CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07710833Updated Jul 17, 2026

Effect of Intracanal Cryotherapy on Postoperative Endodontic Pain

An interventional study of root canal treatment and cryotherapy in Periapical Periodontitis, Asymptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis and Cryotherapy, sponsored by Recep Tayyip Erdogan University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-17.

Sponsored by Recep Tayyip Erdogan University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
132
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of cooled and room-temperature NaOCl irrigation on postoperative endodontic pain in single-rooted teeth diagnosed with asymptomatic irreversible pulpitis (AIP) or asymptomatic apical periodontitis (AAP).

02

Conditions studied

  • Periapical Periodontitis
  • Asymptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis
  • Cryotherapy
03

In context

Periapical Periodontitis

246 studies on the registry are indexed under Periapical Periodontitis; 64 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 132 is above the median of 60 across 211 interventional studies indexed under Periapical Periodontitis.

Browse Periapical Periodontitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Recep Tayyip Erdogan University is the lead sponsor of 67 studies on the registry; 12 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Systemically healthy patients with 18-70 years of age
  2. Single-rooted teeth with a single root canal, diagnosed with either AIP and normal periapical tissues or AAP.

Pulpal and periapical diagnoses were established according to the American Association of Endodontists (AAE) [20] diagnostic terminology. Included teeth were categorized into 2 diagnostic groups: AIP with normal periapical tissues and AAP associated with pulp necrosis. AIP was provisionally diagnosed in teeth with extremely deep caries approximating or reaching the pulp, a positive response to cold testing (Dispodent, Nadu, India), and no clinical symptoms. Periapical radiographs showed a PAI score of 1 without periodontal ligament widening. The diagnosis was confirmed intraoperatively by persistent pulpal bleeding that remained uncontrolled after 10 minutes of application of a sterile cotton pellet moistened with 2.5% sodium hypochlorite. AAP was diagnosed in teeth with a PAI score of ≥3 in the absence of clinical symptoms. None of the included teeth exhibited tenderness to percussion. All periapical radiographs were obtained using a phosphor storage plate system and the paralleling technique (Myray parallel holder, NDental, Imola, Italy) under standardized exposure parameters (70 kV, 8 mA, 0.360 s).

Exclusion Criteria: 1) Teeth with canal calcification, complex or atypical canal anatomy, root resorption, incomplete root development, or a history of endodontic treatment of the study tooth.

2) Teeth initially diagnosed with AIP in which pulpal bleeding was controlled within 10 min after access cavity preparation, as these teeth were considered eligible for vital pulp therapy.

3) Teeth initially diagnosed with AIP in which pulp necrosis was identified after access cavity preparation.

4) Teeth in which root canal treatment could not be completed in a single visit.

5) Patients who had taken analgesics within 12 hours before the appointment or antibiotics within the previous month.

6) Teeth with periodontal probing depths >3 mm or clinical/radiographic signs of periodontal disease.

7) Teeth with insufficient coronal tooth structure to allow an adequate ferrule.

8) Pregnant or breastfeeding patients and patients with systemic conditions or regular medication use that could affect treatment outcomes.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
132 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    GROUP 1- Asymptomatic irreversible pulpitis - control

    20 mL of 2.5% NaOCl was kept in a glass beaker at room temperature and monitored with a digital thermometer to maintain a temperature of 22°C. Final irrigation in Groups 1 was performed using this solution.

    Other: root canal treatment and cryotherapy

  • Experimental
    GROUP 2- Asymptomatic irreversible pulpitis- cryotherapy

    For Group 2, 20 mL of 2.5% NaOCl was divided into eight 2.5-mL syringes and cooled to 2 °C in a refrigerator. The syringes were then placed in an insulated container filled with ice to maintain the target temperature during transport to the clinic and until use. A digital thermometer was used to verify that the solution remained at 2 °C. Each syringe was removed individually immediately before irrigation and delivered over approximately 40 seconds.

    Other: root canal treatment and cryotherapy

  • Other
    GROUP 3- Asymptomatic apical periodontitis - control (n=33)

    20 mL of 2.5% NaOCl was kept in a glass beaker at room temperature and monitored with a digital thermometer to maintain a temperature of 22°C. Final irrigation in Groups 1 and 3 was performed using this solution.

    Other: root canal treatment and cryotherapy

  • Experimental
    GROUP 4- Asymptomatic apical periodontitis - cryotherapy

    For Group 4, 20 mL of 2.5% NaOCl was divided into eight 2.5-mL syringes and cooled to 2 °C in a refrigerator. The syringes were then placed in an insulated container filled with ice to maintain the target temperature during transport to the clinic and until use. A digital thermometer was used to verify that the solution remained at 2 °C. Each syringe was removed individually immediately before irrigation and delivered over approximately 40 seconds.

    Other: root canal treatment and cryotherapy

Interventions

  • Otherroot canal treatment and cryotherapy

    All endodontic procedures were completed in a single visit by one operator with 6 years of clinical experience. Only 1 tooth per patient was included. Local anesthesia was administered using 2 mL articaine HCl containing 1:100,000 epinephrine. After rubber dam isolation and access cavity preparation, working length was determined using an electronic apex locator and confirmed radiographically. Root canals were prepared with Endoart Smart Gold files to size 40/.04 and, when needed, up to 2 larger sizes according to canal anatomy. Apical patency was maintained 1 mm beyond the working length using a size 10 K-file. Between instruments, canals were irrigated with 2 mL of 2.5% NaOCl using a 30-gauge side-vented needle. NaOCl was ultrasonically activated three times for 20 seconds to aid smear-layer removal. Canals were then irrigated with saline, followed by 5 mL of 17% EDTA for 1 minute.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Between- and Within-Group Comparisons of Postoperative Pain Scores Over Time

    Time frame: During the first week after treatment

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Endodontics
    Rize, Centre, Turkey (Türkiye)
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 17, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07710833
Lead sponsor
Recep Tayyip Erdogan University
Responsible party
Medine Ciçek (department of endodontics, research assistant, Recep Tayyip Erdogan University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 17, 2026
Start date
May 11, 2026
Primary completion
Jun 26, 2026
Completion
Jul 3, 2026
Last update
Jul 17, 2026

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion