CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07737158Updated Jul 30, 2026

Venlafaxine for Non-specific Low Back Pain

An interventional study of Control Group and Venlafaxine group in Non-specific Low Back Pain and Pain Management, sponsored by Beijing Tiantan Hospital. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-30.

Sponsored by Beijing Tiantan Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
228
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Chronic non-specific low back pain is the leading cause of productivity loss and disability worldwide, constituting a major public health challenge. This study aims to systematically evaluate and compare the role of the antidepressant drug Venlafaxine in chronic non-specific low back pain, which is of critical importance for optimising clinical practice and developing precise, individualised treatment regimens.

02

Conditions studied

  • Non-specific Low Back Pain
  • Pain Management

Browse trials for

03

In context

Agnosia

1,190 studies on the registry are indexed under Agnosia; 508 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 228 is above the median of 78 across 1,024 interventional studies indexed under Agnosia.

Browse Agnosia studies →

Lead sponsor

Beijing Tiantan Hospital is the lead sponsor of 465 studies on the registry; 282 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged 18 to 75 years.
  • Diagnosis of chronic nonspecific low back pain, defined as pain located below the costal margin and above the inferior gluteal folds, lasting for more than 3 months, without a specific pathological cause.
  • Moderate to severe pain, defined as a Numerical Rating Scale score of 3 or higher.
  • Able to understand the study procedures and sign written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Low back pain caused by a known specific pathological condition, including but not limited to fracture, malignancy, infection, inflammatory disease, or other identifiable structural or systemic causes.
  • Major comorbidities that may interfere with study outcomes or represent contraindications to the study medication.
  • Current or previous diagnosis of depression, regardless of whether treatment was received.
  • Current or previous use of antidepressant medication.
  • Current use of opioid analgesics.
  • Pregnancy, breastfeeding, or planned pregnancy during the study period.
  • Known allergy, hypersensitivity, or contraindication to toludesvenlafaxine.
  • History of psychosis or other major psychiatric disorders.
  • Any condition that, in the investigator's judgment, makes the participant unsuitable for the study.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
228 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Control Group

    Participants in the control group will receive routine clinical care for chronic nonspecific low back pain

    Drug: Control Group

  • Experimental
    Venlafaxine group

    Venlafaxine is administered orally at a starting dose of 75 mg once daily. In patients with insufficient pain response who can tolerate the adverse effects, the dose may be carefully titrated up to 225 mg once daily. The maintenance period is 3 months.

    Drug: Venlafaxine group

Interventions

  • DrugControl Group

    Participants in the control group will receive routine clinical care for chronic nonspecific low back pain.

  • DrugVenlafaxine group

    Venlafaxine is administered orally at a starting dose of 75 mg once daily. In patients with insufficient pain response who can tolerate the adverse effects, the dose may be carefully titrated up to 225 mg once daily. The maintenance period is 3 months.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Average Low Back Pain Intensity at Month 3

    Average low back pain intensity during the previous week will be assessed using an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale, ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain.

    Time frame: 3 months after randomization

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Average Low Back Pain Intensity

    Average low back pain intensity during the previous week will be assessed using an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale, ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month, and 6 months after randomization

  2. Change From Baseline in Functional Disability Assessed by the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire

    Functional disability related to low back pain will be assessed using the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire. Higher scores indicate greater functional disability.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after randomization

  3. Global Perceived Recovery

    Overall improvement will be assessed using a 6-point Likert scale ranging from "much worse" to "completely recovered."

    Time frame: 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after randomization

  4. Change From Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life Assessed by EQ-5D-5L

    Health-related quality of life will be assessed using the EQ-5D-5L. The EQ-5D-5L includes five health dimensions, and each dimension has five severity levels. Higher health utility scores indicate better health status.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after randomization

  5. Change From Baseline in Sleep Quality Assessed by the Insomnia Severity Index

    Sleep quality and insomnia symptoms will be assessed using the patient-reported version of the Insomnia Severity Index. The scale contains 7 items evaluating sleep onset difficulty, sleep maintenance difficulty, early morning awakening, satisfaction with sleep, interference with daytime functioning, noticeability of sleep problems, and distress caused by sleep difficulties. Each item is scored from 0 to 4, and the total score ranges from 0 to 28. Scores are interpreted as follows: 0-7, no clinically significant insomnia; 8-14, subthreshold insomnia; 15-21, moderate insomnia; and 22-28, severe insomnia.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after randomization

  6. Change From Baseline in Back Pain Beliefs Assessed by the Back Beliefs Questionnaire

    Beliefs about back pain will be assessed using the Back Beliefs Questionnaire. Scores range from 9 to 45, with lower scores indicating more pessimistic beliefs about the consequences of back pain.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after randomization

  7. Change From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Features Assessed by the painDETECT Questionnaire

    Neuropathic pain features will be assessed using the painDETECT questionnaire. A score of 19 or higher suggests the presence of a neuropathic pain component.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after randomization

  8. Use of Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs

    The amount and frequency of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use during the study period will be recorded.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after randomization

  9. Incidence of Adverse Events

    Adverse events will be recorded throughout the study

    Time frame: From randomization to 6 months after randomization

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Beijing Tiantan Hospital
    Beijing, China 100050, China
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Konno S, Oda N, Ochiai T, Alev L. Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Phase III Trial of Duloxetine Monotherapy in Japanese Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Nov 15;41(22):1709-1717. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001707. PubMed 27831985 ↗
  • Skljarevski V, Ossanna M, Liu-Seifert H, Zhang Q, Chappell A, Iyengar S, Detke M, Backonja M. A double-blind, randomized trial of duloxetine versus placebo in the management of chronic low back pain. Eur J Neurol. 2009 Sep;16(9):1041-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2009.02648.x. Epub 2009 May 12. PubMed 19469829 ↗
  • GBD 2019 Diseases and Injuries Collaborators. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2020 Oct 17;396(10258):1204-1222. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30925-9. PubMed 33069326 ↗
  • Qaseem A, Wilt TJ, McLean RM, Forciea MA; Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians; Denberg TD, Barry MJ, Boyd C, Chow RD, Fitterman N, Harris RP, Humphrey LL, Vijan S. Noninvasive Treatments for Acute, Subacute, and Chronic Low Back Pain: A Clinical Practice Guideline From the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2017 Apr 4;166(7):514-530. doi: 10.7326/M16-2367. Epub 2017 Feb 14. PubMed 28192789 ↗
  • Leao Nunes Filho MJ, Barreto ESR, Antunes Junior CR, Alencar VB, Falcao Lins-Kusterer LE, Azi LMTA, Kraychete DC. Efficacy of antidepressants in the treatment of chronic nonspecific low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain Manag. 2024;14(8):437-451. doi: 10.1080/17581869.2024.2408215. Epub 2024 Oct 8. PubMed 39377458 ↗
  • Skljarevski V, Zhang S, Desaiah D, Alaka KJ, Palacios S, Miazgowski T, Patrick K. Duloxetine versus placebo in patients with chronic low back pain: a 12-week, fixed-dose, randomized, double-blind trial. J Pain. 2010 Dec;11(12):1282-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2010.03.002. Epub 2010 May 15. PubMed 20472510 ↗
  • Skljarevski V, Desaiah D, Liu-Seifert H, Zhang Q, Chappell AS, Detke MJ, Iyengar S, Atkinson JH, Backonja M. Efficacy and safety of duloxetine in patients with chronic low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Jun 1;35(13):E578-85. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d3cef6. PubMed 20461028 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 30, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07737158
Lead sponsor
Beijing Tiantan Hospital
Responsible party
Fang Luo (Director of Department of Pain Management, Beijing Tiantan Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 30, 2026
Start date
Sep 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 30, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 30, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 30, 2026

Study contacts

Fang Luo
Contact
13611326978@163.com
+8659976661

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion