CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07698990SOLIDUpdated Aug 26, 2026

Segmentectomy Versus Lobectomy for Deep Solid-Dominant Early-Stage NSCLC

An interventional study of Anatomic Segmentectomy and Anatomic Lobectomy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Stage IA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, sponsored by Shanghai Chest Hospital. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-26.

Sponsored by Shanghai Chest Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,200
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

SOLID is a multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled, phase III non-inferiority trial comparing anatomic segmentectomy with lobectomy in patients with deeply located, solid-dominant, clinical stage IA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) measuring \<=2 cm. Eligible participants will undergo centralized imaging review and will be randomized preoperatively in a 1:1 ratio before induction of anesthesia.

The primary endpoint is 5-year overall survival. The key supportive secondary endpoint is 5-year recurrence-free survival. The study will enroll 1,200 participants and will use intention-to-treat analysis for the primary endpoint. An independent Data and Safety Monitoring Board and an independent Endpoint Adjudication Committee will oversee safety, surgical quality, data quality, and endpoint adjudication.

Read the detailed description

Segmentectomy has been established as an accepted treatment option for selected small peripheral NSCLC, but high-level randomized evidence is limited for tumors located in the inner two-thirds of the lung parenchyma. Deep, solid-dominant nodules may have higher oncologic risk, more complex anatomy, and greater difficulty achieving conventional linear surgical margins.

This trial evaluates whether standardized anatomic segmentectomy, including surgical quality control and lymph-node dissection requirements, is non-inferior to lobectomy for overall survival in patients with deeply located, solid-dominant, clinical stage IA NSCLC \<=2 cm. The trial incorporates centralized pre-randomization imaging review, mandatory recording of margin and surgical quality metrics, systematic or lobe-specific lymph-node dissection, independent endpoint adjudication, and DSMB safety and quality oversight.

Participants randomized to the segmentectomy arm will undergo anatomic segmentectomy when feasible. Conversion to lobectomy is required for intraoperative frozen-section N1/N2 nodal metastasis and may occur for inadequate margins, anatomic difficulty, or safety concerns. Participants randomized to the lobectomy arm will undergo standard anatomic lobectomy. Intraoperative findings and final pathology do not change the original randomized assignment for the primary intention-to-treat analysis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
  • Stage IA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Keywords

  • segmentectomy
  • lobectomy
  • deep pulmonary nodule
  • solid-dominant nodule
  • early-stage NSCLC
  • non-inferiority trial
  • overall survival
  • recurrence-free survival
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age 18 to 80 years.
  2. Solitary pulmonary nodule with whole-tumor maximal diameter \<=2 cm confirmed by preoperative thin-slice CT (\<=1 mm) and 3D reconstruction.
  3. Solid-dominant nodule with consolidation-to-tumor ratio (CTR) >0.5, including pure-solid nodules.
  4. Deeply located lesion, defined as the lesion center located in the inner two-thirds of the lung field on axial, coronal, and sagittal MPR images.
  5. Clinically definite suspected primary NSCLC after complete preoperative work-up and MDT discussion, with estimated malignancy probability >=95%. Preoperative pathologic confirmation is not mandatory, but preoperative or intraoperative pathology should be obtained when technically safe and feasible.
  6. Complete staging with thin-slice contrast-enhanced chest CT, whole-body PET-CT, brain contrast-enhanced MRI or CT, and serum tumor markers as appropriate; clinical stage IA (cT1a-bN0M0) without regional nodal or distant metastasis.
  7. Cardiopulmonary function sufficient to tolerate both lobectomy and segmentectomy, with FEV1 and DLCO >=60% predicted.
  8. Written informed consent, including special disclosure that final pathology may be benign.
  9. Centralized imaging review confirmation by the lead-center technical committee before randomization.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Lesion located in the right middle lobe.
  2. Lesion located in the inner two-thirds but adjacent to the lung apex or base and judged suitable for wedge resection.
  3. Two or more lesions requiring anatomic resection. One secondary lesion requiring only non-anatomic wedge resection is allowed; two main lesions in the same segment are excluded.
  4. Prior ipsilateral lung surgery or another malignancy within 5 years.
  5. Severe cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease or other comorbidity making lobectomy or conversion to lobectomy intolerable.
  6. Planned basal segmentectomy (S7-10); proper segmentectomy is permitted.
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
1,200 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Segmentectomy

    Participants assigned to this arm will undergo anatomic pulmonary segmentectomy. Combined segmentectomy or proper segmentectomy is permitted; basal segmentectomy (S7-10) is prohibited. Segmentectomy must include anatomic treatment of the segmental hilar artery, vein, and bronchus, margin assessment, and required lymph-node dissection. Conversion to lobectomy is permitted or required according to protocol-defined clinical and safety criteria.

    Procedure: Anatomic Segmentectomy

  • Active comparator
    Lobectomy

    Participants assigned to this arm will undergo standard anatomic pulmonary lobectomy with required systematic or lobe-specific lymph-node dissection.

    Procedure: Anatomic Lobectomy

Interventions

  • ProcedureAnatomic Segmentectomy

    Anatomical resection of the involved pulmonary segment or segments with lymph-node dissection and surgical quality-control assessment.

  • ProcedureAnatomic Lobectomy

    Anatomical resection of the involved pulmonary lobe with lymph-node dissection.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Overall Survival

    Overall survival is defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause. The primary analysis will compare segmentectomy with lobectomy using the intention-to-treat set and a non-inferiority hazard-ratio margin of 1.54.

    Time frame: 5 years after randomization

Secondary outcomes

  1. Recurrence-Free Survival

    Recurrence-free survival is defined as the time from randomization to first recurrence, distant metastasis, second primary lung cancer, or death from any cause. Event-free participants will be censored at the last event-free follow-up. RFS will be formally tested only if OS non-inferiority is established.

    Time frame: 5 years after randomization

  2. Locoregional Recurrence Rate

    Proportion of participants with recurrence at the surgical margin, ipsilateral remaining lung, or ipsilateral hilar/mediastinal lymph nodes.

    Time frame: Up to 5 years after randomization

  3. Distant Metastasis Rate

    Proportion of participants with metastasis involving contralateral lung, pleura, N3 lymph nodes, or extrathoracic organs.

    Time frame: Up to 5 years after randomization

  4. Patient-Reported Quality of Life Score (EORTC QLQ-C30)

    Patient-reported quality of life measured using EORTC QLQ-C30, with attention to dyspnea, chest pain, and cough.

    Time frame: Baseline and 6, 12, and 36 months after surgery

  5. Six-Minute Walk Distance

    Change in 6-minute walk test distance.

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 and 12 months after surgery

  6. FEV1 Change Rate

    Change or loss rate in FEV1 (Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second).

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 and 12 months after surgery

  7. Surgical Quality Metrics

    Surgical grade distribution, margin distance, R0 resection rate, lymph-node dissection station and count compliance, and conversion rate from segmentectomy to lobectomy.

    Time frame: Perioperative period

  8. Perioperative Complications

    Postoperative adverse events graded by Clavien-Dindo, with emphasis on grade II or higher complications.

    Time frame: Through discharge or 30 days after surgery, whichever came first

  9. 30-Day Mortality

    All-cause mortality within 30 days after surgery.

    Time frame: 30 days after surgery

  10. DLCO Change Rate

    Change or loss rate in DLCO (Diffusing Capacity of the Lungs for Carbon Monoxide).

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 and 12 months after surgery

  11. Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptom Score (EORTC QLQ-LC13)

    Patient-reported lung cancer-specific symptoms measured using EORTC QLQ-LC13, with attention to dyspnea, chest pain, and cough.

    Time frame: Baseline and 3, 6, 12, and 36 months after surgery

  12. 90-Day Mortality

    All-cause mortality within 90 days after surgery.

    Time frame: 90 days after surgery

06

Study locations

1 site
  • Shanghai Chest Hospital
    Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality 200030, China
07

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07698990
Lead sponsor
Shanghai Chest Hospital
Responsible party
Zhigang Li (Professor, Shanghai Chest Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 13, 2026
Start date
Aug 21, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jul 2034 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 2034 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 26, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion