CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07722520Updated Jul 23, 2026

Role-play Video Demonstrations in Teaching Communication Skills

An interventional study of Role play video demonstrations in Education, Education, Medical and Communication, sponsored by Ain Shams University. Completed at 1 site in Egypt. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-23.

Sponsored by Ain Shams University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 4 years 4 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Feb 2022, registered Jul 2026).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
847
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of role-play video demonstrations in teaching Doctor-Team Communication skills to fifth-year medical students at Ain Shams University. The study compares students who learn through online courses supplemented with role-play videos with students who received the traditional online course. Outcomes include student satisfaction and academic performance. The findings may help improve communication skills training in undergraduate medical education.

Read the detailed description

This educational intervention study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of integrating role-play video demonstrations into an online Doctor-Team Communication course for fifth-year medical students at Ain Shams University Faculty of Medicine. Effective communication and teamwork are essential competencies for healthcare professionals and contribute to patient safety and quality of care.

The intervention consists of a series of recorded role-play videos demonstrating key communication and teamwork skills, including closed-loop communication, call-out and check-back, brief, huddle, debrief, SBAR, IPASS, doctor-patient communication, physician-nurse communication, nurse-patient communication, peer-to-peer communication, and doctor-pharmacist communication. These videos are integrated into the existing online course delivered through the university learning management system.

The study compares an intervention cohort exposed to the role-play videos with a comparison cohort that completed the traditional online course without the video demonstrations. Outcomes include student satisfaction with the course and academic performance as measured by course assessments and examination results.

The findings are expected to provide evidence regarding the value of role-play video demonstrations in enhancing communication skills education in undergraduate medical training and may inform future curriculum development in health professions education.

02

Conditions studied

  • Education
  • Education, Medical
  • Communication
  • Communication Barriers
  • Role Playing
  • Video
  • Healthcare Team
  • Online Learning

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Medical education
  • Video based
  • Role play
  • Communication skills
  • Doctor team communication
  • Online
03

In context

Communication

183 studies on the registry are indexed under Communication; 87 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 847 is above the median of 171 across 158 interventional studies indexed under Communication.

Browse Communication studies →

Lead sponsor

Ain Shams University is the lead sponsor of 1,876 studies on the registry; 423 are open to participants now.

Of its 32 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Fifth-year medical students enrolled in the Doctor-Team Communication course.
  • Taking the course for the first time.
  • Willing to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria :

  • Students who had previously completed the Doctor-Team Communication course.
  • Students who declined participation.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
847 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention group

    Participants received the online Doctor-Team Communication course supplemented with recorded role-play video demonstrations illustrating key communication and teamwork skills, including closed-loop communication, call-out and check-back, brief, huddle, debrief, SBAR, IPASS, and interprofessional communication scenarios

    Other: Role play video demonstrations

  • No intervention
    Control group

    Participants received the standard online Doctor-Team Communication course delivered through the learning management system without the additional role-play video demonstrations

Interventions

  • OtherRole play video demonstrations

    A series of recorded role-play video demonstrations was integrated into the online Doctor-Team Communication course. The videos illustrated key communication and teamwork competencies in realistic healthcare scenarios, including closed-loop communication, call-out and check-back, brief, huddle, debrief, SBAR, IPASS, doctor-patient communication, physician-nurse communication, nurse-patient communication, peer-to-peer communication, and doctor-pharmacist communication

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean Total Course Score (0-25 Marks) in the Doctor-Team Communication Course ( academic performance )

    Student academic performance: Student marks were recorded as an objective indicator of students' achievement. Total course marks were 25 marks, including: 17 marks for end of course exam which was in the form of single best answer questions and the remaining 8 marks were allocated for continuous assessment, with students' progress tracked on their learning management system.

    Time frame: Immediately post-intervention (7 weeks) at course completion

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mean Student Satisfaction Score on a Structured Course Evaluation survey ( student satisfaction )

    Student satisfaction will be assessed using a structured course evaluation surevy consisting of Likert-scale items evaluating instructor performance, course design, course structure, assessment and feedback, and overall satisfaction. Responses are scored on a 5-point Likert scale, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction. The Survey was delivered online immediately after the end of the course. It was derived from a previous survey by Strachota (2006)7, titled The Use of Survey Research to Measure Student Satisfaction in Online Courses, presented at the Midwest Research-to-Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education at the University of Missouri-St. Louis. The survey was designed using closed-ended questions on a 5-point Likert scale as well as one open-ended question.

    Time frame: Immediately post-intervention (7 weeks)at course compltion

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Faculty of medicine ain shams university
    Cairo, Abbasya 11511, Egypt
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be made publicly available due to confidentiality and privacy considerations. Study findings will be reported in aggregate form only

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 23, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07722520
Lead sponsor
Ain Shams University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 23, 2026
Start date
Feb 22, 2022
Primary completion
Jan 12, 2024
Completion
Apr 22, 2024
Last update
Jul 23, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion