An interventional study of Home-Based Intensive Segmental Trunk Training (ISTT) in Cerebral Palsy (CP), Home-based Rehabilitation and Home-based Programs, sponsored by Iqra Khan. Completed at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to participants aged 4 Years to 12 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-27.
Sponsored by Iqra Khan · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care
The goal of this feasibility study is to evaluate the adherence, parental experiences, and perceptions of a home-based Intensive Segmental Trunk Training (ISTT) program for children aged 4-12 with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy (CP) in Pakistan. The main questions it aims to answer are:
What is the rate of caregiver adherence to a home-based ISTT program over 12 weeks? What are the primary barriers, experiences, and perceptions of caregivers implementing the program? What are the preliminary signals of clinical effectiveness on trunk control and gross motor function? Researchers will compare pre- and post-intervention outcomes (baseline vs. week 12) to see if there are statistically significant improvements in trunk control (measured by SATCo) and gross motor function (measured by GMFM-88).
Participants (20 primary caregivers and their children) will:
Attend an initial in-person orientation session to learn trunk stabilization exercises from a senior pediatric physical therapist Complete a 12-week home-based ISTT program with weekly tele-supervision video calls to monitor progress and address challenges Attend monthly face-to-face monitoring visits at the hospital for clinical assessment and technique reinforcement Complete a KABA (Knowledge, Attitudes, Barriers, and Adherence) survey at baseline and week 12 Participate in a semi-structured interview at the end of the 12-week program to share their experiences.
This single-arm feasibility study was conducted at a hospital in Lahore, Pakistan, to investigate parental experiences and adherence to a home-based Intensive Segmental Trunk Training (ISTT) program for children with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy (CP).
Background: Trunk control is a fundamental prerequisite for gross motor function, postural stability, and functional mobility in children with CP. Conventional clinic-based rehabilitation in Pakistan faces significant challenges including transportation barriers, high costs, and limited access to specialized pediatric physical therapy services, resulting in poor adherence and suboptimal outcomes. Home-based, caregiver-delivered programs offer a promising alternative, but evidence is limited on their feasibility and acceptability in low-resource settings.
Intervention: The ISTT program is a structured, progressive trunk stabilization protocol targeting segmental control of the cervical, upper thoracic, lower thoracic, and lumbar regions of the spine. The 12-week intervention was delivered through a hybrid model:
Week 1: In-person orientation and training session at the hospital, where a senior pediatric physical therapist taught caregivers the exercise protocol, including proper positioning, facilitation techniques, and progression criteria using both verbal instruction and practical demonstration.
Weeks 1-12: Daily home-based sessions (approximately 30 minutes), guided by a library of pre-recorded instructional videos and a picture-based manual developed specifically for this program. Exercises progressed from supported to unsupported positions and from static to dynamic tasks.
Weekly tele-supervision: Synchronous video calls between the therapist and caregiver to monitor progress, correct technique, address barriers, and adjust exercise difficulty as needed.
Monthly in-person visits: Face-to-face monitoring at the hospital for clinical reassessment, technique refinement, and reinforcement of training principles.
Participants: Twenty primary caregivers (mothers or fathers) of children aged 4-12 years with a confirmed diagnosis of spastic diplegic CP, classified at Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels II-IV, who were willing to commit to the 12-week program and had access to a smartphone with video-calling capability.
Outcome Measures:
Primary outcomes:
Adherence rate (percentage of prescribed sessions completed over 12 weeks) Caregiver experiences and perceptions (assessed via the KABA [Knowledge, Attitudes, Barriers, and Adherence] survey administered at baseline and week 12, and a semi-structured qualitative interview at study completion)
Secondary outcomes (pre-post comparison):
Trunk control measured by the Segmental Assessment of Trunk Control (SATCo) Gross motor function measured by the Gross Motor Function Measure-88 (GMFM-88)
1,853 studies on the registry are indexed under Cerebral Palsy; 435 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 20 is below the median of 33 across 1,368 interventional studies indexed under Cerebral Palsy.
Browse Cerebral Palsy studies →This is the only study on the registry with Iqra Khan as lead sponsor.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
All 20 caregiver-child dyads received a 12-week home-based Intensive Segmental Trunk Training (ISTT) program. The intervention included an initial in-person orientation session, daily home-based trunk stabilization exercises guided by pre-recorded instructional videos and a picture-based manual, weekly tele-supervision video calls with a pediatric physical therapist, and monthly face-to-face monitoring visits at the hospital. No control, placebo, or sham comparator arm was included in this feasibility study.
Other: Home-Based Intensive Segmental Trunk Training (ISTT)
A 12-week structured, progressive trunk stabilization protocol targeting segmental control of the cervical, upper thoracic, lower thoracic, and lumbar regions of the spine. The program consisted of daily home-based sessions (approximately 30 minutes per session), guided by pre-recorded instructional videos and a picture-based manual developed specifically for this study. Exercises progressed from supported to unsupported positions and from static to dynamic tasks. Caregivers received an initial in-person orientation session at a hospital, followed by weekly tele-supervision video calls with a senior pediatric physical therapist to monitor progress, correct technique, address barriers, and adjust exercise difficulty. Monthly face-to-face monitoring visits were conducted at the hospital for clinical reassessment and reinforcement of training principles.
Also known as: Home-based trunk stabilization program, caregiver-delivered ISTT
Adherence Rate
Percentage of prescribed home-based ISTT sessions completed by caregivers over the 12-week intervention period, calculated as (number of sessions completed / number of sessions prescribed) × 100. Adherence was cross-validated through caregiver self-report and observation during weekly tele-supervision video calls.
Time frame: Week 12 (end of intervention)
Caregiver Experiences and Perceptions (Qualitative)
Measured using a semi-structured qualitative interview conducted at the end of the intervention to explore caregivers' experiences, challenges, and perceived benefits of the home-based program.
Time frame: Week 12 (semi-structured interview)
Caregiver Knowledge, Attitudes and Barriers
Measured using the KABA (Knowledge, Attitudes, Barriers, and Adherence) survey, administered at baseline and Week 12, to assess caregivers' knowledge, attitudes, and perceived barriers to the home-based Intensive Segmental Trunk Training program.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Segmental Assessment Trunk Control (SATCo)
Segmental Assessment of Trunk Control (SATCo) evaluates segmental trunk control across cervical, upper thoracic, lower thoracic, and lumbar regions. Scores range from 0 to 20, with higher scores indicating better trunk control.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Gross Motor Function Measure-88 (GMFM-88)
Gross Motor Function Measure-88, a standardized observational instrument assessing gross motor function across five dimensions (lying and rolling; sitting; crawling and kneeling; standing; walking, running, and jumping). Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better gross motor function.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Plan to share: No — This was a small feasibility study conducted at a single center with a limited sample size (n = 20). Individual participant data are not planned for sharing due to confidentiality considerations and the feasibility nature of the study protocol.
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.