ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07704060IN-HOMEUpdated Jul 16, 2026

Intervention to Help Orient Men to Excel (IN-HOME) Phase II Study

An interventional study of Intervention to Help Orient Men to Excel (IN-HOME) and Supplying Useful Perimenopause Through Post-menopause Online Resources and Tools (SUPPORT) in Caregivers, Community Health Workers and Knowledge, sponsored by KDH Research & Communication. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to male participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-16.

Sponsored by KDH Research & Communication · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jun 2026; still recruiting 4 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
360
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

The goal of the study is to examine the effect of outreach from IN-HOME-trained CHWs on changes in male informal caregiver knowledge/skills, positive attitudes, self-efficacy, and intentions about caregiving topics. The study will also assess the extent to which exposure to IN-HOME improves male caregivers' general, physical, and mental health and reduces interference with daily tasks due to health-related issues and satisfaction with the program and associated app.

Read the detailed description

The investigators will use a randomized, two-group design to evaluate the Intervention to Help Orient Men to Excel (IN-HOME) course and explore the following research questions: 1) To what extent does male caregiver receipt of outreach from IN-HOME-trained CHWs (a) increase their knowledge, skills, and self-efficacy about the importance of caregiving and accessing caregiving resources; managing their and their family member's health and financial needs; and navigating the health care system and (b) improve their general, physical, and mental health and reduce interference with daily tasks due to health-related issues? and 2) To what extent do caregivers report satisfaction, comfort accessing CHW support, and perceived benefit of the toolbox app?

KDH Research \& Communication (KDHRC) will contract with 60 CHWs who will receive the IN-HOME training or alternative training (SUPPORT, which focuses on menopause content). IN-HOME content was developed in conjunction with subject matter experts and the intended audience to ensure the IN-HOME course includes accurate material and reflects the specific needs of CHWs providing outreach male caregivers. Trained CHWs will be assigned five to six male caregivers to provide outreach to over a three-week period. Male caregivers, the human subject participants in the study, will complete three surveys.

Principal Investigator Nicole Wanty (KDHRC), with input from subject matter experts, developed necessary research materials, including the recruitment protocols, evaluation instrumentation, and human subjects consent materials. The PI also outlined the appropriate statistical analysis methods. All procedure documents were reviewed by the KDHRC Institutional Review Board before the evaluation launch.

KDHRC contracted with a national recruitment company to recruit participants. The recruitment company implements the IRB-approved eligibility screener with men in their national database to identify eligible caregivers. Eligible caregivers receive a link to the online consent form programmed in a secure online platform. Consented participants will be randomized to the treatment or control groups and complete Survey 1. The study will include up to 360 male caregivers nationwide (180 treatment group, 180 control group). KDHRC will remind participants that participation in the study is completely voluntary.

Treatment group participants. After completing Survey 1, each treatment group participant will be assigned to an IN-HOME-trained CHW. The email will also include a link for the participant to download the toolbox app. Participants can communicate with their CHW via the toolbox app or directly. Over the three-week intervention period, the participants will have up to three sessions with their CHW. After the intervention period, the treatment participants will complete Survey 2. Then, three weeks later the treatment participants will complete Survey 3.

Control group participants. The control group will use a lagged design where the control participants will receive no intervention, then they will receive the control intervention. After completing Survey 1, the control group will receive no intervention for the first three weeks. Then, the control participants will complete Survey 2 and be introduced to their CHWs. Control participants will receive CHW support "as usual", defined as general health education from the control group CHWs over a three-week period before completing Survey 3. After completing Survey 3, KDHRC will share IN-HOME resources from the toolbox app with control participants.

Participant responses to survey measures will be linked using non-personal identifiers. KDHRC will download and export the data from the online survey platform into encrypted Excel files and import the raw data into STATA. The study team will match the surveys using the non-personal identifiers and conduct analyses to test the effect of IN-HOME-trained CHW support on changes in caregivers' knowledge, skills, attitudes, self-efficacy, and health.

02

Conditions studied

  • Caregivers
  • Community Health Workers
  • Knowledge
  • Attitude
  • Self-Efficacy
  • Intentions
  • Health

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Male
  • Caregivers
  • Health
03

In context

Behavior

1,573 studies on the registry are indexed under Behavior; 313 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 360 is above the median of 120 across 1,197 interventional studies indexed under Behavior.

Browse Behavior studies →

Lead sponsor

KDH Research & Communication is the lead sponsor of 7 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Must identify as male.
  • Must be at least 18 years old.
  • Must be a caregiver (defined as providing care for an older adult who is ≥65 years of age).
  • Must live in the United States.
  • Must have access to a smartphone.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

- None

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
360 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Treatment

    Education and support by IN-HOME trained CHWs and use of the IN-HOME toolbox app

    Behavioral: Intervention to Help Orient Men to Excel (IN-HOME)

  • Active comparator
    Control

    Support by CHWs trained in other topic area to provide support "as usual" defined as general health education for the control group participants

    Other: Supplying Useful Perimenopause Through Post-menopause Online Resources and Tools (SUPPORT)

Interventions

  • BehavioralIntervention to Help Orient Men to Excel (IN-HOME)

    The IN-HOME CHW training is an eight-lesson online course delivered via live webinar sessions and asynchronously via the KDHRC CHW Virtual Academy. IN-HOME trained CHWs will provide support via three virtual sessions (phone, text, video call) to male caregivers over three weeks.

  • OtherSupplying Useful Perimenopause Through Post-menopause Online Resources and Tools (SUPPORT)

    Lessons 1-4 for SUPPORT course; multi-module SUPPORT online training

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Declarative knowledge survey 1 score

    Investigators will ask participants multiple-choice questions about caregiving declarative knowledge. Investigators will sum to create a composite knowledge score ranging from 0 to 7. A score of 0 means a participant got zero questions correct, while a score of 7 means a participant got all 7 questions correct. Then, the investigators will create the composite knowledge average by dividing the participant's composite score by the total number of questions (7) and multiplying by 100. The higher the score, the more questions a participant answered correctly.

    Time frame: Survey 1 (baseline)

  2. Declarative knowledge survey 2 score

    Investigators will ask participants multiple-choice questions about caregiving declarative knowledge. Investigators will sum to create a composite knowledge score ranging from 0 to 7. A score of 0 means a participant got zero questions correct, while a score of 7 means a participant got all 7 questions correct. Then, the investigators will create the composite knowledge average by dividing the participant's composite score by the total number of questions (7) and multiplying by 100. The higher the score, the more questions a participant answered correctly.

    Time frame: Three weeks after survey 1

  3. Declarative knowledge survey 3 score

    Investigators will ask participants multiple-choice questions about caregiving declarative knowledge. Investigators will sum the scores to create a composite knowledge score ranging from 0 to 7. A score of 0 means a participant got zero questions correct, while a score of 7 means a participant got all 7 questions correct. Then, the investigators will create the composite knowledge average by dividing the participant's composite score by the total number of questions (7) and multiplying by 100. The higher the score, the more questions a participant answered correctly.

    Time frame: Three weeks after survey 2

  4. Procedural knowledge survey 1 score

    Investigators will ask participants multiple-choice questions about caregiving procedural knowledge. Investigators will sum the scores to create a composite knowledge score ranging from 0 to 4. A score of 0 means a participant got zero questions correct, while a score of 4 means a participant got all 4 questions correct. Then, the investigators will create the composite knowledge average by dividing the participant's composite score by the total number of questions (4) and multiplying by 100. The higher the score, the more questions a participant answered correctly.

    Time frame: Survey 1 (baseline)

  5. Procedural knowledge survey 2 score

    Investigators will ask participants multiple-choice questions about caregiving procedural knowledge. Investigators will sum the scores to create a composite knowledge score ranging from 0 to 4. A score of 0 means a participant got zero questions correct, while a score of 4 means a participant got all 4 questions correct. Then, the investigators will create the composite knowledge average by dividing the participant's composite score by the total number of questions (4) and multiplying by 100. The higher the score, the more questions a participant answered correctly.

    Time frame: Three weeks after survey 1

  6. Procedural knowledge survey 3 score

    Investigators will ask participants multiple-choice questions about caregiving procedural knowledge. Investigators will sum the scores to create a composite knowledge score ranging from 0 to 4. A score of 0 means a participant got zero questions correct, while a score of 4 means a participant got all 4 questions correct. Then, the investigators will create the composite knowledge average by dividing the participant's composite score by the total number of questions (4) and multiplying by 100. The higher the score, the more questions a participant answered correctly.

    Time frame: Three weeks after survey 2

  7. Skills survey 1 score

    Investigators will ask all participants Likert-type scale questions about skills to conduct caregiving tasks. Each answer choice rating will range from 1 to 10, with higher ratings representing more caregiver experience. Investigators will create the composite skills score by summing the scores from the participant's 9 skill items with a range of 9 to 90. Then, investigators will create the skills average by dividing the participant's composite score by the total number of questions (9), and the composite score will range from 1 to 10. The higher the score, the more experience a participant indicates.

    Time frame: Survey 1 (baseline)

  8. Skills survey 2 score

    Investigators will ask all participants Likert-type scale questions about skills to conduct caregiving tasks. Each answer choice rating will range from 1 to 10, with higher ratings representing more caregiver experience. Investigators will create the composite skills score by summing the scores from the participant's 9 skill items with a range of 9 to 90. Then, investigators will create the skills average by dividing the participant's composite score by the total number of questions (9), and the score will range from 1 to 10. The higher the score, the more experience a participant indicates.

    Time frame: Three weeks after survey 1

  9. Skills survey 3 score

    Investigators will ask all participants Likert-type scale questions about skills to conduct caregiving tasks. Each answer choice rating will range from 1 to 10, with higher ratings representing more caregiver experience. Investigators will create the composite skills score by summing the scores from the participant's 9 skill items with a range of 9 to 90. Then, investigators will create the skills average by dividing the participant's composite score by the total number of questions (9), and the score will range from 1 to 10. The higher the score, the more experience a participant indicates.

    Time frame: Three weeks after survey 2

  10. Positive attitudes survey 1 score

    Investigators will ask all participants Likert-type scale questions about attitudes toward CHW support and caregiving. Each answer choice rating will range from 1 to 10, with higher ratings representing more positive attitudes. Investigators will create the composite attitudes score by summing the scores from the participant's 4 attitude items with a range of 4 to 40. Then, investigators will create the attitudes average by dividing the participant's composite score by the total number of questions (4), and the score will range from 1 to 10. The higher the score, the more experience a participant indicates.

    Time frame: Survey 1 (baseline)

  11. Positive attitudes survey 2 score

    Investigators will ask all participants Likert-type scale questions about attitudes toward CHW support and caregiving. Each answer choice rating will range from 1 to 10, with higher ratings representing more positive attitudes. Investigators will create the composite attitudes score by summing the scores from the participant's 4 attitude items with a range of 4 to 40. Then, investigators will create the attitudes average by dividing the participant's composite score by the total number of questions (4), and the score will range from 1 to 10. The higher the score, the more experience a participant indicates.

    Time frame: Three weeks after survey 1

  12. Positive attitudes survey 3 score

    Investigators will ask all participants Likert-type scale questions about attitudes toward CHW support and caregiving. Each answer choice rating will range from 1 to 10, with higher ratings representing more positive attitudes. Investigators will create the composite attitudes score by summing the scores from the participant's 4 attitude items with a range of 4 to 40. Then, investigators will create the attitudes average by dividing the participant's composite score by the total number of questions (4), and the score will range from 1 to 10. The higher the score, the more experience a participant indicates.

    Time frame: Three weeks after survey 2

  13. Self-efficacy survey 1 score

    Investigators will ask all participants Likert-type scale questions related to perceived self-efficacy with conducting caregiving tasks. Each rating will range from 1 to 10, with higher ratings representing higher perceptions of confidence in conducting caregiving tasks. Investigators will create the composite self-efficacy score by summing the scores from the participant's 7 self-efficacy items with a range of 7 to 70. Then, investigators will create the self-efficacy average by dividing the participant's score by the number of self-efficacy items (7). The composite will range from 1 to 10.

    Time frame: Survey 1 (baseline)

  14. Self-efficacy survey 2 score

    Investigators will ask all participants Likert-type scale questions related to perceived self-efficacy with conducting caregiving tasks. Each rating will range from 1 to 10, with higher ratings representing higher perceptions of confidence in conducting caregiving tasks. Investigators will create the composite self-efficacy score by summing the scores from the participant's 7 self-efficacy items with a range of 7 to 70. Then, investigators will create the self-efficacy average by dividing the participant's score by the number of self-efficacy items (7). The composite will range from 1 to 10.

    Time frame: Three weeks after survey 1

  15. Self-efficacy survey 3 score

    Investigators will ask all participants Likert-type scale questions related to perceived self-efficacy with conducting caregiving tasks. Each rating will range from 1 to 10, with higher ratings representing higher perceptions of confidence in conducting caregiving tasks. Investigators will create the composite self-efficacy score by summing the scores from the participant's 7 self-efficacy items with a range of 7 to 70. Then, investigators will create the self-efficacy average by dividing the participant's score by the number of self-efficacy items (7). The composite will range from 1 to 10.

    Time frame: Three weeks after survey 2

  16. Intentions survey 1 score

    Investigators will ask all participants Likert-type scale questions related to intentions of conducting caregiving tasks. Each rating will range from 1 to 10, with higher ratings representing higher intentions to conduct caregiving tasks. Investigators will create the composite intention score by summing the scores from the participant's 5 intention items with a range of 5 to 50. Then, investigators will create the intentions average by dividing the participant's composite score by the number of intention items (5). The average will range from 1 to 10.

    Time frame: Survey 1 (baseline)

  17. Intentions survey 2 score

    Investigators will ask all participants Likert-type scale questions related to intentions of conducting caregiving tasks. Each rating will range from 1 to 10, with higher ratings representing higher intentions to conduct caregiving tasks. Investigators will create the composite intention score by summing the scores from the participant's 5 intention items with a range of 5 to 50. Then, investigators will create the intentions average by dividing the participant's composite score by the number of intention items (5). The average will range from 1 to 10.

    Time frame: Three weeks after survey 1

  18. Intentions survey 3 score

    Investigators will ask all participants Likert-type scale questions related to intentions of conducting caregiving tasks. Each rating will range from 1 to 10, with higher ratings representing higher intentions to conduct caregiving tasks. Investigators will create the composite intention score by summing the scores from the participant's 5 intention items with a range of 5 to 50. Then, investigators will create the intentions average by dividing the participant's composite score by the number of intention items (5). The average will range from 1 to 10.

    Time frame: Three weeks after survey 2

  19. Health survey 1

    Investigators will ask all participants four questions from the BRFSS 2021 core section 1: health status and core section 2: health days to assess general health, physical health, mental health, and interference with daily activities.

    Time frame: Survey 1 (baseline)

  20. Health survey 2

    Investigators will ask all participants four questions from the BRFSS 2021 core section 1: health status and core section 2: health days to assess general health, physical health, mental health, and interference with daily activities.

    Time frame: Three weeks after survey 1

  21. Health survey 3

    Investigators will ask all participants four questions from the BRFSS 2021 core section 1: health status and core section 2: health days to assess general health, physical health, mental health, and interference with daily activities.

    Time frame: Three weeks after survey 2

Secondary outcomes

  1. Satisfaction - survey 2

    Investigators will ask only the treatment group participants Likert-type scale questions related to their satisfaction with IN-HOME trained CHW support and the IN-HOME toolbox app. Each rating will range from 1 to 10, with higher scores representing higher satisfaction. Investigators will sum the scores from the participant's 4 satisfaction items for a satisfaction composite score ranging from 4 to 40. Investigators will then create the satisfaction average by dividing by the total number of satisfaction items (4). Scores range from 1 to 10, with higher scores meaning better satisfaction.

    Time frame: Three weeks after survey 1

Other outcomes

  1. Change in declarative knowledge scores from survey 1 to survey 2

    At both survey 1 and survey 2, investigators created a composite knowledge score for each participant ranging from 0 to 100. A score of 0 means a participant got zero questions correct while a score of 100 means a participant got all questions correct. Investigators will then subtract survey 1 composite from survey 2 composite. Higher scores mean higher gains from baseline to survey 2.

    Time frame: From baseline through survey 2, average 3 weeks

  2. Change in declarative knowledge scores from survey 1 to survey 3

    At both survey 1 and survey 3, investigators created a composite knowledge score for each participant ranging from 0 to 100. A score of 0 means a participant got zero questions correct while a score of 100 means a participant got all questions correct. Investigators will then subtract survey 1 composite from survey 3 composite. Higher scores mean higher gains from baseline to survey 3.

    Time frame: From baseline through survey 3, average 6 weeks

  3. Change in procedural knowledge scores from survey 1 to survey 2

    At both survey 1 and survey 2, investigators created a composite knowledge score for each participant ranging from 0 to 100. A score of 0 means a participant got zero questions correct while a score of 100 means a participant got all questions correct. Investigators will then subtract survey 1 composite from survey 2 composite. Higher scores mean higher gains from baseline to survey 2.

    Time frame: From baseline through survey 2, average 3 weeks

  4. Change in procedural knowledge scores from survey 1 to survey 3

    At both survey 1 and survey 3, investigators created a composite knowledge score for each participant ranging from 0 to 100. A score of 0 means a participant got zero questions correct while a score of 100 means a participant got all questions correct. Investigators will then subtract survey composite from survey 3 composite. Higher scores mean higher gains from baseline to survey 3.

    Time frame: From baseline through survey 3, average 6 weeks

  5. Change in skills scores from survey 1 to survey 2

    At both survey 1 and survey 2, investigators created a composite skills score for each participant ranging from 9 to 90. Higher ratings represent higher perceived experience. Investigators will then subtract survey 1 composite from survey 2 composite. Higher scores mean higher gains from baseline to survey 2.

    Time frame: From baseline through survey 2, average 3 weeks

  6. Change in skills scores from survey 1 to survey 3

    At both survey 1 and survey 3, investigators created a composite skills score for each participant ranging from 9 to 90. Higher ratings represent higher perceived experience. Investigators will then subtract survey 1 composite from survey 3 composite. Higher scores mean higher gains from baseline to survey 3.

    Time frame: From baseline through survey 3, average 6 weeks

  7. Change in positive attitude scores from survey 1 to survey 2

    At both survey 1 and survey 2, investigators created a composite attitude score for each participant ranging from 4 to 40. Higher ratings represent higher positive attitudes. Investigators will then subtract survey 1 composite from survey 2 composite. Higher scores mean higher gains from baseline to survey 2.

    Time frame: From baseline through survey 2, average 3 weeks

  8. Change in positive attitude scores from survey 1 to survey 3

    At both survey 1 and survey 3, investigators created a composite attitude score for each participant ranging from 4 to 40. Higher ratings represent higher positive attitudes. Investigators will then subtract survey 1 composite from survey 3 composite. Higher scores mean higher gains from baseline to survey 3.

    Time frame: From baseline through survey 3, average 6 weeks

  9. Change in self-efficacy scores from survey 1 to survey 2

    At both survey 1 and survey 2, investigators created a composite self-efficacy score for each participant ranging from 7 to 70. Higher ratings represent higher self-efficacy. Investigators will then subtract survey 1 composite from survey 2 composite. Higher scores mean higher gains from baseline to survey 2.

    Time frame: From baseline through survey 2, average 3 weeks

  10. Change in self-efficacy scores from survey 1 to survey 3

    At both survey 1 and survey 3, investigators created a composite self-efficacy score for each participant ranging from 7 to 70. Higher ratings represent higher self-efficacy. Investigators will then subtract survey 1 composite from survey 3 composite. Higher scores mean higher gains from baseline to survey 3.

    Time frame: From baseline through survey 3, average 6 weeks

  11. Change in intention scores from survey 1 to survey 2

    At both survey 1 and survey 2, investigators created a composite intention score for each participant ranging from 5 to 50. Higher ratings represent higher intentions. Investigators will then subtract survey 1 composite from survey 2 composite. Higher scores mean higher gains from baseline to survey 2.

    Time frame: From baseline through survey 2, average 3 weeks

  12. Change in intention scores from survey 1 to survey 3

    At both survey 1 and survey 3, investigators created a composite intention score for each participant ranging from 5 to 50. Higher ratings represent higher intentions. Investigators will then subtract survey 1 composite from survey 3composite. Higher scores mean higher gains from baseline to survey 3.

    Time frame: From baseline through survey 3, average 6 weeks

  13. Change in health from survey 1 to survey 2

    At both survey 1 and survey 2, participants responded to 4 questions on health status and days of not good physical health, mental health, and interference with daily activities. For each question investigators will calculate change from survey 1 to survey 2 and create a dichotomous variable (positive change or negative change). For example, a participant who reports 14 "not good" physical health days at survey 1 and 9 "not good" physical health days at survey 2 would be categorized as positive change.

    Time frame: From baseline through survey 2, average 3 weeks

  14. Change in health from survey 1 to survey 3

    At both survey 1 and survey 3, participants responded to 4 questions on health status and days of not good physical health, mental health, and interference with daily activities. For each question investigators will calculate change from survey 1 to survey 3 and create a dichotomous variable (positive change or negative change). For example, a participant who reports 14 "not good" physical health days at survey 1 and 4 "not good" physical health days at survey 3 would be categorized as positive change.

    Time frame: From baseline through survey 3, average 6 weeks

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • KDH Research & Communication
    Atlanta, Georgia 30309, United States
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — KDHRC will share the manipulated, de-identified survey data on openICPSR

Time frame: Public use data will be submitted to OpenICPSR within 12 months of final data analysis by the project team.

Access criteria: Public use data: Upon approval by the data repository, KDHRC will share de-identified survey data on openICPSR. OpenICPSR will inform KDHRC of how many parties have downloaded the IN-HOME data, and users downloading openICPSR data agree: 1) To not use the datasets for investigation of specific research subjects, except when identification is authorized in writing by ICPSR; and 2) To make no use of the identity of any research subject discovered inadvertently, and to advise ICPSR of any such discovery."8 Access to data on openICPSR is free. Restricted data: Alchemer will collect restricted data, including IP addresses and geographic location of the participant when completing the surveys. KDHRC will also collect demographic information from participants, such as age, race, ethnicity, education, years as a caregiver, caregiving experience, geographic location, and technology use experience. These restricted data will be kept separate from the public use data, described above.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jun 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Sep 2026, 2 months after the start.

Of 757 interventional studies with no phase under Behavior, half reached primary completion within 13 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 32. This study's planned 2 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 9, 2026
First posted
Jul 15, 2026
StartActual
Jun 19, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Sep 1, 2026
CompletionEst.
Nov 15, 2026
Last update
Jul 16, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 16, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07704060
Lead sponsor
KDH Research & Communication
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 15, 2026
Start date
Jun 19, 2026
Primary completion
Sep 1, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 15, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 16, 2026

Study contacts

Kristen D Holtz, PhD
Contact
kholtz@kdhrc.com
404-395-8711
Nicole I Wanty, MA
Contact
nwanty@kdhrc.com
715-360-0790
Nicole I Wanty, MA
principal investigator · KDH Research & Communication

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion