ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07694479Updated Jul 10, 2026

Feasibility of a Habit-Based Intervention to Reduce Sedentary Behaviour in Cancer Survivors

An interventional study of Sedentary Behaviour Intervention and Active Control Group in Cancer and Sedentary Behaviour, sponsored by University of Toronto. Recruiting at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-10.

Sponsored by University of Toronto · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 6 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Dec 2025, registered Jul 2026).
  • Started Dec 2025; still recruiting 10 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Cancer and its treatments are associated with long-term side effects including lowered physical strength and quality of life. Decreasing sedentary behaviour improves health outcomes in cancer survivors. Habit-based programs aimed at lowering sedentary behaviour have been successful in decreasing sedentary behaviour in other populations. However, limited clinical trials aimed at lowering sedentary behaviour have recruited cancer survivors, and none are exclusively based on Habit Theory.

The primary goal of this clinical trial is to test the feasibility of an 8-week, habit-based program to lower sedentary behaviour in cancer survivors. Sedentary behaviour refers to low-energy activities performed during waking hours in a seated, reclined or laid down position. Secondarily, this clinical trial aims to examine changes in sedentary behaviour, physical strength, habit, and quality of life.

Enrolled participants will be assigned to a sedentary behaviour or active control group. The sedentary behaviour group will receive 8 weekly sheets consisting of tips recommending to lower sedentary behaviour. Tips will be individualized to participants' lifestyles, and will consider their cancer-specific and other physical limitations. Participants in the sedentary behaviour group will also meet with the researcher once a week for a check-in session for more individualized tips and progressions. The active control group will receive the Canadian 24-hour Movement Guidelines, and a handout highlighting the benefits of lowering sedentary behaviour. Both groups will be provided with wearable activity monitors (Fitbits).

Read the detailed description

Cancer and its treatments are associated with late and long-term side effects such as reduced quality of life (QoL) and physical function. Reducing sedentary behaviour (SED), any waking behaviour characterized by a low-energy expenditure performed while seated, reclined or lying down, has been shown to improve health outcomes in cancer survivors. Habit is a cognitive process in which a cue triggers a specific behaviour, learned through repetition of the behaviour every time the cue is encountered. By prompting sedentary breaks through everyday cues, SED may decrease in cancer survivors that may be sustained long-term. Current habit-based sedentary behaviour interventions in other populations are limited as they have only used self-report measures, did not recruit control groups, and/or were not exclusively grounded in Habit Theory. Additionally, remotely-delivered interventions may be an effective option to decrease sedentary behaviour in cancer survivors, while expanding reach and improving accessibility by overcoming barriers to participation in traditional in-person programs. To address the current gaps in the literature, research is needed to assess the feasibility of a remotely-delivered SED program for physical function and quality of life in cancer survivors. Therefore, the primary objective of this study is to examine the feasibility (adherence, safety, attrition, and participant satisfaction) of an 8-week, remotely-delivered, habit-based intervention to reduce SED in cancer survivors compared to an active control group (movement guidelines and sedentary behaviour handout). Feasibility indicators are: (1) check-in session adherence rate ≥70%, (2) tip adherence ≥70% (based on goal of following 2-4 tips per day), attrition rate \< 30%, and no intervention-related adverse events. Secondary objectives include examining changes in (1) physical function, (2) general health-related and cancer-specific QoL, (3) habit, and (4) objective and device-based sedentary behaviour of cancer survivors. The trial findings may be used to inform larger randomized controlled trials to reduce SED in cancer survivors, and may be a cost-effective and accessible option for cancer survivors to optimize their health.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cancer
  • Sedentary Behaviour

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • cancer survivorship
  • quality of life
  • physical function
  • cancer
  • remote delivery
  • feasibility
  • sedentary behaviour intervention
03

In context

Neoplasms

10,818 studies on the registry are indexed under Neoplasms; 2,324 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 30 is below the median of 60 across 7,703 interventional studies indexed under Neoplasms.

Browse Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Toronto is the lead sponsor of 403 studies on the registry; 54 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • 18 years of age or older
  • have been diagnosed with localized or asymptomatic cancer of any type
  • completed primary cancer treatment
  • self-report being sedentary for more than or equal to 8 hours per day
  • access to the internet and a device with a webcam
  • able to complete the study in English

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • presence of other primary or recurrent invasive cancer
  • having experienced a fall in the last 12 months
  • not residing in Canada
  • participating in other behaviour change interventions
  • using a gait aid device
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Sedentary Behaviour Intervention Group

    The sedentary behaviour intervention will consist of weekly tick-sheets, one weekly check-in session, and a Fitbit for physical inactivity reminders over 8 weeks. The weekly tick-sheets will consist of tips recommending to lower sedentary behaviour by enacting actions in the presence of cues. Progressions, illustrations and steps to perform these actions will be provided as an attachment with the tick-sheets. An example of a tip is "During TV/online video ad breaks or when you finish watching one episode of a show or online video, climb up and down a staircase to reduce cancer-related fatigue associated with prolonged sitting". Tips will be individualized to participants' lifestyles, and will consider their cancer-specific and other physical limitations. Participants in the sedentary behaviour group will also meet with the researcher once a week for a check-in session for more individualized tips and progressions.

    Behavioral: Sedentary Behaviour Intervention

  • Active comparator
    Active Control Group

    The active control group will receive the Canadian 24-hour Movement Guidelines, and a handout highlighting the benefits of reducing sedentary behaviour. They will also receive Fitbits, with the hourly inactivity reminders turned off.

    Other: Active Control Group

Interventions

  • BehavioralSedentary Behaviour Intervention

    The sedentary behaviour intervention will consist of weekly tick-sheets, one weekly check-in session, and a Fitbit for physical inactivity reminders over 8 weeks. The weekly tick-sheets will consist of tips recommending to lower sedentary behaviour by enacting actions in the presence of cues. Progressions, illustrations and steps to perform these actions will be provided as an attachment with the tick-sheets. An example of a tip is "During TV/online video ad breaks or when you finish watching one episode of a show or online video, climb up and down a staircase to reduce cancer-related fatigue associated with prolonged sitting". Tips will be individualized to participants' lifestyles, and will consider their cancer-specific and other physical limitations. Participants in the sedentary behaviour group will also meet with the researcher once a week for a check-in session for more individualized tips and progressions.

  • OtherActive Control Group

    The active control group will receive the Canadian 24-hour Movement Guidelines, and a handout highlighting the benefits of reducing sedentary behaviour. They will also receive Fitbits, with the hourly inactivity reminders turned off.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Enrollment

    Participant enrollment rate will be a measure of feasibility. Enrollment will be calculated by measuring the number of participants who enrolled in the intervention, divided by the number of participants who were assessed for eligibility.

    Time frame: Change from baseline (pre- intervention) to post-intervention (8 weeks).

  2. Adherence

    Adherence is another measure of feasibility. Two types of adherence will be measured: check-in session adherence and tip adherence. Check-in session adherence will be calculated by assessing the number of check-in sessions attended divided by the total number of check-in sessions that took place (i.e. 8 sessions). Tip adherence will be calculated by the number of days that the daily tip goal of 2-4 tips was met, divided by 56 (7 days per week for 8 weeks).

    Time frame: From baseline (pre-intervention) to post-intervention (8 weeks).

  3. Attrition

    Attrition will be a measure of feasibility. Attrition will be measured by calculating the number of participants who did not complete the intervention, divided by the number of participants who were randomized.

    Time frame: Assessed from baseline (pre-intervention) to post-intervention (8 weeks).

  4. Adverse Events

    Adverse events will be a measure of feasibility. This will be assessed as an unexpected and severe medical problem or injury (e.g., cardiac-related events, musculoskeletal injury or pain, falls) that occurs due to the intervention.

    Time frame: From baseline (pre-intervention) to post-intervention (8 weeks).

  5. Participant Satisfaction

    A participant satisfaction survey will be administered following the 8-week intervention to assess the acceptability of the intervention by using researcher-generated statements (e.g., "I found the sedentary behaviour reduction intervention rewarding"). The survey will assess the burden of the program and the participant's feedback regarding the sedentary behaviour intervention and overall study experience. Likert scales ranging from 1 (not at all) to 5 (very much) will be used. The active control group will complete a satisfaction survey which will include statements relevant to the active control arm.

    Time frame: Post-intervention (8 weeks).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Objective Sedentary Behaviour

    Objective sedentary behaviour will be measured using inclinometers (i.e. the ActivPAL) pre- and post-intervention. The inclinometer records the amount of time spent lying, sitting, standing, in upright position, cycling, in seated transport, total sedentary time, and sit-to-stand transitions. Participants will be mailed the inclinometers and will be provided instructions through videoconferencing.

    Time frame: Change from baseline (pre-intervention) to post-intervention (8 weeks).

  2. Self-Reported Sedentary Behaviour

    Self-reported sedentary behaviour will be measured using the AusDiab3 Sedentary Behaviour Questionnaire. This questionnaire measures the amount of time, in minutes and hours, spent seated, reclined or laying down while working, using transport, watching TV, as well as playing computer, internet, and electronic games, in the past week on weekdays and weekends. The choices for this questionnaire are none, 15 minutes or less, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours, 4 hours, 5 hours, or 6 hours or more.

    Time frame: Change from baseline (pre- intervention) to post-intervention (8 weeks).

  3. Habit

    Habit will be assessed using the brief Self-Report Behavioural Automaticity Index. This is a 4-item measure that assesses the automaticity of specific behaviours (i.e. actions in the tick-sheets to reduce sedentary behaviour).

    Time frame: Change from baseline (pre- intervention) to post-intervention (8 weeks).

  4. Physical Function

    Physical function will be measured at baseline and follow-up using the remotely-delivered 30-second sit-to-stand and 6-minute walk tests. The purpose of the 30-second sit-to-stand test is to measure participants' lower body strength and endurance by measuring the number of full chair stands with arms folded at the chest completed in 30-seconds. The 6-minute walk test assesses functional walking capacity by the distance walked in 6 minutes without running or jogging. A qualified exercise professional will administer these tests.

    Time frame: Change from baseline (pre- intervention) to post-intervention (8 weeks).

  5. Cancer-Specific Quality of Life

    Cancer-specific quality of life will be measured using the FACT-G. This is a 27-item questionnaire that assesses four domains of health-related quality of life in the past 7 days: physical, social, emotional, and functional well-being . Participants will be asked to rate each statement on a 5-point Likert scale (0= "not at all", 4= "very much") based on how much they relate to the statement.

    Time frame: Change from baseline (pre- intervention) to post-intervention (8 weeks).

  6. General-Health-Related Quality of Life

    General health-related quality of life will be measured using the Short Form-12 questionnaire. This questionnaire consists of 12 items that measure 8 physical and mental health-related domains: general health, physical functioning, role physical, body pain, vitality, social functioning, role emotional, and mental health.

    Time frame: Change from baseline (pre- intervention) to post-intervention (8 weeks).

  7. Self-Reported Exercise

    Self-reported exercise will be measured using the modified Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire. Participants will report the number of times per week and minutes per session that they engage in light, moderate, and vigorous leisure-time exercise, and resistance exercise. Total weekly minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity will be calculated as the sum of the number of moderate exercise minutes per week, plus twice the number of vigorous exercise minutes per week.

    Time frame: Change from baseline (pre- intervention) to post-intervention (8 weeks).

  8. Clinical Demographics

    Clinical variables include: cancer type, date of diagnosis, cancer stage, cancer spread, cancer stage, cancer treatment(s) received, current treatment status, previous recurrence, other cancer diagnoses, general health status, comorbidities, smoking history, and alcohol consumption history.

    Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention)

  9. Demographic Variables

    Demographic variables collected will include age (in years), sex (options are male, female, other, and prefer not to say), gender (options are agender, bigender/multigender, gender fluid, genderqueer, man, nonbinary, transgender, two-spirit, woman, other, and prefer not to say), marital status (options are single, married, common-law, separated, widowed, and divorced), highest level of education (options are some high school, completed high school, some university/college, completed university/college, some graduate school, and completed graduate school), current employment status (options are disability, retired, part-time, homemaker, full-time, and unemployed), ethnicity (options are Black, East Asian, Middle Eastern, Arab or West Asian, Latin American, South Asian, Southeast Asian, White, and other in which they would be asked to specify) as well as height (in feet and inches) and weight (in pounds) to calculate body mass index.

    Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention)

  10. Fatigue

    Fatigue will be assessed at baseline and follow-up using the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy- Fatigue Scale (FACIT-Fatigue). The FACIT-Fatigue is a 13-item measure which assesses self-reported fatigue and its effect on daily activities and function. Participants will be asked to rate 13 items related to their fatigue in the previous 7 days on a 5-point Likert scale (0="not at all" or "never" and 4= "very much" or "several times/day) in which higher scores indicate higher quality of life.

    Time frame: Change from baseline (pre- intervention) to post-intervention (8 weeks).

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • University of Toronto - Athletic Centre
    Toronto, Ontario M5S 2W6, Canada
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Park C, Larsen B, Mogos M, Muchira J, Dietrich M, LaNoue M, Jean J, Norfleet J, Doyle A, Ahn S, Mulvaney S. A multiple technology-based and individually-tailored Sit Less program for people with cardiovascular disease: A randomized controlled trial study protocol. PLoS One. 2024 May 9;19(5):e0302582. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302582. eCollection 2024. PubMed 38722831 ↗
  • Tam RM, Zablocki RW, Liu C, Narayan HK, Natarajan L, LaCroix AZ, Dillon L, Sakoulas E, Hartman SJ. Feasibility of a Health Coach Intervention to Reduce Sitting Time and Improve Physical Functioning Among Breast Cancer Survivors: Pilot Intervention Study. JMIR Cancer. 2023 Dec 19;9:e49934. doi: 10.2196/49934. PubMed 38113082 ↗
  • Gardner, B., Rebar, A. L., de Wit, S., & Lally, P. (2024). What is habit and how can it be used to change real-world behaviour? Narrowing the theory-reality gap. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 18(6), e12975. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12975
  • White I, Smith L, Aggio D, Shankar S, Begum S, Matei R, Fox KR, Hamer M, Iliffe S, Jefferis BJ, Tyler N, Gardner B. On Your Feet to Earn Your Seat: pilot RCT of a theory-based sedentary behaviour reduction intervention for older adults. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2017 May 8;3:23. doi: 10.1186/s40814-017-0139-6. eCollection 2017. PubMed 28491459 ↗
  • Matei R, Thune-Boyle I, Hamer M, Iliffe S, Fox KR, Jefferis BJ, Gardner B. Acceptability of a theory-based sedentary behaviour reduction intervention for older adults ('On Your Feet to Earn Your Seat'). BMC Public Health. 2015 Jul 2;15:606. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1921-0. PubMed 26135402 ↗
  • Tremblay MS, Aubert S, Barnes JD, Saunders TJ, Carson V, Latimer-Cheung AE, Chastin SFM, Altenburg TM, Chinapaw MJM; SBRN Terminology Consensus Project Participants. Sedentary Behavior Research Network (SBRN) - Terminology Consensus Project process and outcome. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Jun 10;14(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0525-8. PubMed 28599680 ↗
  • Sardinha LB, Santos DA, Silva AM, Baptista F, Owen N. Breaking-up sedentary time is associated with physical function in older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2015 Jan;70(1):119-24. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glu193. Epub 2014 Oct 16. PubMed 25324221 ↗
  • Gaskin CJ, Craike M, Mohebbi M, Salmon J, Courneya KS, Broadbent S, Livingston PM. Associations of objectively measured moderate-to-vigorous physical activity and sedentary behavior with quality of life and psychological well-being in prostate cancer survivors. Cancer Causes Control. 2016 Sep;27(9):1093-103. doi: 10.1007/s10552-016-0787-5. Epub 2016 Jul 28. PubMed 27469939 ↗
  • Gotay CC, Muraoka MY. Quality of life in long-term survivors of adult-onset cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998 May 6;90(9):656-67. doi: 10.1093/jnci/90.9.656. PubMed 9586662 ↗
  • Grusdat NP, Stauber A, Tolkmitt M, Schnabel J, Schubotz B, Wright PR, Schulz H. Routine cancer treatments and their impact on physical function, symptoms of cancer-related fatigue, anxiety, and depression. Support Care Cancer. 2022 May;30(5):3733-3744. doi: 10.1007/s00520-021-06787-5. Epub 2022 Jan 11. PubMed 35018519 ↗
  • Muhandiramge J, Orchard SG, Warner ET, van Londen GJ, Zalcberg JR. Functional Decline in the Cancer Patient: A Review. Cancers (Basel). 2022 Mar 8;14(6):1368. doi: 10.3390/cancers14061368. PubMed 35326520 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Dec 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Sep 2026, 9 months after the start.

Of 1,981 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 29 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 52. This study's planned 9 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 2,056 studies reached it within 29 months; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 52.

Neoplasms covers many different conditions, not one, so the studies compared here vary widely. Read these figures as a rough guide.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 2, 2026
First posted
Jul 10, 2026
StartActual
Dec 30, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Sep 2026
CompletionEst.
Sep 2026
Last update
Jul 10, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 10, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07694479
Responsible party
Linda Trinh (Associate Professor, University of Toronto) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 10, 2026
Start date
Dec 30, 2025
Primary completion
Sep 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 10, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion