng/mL. Subgroup assessments will also test how well the miRNA panel differentiates low-risk versus high-risk prostate cancer and clinically significant versus insignificant tumors across different PSA tiers, age groups, mpMRI risk scores and prostate sizes. Additional laboratory testing will confirm the stability of serum miRNAs under different storage temperatures and storage durations, as well as test consistency across operators, reagent batches and detection platforms to validate real-world clinical usability.

For participants, the study only involves a one-time fasting venous blood draw of up to 10 mL before biopsy, with no extra invasive procedures or experimental medications added to routine clinical care. The free miRNA test results can serve as supplementary evidence to help doctors judge whether a prostate biopsy is truly necessary, potentially sparing many patients from unnecessary invasive biopsy and its associated discomfort or complications. All blood samples will be stored under standardized biosafety protocols with de-identified personal data to fully protect participant privacy. Minimal risks include minor temporary bruising or slight pain at the blood draw site, which resolve spontaneously without long-term harm.

Statistical analysis will use three defined datasets (full analysis set, per-protocol set, safety set) and advanced methods including DeLong's test, logistic regression, NRI and IDI to quantify diagnostic improvement versus PSA. A 70% training cohort will build the miRNA diagnostic model, and the remaining 30% of samples will act as an independent validation group to verify model reliability. Safety monitoring will record all adverse events throughout follow-up, with strict ethical oversight following the Declaration of Helsinki and Chinese biomedical research regulations. After sample testing, data analysis and result summarization finish by October 2027, the research team plans to publish 1-2 peer-reviewed SCI papers to share findings globally. If validated, this serum miRNA panel will provide a more precise, non-invasive screening tool to reduce overdiagnosis and unnecessary prostate biopsies, optimize early prostate cancer detection, and lower overall medical burdens for men at risk of prostate disease in clinical practice.

02

Conditions studied

  • Prostate Cancer (Diagnosis)

Keywords

  • Prostate cancer
  • BPH
  • miRNA
  • serum biomarker
  • diagnosis
03

In context

Prostatic Neoplasms

7,046 studies on the registry are indexed under Prostatic Neoplasms; 1,580 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 500 is above the median of 200 across 1,310 observational studies indexed under Prostatic Neoplasms.

Browse Prostatic Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

RenJi Hospital is the lead sponsor of 550 studies on the registry; 247 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Male patients aged 18 years or older visiting the urology outpatient department of Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, with clinical indications for prostate biopsy due to suspected prostate lesions. Eligible patients present with abnormal PSA levels, abnormal digital rectal examination, suspicious mpMRI/TRUS/PSMA PET/CT findings, positive prostate cancer family history, or pathogenic prostate cancer-related gene mutations. A total of 500 participants will be enrolled, who will undergo transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy as the diagnostic gold standard to classify them into prostate cancer and benign prostatic hyperplasia subgroups.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Male participants aged ≥18 years Serum PSA > 4.0 ng/mL confirmed by repeat testing with ≥4-week interval, excluding interfering conditions such as acute urinary retention, catheterization and prostatitis PSA within gray zone (4.0-10.0 ng/mL) accompanied by abnormal f/t PSA ratio \<0.16, PSAD >0.15 ng/mL/g or PSAV >0.75 ng/mL/year Persistently rising PSA on two consecutive tests with abnormal PSAV regardless of absolute PSA value Abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE): palpable hard, nodular, fixed or asymmetric prostate lesions, indistinct induration or suspected space-occupying lesions Suspicious transrectal ultrasound (TRUS): hypoechoic nodules, hypervascular areas or disrupted prostatic capsule mpMRI PI-RADS v2.1 score ≥3, especially lesions scoring 4-5 Elevated focal PSMA uptake on PSMA PET/CT (if performed) First-degree relative with prostate cancer and personal PSA >3.0 ng/mL Carriers of pathogenic BRCA1/2, HOXB13 mutations with PSA >3.0 ng/mL Prior negative prostate with subsequent sustained PSA elevation or new suspicious mpMRI lesions Unexplained bone pain or pathological fracture with elevated PSA requiring exclusion of primary prostate Aggravated bladder outlet obstruction with elevated PSA or abnormal DRE requiring differentiation of malignant obstruction

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Confirmed prostate cancer receiving radical surgery, radiotherapy, androgen deprivation therapy or active surveillance Acute bacterial prostatitis, febrile urinary tract infection or acute urinary retention within the preceding 4 weeks Prostate massage, cystoscopy, ejaculation within 72 hours; prostate within 6 weeks; transurethral prostate surgery within 3 months prior to screening Active concurrent or history of any malignant tumor within the past 5 years (non-melanoma skin cancer excluded) Severe grade C liver dysfunction, \<30 mL/min/1.73m², coagulopathy ( >1.5 or count \<50×10⁹/L) Unable to discontinue anticoagulants (warfarin, dabigatran, rivaroxaban) or dual antiplatelet therapy for ≥5 days Severe cognitive impairment or acute psychiatric disorder precluding independent , follow-up and biospecimen collection Participation in other interventional clinical trials within 3 months or concurrent observational trials interfering with study outcomes Hematological disorders including myelodysplastic syndrome and leukemia that alter serum nucleic acid stability Severe peripheral vascular disease hindering venipuncture or inability to comply with fasting blood collection requirements

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(7)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Child-Pugh class

A score of how well the liver works in people with liver disease such as cirrhosis: class A is mild, B moderate and C severe.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

INR, PT and aPTT (clotting tests)

Blood tests of how long blood takes to clot. The INR is the prothrombin time (PT) put on a common scale; about 1 is usual for someone not taking a blood thinner.

Criteria often make an exception for people on a blood thinner such as warfarin, whose INR is raised on purpose.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
500 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
30 Days
Patient registry
Yes
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna

Groups and cohorts

  • PCa cohort

    Two diagnostic subgroups classified by histopathological gold standard from prostate biopsy: Cohort 1: Participants diagnosed with prostate cancer (PCa) Cohort 2: Participants diagnosed with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and other non-malignant prostate lesions All 500 enrolled subjects originate from a single unified screening cohort of men with suspected prostate lesions meeting biopsy indications; post-biopsy pathological results allocate subjects into the above two analytical cohorts.

    Diagnostic Test: Serum microRNA panel detection for prostate lesion differentiation

  • BPH cohort

    Two diagnostic subgroups classified by histopathological gold standard from prostate biopsy: Cohort 1: Participants diagnosed with prostate cancer (PCa) Cohort 2: Participants diagnosed with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and other non-malignant prostate lesions All 500 enrolled subjects originate from a single unified screening cohort of men with suspected prostate lesions meeting biopsy indications; post-biopsy pathological results allocate subjects into the above two analytical cohorts.

    Diagnostic Test: Serum microRNA panel detection for prostate lesion differentiation

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testSerum microRNA panel detection for prostate lesion differentiation

    This diagnostic test quantitatively detects a custom panel of circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) extracted from fasting serum specimens collected from participants within 24 hours prior to transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy. Total RNA is isolated from serum samples, reverse-transcribed into cDNA, and quantified via quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). The miRNA expression signature is used to construct a logistic regression/machine learning diagnostic model, whose discriminatory performance is benchmarked against total PSA, f/t PSA ratio, and multiparametric MRI (mpMRI). Unique aspects of this test include: 1) systematic evaluation of miRNA stability under varied serum storage temperatures and storage durations; 2) assessment of inter-operator, inter-batch reagent, and inter-platform assay reproducibility via coefficient of variation (CV); 3) stratified performance testing across PSA gray zone (4-10 ng/mL), ISUP low/high-risk prostate cancer subgrou

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of serum miRNA panel for differentiating prostate cancer from benign prostatic hyperplasia

    Evaluate the AUC, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of the serum miRNA signature using transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy pathology as the diagnostic gold standard. Compare the miRNA panel's diagnostic performance against serum total PSA via DeLong test.

    Time frame: Completed after pathological diagnosis results of prostate biopsy are available for all enrolled participants, following serum miRNA laboratory testing and statistical analysis of the full study cohort.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Incremental diagnostic benefit of serum miRNA panel combined with PSA or mpMRI; stratified diagnostic performance across PSA subgroups and prostate cancer risk tiers

    1\. Compare diagnostic gain of miRNA panel vs total PSA and f/t PSA via NRI and IDI; assess combined miRNA-PSA/mpMRI model accuracy especially for PSA gray zone (4-10 ng/mL). 2. Evaluate panel performance stability in PSA \<4, 4-10, \>10 ng/mL strata; distinguish low-risk (ISUP 1-2) vs high-risk (ISUP 3-5) and clinically significant/insignificant prostate cancer.

    Time frame: After completion of all biopsy pathology reports, serum miRNA testing and stratified subgroup statistical analyses of the full 500-subject cohort

  2. Assay reproducibility and serum miRNA stability under different sample storage conditions

    Calculate coefficient of variation (CV) across different operators, reagent batches and detection platforms. Detect miRNA expression changes in serum stored at room temperature, 4°C and -80°C over variable storage durations to verify clinical laboratory suitability.

    Time frame: Concurrent with batch serum miRNA laboratory testing throughout participant enrollment and sample processing phase

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — Individual participant data (IPD) sharing is undecided at present. All participant serum samples, raw miRNA detection data, clinical examination records and pathology reports contain sensitive personal clinical information and biospecimen-related private data protected by hospital biobank management regulations and Chinese personal information protection laws. The research team needs to complete data de-identification, formulate standardized data access agreements and obtain additional ethics committee approval before formalizing any data sharing scheme. No definitive IPD sharing policy has been finalized prior to completion of study enrollment, laboratory testing and statistical analysis.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Apr 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Oct 2027, 17 months after the start.

Of 541 non-industry observational studies under Prostatic Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 67 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 29 and three quarters within 162. This study's planned 17 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 650 studies reached it within 60 months; a quarter within 29 and three quarters within 141.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 4, 2026
First posted
Aug 10, 2026
StartActual
Apr 13, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Oct 1, 2027
CompletionEst.
Dec 1, 2027
Last update
Aug 11, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 11, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07755592
Lead sponsor
RenJi Hospital
Responsible party
Liang Dong (Associate Research Fellow, Attending Physician, Principal Investigator, RenJi Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 10, 2026
Start date
Apr 13, 2026
Primary completion
Oct 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 11, 2026

Study contacts

Wei Xue, PhD
Contact
uroxuewei@163.com
8621-58752345
Wei Xue, PhD
principal investigator · RenJi Hospital
Pengfei Wang, MD
principal investigator · RenJi Hospital
Liang Dong, PhD
principal investigator · RenJi Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion