ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07753083SGMT-CPUpdated Aug 7, 2026

Structured Graphic Motor Therapy in Pediatric CP

An interventional study of Structured Graphic Motor Therapy (SGMT) and Conventional Upper-Limb Rehabilitation in Cerebral Palsy (CP), sponsored by Armenian State Institute of Physical Culture and Sport. Completed at 1 site in Armenia. Open to participants aged 8 Years to 12 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-07.

Sponsored by Armenian State Institute of Physical Culture and Sport · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 4 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Apr 2025, registered Aug 2026).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
12
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
8 Years to 12 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Structured Graphic Motor Therapy (SGMT) is a novel task-oriented rehabilitation approach that uses standardized, progressively challenging drawing trajectories to improve upper-limb motor function in children with cerebral palsy. This pilot randomized controlled trial will compare SGMT combined with conventional rehabilitation with conventional upper-limb rehabilitation alone over a 16-week intervention period. Standardized clinical assessments and quantitative image-derived measures of graphical motor performance will be used to evaluate changes in motor function, visuomotor coordination, and movement quality.

Read the detailed description

Upper-limb dysfunction is a major cause of activity limitation and reduced independence in children with cerebral palsy. Although conventional physiotherapy and occupational therapy improve motor performance, persistent deficits in fine motor control, visuomotor integration, and movement precision remain common. Structured Graphic Motor Therapy (SGMT) was developed as a standardized rehabilitation intervention based on principles of task-specific practice, motor learning, progressive overload, intrinsic visual feedback, and experience-dependent neuroplasticity. Rather than emphasizing artistic expression, SGMT employs individualized graphical trajectories of increasing complexity to promote coordinated upper-limb movement, continuous error correction, and sensorimotor integration.

This assessor-blinded pilot randomized controlled trial will enroll children aged 8-12 years with unilateral or predominantly unilateral cerebral palsy. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either SGMT in addition to conventional rehabilitation or a time-matched program of conventional upper-limb rehabilitation alone. Both groups will complete four supervised 70-minute sessions per week for 16 weeks. Clinical outcomes will be assessed using the Melbourne Assessment of Unilateral Upper Limb Function (MA2) and selected Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency, Second Edition (BOT-2) subtests. Exploratory quantitative image-derived measures, including the Graphic Motor Performance Index (GMPI), will also be evaluated. Assessments will be performed at baseline, Week 8, Week 16, and 12-week follow-up to determine the feasibility, safety, and preliminary effectiveness of SGMT and to generate data for a future definitive multicenter randomized clinical trial.

These sections conform well to the style typically expected by ClinicalTrials.gov: the Brief Summary is concise, while the Detailed Description explains the scientific rationale, study design, intervention, outcomes, and objectives without presenting study results.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cerebral Palsy (CP)

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Cerebral Palsy
  • upper limb
  • Task oriented and visuomotor training
  • Structured Graphic Motor Therapy
  • Fine Motor Skills
  • Graphic Motor Performance
03

In context

Cerebral Palsy

1,936 studies on the registry are indexed under Cerebral Palsy; 458 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 12 is below the median of 34 across 1,431 interventional studies indexed under Cerebral Palsy.

Browse Cerebral Palsy studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Armenian State Institute of Physical Culture and Sport as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
8 Years to 12 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Children aged 8 to 12 years. Confirmed diagnosis of cerebral palsy with unilateral or predominantly unilateral upper-limb motor impairment.

Sufficient voluntary movement of the affected upper limb to grasp and manipulate a drawing instrument on a supported horizontal surface.

Adequate visual, auditory, cognitive, and communication abilities to understand study instructions and complete standardized rehabilitation tasks.

Ability to follow standardized two-step verbal commands. Written provided by a parent or legal guardian and age-appropriate assent provided by the child.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Uncontrolled epilepsy. Fixed upper-limb contracture preventing completion of the intervention tasks. Orthopedic surgery involving the upper limb within the previous 6 months. Botulinum toxin injection affecting the upper limb within the previous 6 months.

Severe uncorrected visual impairment. upper-limb pain that interferes with task performance. Unstable medical condition that could interfere with participation. Participation in another intensive upper-limb rehabilitation program during the study period.

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
12 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Structured Graphic Motor Therapy + Conventional Rehabilitation

    Participants receive Structured Graphic Motor Therapy (SGMT) in addition to conventional upper-limb rehabilitation. The intervention consists of therapist-guided, progressively individualized trajectory-based drawing tasks combined with standard rehabilitation. Participants complete four supervised 70-minute sessions per week for 16 weeks.

    Behavioral: Structured Graphic Motor Therapy (SGMT)

  • Active comparator
    Conventional Upper-Limb Rehabilitation

    Participants receive a time-matched program of conventional upper-limb rehabilitation consisting of active and active-assisted range-of-motion exercises, reaching activities, grasp-and-release practice, object manipulation, bilateral upper-limb activities, and functional task training. Participants complete four supervised 70-minute sessions per week for 16 weeks.

    Other: Conventional Upper-Limb Rehabilitation

Interventions

  • BehavioralStructured Graphic Motor Therapy (SGMT)

    Structured Graphic Motor Therapy (SGMT) is a therapist-guided, task-oriented rehabilitation intervention using standardized, progressively individualized graphical trajectories to improve upper-limb motor function, visuomotor integration, movement precision, and motor learning. Training incorporates repetitive practice, intrinsic visual feedback, and progressive task complexity over 16 weeks.

  • OtherConventional Upper-Limb Rehabilitation

    Conventional upper-limb rehabilitation consists of active and active-assisted range-of-motion exercises, reaching, grasp-and-release practice, object transfer, forearm pronation and supination, wrist and finger exercises, bilateral upper-limb activities, and functional task practice delivered over 16 weeks.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Melbourne Assessment of Unilateral Upper Limb Function (MA2) Score

    The primary outcome is the change in upper-limb motor function measured using the Melbourne Assessment of Unilateral Upper Limb Function, Second Edition (MA2). The MA2 evaluates movement quality, range of motion, dexterity, fluency, and accuracy during standardized unilateral upper-limb tasks in children with cerebral palsy. Higher scores indicate better upper-limb motor performance.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 16 (end of intervention)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Armenian State Institute of Physical Culture and Sport
    Yerevan, Yerevan 0070, Armenia
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — Individual participant data (IPD) will not be publicly shared because of the small sample size and the potential risk of participant re-identification. De-identified data may be made available to qualified researchers upon reasonable request to the Principal Investigator, subject to institutional approval, applicable ethical requirements, and data use agreements.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 7, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07753083
Lead sponsor
Armenian State Institute of Physical Culture and Sport
Responsible party
Tigran Petrosyan (Associate Professor and Principal Investigator, Armenian State Institute of Physical Culture and Sport) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 7, 2026
Start date
Apr 1, 2025
Primary completion
Oct 1, 2025
Completion
Nov 30, 2025
Last update
Aug 7, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion