An interventional study of LIFU in Schizophrenia and Auditory Hallucinations, sponsored by University of California, San Francisco. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 64 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-05.
Sponsored by University of California, San Francisco · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Individuals with schizophrenia often experience persistent auditory hallucinations despite treatment with antipsychotic medications. Research suggests that abnormal communication between the striatum and the auditory cortex contributes to hallucinations. This first-in-human, proof-of-concept Phase 1 study will evaluate the safety, feasibility, and preliminary effects of repeated-session low-intensity focused ultrasound (LIFU), a non-invasive neuromodulation technique targeting the striatum. The study will examine whether LIFU can safely modulate brain circuits involved in hallucinations, reduce abnormal communication between the striatum and auditory cortex, and improve auditory hallucination symptoms.
Background:
Auditory hallucinations affect approximately 70% of individuals with schizophrenia and often persist despite antipsychotic treatment, contributing substantially to disability and reduced quality of life. Neuroimaging studies have consistently demonstrated abnormal functional connectivity between the striatum and superior temporal cortex, implicating corticostriatal circuitry in the generation and maintenance of hallucinations. Among striatal regions, the caudate has been associated with aberrant self-monitoring, abnormal predictive processing, and hallucination severity, making it a promising therapeutic target. The current study builds on these findings by evaluating whether non-invasive neuromodulation of the caudate can normalize striatal-temporal network function and improve hallucination symptoms.
Study Objective:
This first-in-human, early Phase 1 investigator-initiated clinical trial will evaluate the safety, feasibility, tolerability, target engagement, and preliminary mechanistic effects of repeated-session low-intensity focused ultrasound (LIFU) targeting the caudate, a key striatal region implicated in auditory hallucinations in schizophrenia. The study will determine whether individualized LIFU can safely modulate deep corticostriatal circuits and reduce hallucination-related functional connectivity abnormalities while improving psychotic hallucination symptoms.
Study Design:
Participants with schizophrenia and persistent clinically significant auditory hallucinations will undergo MRI-guided, neuronavigated LIFU targeting an individualized caudate target, a key striatal region implicated in hallucination-related corticostriatal circuitry. The study incorporates repeated-session stimulation with sham control to evaluate safety, feasibility, neural target engagement, and preliminary efficacy. Resting-state functional MRI will be obtained before and after treatment to quantify changes in functional connectivity between the caudate and superior temporal cortex. Clinical outcomes will include validated measures of auditory hallucination severity, psychiatric symptoms, tolerability, and adverse events.
Scientific Rationale:
LIFU provides a unique capability to non-invasively modulate deep brain structures with millimeter spatial precision that cannot be reached using conventional non-invasive brain stimulation approaches. By targeting the caudate, this study seeks to directly test the causal role of striatal circuitry in hallucination generation and determine whether modulation of corticostriatal connectivity produces measurable improvements in hallucination symptoms. The results will establish the safety and feasibility of this approach while providing mechanistic evidence to guide future randomized efficacy trials of circuit-based neuromodulation for schizophrenia.
Safety and Feasibility of LIFU This study has been designated a non-significant risk (NSR) device study by the UCSF Institutional Review Board and follows International Transcranial Ultrasonic Stimulation Safety and Standards Consortium (ITRUSST) recommendations. Individualized MRI-guided targeting and subject-specific acoustic simulations will optimize focal targeting while maintaining acoustic exposure within established safety limits. Participants will undergo continuous monitoring during treatment, structured adverse-event assessments using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) criteria, repeated tolerability assessments, and psychiatric safety monitoring throughout the study. Preliminary studies demonstrated that caudate-targeted LIFU was well tolerated, with no device-related adverse events beyond mild transient auditory sensations, supporting the safety and feasibility of repeated-session caudate-targeted LIFU in schizophrenia.
3,563 studies on the registry are indexed under Schizophrenia; 491 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 12 is below the median of 71 across 2,944 interventional studies indexed under Schizophrenia.
Browse Schizophrenia studies →University of California, San Francisco is the lead sponsor of 2,169 studies on the registry; 372 are open to participants now.
Of its 267 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 202 (76%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
neurological disorder or MRI incompatibility
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
The American Psychiatric Association’s manual of mental health diagnoses. DSM-5 (2013, revised as DSM-5-TR in 2022) replaced DSM-IV, and some studies still name the older edition. “Meets DSM criteria for …” means diagnosed by that edition’s diagnostic criteria, usually by a clinician in an interview.
A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.
Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.
DSM diagnostic criteria
The American Psychiatric Association’s manual of mental health diagnoses. DSM-5 (2013, revised as DSM-5-TR in 2022) replaced DSM-IV, and some studies still name the older edition. “Meets DSM criteria for …” means diagnosed by that edition’s diagnostic criteria, usually by a clinician in an interview.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Contraindication
A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Clinically significant
Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Active LIFU targeting teh caudate
Device: LIFU
Sham Unfocused Sonication
Device: LIFU
MRI-guided, neuronavigated low-intensity focused ultrasound (LIFU) delivered to the caudate target will be compared to sham unfocused sonication delivered using the same device and procedures as the active intervention but without focal ultrasound energy to the target.
Also known as: Active LIFU targeting the caudate, Sham Unfocused Sonication
Auditory Hallucinations
We will compare hallucinations after LIFU to caudate with baseline and the sham unfocused sonication condition using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Auditory Vocal Hallucination Rating Scales (AVHRS).
Time frame: Baseline and Post-Treatment (Weekly follow-up for 8 weeks)
Caudate-superior temporal cortical (STC) connectivity
We will compare functional connectivity using Fisher r-to-z values from the CONN toolbox between the caudate and STC after LIFU compared to baseline and the sham unfocused sonication condition
Time frame: Baseline and Post-Treatment ( Day 5)
Clinical Positive and Negative Symptoms
We will compare positive and negative symptoms using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) after LIFU targeting the caudate with baseline and the sham unfocused sonication condition.
Time frame: Baseline and Post-Treatment (Weekly follow-up for 8 weeks)
Plan to share: No
This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University of California, San Francisco →