ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07753356FUSION-CEMEPUpdated Aug 7, 2026

VALIDATION OF FUSION CEMEP SCORE FOR OMITTING SYSTEMATIC PROSTATE BIOPSY

An observational study in Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Neoplasms/Diagnosis, sponsored by Marcelo Ruben Oliva. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Argentina. Open to male participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-07.

Sponsored by Marcelo Ruben Oliva · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
150
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

This study aims to prospectively validate the Fusion CEMEP score to assess the safety and efficacy of omitting systematic prostate biopsy in patients undergoing multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy. The main objective is to determine if target-only biopsy guided by the score is sufficient for clinically significant prostate cancer detection while reducing overtreatment and unnecessary cores.

02

Conditions studied

  • Prostate Cancer
  • Prostatic Neoplasms/Diagnosis

Keywords

  • PROSTATE BIOPSY
  • MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
  • FUSION CEMEP SCORE
03

In context

Prostatic Neoplasms

7,046 studies on the registry are indexed under Prostatic Neoplasms; 1,580 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 150 is below the median of 200 across 1,310 observational studies indexed under Prostatic Neoplasms.

Browse Prostatic Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Marcelo Ruben Oliva as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Male patients evaluated at the clinic with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer undergoing MRI-targeted biopsy.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult male patients with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer.
  • Patients scheduled to undergo multiparametric MRI-targeted prostate .
  • Signed .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior treatment for prostate cancer.
  • to prostate or multiparametric MRI.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
150 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
36 Months
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • FUSION CEMEP SCORE COHORT, PROSPECTIVE COHORT

    Patients evaluated with multiparametric MRI-targeted biopsy using the Fusion CEMEP score.

    Other: FUSION CEMEP SCORE STRATEGY

Interventions

  • OtherFUSION CEMEP SCORE STRATEGY

    Guidance of prostate biopsy decisions based on the Fusion CEMEP score to determine the safety of omitting systematic biopsies.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. DETECTION RATE OF CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT PROSTATE CANCER

    Percentage of patients diagnosed with clinically significant prostate cancer (Gleason score \>= 7) using the target-only biopsy guided by the Fusion CEMEP score compared to the full systematic scheme.

    Time frame: AT THE TIME OF PROSTATE BIOPSY (WITHIN 30 DAYS OF EVALUATION)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Clinica Cemep
    Rio Grande, Tierra del Fuego Province 9420, Argentina
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Aug 2026; primary completion for Dec 2027, 16 months later.

Of 541 non-industry observational studies under Prostatic Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 67 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 29 and three quarters within 162. This study's planned 16 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 650 studies reached it within 60 months; a quarter within 29 and three quarters within 141.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 4, 2026
First posted
Aug 7, 2026
StartEst.
Aug 15, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 20, 2027
CompletionEst.
Dec 30, 2029
Last update
Aug 7, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 7, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07753356
Lead sponsor
Marcelo Ruben Oliva
Responsible party
Marcelo Ruben Oliva (UROLOGIST, Servicio Urologia CEMEP) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Aug 7, 2026
Start date
Aug 15, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 20, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 30, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 7, 2026

Study contacts

MARCELO R OLIVA, MD
Contact
moliva.uba@gmail.com
+541151409244
MARCELO R OLIVA, MD
principal investigator · CLINICA CEMEP

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion