CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07744308Updated Aug 4, 2026

Effect of Intraoperative Dexmedetomidine on Postoperative Pain in Elderly Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal Surgery: a Secondary Analysis Based on Prospective Data

An observational study in Chronic Postoperative Pain, sponsored by Chinese PLA General Hospital. Completed at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 65 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-04.

Sponsored by Chinese PLA General Hospital · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
2,754
Ages
65 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is a secondary analysis of multicenter prospective data, including elderly patients who underwent elective major abdominal surgery between April 2020 and April 2022 from a perioperative database of elderly patients in China. This study aims to evaluate the impact of intraoperative dexmedetomidine on chronic postoperative pain in elderly patients undergoing major abdominal surgery, with a comprehensive analysis of pain across multiple dimensions.

Read the detailed description

This study is a secondary analysis of multicenter prospective data, including elderly patients who underwent elective major abdominal surgery between April 2020 and April 2022 from a perioperative database of elderly patients in China. In this study, we specifically extracted and analyzed the data at the 3-month follow-up time point after abdominal major surgeries in elderly patients to evaluate the association between the intraoperative use of dexmedetomidine and postoperative chronic pain (CPSP) in this elderly patient population.

Exposure definition: Patients who received dexmedetomidine (dose range 0.2-1.0 μg/kg·h) for anesthesia induction or maintenance during the operation were defined as exposed, while those who did not receive it were the unexposed group.

Primary outcome: The primary outcome was the incidence of postoperative pain at 3 months, assessed using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI).

Secondary outcomes: Secondary outcomes included pain severity, pain interference score, and health-related quality of life at 7 days, 1 month, and 3 months after surgery. Pain indicators were evaluated using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), and health-related quality of life was assessed using the EQ-5D-5L scale.

Statistical analysis: Missing covariates were handled using multiple imputation (m = 25), and potential confounders were controlled using inverse probability weighting (IPTW). Considering hospital clustering, all regression models had hospital as a random effect. A weighted logistic regression model was used to assess the impact of dexmedetomidine on the incidence of pain, a log-linear model was used to analyze pain severity scores and pain interference scores, and a linear mixed-effects model was used to analyze changes in health-related quality of life at the three time points after surgery.

Sample size and statistical power: Sample size estimation was based on previous literature. A prospective cohort study of patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery showed that the incidence of chronic pain 3 months after surgery was 30.58% . Based on the results of a meta-analysis , the incidence of chronic pain 3 months after surgery in patients using dexmedetomidine was estimated to be reduced to 15.6%. Based on the distribution of patients meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria in the database, the sample size ratio between the treatment group and the non-treatment group was approximately 1:2. Using PASS 2021 software, continuity correction was set, and under the two-sided test level α = 0.05 and test power 1 - β = 0.80, 251 patients (84 in the treatment group and 167 in the non-treatment group) were required. Considering a 20% dropout rate, the total sample size should be at least 314 cases (105 in the treatment group and 209 in the non-treatment group).

Data processing and quality control: All data will be extracted by trained researchers from the database.

Ethical considerations: Since this study only conducts a secondary analysis of anonymized existing data, the ethics committee waived the requirement for obtaining additional written informed consent from the participants. This study will be conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration and relevant local regulations.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Postoperative Pain

Browse trials for

03

In context

Pain, Postoperative

5,093 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain, Postoperative; 1,140 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 2,754 is above the median of 102 across 608 observational studies indexed under Pain, Postoperative.

Browse Pain, Postoperative studies →

Lead sponsor

Chinese PLA General Hospital is the lead sponsor of 558 studies on the registry; 202 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
65 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

This study is a secondary analysis based on a multi-center prospective database. We included 2,754 elderly patients who underwent major abdominal surgeries at five medical centers from April 2020 to April 2022. The data were sourced from Perioperative Database of Elderly Patients in China, which is a multi-center prospective study. The main objective of this parent study is to identify the perioperative risk factors for elderly non-cardiac surgery patients and establish a targeted risk prevention and management plan.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age ≥ 65 years;
  2. Underwent elective gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary surgeries.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with ASA grade IV or above;
  2. Patients with missing exposure factor data;
  3. Patients without postoperative pain assessment data;
  4. Patients transferred to the ICU after surgery or who died within 7 days after surgery.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
2,754 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The incidence of postoperative pain severity three months after the operation

    The incidence of postoperative pain severity three months after the operation using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). The BPI assesses pain at its "worst," "least," "average," and "now" (current pain). The scores of these four items are summed up and averaged. Then, this average value is multiplied by 10 to convert it into a standard score ranging from 0 to 100. The incidence of chronic postoperative pain is defined as a score of ≥ 10 after conversion (that is, the original average score is ≥ 1).

    Time frame: Three months after the operation

Secondary outcomes

  1. The incidence of postoperative pain interference three months after the operation

    The incidence of postoperative pain interference three months after the operation using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). The BPI measures how much pain has interfered with seven daily activities, including general activity, walking, work, mood, enjoyment of life, relations with others, and sleep. The pain scores of these seven items were summed up, and the average value was calculated. Then, this average value was multiplied by 10 to convert it into a standard score ranging from 0 to 100. The incidence of postoperative pain interference was defined as a converted score of ≥ 10 (that is, the original average score ≥ 1).

    Time frame: Three months after the operation

  2. Pain severity score

    Pain severity score: the BPI assesses pain at its "worst," "least," "average," and "now" (current pain). The scores of these four items are summed up and averaged. Then, this average value is multiplied by 10 to convert it into a standard score ranging from 0 to 100.

    Time frame: Three months after the operation

  3. Pain interference score

    Pain interference score: the BPI measures how much pain has interfered with seven daily activities, including general activity, walking, work, mood, enjoyment of life, relations with others, and sleep. The pain scores of these seven items were summed up, and the average value was calculated. Then, this average value was multiplied by 10 to convert it into a standard score ranging from 0 to 100.

    Time frame: Three months after the operation

  4. EQ-5D-5L

    At 7 days, 1 month and 3 months after the surgery, the European Five-Dimensional Health Scale (EQ-5D-5L) were used to assess the dynamic changes in postoperative health-related quality of life. It includes five dimensions: mobility, self-care, daily activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression (the utility values converted according to Chinese standards quantify the health status of patients). The health status effect value range of EQ-5D-5L is from -0.391 to 1. A score lower than 0 indicates "worse than death", 0 indicates "no quality of life" or "death", and 1 indicates complete health.

    Time frame: At 7 days, 1 month and 3 months after the surgery

  5. EQ VAS

    The overall health visual analogue score (EQ VAS) of the European Five-Dimensional Health Scale (EQ-5D-5L) was used to quantify the health status of the patients. The EQ VAS score ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better function.

    Time frame: At 7 days, 1 month and 3 months after the surgery

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Department of Anesthesiology, First Medical Center of the People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, Haidian 100853
    Beijing, China
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Zeng M, Xu X, Li R, Zhang X, Ma T, Cui Q, Wang J, Li S, Peng Y. Dexmedetomidine Prevents Chronic Incisional Pain After Brain Tumor Resection: A Secondary Analysis of the Randomized Control Trial. Anesth Analg. 2024 Apr 1;138(4):839-847. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000006563. Epub 2023 Jun 12. PubMed 37307232 ↗
  • Maurice-Szamburski A, Bringuier S, Auquier P, Capdevila X. From pain level to pain experience: redefining acute pain assessment to enhance understanding of chronic postsurgical pain. Br J Anaesth. 2024 Nov;133(5):1021-1027. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2024.08.003. Epub 2024 Sep 26. PubMed 39332996 ↗
  • Doleman B, Mathiesen O, Sutton AJ, Cooper NJ, Lund JN, Williams JP. Non-opioid analgesics for the prevention of chronic postsurgical pain: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2023 Jun;130(6):719-728. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2023.02.041. Epub 2023 Apr 12. PubMed 37059625 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — The individual participant data (IPD) generated in this study are not planned to be shared publicly. The data contain sensitive personal health information and are subject to confidentiality protections under the ethical approval and data management regulations governing this research. Data access is restricted to the immediate research team for the purposes outlined in the approved study protocol

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 4, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07744308
Lead sponsor
Chinese PLA General Hospital
Responsible party
Weidong Mi (Director of Department of Anesthesiology, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Chinese PLA General Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 4, 2026
Start date
Apr 1, 2020
Primary completion
Apr 30, 2024
Completion
Apr 30, 2024
Last update
Aug 4, 2026

Study contacts

Wei dong Mi, MD, PhD
study director · Department of Anesthesiology, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion