ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07711730TPCLGMDUpdated Jul 17, 2026

Telecare Psychosocial and Cognitive Intervention for Children and Adolescents With Limb-Girdle Muscular Dystrophy

An interventional study of Neuro-psychosocial teleassistance program in Limb-Girdle Muscular Dystrophy, Social Competence and Self Esteem, sponsored by University of Deusto. Recruiting at 1 site in Spain. Open to participants aged 7 Years to 17 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-17.

Sponsored by University of Deusto · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 4 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Mar 2026, registered Jul 2026).
  • Started Mar 2026; still recruiting 8 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
7 Years to 17 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This clinical trial aims to evaluate the efficacy of a telecare-mediated psychosocial and cognitive intervention for children and adolescents aged 7 to 17 with limb-girdle muscular dystrophy. This group-based intervention (comprising 5 participants) consists of 12 weekly one-hour sessions. The objective of the intervention is to improve the participants' quality of life as well as to reduce their symptomatology by targeting areas such as social cognition, emotional and personal management, cognitive restructuring, relaxation strategies, social skills, and coping strategies.

Read the detailed description

Development and implementation of a psychosocial and cognitive tele-assistance programme for groups of children and adolescents affected by limb-girdle muscular dystrophy. In this project the variables of interest and intervention include social cognition, quality of life, psychological symptomatology and coping strategies. The aim of this study is to test whether this programme improves the indicators in the mentioned variables.

02

Conditions studied

  • Limb-Girdle Muscular Dystrophy
  • Social Competence
  • Self Esteem
  • Health Related Quality of Life
  • Social Skills
03

In context

Muscular Dystrophies, Limb-Girdle

47 studies on the registry are indexed under Muscular Dystrophies, Limb-Girdle; 10 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 30 is above the median of 13 across 22 interventional studies indexed under Muscular Dystrophies, Limb-Girdle.

Browse Muscular Dystrophies, Limb-Girdle studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Deusto is the lead sponsor of 20 studies on the registry; 7 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
7 Years to 17 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • To be diagnosed with limb-girdle muscular dystrophy
  • Being between 7 and 17 years old
  • Having signed an form through their legal guardians prior to participation in the study
  • Having Spanish as one of their main languages
  • Having access to a computer (with a camera, microphone and speakers integrated) and Internet connection to take part in the videoconferences

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of any other diagnosis or sensory deficit that would prevent the application of the tests or hinder the correct performance of the intervention's activities
  • Being illiterate
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention

    Neuro-psychosocial intervention with 12 groupal sessions is offered

    Behavioral: Neuro-psychosocial teleassistance program

  • Experimental
    Control

    Waiting list control group

    Behavioral: Neuro-psychosocial teleassistance program

Interventions

  • BehavioralNeuro-psychosocial teleassistance program

    The intervention is carried out in groups of 5 participants and is organised in 12 sessions: 1 session per week of 1h duration. The objective of the intervention is to improve the participants' quality of life as well as to reduce their symptomatology by targeting areas such as social cognition, emotional and personal management, cognitive restructuring, relaxation strategies, social skills, and coping strategies.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Social cognition - Emotion Recognition

    Affect Recognition subtest of the Social Perception Domain of the NEPSY-II in the Spanish edition (Korkman et al., 2014) measures the capacity to identify emotions (happy, sad, neutral, afraid, irrationally angry, and disgust) in various images of children.

    Time frame: 3 months after the intervention

  2. Social cognition - Theory of mind - NEPSY-II

    Theory of Mind subtest of the Social Perception Domain of the NEPSY-II in the Spanish edition (Korkman et al., 2014) assesses figurative language, imitation skills, and the capacity to comprehend the thoughts, ideas, and beliefs of others and it also evaluates a person's capacity to comprehend how emotions relate to the social context.

    Time frame: 3 months after the intervention

  3. Social cognition - Theory of mind - Happé's Strange Stories

    The Happé's Strange Stories Test is a well-known test of ToM (Happé, 1994; Spanish version: Pousa, 2002). In this study, we used the White et al. (2009) version that has eight story-types. This test evaluates participants' capacity to comprehend nonliteral meanings through the reading of brief vignettes.

    Time frame: 3 months after the intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. Health-related quality of life

    How an individual's health status impacts their overall well-being and ability to lead a satisfying life The perception of HRQoL is assessed in both healthy and chronically ill children using the Spanish version of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQLTM 4.0) (Varni et al., 2001). We used the self-report questionnaire in this study for three age ranges: 5-7, 8-12, and 13-18. Physical functioning, emotional functioning, social functioning, and academic functioning are the four dimensions covered by the 23-item assessment. The PedsQL 4.0 provides a physical and a psychosocial summary score in addition to a total score. It is answered through a likert scale with 5 response options that are then converted into quantitative scores ranging from 0-100 points, with a higher score being a better HRQoL.

    Time frame: 3 months after the intervention

  2. Health-related quality of life neuromuscular

    How an individual's health status impacts their physical well-being and ability to communicate their disease The perception of HRQoL is assessed in both healthy and chronically ill children using the Spanish version of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Neuromuscular (PedsQLTM Neuromuscular) (Varni et al., 2001). We used the self-report questionnaire in this study for three age ranges: 5-7, 8-12, and 13-18. Neuromuscular disease, communication and family functioning are the three dimensions covered by the 25-item assessment. The PedsQL Neuromuscular provides a physical and a communication skills summary score in addition to a total score. It is answered through a likert scale with 5 response options that are then converted into quantitative scores ranging from 0-100 points, with a higher score being a better HRQoL.

    Time frame: 3 months after the intervention

  3. Children's Depression Inventory-Short

    Depression symptoms The Children's Depression Inventory-Short (Kovacs, 1992; Spanish version: Barrio et al. 2012) measures key signs of depression such as sadness, sleep issues, and low self-esteem in just a few. It is a 10-item self-report questionnaire designed to quickly screen for depressive symptoms in youths aged 7 to 17. Each choice is scored from 0 to 2, with higher scores reflecting greater symptom severity.

    Time frame: 3 months after the intervention

  4. Child Medical Fear

    To what children have fear in a medical context The Child Medical Fear scale (Broome et al., 1988; Spanish version: San Martin-Rodriguez et al., 2021) is an assessment tool used to measure a child's anxiety and fear regarding medical events and healthcare environments. It has 17 items in total, and the scores are rated on a 3-point Likert scale: Not at all (0 points), A little (1 point), and A lot (2 points). It helps pediatricians and psychologists identify specific triggers-such as physical pain or loss of control-so they can tailor medical care to reduce a child's stress.

    Time frame: 3 months after the intervention

  5. Psychopathology

    Behavioral and emotional symptoms The Child Behavior Checklist for Ages 6-18 (CBCL/6-18) (Achenbach \& Rescorla, 2001) is a multiaxial assessment tool for identifying behavioral and emotional issues in children and adolescents that is aligned with the ASEBA (Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment). It has 113 items total, broken down into eight scales for the following syndromes: anxious/depressed, withdrawn/depressed, somatic complaints, social problems, thinking problems, attention problems, rule-breaking behavior and aggressive behavior. Scores for internalizing, externalizing, and overall difficulties are also provided by the items.

    Time frame: 3 months after the intervention

  6. Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire

    Mental, emotion and behaviour health possible problems The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (Goodman, 1997; Spanish version: García et al., 2000) is a brief behavioral and emotional screening tool for children and adolescents aged 2 to 17. It uses 25 questions across five categories (emotional symptoms, conduct problems, hyperactivity, peer relationship problems and prosocial behavior) to assess both psychological problems and positive social behaviors.

    Time frame: 3 months after the intervention

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — This plan is open to other reserchers to contact the principal investigator of the study.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form

Time frame: The data is available from now until 2029.

Access criteria: This plan is open to other reserchers to contact the principal investigator of the study.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Mar 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2026, 9 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 13, 2026
First posted
Jul 17, 2026
StartActual
Mar 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 30, 2026
CompletionEst.
Jun 1, 2027
Last update
Jul 17, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 17, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07711730
Lead sponsor
University of Deusto
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 17, 2026
Start date
Mar 1, 2026
Primary completion
Dec 30, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 17, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion