ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07754032NEU-CAPUpdated Aug 10, 2026

The NEU - CAP Trial

An interventional study of Local standard care of monitoring non-invasive ventilation and CO₂-guided Non-Invasive Ventilation in Infant, Premature, Diseases, Birth, Preterm and Respiratory Distress Neonatal, sponsored by Leiden University Medical Center. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged Up to 32 Weeks. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-10.

Sponsored by Leiden University Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,860
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
Up to 32 Weeks
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of NEU-CAP is to investigate the clinical impact of using a colorimetric carbon dioxide (CO₂) detector during non-invasive ventilation (NIV). Infants born before 32 weeks of gestation will be included in this trial. This is a stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trial. The participating centre, rather than the individual infant, will be the unit of randomisation. This design is appropriate to test the effect of an intervention that encompasses a behavioural aspect, in this case CO₂-detector-guided non-invasive ventilation.

Read the detailed description

Rationale: Most infants establish effective gas exchange after birth independently with spontaneous breathing. Those that don't, receive breathing support non-invasively either through a face mask or invasively through endotracheal tube (ETT). Endotracheal ventilation is associated with lung injury in preterm infants. As a result, clinicians aim to support premature infants non-invasively and to only intubate those who don't respond adequately to mask positive pressure ventilation (PPV). It is a challenge for clinicians to judge how well infants are breathing and the effect of PPV during face mask breathing support. Current methods of monitoring provide indirect feedback that may be difficult to interpret. Exhaled carbon dioxide (CO₂) detectors that change colour in the presence of CO₂ are used to confirm ETT position. Detection of CO₂ during mask breathing support may offer a direct indication of gas exchange, which might allow for better assessment of spontaneous breathing and ventilation effectiveness.

Objective: To assess the effect of colorimetric CO₂ detector use during non-invasive ventilation, versus standard care, on the proportion of neonates receiving PPV after 5 minutes of life

Study design: This is a stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial, with randomisation occurring at the level of the participating hospital rather than the individual infant. This design is suitable for evaluating interventions with a potential learning effect and supports a structured implementation across study sites.

Study population: Infants receiving non-invasive breathing support in the first 10 minutes of life, born before 32 weeks of gestation.

Intervention: At the start of the study, all participating centres will continue their standard practice by providing non-invasive breathing support without using a CO₂ detector. As the study progresses, centres will switch one-by-one to using the colorimetric CO₂ detector during mask breathing support until all have switched. Once they have switched, centres will continue to use the CO₂ detector until the end of the study.

Main study parameter: The proportion of infants receiving PPV after 5 minutes of life.

02

Conditions studied

  • Infant, Premature, Diseases
  • Birth, Preterm
  • Respiratory Distress Neonatal

Keywords

  • Resuscitation
  • Preterm infant
  • Non-invasive ventilation
  • CO₂-detection
03

In context

Infant, Premature, Diseases

88 studies on the registry are indexed under Infant, Premature, Diseases; 12 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 1,860 is above the median of 63 across 57 interventional studies indexed under Infant, Premature, Diseases.

Browse Infant, Premature, Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

Leiden University Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 334 studies on the registry; 110 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 32 Weeks
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Born before 32 weeks of gestation
  • Received non-humidified face-mask support in the first 10 minutes of life
  • Parental consent obtained

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Congenital diaphragmatic hernia
  • Tracheo-oesophageal fistula
  • Cyanotic heart disease
  • Surfactant protein deficiency
  • Any other congenital abnormality or condition with an adverse effect on breathing, ventilation, or oxygenation. Many of the infants enrolled in the study will later be diagnosed with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS); this will not render them ineligible for inclusion.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
1,860 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Standard care

    At the start of the study, all participating centres will provide NIV using the standard monitoring methods in place as part of their local standard of care; this will not include using a CO₂ detector at any centre. No additional tools or changes to monitoring protocols will be introduced during this period.

    Procedure: Local standard care of monitoring non-invasive ventilation

  • Experimental
    Colorimetric CO₂-detector-guided non-invasive ventilation

    For each centre, a lot will be drawn which indicates the fortnight in which the protocol changes from standard care to CO₂-detector-guided non-invasive ventilation. Colorimetric CO₂ detectors have a chemical indicator that changes colour when a threshold level of CO₂ is exceeded. They are routinely used in newborn infants to confirm that an endotracheal tube (ETT) is correctly placed in the trachea. The CO₂ detector also has promise as a tool to directly assess lung aeration during mask breathing support. It could offer immediate feedback on both the adequacy of spontaneous breathing during continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and the effectiveness of PPV in non-breathing neonates. The colorimetric CO₂ detector used in this study has been developed specifically for use during NIV. All other procedures in the delivery room and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) will be performed according to international and local guidelines.

    Procedure: CO₂-guided Non-Invasive Ventilation

Interventions

  • ProcedureLocal standard care of monitoring non-invasive ventilation

    See arm

  • ProcedureCO₂-guided Non-Invasive Ventilation

    See arm

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Use of positive pressure ventilation (PPV) between 5 and 10 minutes after birth

    Proportion of infants receiving positive pressure ventilation between 5 and 10 minutes after birth

    Time frame: 5-10 minutes after birth

Secondary outcomes

  1. Use of PPV before 1 minute

    Proportion of infants receiving positive pressure ventilation before 1 minute after birth

    Time frame: Before 1 minute after birth

  2. Use of PPV between 1 and 5 minutes

    Proportion of infants receiving Positive Pressure Ventilation between 1 and 5 minutes after birth

    Time frame: 1-5 minutes after birth

  3. Use of PPV after 10 minutes

    Proportion of infants who continued to receive positive pressure ventilation in the delivery room after 10 minutes after birth

    Time frame: After 10 minutes after birth

  4. Heart rate

    Heart rate

    Time frame: At 5 minutes after birth

  5. Apgar score

    Apgar score at 1, 5 and 10 minutes after birth. Scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating a better clinical condition.

    Time frame: 1, 5 and 10 minutes after birth

  6. Use of PPV <10 min

    Proportion of infants receiving positive pressure ventilation within the first 10 minutes after birth

    Time frame: Within 10 minutes after birth

  7. Number of infants who received chest compressions <10min

    Number of infants who received chest compressions

    Time frame: Within 10 minutes after birth

  8. Number of infants who were intubated <10min

    Number of infants who were endotracheally intubated

    Time frame: Within 10 minutes after birth

  9. Number of infants who were administered adrenaline <10min

    Number of infants who were administered adrenaline

    Time frame: Within 10 minutes after birth

  10. Number of infants who were administered volume expansion <10min

    Number of infants who were administered volume expansion

    Time frame: Within 10 minutes after birth

  11. Death <10min

    Number of infants who died in the first 10 minutes after birth

    Time frame: Within 10 minutes after birth

  12. Number of infants who were supported by continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in the first week after birth

    CPAP use in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU)

    Time frame: In the first week after birth

  13. Number of infants who received surfactant in first week

    Surfactant administration via * Intubate-Surfactant-Extubate (INSURE) * Less Invasive Surfactant Administration (LISA) * ET tube

    Time frame: In the first week after birth

  14. Surfactant doses

    Number of surfactant doses administered

    Time frame: In the first week after birth

  15. Number of infants who were mechanically ventilated

    Mechanical ventilation

    Time frame: In the first week after birth

  16. Number of infants with abnormalities on the first cranial ultrasound

    Abnormalities on first cranial ultrasound: Intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH)/periventricular leukomalacia (PVL)

    Time frame: In the first week after birth

  17. Number of infants who died in the first week after birth

    Mortality

    Time frame: In the first week after birth

  18. Cord clamping time

    The time after birth at which the cord is clamped

    Time frame: During resuscitation at birth

Other outcomes

  1. Number of infants diagnosed with congenital anomalies

    Whether the infant has congenital anomalies, e.g. diaphragmatic hernia, oesophageal atresia, cyanotic heart disease

    Time frame: At birth

  2. Gestational age

    Gestational age at birth in weeks and days

    Time frame: At birth

  3. Gender

    Gender of the infant

    Time frame: At birth

  4. Mode of delivery

    Mode of delivery

    Time frame: At birth

  5. Doses of antenatal steroids

    Number of doses of antenatal steroids administered

    Time frame: Before birth

  6. Number of Infants Whose Mothers Received General Anaesthesia

    Maternal general anaesthesia

    Time frame: Before birth

  7. Complications during pregnancy

    Whether there were any complications during pregnancy, e.g. premature prolonged rupture of membranes, chorioamnionitis, pre-eclampsia, placental abruption, twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome, hydrops fetalis, feto-maternal haemorrhage

    Time frame: Before birth

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Jan 2027; primary completion for Mar 2028, 14 months later.

Of 33 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Infant, Premature, Diseases, half reached primary completion within 19 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 29. This study's planned 14 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 33 studies reached it within 19 months; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 29.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 30, 2026
First posted
Aug 10, 2026
StartEst.
Jan 2027
Primary completionEst.
Mar 2028
CompletionEst.
Mar 2028
Last update
Aug 10, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 10, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07754032
Responsible party
Janneke Dekker (Assistant Professor, Leiden University Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 10, 2026
Start date
Jan 2027 (estimated)
Primary completion
Mar 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 10, 2026

Study contacts

Mirthe M Bloemhof, MD
Contact
m.m.bloemhof@lumc.nl
+31715298760
Janneke Dekker, PhD
Contact
j.dekker@lumc.nl
+31715266620

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion