ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07705945TELE-MCUpdated Jul 15, 2026

Using Telehealth to Improve Musculoskeletal Care Through Expanded Physical Therapy Access

An interventional study of In-person physical therapy (PT) and Telehealth physical therapy (TH-PT) in Musculoskeletal Pain, sponsored by Brooke Army Medical Center. Not yet recruiting at 4 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 64 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-15.

Sponsored by Brooke Army Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
210
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 64 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to explore and compare the effectiveness of in-person versus remote physical therapy (PT) for the treatment of musculoskeletal (MSK) pain within the Military Health System (MHS).

Read the detailed description

This study will explore the effect of remote two-way video conference telehealth physical therapy sessions compared to standard of care in-person physical therapy. Eligible participants will be randomized into one of the 2 treatment arms. Specific aims will compare the effectiveness of physical therapy delivery strategies on the primary outcome of Pain, Enjoyment, and General Activity (PEG-3) Scale, which measures pain interference, and secondary outcomes of PROMIS short forms (mood, physical function, fatigue, sleep disturbance, and prescription medication misuse), patient global impression of change, and pain self-efficacy.

02

Conditions studied

  • Musculoskeletal Pain

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • musculoskeletal pain
  • tele-health
  • stepped care
  • physical thrapy access
  • cost-effective care
03

In context

Musculoskeletal Pain

515 studies on the registry are indexed under Musculoskeletal Pain; 127 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 210 is above the median of 70 across 370 interventional studies indexed under Musculoskeletal Pain.

Browse Musculoskeletal Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Brooke Army Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 94 studies on the registry; 11 are open to participants now.

Of its 8 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 2 (25%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 64 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Ages 18-64
  • TRICARE Beneficiary (active duty, retiree, dependent)
  • Health care visit for their MSK condition in the past 6 weeks
  • Diagnosed with an MSK condition that has persisted for at least 2 weeks
  • Has a computer (either smartphone, tablet or laptop), with video and audio capabilities for telehealth, including access to internet
  • Able to speak and read English well enough to provide , follow study instructions and independently answer the questionnaires
  • Available to attend treatment sessions over the next 2 months

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Surgery for any MSK condition in the past 6 months
  • Currently known to be pregnant
  • Medical to exercise
  • Currently receiving or scheduled to receive invasive or other nonpharmacologic interventions for any MSK condition (e.g., chiropractic, injections, etc.) with the exception of a physical therapy referral, an issued profile or duty restriction, or other related patient education
  • Anyone separating from the military within 9 months (other than normal military retirement), pending a medical or physical evaluation board, discharge from the military for medical reasons, or pending or undergoing any litigation for an injury
  • Signs of serious or systemic pathology that could be responsible for the musculoskeletal pain (i.e. ankylosing spondylitis, rheumatoid arthritis, gout, lupus, vertebral osteomyelitis, or psoriatic arthritis), currently receiving treatment for cancer other than skin cancer or acute fracture (in the last 3 months) of the musculoskeletal region.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
210 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    In-person physical therapy (PT)

    Participants will receive individual treatment sessions provided in-person based on the preference and clinical expertise of the clinician. All sessions will be supervised in a clinic. A digital exercise prescription and patient education platform will be available for their use.

    Other: In-person physical therapy (PT)

  • Experimental
    Telehealth physical therapy (TH-PT)

    Participants will receive individual treatment sessions provided remotely via a 2-way video conferencing platform. The core components of the treatment sessions include: 1) education, particularly on the biopsychosocial aspects of pain, 2) individualized exercise instruction, and 3) pain coping strategies for self-management. A digital exercise prescription and patient education platform will be available for their use.

    Other: Telehealth physical therapy (TH-PT)

Interventions

  • OtherIn-person physical therapy (PT)

    Participants assigned to in-person PT will receive individual treatment sessions provided by a licensed, on-site PT. Participants will receive 1-on-1 sessions based on the preference and clinical expertise of the clinician. Participants assigned to in-person physical therapy will receive individual treatment sessions provided by a licensed, on-site physical therapist at the participating military treatment facility. Physical therapists delivering in-person physical therapy will have the option to provide participants a digital home exercise program, however this will not be required. If you choose to download and use either app, you will have to accept the app's terms of service.

  • OtherTelehealth physical therapy (TH-PT)

    Participants assigned to telehealth physical therapy will use two-way video conferencing with a licensed physical therapist via a secure platform approved for patient care. Video conferencing will be accessible via a mobile app or web browser on your home computer. Participants assigned to telehealth physical therapy will be provided a digital home exercise program. The home exercise program is accessible via a mobile app or web browser on your home computer. This is an app that some military clinics already use as standard of care for providing home exercise programs to their patients, so there is a chance you would be receiving your exercises by this method even if you didn't participate in this study.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain, Enjoyment, and General Activity Scale (PEG-3)

    The PEG-3 measure includes 3 items evaluating 1) pain severity; and interference of pain with 2) enjoyment and 3) general activity. Item response options range from 0-10. The PEG-3 score is expressed as the mean of all item scores ranging from 0-10.

    Time frame: 12 Weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. PROMIS-29

    The PROMIS-29 assesses additional domains relevant to patients with MSK pain including physical function, fatigue, depression, anxiety, pain intensity, ability to participate in social roles, and sleep disturbance. The PROMIS-29 can also be used to calculate a physical and mental health summary score and can be used in cost-effectiveness analyses.

    Time frame: 12 Weeks

  2. Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ)

    Because of its role in patients' capacity of selfmanagement, we will use the 10 item Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ) to quantify an individual's confidence in performing activities despite pain.

    Time frame: 12 Weeks

  3. Patient Global Assessment of Change (PGIC)

    Participants' satisfaction with their intervention will be based on the single-item Patient Global Assessment of Change (PGIC).

    Time frame: 12 Weeks

  4. PROMIS Short Form Prescription Pain Medication Misuse

    The PROMIS short form 7a assesses the abuse of prescription pain medication. The short form uses fixed items from the PROMIS item bank to provide a T-score with population mean = 50 (sd=10).

    Time frame: 26 Weeks

  5. EuroQoL (EQ-5D)

    The EQ-5D is a generic quality of life questionnaire that will assess quality of life on a scale that can be referenced to other disease conditions. The EQ-5D covers 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each domain has 3 response categories: level 1, "no problems"; level 2, "some problems"; and level 3, "inability or extreme problems." Responses are combined to give a 5-digit descriptive health state classification (e.g., 11222). The EQ-5D yields a total of 243 possible health states. Valuations for each health state are available. The EQ-5D is commonly used in economic evaluation of interventions and cost-effectiveness analysis.

    Time frame: 12 Weeks

07

Study locations

4 sites
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Krebs EE, Lorenz KA, Bair MJ, Damush TM, Wu J, Sutherland JM, Asch SM, Kroenke K. Development and initial validation of the PEG, a three-item scale assessing pain intensity and interference. J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Jun;24(6):733-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-0981-1. Epub 2009 May 6. PubMed 19418100 ↗
  • Ojha HA, Wyrsta NJ, Davenport TE, Egan WE, Gellhorn AC. Timing of Physical Therapy Initiation for Nonsurgical Management of Musculoskeletal Disorders and Effects on Patient Outcomes: A Systematic Review. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2016 Feb;46(2):56-70. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2016.6138. Epub 2016 Jan 11. PubMed 26755406 ↗
  • Fritz JM, Magel JS, McFadden M, Asche C, Thackeray A, Meier W, Brennan G. Early Physical Therapy vs Usual Care in Patients With Recent-Onset Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2015 Oct 13;314(14):1459-67. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.11648. PubMed 26461996 ↗
  • Lopez-Marcos JJ, Diaz-Arribas MJ, Valera-Calero JA, Navarro-Santana MJ, Izquierdo-Garcia J, Ortiz-Gutierrez RM, Plaza-Manzano G. The Added Value of Face-to-Face Supervision to a Therapeutic Exercise-Based App in the Management of Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Sensors (Basel). 2024 Jan 16;24(2):567. doi: 10.3390/s24020567. PubMed 38257659 ↗
  • Hunter R, Beattie M, O'Malley C, Gorely T. Mobile apps to self-manage chronic low back pain: A realist synthesis exploring what works, for whom and in what circumstances. PEC Innov. 2023 Jun 16;3:100175. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100175. eCollection 2023 Dec 15. PubMed 38213759 ↗
  • Chen M, Wu T, Lv M, Chen C, Fang Z, Zeng Z, Qian J, Jiang S, Chen W, Zhang J. Efficacy of Mobile Health in Patients With Low Back Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Jun 11;9(6):e26095. doi: 10.2196/26095. PubMed 34114965 ↗
  • Madsen C, Poropatich R, Koehlmoos TP. Telehealth in the Military Health System: Impact, Obstacles, and Opportunities. Mil Med. 2023 Mar 6;188(Suppl 1):15-23. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usac207. PubMed 36882030 ↗
  • Childs JD, Fritz JM, Wu SS, Flynn TW, Wainner RS, Robertson EK, Kim FS, George SZ. Implications of early and guideline adherent physical therapy for low back pain on utilization and costs. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Apr 9;15:150. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0830-3. PubMed 25880898 ↗
  • Abiero B, Gliner M, Beamer S, Sackett A, Marshall-Aiyelawo K, Ellison J, McDavid T, de Geus J. Military Medical Readiness and Patient Experience with Access to Care. Med J (Ft Sam Houst Tex). 2022 Jan-Mar;(Per 22-01/02/03):3-10. PubMed 34940962 ↗
  • Molloy JM, Pendergrass TL, Lee IE, Chervak MC, Hauret KG, Rhon DI. Musculoskeletal Injuries and United States Army Readiness Part I: Overview of Injuries and their Strategic Impact. Mil Med. 2020 Sep 18;185(9-10):e1461-e1471. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usaa027. PubMed 32175566 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Study data will be made available upon reasonable request, and pursuant to any Data Sharing Agreement requirements from the US Defense Health Agency. DSA applications and information can be found at health.mil

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Analytic code

Time frame: Within one year

Data sharing details ↗ · www.health.mil

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 15, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07705945
Lead sponsor
Brooke Army Medical Center
Collaborators
Tripler Army Medical Center, Madigan Army Medical Center, C.R.Darnall Army Medical Center, University of Utah
Responsible party
Dan Rhon (Professor, Brooke Army Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 15, 2026
Start date
Jul 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Mar 1, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 1, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 15, 2026

Study contacts

Tina Greenlee, PhD
Contact
sammc@militaryclinicalresearch.org
210-539-9638
Cedar Sexton
Contact
militaryclinicalresearch@gmail.com
210-916-8634

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion