ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07095946Updated Oct 20, 2026

Effectiveness of Intraligament vs IANB Anesthesia in Children Using Electronic Syringe

An interventional study of Electronic Syringe Intraligament Technique and Electronic syringe IANB Technique in Effectiveness of Anesthesia Using Electronic Syringe in Children in the Context of Endotopy Treatment, sponsored by Latakia University. Completed at 1 site in Syria. Open to participants aged 6 Years to 10 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-20.

Sponsored by Latakia University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Oct 20, 2026Now CompletedEnrollment updatedGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
6 Years to 10 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This randomized clinical study aims to evaluate the efficacy and pain response of two local anesthesia techniques in pediatric dental treatment using an electronic syringe: ligament anesthesia and inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB). The study applies both techniques to the same sample, where each child undergoes pulpectomy for two different teeth, each under the influence of a different anesthesia technique, during two separate visits.

This study comes in the context of technological advancements in dentistry, which led to the development of computerized syringes as an alternative to traditional syringes. These devices are characterized by precise control of the anesthetic flow rate, as well as containing musical and auditory systems aimed at distracting the child and reducing feelings of fear and anxiety associated with dental treatment. Additionally, computerized syringes provide audible indicators showing the amount of anesthetic injected and support multiple injection modes such as rapid injection, slow injection, and ligament injection, allowing for more efficient and comfortable anesthetic delivery.

Pain intensity will be assessed during three stages of the treatment procedure: during anesthesia administration, during placement of the rubber dam, and during opening of the pulp chambers. Post-procedure pain will also be evaluated using an age-appropriate validated pain scale, along with assessing the satisfaction level of both the children and their parents regarding the use of the electronic syringe as an alternative anesthesia tool. These combined measures aim to provide a comprehensive understanding of the child's experience during dental treatment and contribute to improving anesthesia practices in pediatric dentistry.

02

Conditions studied

  • Effectiveness of Anesthesia Using Electronic Syringe in Children in the Context of Endotopy Treatment

Keywords

  • Pediatric Dental Anesthesia Pulpitis Pain Management in Pediatric Dentistry Primary Teeth Endodontic Treatment
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Latakia University is the lead sponsor of 20 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Years to 10 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Cooperative children based on Frankl Behavior Rating Scale (Positive or Definitely Positive)
  • No clinical signs or symptoms indicating irreversible pulpitis
  • No periodontal ligament inflammation of the tooth to be treated
  • Children aged between 5 and 9 years
  • Children without systemic health problems

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Children who are uncooperative based on Frankl Behavior Rating Scale (Negative or Definitely Negative)
  • Presence of spontaneous or nocturnal pain
  • Clinical signs and symptoms indicating irreversible pulpitis
  • Presence of periodontal ligament inflammation of the treated tooth
  • Child age older than 10 years or younger than 3 years
  • Children with systemic health problems
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
30 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Electronic Syringe - IANB Technique

    Children receive inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) using an electronic syringe. The injection is performed with controlled speed and pressure to ensure efficient pulpal anesthesia with minimal discomfort.

    Device: Electronic syringe IANB Technique

  • Experimental
    Electronic Syringe - Intraligamentary Technique

    Children receive intraligamentary anesthesia using an electronic syringe. The anesthetic is administered around the tooth ligament to provide localized anesthesia with minimal invasiveness and reduced discomfort.

    Device: Electronic Syringe Intraligament Technique

Interventions

  • DeviceElectronic Syringe Intraligament Technique

    Use of an electronic syringe device to deliver local anesthesia using the periodontal ligament (PDL) technique in pediatric dental patients

  • DeviceElectronic syringe IANB Technique

    Use of an electronic syringe device to deliver local anesthesia via the Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block Technique in pediatric dental patients

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Success rate of electronic syringe anesthesia in pediatric dental procedures

    Time frame: During procedure (From the start of ligation anesthesia (30 seconds) and block anesthesia (3 to 5 minutes) until reaching the stage of pulp chamber opening)

  2. Success rate of anesthesia technique

    Time frame: During procedure (From the start of ligation anesthesia (30 seconds) and block anesthesia (3 to 5 minutes) until reaching the stage of pulp chamber opening.)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Faculty of Pediatric Dentistry, Tishreen University
    Latakia, Latakia Governorate, Syria
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — To protect the privacy of pediatric patients.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from May 2025 to primary completion in Sep 2025, 3 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 24, 2025
First posted
Jul 31, 2025
StartActual
May 28, 2025
Primary completionActual
Sep 20, 2025
CompletionActual
Apr 20, 2026
Last update
Oct 20, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Status
Recruiting→Completed
changed Oct 20, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 20, 2026
    Recruiting→Completed
    + 4 other changes: verification date, date precision, contact details and site details

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07095946
Lead sponsor
Latakia University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 31, 2025
Start date
May 28, 2025
Primary completion
Sep 20, 2025
Completion
Apr 20, 2026
Last update
Oct 20, 2026

Study contacts

Abdul Wahab Nourallah, Prof.Dr
study chair · Faculty of Pediatric Dentistry,Tishreen university

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion