ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT07706114FES in MSUpdated Sep 15, 2026

FES: Effect on Walking in the Real World and Participation in Daily Life in People With Multiple Sclerosis.

An interventional study of Use of functional electrical stimulation for extended duration on the participants' weaker limb in Multiple Sclerosis, sponsored by University of California, San Francisco. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 22 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-15.

Sponsored by University of California, San Francisco · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
70
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
22 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 20 studies in Multiple Sclerosis by University of California, San Francisco — 6 open to participants now, 10 under way, none of them phase 3. Multiple Sclerosis · University of California, San Francisco.

Planned enrollment
6th of 15
70 · median 44
Started
2026
the only one that year
No phase
9 of 20
1 open now
Registered
20th of 20
by date

Among the 20 studies in Multiple Sclerosis by University of California, San Francisco, this one is the 6th largest by planned enrollment of the 15 interventional ones that give a count, is the only one that started in 2026, is one of 9 with no phase, and was the 20th registered.

Multiple Sclerosis

3,264 studies on the registry are indexed under Multiple Sclerosis; 659 are open to participants now.

Browse Multiple Sclerosis studies →

Open to participants now

6 of the 20 studies in Multiple Sclerosis by University of California, San Francisco are open now, in 1 country. Recruiting first, the newest first:

By country, each count listing its studies:

All 6 open studies →

Where they have run

Who these studies take

Of the 430 Multiple Sclerosis studies recruiting now, 163 (38%) set no upper age limit and 211 (49%) stop at 75 or younger; 40 take children under 18; 96 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 22 Years to 75 Years · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 20 studies in Multiple Sclerosis by University of California, San Francisco, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic, neurodegenerative disease and the most common cause of non- traumatic disability in young adults. Foot drop, arising from MS-induced muscle weakness, leads to impaired mobility, increased fall risk, reduced overall physical activity and reduced health-related quality of life. Functional electrical stimulation (FES) represents a revolutionary approach for addressing gait mobility challenges in MS and evolution in the technology has greatly improved its design, comfort, and functionality. Despite its proven benefits, FES is underutilized in MS clinical practice and lacks a comprehensive assessment of its long-term effectiveness and impact in real-world applications. Study objectives are to evaluate the utility of FES for improving function and real-world outcomes in people with MS (PwMS) who have gait impairments. Study design: 4-month randomized controlled trial (RCT) (n=70 PwMS) evaluating FES efficacy. Group 1: 4M FES; Group 2: 4M sham stimulation, followed by both groups: 4M FES, then 1M (no-FES) follow-up assessing carryover. We will assess gait quality, muscle function, physical activity, and FES adoption factors, with covariates including age, sex, MS severity, MS symptoms, biomechanical factors, and device usage patterns.

Read the detailed description

OVERARCHING PLAN. To evaluate the utility of FES for improving function and real-world outcomes in PwMS with gait impairments. Study design: a 4-month (4M) parallel 1:1 RCT in 70 PwMS. Epoch A: Group 1, 4M of FES. Group 2, 4M of sham stimulation. Epoch B; Groups 1 and 2, 4M of FES - followed by 1-month no-FES follow-up to evaluate carryover. Outcomes: We will examine gait quality, muscle function, physical activity, and factors influencing long-term FES adoption. Covariates: age, sex, clinical (MS severity, symptoms) and biomechanical (i.e. orthotic effects) factors, and wear time /stimulation levels. Interprofessional team: expertise in biomechanics, remote monitoring of PwMS, clinical trials, biostatistics and implementation science.

STUDY DESIGN. This study is a 4-month parallel 1:1 randomized controlled trial (RCT) involving 70 PwMS, designed to evaluate the impact of FES on mobility and long-term adoption. Participants will be randomized into two groups. Group 1: will receive FES during EPOCH A (4 months) and EPOCH B (4 months). Group 2 (delayed start): will receive 4 months of Sham stimulation during EPOCH A, and FES during EPOCH B. Follow-up: After Epoch B, all participants will be followed for 1 month with no FES sleeve or stimulation to assess carryover. Randomization. Participants will be stratified and randomized via a computer-generated sequence, with allocation concealed by an independent researcher. Blinding. Study coordinators and assessors will be blinded to group assignment to minimize bias. Setting. The UCSF Center for MS and Neuroinflammation provides state-of-the-art care to over 6,000 adults with MS annually. We have extensive experience with research studies enrolling patients including pivotal trials for MS,66 67 gathering patient generated data (PGD; i.e., remote physical activity)68, 69 and deploying digital technologies for health70 (see Facilities). Recruitment. Our goal is to enroll 70 adults (for 58 approximately 35 in each group, conservatively allowing for up to 20% attrition) with relapsing or progressive MS71 and some previously identified gait impairment who meet full inclusion/exclusion criteria. The study coordinator will pre-screen potential participants for disability level (EDSS) in the electronic health record (EHR).72 Some enrollment criteria require in-person assessment. Within each Group: We will include between 2:1 and 3:1 women to men, since MS affects 2-3 times more women than men. We will cap enrollment of non-Hispanic White patients at 65% to ensure that our participants reflect composition of our diverse clinic population (30-35% of whom identify as Black, Hispanic, Asian, or "Other") and that our data are generalizable to the experience of diverse PwMS. Patients will be contacted by IRB-approved means (telephone or email) or during a regular clinic visit (by the study team). Informed Consent. The study coordinator will obtain informed consent from eligible patients as detailed in the Human Subject's form prior to enrollment. Enrollment and screening. An eHEALS survey will assess participants' ability to use electronic health information. Patients who have given written informed consent will be formally enrolled into the study. We will block enroll (approximately 9 per disability group) across the EDSS disability spectrum based on preliminary data40, 43, 44, 49, 53, 54, 57: "mild - mild gait" (2.0-4.0), "moderate gait" (4.5-5.5), "unilateral support-" (6.0), and "bilateral support-" (6.5) for gait. This stratification enables evaluation of FES effects across diverse disability levels.

STUDY PROCEDURES. Overview. Participants will complete baseline assessments over 2-3 visits (within 1-2 weeks) to minimize fatigue, a common MS symptom. Baseline (Pre-Epoch A). They will undergo an in-clinic visit aligned with routine neurological care, including a detailed neurological exam and patient-reported outcomes (PROs, Table 2) available as paper or digital versions via REDCap74. Demographic/socioeconomic data will be obtained from the EHR. Based on inclusion criteria, participants will receive a standard-of-care referral to a neuro-PT. Participants will receive a Fitbit (Inspire 3 or newer), for continuous activity monitoring, with training and setup using anonymous credentials. One week of baseline activity data will be collected at home before initiating Epoch A (Group 1: FES, Group 2: Sham). At 4M (end of Epoch A) \& 8M (end of Epoch B). Standardized assessments will include walking endurance, mobility, speed, fall risk (monthly surveys), balance, and participation-based measures (all detailed in Table 2), recommended by the MS Evidence Database to Guide Effectiveness task force for both clinical and research use.75 A trained PT will be present for all tests (for safety). Participants will rate effort (Rate of Perceived Exertion, scale: 0-10) and fatigue (0-10 scale) pre/post walking tests; if effort exceeds 4-5 or increases by ≥20%, they may rest longer or return another day. 1M Follow-up. Outcomes will be repeated per Table 2. A validated electronic patient-reported EDSS (ePR-EDSS76) will be collected to confirm no unexpected disability progression, which is not anticipated in this timeframe.

Intervention: Functional electrical stimulation via neural sleeve. The Cionic Neural Sleeve ("FES") is an FDA-cleared Class 2 medical device designed to aid mobility by stimulating leg muscles through metal electrodes embedded in a Nylon/Lycra garment (Fig 2).42 The interior of the sleeve has small metal electrodes which are covered by reusable 1.75"x1.75" gel sensor pads that adhere to the skin's surface. The electrodes connect to a handheld Control Unit, which powers the device and can be controlled via a smartphone application using Bluetooth Low Energy. The sleeve features gel sensor pads for skin contact and Velcro flaps for secure placement. Originally approved on February 14, 2022 [K213622], its compatibility was extended to include Android systems on July 21, 2022 [K221823]. Please see Preliminary Data (PD) below. Each participant will receive a neural sleeve and be asked to use it on their weaker limb (Group 1: 8M FES; Group 2: 4M Sham then 4M FES). Following manufacturer and FDA approved guidelines, a Cionic team member will fit the participant's affected leg with the appropriate Cionic sleeve size (XS - L). In a seated position, test stimulation is applied to muscle groups (dorsiflexors, plantarflexors, knee extensors/ flexors).

FES SETTINGS: FES Stimulation. Using a tailored electrode settings at an initial frequency of 35Hz and pulse width of 300µs, which has been shown in Cionic prior work (unpublished) to activate a visible motor contraction of the dorsiflexors. Stimulation intensity will start at 0mA, increasing in 10mA increments (range: 25-30mA) based on participant feedback (comfort/effectiveness) and gait effects. Sham Stimulation. Our own pilot data (Cionic; 12 PwMS) as well as literature propose a high-frequency (50-100 Hz), low-intensity (paresthesia, not painful), small pulse width (50-200μs) for stimulation that can be felt, but does not promote motor muscle contractions for sham stimulation/control,.77, 78

Cionic setup protocol details: Placement. Using the Neural Sleeve, electrodes will be positioned over four key gait muscles (see Figure 2): (1) quadriceps (vastus lateralis and rectus femoris at mid-thigh) for knee extension; (2) tibialis anterior (proximal third of the anterior-lateral tibia) for dorsiflexion; (3) gastrocnemius (medial/lateral heads at the proximal calf) for plantarflexion; and (4) hamstrings (biceps femoris along the posterior thigh) for knee flexion. Stimulation: the intensity of stimulation (mA) per day will be recorded and saved in the FES dashboard for each participant (initial group levels described above). The stimulation level per week will be used as a covariate in the analysis. Progression of FES: Figure 3 describes how FES will be progressed over the study. Minute-by-minute wear time will be recorded by the device and stored for analysis. Muscle selection: inclusion criteria require some lower extremity weakness (e.g. tibialis anterior, leading to foot drop). Activation of other muscle groups will be based on individual muscle weakness (\<5/5 on manual muscle testing by the study PT) and recorded. The Cionic team will follow up with the participant (as per manufacturer guidelines) for virtual training, safety questions and all technical support throughout the study (see patient LOS). Risk mitigation for Cionic (set up and use): the study PT and Cionic team will assess participants' gait to note any visible impairments and ensure it is appropriate for device use. Individuals may use their assistive device (i.e. cane, walker) if applicable, assessing need to begin with AFO or other orthosis with sleeve for stability. The stimulation will never be raised to the point of discomfort or pain.

Details on Gait Metrics. Instrumented Walkway. Instrumented walkways (IWW) offer precise measurements of temporal-spatial parameters (i.e., gait speed, step length, support times, and base of support), which have been used to identify underlying causes of gait dysfunction in MS, as well as guiding treatment.96-98 A 16-foot ZenoTM IWW is permanently housed within our MS Clinic for clinical and research use (Bove), enrolling participants with variable neurological conditions, gait impairments and risk of falls. This reliable pressure IWW has been recognized (by the FDA) as the ground truth for gait measurements.99 Gait metrics. The ProtoKinetics software [PKMAS, LLC, Havertown, PA, USA) exports 679 gait variables from the IWW. From prior literature and our experience,99, 100 core variables capturing changes in gait in PwMS are: velocity (cm./sec - mean), cadence (steps/min - mean), step length (magnitude [increase] and symmetry - L/R ratio OR ASI [asymmetry index, aiming for =1]), variability (single support %, stride width: aiming for lower values). We will also include: total double support %, single support %, stride velocity, mean gait variability index, walk ratio, stride time, stride length. At baseline, 4M, 8M and follow/up: guided, and guarded by a study PT(safety), participants will walk over IWW at comfortable and fast gait speeds (2-4 passes per protocol)99 using their usual assistive device (cane, walker). Rationale for Timepoints: PwMS with disability will likely demonstrate slowing (\~1-2s) of gait over time, the timepoints will account for natural progression. Ample rest breaks will be given between protocols.

03

Conditions studied

  • Multiple Sclerosis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • functional electrical stimulation
  • multi-modal stimulation
  • gait impairment
  • multiple sclerosis
  • implementation science
  • physical activity monitoring
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
22 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of MS (relapsing or progressive) by 2017 McDonald Criteria79
  • Ages 22-75 years old
  • EDSS 2 - 6.5 (wide range of impairment, 6.5 = ambulation requires walker or 2 canes)
  • ≥ 1/5 (and \<5/5 on manual muscle test) of affected leg muscles
  • Any MS therapy, or no disease modifying treatment.
  • Technological criteria: availability of Wi-Fi in the home or workspace for connectivity.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  • Cognitive, dexterity or visual impairment that, in the opinion of the study neurologist (RB), would put the participant at risk or limit their ability to comply with the study protocol.
  • Inability to provide
  • FES use in the last 6 months
  • Musculoskeletal / cardiovascular comorbidities that in the opinion of the study physical therapists (VB, JB), places the patient at risk.
  • Recent (last 30 days) relapse affecting gait
  • >2/4 on the Ashworth scale (3= passive movement difficult)
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
70 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Sham comparator
    Group 2: FES Sham

    This group will receive 4 months of sham stimulation followed by 4 months of functional electrical stimulation.

    Device: Use of functional electrical stimulation for extended duration on the participants' weaker limb

  • Active comparator
    Group 1: FES Full

    This group will receive 8 months of functional electrical stimulation.

    Device: Use of functional electrical stimulation for extended duration on the participants' weaker limb

Interventions

  • DeviceUse of functional electrical stimulation for extended duration on the participants' weaker limb

    Participants will be randomized into two groups. Group 1: will receive FES during EPOCH A (4 months) and EPOCH B (4 months). Group 2 (delayed start): will receive 4 months of Sham stimulation during EPOCH A, and FES during EPOCH B. Follow-up: After Epoch B, all participants will be followed for 1 month with no FES sleeve or stimulation to assess carryover.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Adherence

    Adherence will be measured by monitoring compliance with prescribed use (at least ½ of prescribed FES use = success).

    Time frame: 4 months

  2. Retention

    Retention will be assessed by the proportion of participants in each group, who remain in the study till the end of Epoch A

    Time frame: 4 months

  3. Peak Step Rate

    Peak step rate will be calculated per literature using minute-by-minute step count

    Time frame: 4 months

  4. PROMIS - Participation satisfaction

    We will evaluate changes in participation from baseline to 4 months using Wilcoxon signed rank test.

    Time frame: 4 months

  5. Dorsiflexion angle

    Assess changes in ankle dorsiflexion angle from pre to post by a paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed rank test

    Time frame: baseline

  6. Spatiotemporal gait metrics

    A linear mixed model with random intercepts for participants will assess the relationship between muscle function changes (i.e., Manual muscle testing, sEMG activation) and unassisted (no FES) gait.To compare FES vs. Sham in Epoch A, we will use an LMM with fixed effects for group, time (baseline, 4M), and interaction, adjusting for covariates

    Time frame: 4 months

  7. Dynamometer muscle strength

    To compare FES vs. Sham in Epoch A, we will use an linear mixed model with fixed effects for group, time (baseline, 4M), and interaction, adjusting for covariates

    Time frame: 4 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Persistence (prolonged adherence to FES)

    Prolonged adherence to FES will be tracked via the FES device database, with success defined as ≥60% of participants using FES an average of ≥3 days per week.

    Time frame: 4 months

  2. Adoption

    Adoption: will be measured by calculating the % of patients who use the FES during the first month of the study (3-5 days per week in each of the 4 weeks = success).

    Time frame: 4 months

  3. Daily Step count

    A linear mixed model will be used to evaluate change in STEPS from baseline to 6 months, by controlling for confounding factors such as attendance to neurological physical therapy, duration, intervention type, and response to specialized PT from the electronic health record.

    Time frame: 4 months

  4. Dorsiflexion angle change

    We will explore additional changes at 8 months, and also assess the impact of compliance and adherence by adjusting for stimulation level and days of use (from Cionic dashboard) and see if the differences are improved for higher compliance.

    Time frame: 8 months

  5. Spatiotemporal gait metrics

    We will apply a linear mixed models with repeated measures, including random intercepts for participants, to compare the changes in outcome measures while using FES in Group 1 (baseline to 4M to 8M) to the changes in Group 2, Epoch B (4m to 8M); to understand if individuals with 8M of FES have improved outcomes compared to those with 4M of FES. Hochberg's method will be used to control for multiple comparisons. 3°) Correlations between self-reported

    Time frame: 8 months

Other outcomes

  1. Retention (prolonged)

    retention will be assessed over 8M (Epoch A + B for Group 1), with additional comparisons between Group 2 (Epoch A/Sham, transitioning to Epoch B/FES) and Group 1 (Epoch A/FES).

    Time frame: 8 months

  2. Persistence

    Persistence will be assessed over 8M (Epoch A + B for Group 1), with additional comparisons between Group 2 (Epoch A/Sham, transitioning to Epoch B/FES) and Group 1 (Epoch A/FES).

    Time frame: 8 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of California San Francisco, Weill Institute for Neurosciences
    San Francisco, California 94158, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Aug 2026; primary completion for Jul 2029, 34 months later.

Of 847 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Multiple Sclerosis, half reached primary completion within 22 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 43. This study's planned 34 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 869 studies reached it within 21 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 43.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 9, 2026
First posted
Jul 15, 2026
StartEst.
Aug 31, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jul 2, 2029
CompletionEst.
Oct 30, 2030
Last update
Sep 15, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 15, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07706114
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 15, 2026
Start date
Aug 31, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jul 2, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 30, 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 15, 2026

Study contacts

Valerie Block, DPTSc
principal investigator · University of California, San Francisco

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion