An interventional study of Manual Tibiofemoral Traction and Sham Tibiofemoral Traction in Knee Osteoarthritis (OA) and Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA), sponsored by Alma Mater Europaea - Slovenia. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Kosovo. Open to female participants aged 50 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-23.
Sponsored by Alma Mater Europaea - Slovenia · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The goal of this clinical trial is to determine whether the addition of manual traction to a standard rehabilitation protocol improves early recovery after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in women aged 50-75 years with knee osteoarthritis.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Researchers will compare participants receiving manual traction plus standard rehabilitation with participants receiving sham traction plus the same standard rehabilitation protocol to determine whether manual traction provides additional clinical benefits during early rehabilitation after TKA.
Participants will:
Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the most effective surgical procedures for managing end-stage knee osteoarthritis. Despite advances in surgical techniques and postoperative care, many patients continue to experience pain, reduced range of motion, impaired physical function, and delayed recovery during the early postoperative period. Early rehabilitation is therefore essential to optimize functional outcomes, promote independence, and improve health-related quality of life.
Standard rehabilitation following TKA typically includes pain management, therapeutic exercises, gait training, progressive weight-bearing, and functional mobility training. Although these interventions are effective, additional manual therapy techniques may further enhance postoperative recovery by reducing pain, improving joint mobility, and facilitating functional performance.
Manual traction is a passive joint distraction technique designed to decrease compressive forces across the tibiofemoral joint, improve joint mobility, and reduce pain. While manual traction has demonstrated beneficial effects in patients with knee osteoarthritis and other musculoskeletal disorders, evidence regarding its effectiveness during the early rehabilitation period after TKA remains limited. High-quality randomized controlled trials investigating this intervention in the postoperative setting are scarce.
This randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled clinical trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness of adding manual traction to a standardized rehabilitation protocol during the first four postoperative weeks following primary TKA. Participants will be randomly allocated to receive either manual traction combined with standard rehabilitation or sham traction combined with the same rehabilitation program. Participant and outcome assessor blinding will be implemented to minimize performance and assessment bias, while the treating physiotherapist will not participate in outcome assessment because blinding of the therapist is not feasible.
Detailed Description - The study is designed to determine whether the addition of manual traction provides clinically meaningful improvements during early postoperative recovery. The findings are expected to provide evidence regarding the effectiveness of manual traction as an adjunct to standard rehabilitation and may contribute to the optimization of postoperative physiotherapy protocols following primary total knee arthroplasty.
3,292 studies on the registry are indexed under Osteoarthritis, Knee; 623 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 48 is below the median of 68 across 2,714 interventional studies indexed under Osteoarthritis, Knee.
Browse Osteoarthritis, Knee studies →Alma Mater Europaea - Slovenia is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.
What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.
A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
BMI (body mass index)
Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.
What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Contraindication
A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Participants assigned to this arm will receive manual tibiofemoral traction combined with a standardized rehabilitation program following total knee arthroplasty. Manual traction will be applied by a licensed physiotherapist using the Kaltenborn mobilization technique for three weeks, with progressive traction grades and force adjusted according to the study protocol and patient tolerance. The standardized rehabilitation program will include supervised therapeutic exercises targeting pain reduction, improvement of knee range of motion, muscle strength, functional mobility, gait, and overall postoperative recovery.
Procedure: Manual Tibiofemoral Traction
Participants assigned to this arm will receive sham tibiofemoral traction combined with the same standardized rehabilitation program following total knee arthroplasty. Sham traction will replicate the positioning and therapist contact of the manual traction procedure without the application of therapeutic traction force, in order to maintain participant blinding. The standardized rehabilitation program will include supervised therapeutic exercises identical to those provided to the intervention group, targeting pain management, knee range of motion, muscle strength, functional mobility, gait, and postoperative recovery.
Procedure: Sham Tibiofemoral Traction
Participants will receive manual tibiofemoral traction combined with a standardized rehabilitation program following total knee arthroplasty. During the first postoperative week, all participants will receive standard rehabilitation without traction. Manual traction will begin in the second postoperative week and will be applied by a physiotherapist using the Kaltenborn technique. The distal femur will be stabilized with a fixation belt, while a separate traction belt around the distal tibia and fibula will apply tibiofemoral traction with the knee in extension. Traction will progress over three weeks: Grade I in week 2 (10-15% body weight), Grade II in week 3 (15-20%), and Grade III in week 4 (20-25%). The traction grade and force will be adjusted according to patient tolerance and postoperative safety. Each session will include 30-60 seconds of traction followed by a 15-second rest interval, repeated for eight cycles. After each session, ROM (20 active,20 assisted) will be performed.
Participants assigned to the control group will receive sham tibiofemoral traction combined with the standardized rehabilitation program following total knee arthroplasty. Sham traction will simulate the manual traction procedure without the application of therapeutic traction force. The procedure will be performed to maintain participant blinding while providing the same rehabilitation protocol as the intervention group.
Pain Intensity Measured by the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
Pain intensity will be assessed using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), an 11-point scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst pain imaginable. Higher scores indicate worse pain.
Time frame: Baseline (preoperative) and weekly during the first four postoperative weeks (5 assessments).
Physical Function Measured by the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS-JR)
Physical function will be assessed using the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS-JR), a 7-item questionnaire. The raw score (0-28) is converted to a normalized score ranging from 0 to 100, where 0 indicates extreme knee-related problems and 100 indicates optimal knee health. Higher scores indicate better knee function.
Time frame: Pre-treatment and at the fourth postoperative week.
Knee range of motion
Knee range of motion will be measured in degrees using a universal goniometer. Higher values indicate greater knee joint mobility and better functional outcome.
Time frame: Baseline (preoperative), pre-treatment, and at the fourth postoperative week.
Timed Up and Go Test (TUG)
Functional mobility will be assessed using the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test. The time required to stand up from a chair, walk 3 meters, turn, return, and sit down will be recorded in seconds. Lower times indicate better functional mobility.
Time frame: At the fourth postoperative week.
Joint Perception Measured by the Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12)
Joint perception will be assessed using the Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12), a 12-item questionnaire. Raw scores are converted to a 0-100 scale, where 0 indicates the greatest joint awareness and 100 indicates complete joint awareness forgetting. Higher scores indicate better joint perception and less awareness of the operated knee during daily activities.
Time frame: At 4 weeks after surgery.
Health-Related Quality of Life Measured by the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L)
Health-related quality of life will be assessed using the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L). The questionnaire evaluates five dimensions of health: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The EQ Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 indicates the worst imaginable health state and 100 indicates the best imaginable health state. Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life.
Time frame: Before surgery (baseline) and at 4 weeks after surgery.
Two-Minute Walk Test (2MWT)
Functional walking capacity will be assessed using the Two-Minute Walk Test (2MWT). The total distance walked in 2 minutes will be recorded in meters. Higher distances indicate better walking capacity.
Time frame: At 4 weeks after surgery.
Single-Leg Stance Test (SLST)
Balance will be assessed using the Single-Leg Stance Test (SLST). The duration participants are able to maintain single-leg stance will be recorded in seconds. Longer times indicate better balance.
Time frame: At 4 weeks after surgery.
Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test (5xSTS)
Lower limb functional performance will be assessed using the Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test (5xSTS). The time required to complete five consecutive sit-to-stand repetitions will be recorded in seconds. Lower times indicate better lower limb functional performance.
Time frame: At 4 weeks after surgery.
Plan to share: No — Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared because the study involves identifiable clinical data collected from human participants. Data will be protected to ensure participant confidentiality and privacy in accordance with ethical approval requirements and applicable data protection regulations. Only aggregated, de-identified study results will be reported in scientific publications.
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Alma Mater Europaea - Slovenia