ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07729540Updated Jul 27, 2026

Efficacy of IPL, an Anti-redness Dermocosmetic, and Their Combination in the Treatment of Rosacea

An interventional study of Intense Pulsed Light (IPL) - Lumecca and Rosacure anti-redness dermocosmetic regimen in Rosacea, sponsored by Medical University of Silesia. Completed at 1 site in Poland. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 57 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-27.

Sponsored by Medical University of Silesia · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 9 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Sep 2025, registered Jul 2026).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
20 Years to 57 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study compares three approaches to treating persistent facial redness in adults with erythematotelangiectatic rosacea: intense pulsed light (IPL) treatment alone, a professional anti-redness dermocosmetic skincare regimen alone, and the combination of both. The main question the study aims to answer is which of these three strategies is more effective at reducing facial redness, using both clinician grading and objective skin-imaging tools that measure redness and skin texture before and after treatment.

Read the detailed description

This was a prospective, single-center, three-arm comparative study conducted in an outpatient setting, with 60 adult patients with a dermatologist-confirmed diagnosis of erythematotelangiectatic rosacea allocated to one of three parallel treatment groups (20 patients per group). No randomization or blinding was performed.

Group 1 (IPL) received three intense pulsed light treatments with the Lumecca applicator (InMode; 515-1200 nm) at 21-day intervals, with fluence individually titrated to skin response; broad-spectrum SPF 50+ sunscreen was applied after each session, and daily photoprotection was mandatory.

Group 2 (dermocosmetic) received four professional in-office anti-redness treatments using the Rosacure Professional system (Synchroline/Cantabria Labs) at 7-day intervals - gentle cleansing, application of Rosacure Professional Serum Booster, and a leave-on regenerating gel mask - together with a standardized 12-week home-care regimen (twice-daily gentle cleanser, Rosacure Intensive SPF 30 in the morning, Rosacure Fast in the evening, and a leave-on mask twice weekly).

Group 3 (combination) received the same three IPL treatments as Group 1, immediately followed within the same session by the professional Rosacure protocol, at 21-day intervals, together with the same home-care regimen used in Group 2.

Facial redness was assessed using objective imaging (Antera 3D chromophore mapping and Gray-Level Co-occurrence Matrix texture analysis) and by clinician grading, at baseline, 2 weeks after the treatment series, and 8 weeks after the treatment series.

02

Conditions studied

  • Rosacea

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Erythema
  • Intense Pulsed Light
  • Dermocosmetic
  • Antera 3D Chromophore Mapping
  • Gray-Level Co-Occurrence Matrix Texture Analysis
  • Clinician Erythema Assessment
  • Lumecca
  • Rosacure
03

In context

Rosacea

233 studies on the registry are indexed under Rosacea; 23 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 60 is close to the median of 61 across 200 interventional studies indexed under Rosacea.

Browse Rosacea studies →

Lead sponsor

Medical University of Silesia is the lead sponsor of 115 studies on the registry; 26 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 57 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients with a dermatologist-confirmed diagnosis of erythematotelangiectatic rosacea

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age under 18 years
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Predisposition to keloid or hypertrophic scarring
  • Use of systemic or topical retinoids, antibiotics, or hormonal therapy within the specified for each agent
  • Chemical peeling within one month
  • Laser treatment or phototherapy within three months
  • Photosensitizing medications or herbal preparations
  • Inflammatory dermatoses other than rosacea
  • disease
  • Active skin infection in the treatment area
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Washout period

A planned gap after a treatment, so that its effects can lessen before the study treatment or a study assessment. Ask the study team and the doctor who prescribed it before changing any medicine.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
60 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    IPL Monotherapy (Lumecca)

    Three intense pulsed light (IPL) treatments using the Lumecca applicator (InMode; 515-1200 nm) at 21-day intervals. Fluence was individually titrated to skin response and increased across sessions. Broad-spectrum sunscreen SPF 50+ was applied after each session, and daily photoprotection was mandatory.

    Device: Intense Pulsed Light (IPL) - Lumecca

  • Experimental
    Dermocosmetic Regimen (Rosacure Professional)

    Four professional in-office anti-redness treatments using the Rosacure Professional system (Synchroline/Cantabria Labs) at 7-day intervals: gentle cleansing, application of Rosacure Professional Serum Booster (4-t-butylcyclohexanol, niacin amide, panthenol, sodium hyaluronate, polyglutamic acid), and a leave-on regenerating gel mask. Concurrently, a standardized 12-week home-care regimen: twice-daily gentle cleanser, Rosacure Intensive SPF 30 each morning, Rosacure Fast each evening, and a leave-on mask twice weekly.

    Other: Rosacure anti-redness dermocosmetic regimen

  • Experimental
    Combined IPL and Dermocosmetic Therapy

    Three IPL treatments identical to Arm 1 (Lumecca applicator, 515-1200 nm, 21-day intervals), immediately followed within the same session by the professional Rosacure protocol described in Arm 2, together with the same 12-week home-care regimen used in Arm 2.

    Device: Intense Pulsed Light (IPL) - Lumecca · Other: Rosacure anti-redness dermocosmetic regimen

Interventions

  • DeviceIntense Pulsed Light (IPL) - Lumecca

    IPL treatment (515-1200 nm) delivered with the Lumecca applicator (InMode, Irvine, CA, USA), administered as three sessions at 21-day intervals with fluence individually titrated to skin response.

  • OtherRosacure anti-redness dermocosmetic regimen

    Professional in-office anti-redness regimen (Rosacure Professional system: gentle cleansing, Rosacure Professional Serum Booster, leave-on regenerating gel mask) plus a standardized 12-week home-care regimen (Rosacure Intensive SPF 30 mornings, Rosacure Fast evenings, leave-on mask twice weekly), manufactured by Synchroline/Cantabria Labs, Spain.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Antera 3D Erythema Index (Mean, Minimum, and Maximum)

    Erythema quantified via the Antera 3D camera (Miravex, Dublin, Ireland), which reconstructs hemoglobin distribution from multidirectional, multispectral light reflectance and expresses erythema on a reproducible relative scale. For each patient and time point, three erythema indices - mean, minimum, and maximum - were extracted for the left and right cheek and averaged into a single value per index.

    Time frame: Baseline, 2 weeks after the treatment series, and 8 weeks after the treatment series

Secondary outcomes

  1. GLCM Contrast

    Gray-Level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM) texture parameter quantifying local brightness variation of the erythematous facial skin from cross-polarized photographs (8-bit grayscale, 256×256 co-occurrence matrix, horizontal offset θ=0°, distance d=1); higher values indicate a more irregular, mottled erythema. Left and right cheek values averaged per patient.

    Time frame: Baseline, 2 weeks after the treatment series, and 8 weeks after the treatment series

  2. GLCM Homogeneity

    Gray-Level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM) texture parameter quantifying surface uniformity of the erythematous facial skin; higher values indicate more uniform erythema. Derived from the same cross-polarized photographs and co-occurrence matrix as GLCM contrast. Left and right cheek values averaged per patient.

    Time frame: Baseline, 2 weeks after the treatment series, and 8 weeks after the treatment series

  3. Clinician Erythema Assessment (CEA) Score

    Semi-quantitative 5-point ordinal scale (0-4) graded by trained dermatologists, where 0 = no visible erythema and 4 = severe, intense redness; mean of scores from three independent raters.

    Time frame: Baseline, 2 weeks after the treatment series, and 8 weeks after the treatment series

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Medical University of Silesia
    Sosnowiec, 41-200, Poland
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Ou X, Pan W, Xiao P. In vivo skin capacitive imaging analysis by using grey level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM). Int J Pharm. 2014 Jan 2;460(1-2):28-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2013.10.024. Epub 2013 Nov 2. PubMed 24188984 ↗
  • Crea F, Pupita G, Galassi AR, el Tamimi H, Kaski JC, Davies GJ, Maseri A. Effect of theophylline on exercise-induced myocardial ischaemia. Lancet. 1989 Apr 1;1(8640):683-6. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(89)92204-6. PubMed 2564505 ↗
  • Seo JK, Shin EJ, Jeong KH, Shin MK. Clinician Severity Assessment Grading Scale on Erythematotelangiectatic Rosacea. Indian J Dermatol. 2021 Mar-Apr;66(2):203-205. doi: 10.4103/ijd.IJD_611_19. No abstract available. PubMed 34188282 ↗
  • Tan J, Liu H, Leyden JJ, Leoni MJ. Reliability of Clinician Erythema Assessment grading scale. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014 Oct;71(4):760-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2014.05.044. Epub 2014 Jul 4. PubMed 24999270 ↗
  • Piccolo D, Fusco I, Zingoni T, Conforti C. Effective Treatment of Rosacea and Other Vascular Lesions Using Intense Pulsed Light System Emitting Vascular Chromophore-Specific Wavelengths: A Clinical and Dermoscopical Analysis. J Clin Med. 2024 Mar 13;13(6):1646. doi: 10.3390/jcm13061646. PubMed 38541871 ↗
  • Zhai Q, Cheng S, Liu R, Xie J, Han X, Yu Z. Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy of Intense Pulsed Light and Pulsed-Dye Laser Therapy in the Management of Rosacea. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2024 Dec;23(12):3821-3827. doi: 10.1111/jocd.16549. Epub 2024 Sep 6. PubMed 39240125 ↗
  • Sulk M, Seeliger S, Aubert J, Schwab VD, Cevikbas F, Rivier M, Nowak P, Voegel JJ, Buddenkotte J, Steinhoff M. Distribution and expression of non-neuronal transient receptor potential (TRPV) ion channels in rosacea. J Invest Dermatol. 2012 Apr;132(4):1253-62. doi: 10.1038/jid.2011.424. Epub 2011 Dec 22. PubMed 22189789 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Individual participant data underlying the results of this study may be reported across one or more publications arising from this dataset. Data will be made available to qualified researchers upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.

Supporting information: Study protocol

Time frame: Available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author, beginning from the date of publication, with no specified end date.

Access criteria: Data will be made available to qualified researchers who submit a reasonable request to the corresponding author (Anna Deda, adeda@sum.edu.pl), for the purpose of methodologically sound reanalysis, subject to authors' approval.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Sep 2025 to primary completion in Apr 2026, 7 months.

Of 42 interventional studies with no phase under Rosacea, half reached primary completion within 13 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 29. This study's 7 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 22, 2026
First posted
Jul 27, 2026
StartActual
Sep 29, 2025
Primary completionActual
Apr 30, 2026
CompletionActual
Apr 30, 2026
Last update
Jul 27, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 27, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07729540
Collaborators
Synchroline/Cantabria Labs
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 27, 2026
Start date
Sep 29, 2025
Primary completion
Apr 30, 2026
Completion
Apr 30, 2026
Last update
Jul 27, 2026

Study contacts

Anna Deda, PhD
principal investigator · Medical University of Silesia

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion