ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07722221Updated Jul 23, 2026

Effectiveness of Virtual Reality Technique on Children

An interventional study of Conventional and Virtual reality in Dental Anxiety, Pain Management and Pediatric Dentistry, sponsored by Latakia University. Completed at 1 site in Syria. Open to participants aged 6 Years to 10 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-23.

Sponsored by Latakia University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 5 years 2 months after the study started (first participant enrolled May 2021, registered Jul 2026).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
64
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
6 Years to 10 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Studying the effect of using virtual reality technique in managing pain, anxiety, and vital signs among pediatric dental patients.

Read the detailed description

Local anaesthesia is essential for pain control during pediatric dental procedures, yet its administration can cause significant anxiety and distress in children.

Recent innovations aim to improve the delivery of anesthesia to make it less painful and more acceptable. This randomized clinical trial studied the effect of using virtual reality technique in managing pain, anxiety, and vital signs among pediatric dental patients. A total of 64 healthy children aged 6 to 10 years participated in the study. The children were randomly assigned to one of two groups. Pain perception was measured using Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale. Anxiety was evaluated using Venham Picture Test. Vital signs, including pulse rate, oxygen saturation and blood pressure were monitored at baseline and during treatment. Satisfaction levels were assessed for the pediatric patients using child-friendly satisfaction questionnaires

02

Conditions studied

  • Dental Anxiety
  • Pain Management
  • Pediatric Dentistry

Keywords

  • Dental extraction
  • Virtual reality
  • Local anesthesia
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Latakia University is the lead sponsor of 20 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Years to 10 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Children aged 6-10 years.
  2. Physically healthy with no neurological disorders or systemic diseases.
  3. Children classified as positive" or "negative-positive" according to the modified Frankl Behavioral Rating Scale.
  4. Not taking any sedatives or analgesics drugs

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Uncooperative children who exhibit clear behavioral problems.
  2. Children with systemic diseases or disorders that may interfere with local anesthesia.
  3. Use of any medications that may affect vital signs or pain response.
  4. Presence of infection at the injection site.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
64 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Control

    Behaviour management was done using the conventional techniques during Local anaesthesia and extraction

    Device: Conventional

  • Experimental
    Virtual Reality

    Behaviour management was done using virtual reality technique during Local anaesthesia and extraction.

    Device: Virtual reality

Interventions

  • DeviceConventional

    Behaviour management was done using the conventional techniques (TSD, positive reinforcement) during Local anaesthesia and treatment (extraction)

  • DeviceVirtual reality

    Behaviour management was done using Virtual Reality technique during Local anaesthesia and treatment (extraction)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain level during dental anesthesia and treatment

    Procedural pain was assessed using the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale to measure children's self-reported pain, It's a self-reported scale with six cartoon faces representing increasing levels of pain, scored from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain). Children were asked to point to the face that best described their pain. Higher scores on either scale indicated greater pain intensity.

    Time frame: From the start of local anesthetic injection until completion of extraction, assessed up to 30 minutes.

  2. Anxiety level during anesthesia and treatment

    Anxiety was assessed using the Venham Picture Test (VPT), a self-reported measure of dental anxiety in children. The scale consists of 8 pairs of drawings, with the child selecting the picture that best reflects their feelings at each pair. Scores range from 0 to 8, where 0 indicates no anxiety and 8 indicates the highest level of anxiety. Higher scores indicate greater anxiety.

    Time frame: From the start of local anesthetic injection until completion of extraction, assessed up to 30 minutes.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pulse rate

    Pulse rate was measured using a pulse oximeter and recorded in beats per minute (bpm). Readings were recorded at predefined intervals. Increases in heart rate indicated heightened stress or discomfort during the procedure.

    Time frame: From baseline measurement taken 5 minutes before local anesthetic injection, through the injection, and until completion of extraction, assessed up to 35 minutes.]

  2. Oxygen saturation

    Peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO₂) was measured using a pulse oximeter and recorded as percentage of oxygen saturation (%). Readings were recorded at predefined intervals. Decreases in SpO2 indicated heightened stress or discomfort during the procedure

    Time frame: From baseline measurement taken 5 minutes before local anesthetic injection, through the injection, and until completion of extraction, assessed up to 35 minutes.

  3. Blood pressure

    Blood pressure was measured using an automated blood pressure monitor and recorded as systolic and diastolic blood pressure in millimeters of mercury (mmHg). Higher values indicate higher blood pressure. Changes from baseline were used to assess the physiological response to the dental procedure.

    Time frame: From baseline measurement taken 5 minutes before local anesthetic injection, through the injection, and until completion of extraction, assessed up to 35 minutes.

  4. Patient's satisfaction

    Patient satisfaction was assessed using a structured questionnaire with two yes/no questions: 1. Are you satisfied with the experience? (Yes/No) 2. Would you like to have the same technique in future visits? (Yes/No) Responses were coded as binary outcomes (Yes = 1, No = 0). Higher total scores indicated greater patient satisfaction.

    Time frame: Immediately after the procedure

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Faculty Of Dentistry ,Tishreen University, Latakia, Syria
    Latakia, Syria
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 23, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07722221
Lead sponsor
Latakia University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 23, 2026
Start date
May 1, 2021
Primary completion
Dec 13, 2022
Completion
Mar 12, 2023
Last update
Jul 23, 2026

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion