CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07715968TuBaUpdated Sep 11, 2026

The Turbine-based CO2 Insufflator Pediatric Feasibility Study

An interventional study of Turbine-based insufflator in Laparoscopy and Pneumoperitoneum, sponsored by Erasmus Medical Center. Recruiting at 1 site in Netherlands. Open to participants aged Up to 18 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-11.

Sponsored by Erasmus Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
12
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
Up to 18 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A novel CO2 insufflator, the Turbine-based insufflator, has been developed to improve minimally invasive surgery. Turbine technology permits accurate pressure control resulting in an intra-abdominal volume that is dynamically adapted to ventilation. In addition, oscillometric measurements are performed to measure the abdominal compliance of the patient. This feasibility trial primarly aims to evaluate the technologic feasibility during pediatric laparoscopic surgery. Secondary outcomes are pressure stability, comparison of intra-abdominal pressure stability between the standard CO2 insufflator and the Turbine-based insufflator, and comparison of ventiliation pressures between these insufflators.

Read the detailed description

A new CO2 insufflator, the turbine-based insufflator (TBI), has been developed with an insufflation technique that enables highly accurate pressure control that is dynamically adapted to ventilation. It is hypothesized that this novel insufflation technique provides more stable abdominal pressures than conventional insufflators and reduces the need for high ventilation pressures. The pediatric population can benefit greatly from this new insufflation technique, as small changes in pressure settings and stabilization of the surgical field already have a relatively large impact.

02

Conditions studied

  • Laparoscopy
  • Pneumoperitoneum

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Pneumoperitoneum
  • Device development
  • Insufflator
  • Laparoscopy
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 18 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Weight ≥ 10 kilograms;
  • Laparoscopic procedure;
  • Intraperitoneal procedure;
  • Written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to use the study-specific trocar during the procedure (surgeon's assessment);
  • The expected time for abdominal insufflation is less than 20 minutes;
  • Conversion to open surgery within 10 minutes after study measurements;
  • Pregnancy.
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
12 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Pediatric laparoscopy

    Pediatric population, planned for intraperitoneal laparoscopic surgery.

    Device: Turbine-based insufflator

Interventions

  • DeviceTurbine-based insufflator

    Use of the Tubine-based insufflator during surgical procedure.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The number of adverse device events as assessed by observations during the procedure (qualitative measurements)

    Observations of researcher and surgeon (number of adverse device events)

    Time frame: During surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Assessment of intra-abdominal pressure stability, assessed by the median and interquartile range of the actual measured pressure

    Recording the intra-abdominal pressure with a pressure line during the surgical procedure. Assessment of the difference between the actual measured pressure and the target pressure. Stability is defined as the median pressure with the interquartile range.

    Time frame: During surgery

  2. Registration of events that impair intra-abdominal pressure stability (observationa, qualitative)

    Time frame: During surgery

  3. Comparison of intra-abdominal pressure stability and ventilation pressures between conventional insufflation and turbine-based insufflation by comparing median, minimum, and maximum pressures.

    Between turbine-based insufflation and conventional insufflation.

    Time frame: During surgery

  4. Abdominal compliance by performing endoscopic oscillometry in a pediatric population (using insufflation pressure and flow for calculating the abdominal compliance; quantitative measurements)

    Intra-abdominal pressure and intra-abdominal flow data recording during surgical procedure.

    Time frame: During surgery

06

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam
    Rotterdam, South Holland 3015 GD, Netherlands
    Recruiting
07

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07715968
Lead sponsor
Erasmus Medical Center
Collaborators
Politecnico di Milano University, Health∼Holland, Topsector Life Sciences & Health, Spatium Medical B.V.
Responsible party
Ass. Prof. J (John) Vlot MD, PhD, FEBPS (Consultant pediatric surgeon, Erasmus Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 21, 2026
Start date
Feb 10, 2026
Primary completion
Dec 1, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 11, 2026

Study contacts

A.I. Jong
Contact
a.i.dejong@erasmusmc.nl
+31107037641
J. Vlot
Contact
+31107039568
J. Vlot
principal investigator · Erasmus Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion