CClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT07690306Updated Sep 15, 2026

Development and Validation of a Non-Invasive AI Diagnostic Model for Prostate Cancer Using Multiparametric MRI and PSMA PET/CT

An observational study in Prostate Cancer (Diagnosis), sponsored by Xiangya Hospital of Central South University. Enrolling by invitation at 6 sites in 2 countries. Open to male participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-15.

Sponsored by Xiangya Hospital of Central South University · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
1,500
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

Prostate cancer is one of the most common malignancies in men. Currently, due to the limited diagnostic accuracy of existing imaging tests, there is a risk of missed diagnosis or unnecessary prostate biopsy. This study aims to develop and validate a non-invasive artificial intelligence (AI) diagnostic model using two advanced imaging techniques: multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and PSMA PET/CT. By integrating information from both imaging modalities, the AI model is expected to improve the diagnostic accuracy of prostate cancer, reduce unnecessary biopsies, and assist physicians in making better clinical decisions. This is a retrospective, multicenter study that plans to collect imaging and pathology data from approximately 1,000 to 1,500 patients across six major hospitals in China. The diagnostic performance of the model will be evaluated, including its ability to identify clinically significant prostate cancer and its value in assisting diagnosis in patients with PSA levels in the gray zone (4-20 ng/mL).

Read the detailed description

Study Design:

This is a retrospective and prospective, multicenter, case-control study. The study aims to develop and validate a non-invasive artificial intelligence (AI) diagnostic model for prostate cancer by integrating multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and PSMA PET/CT imaging.

Participants:

Patients who underwent mpMRI, PSMA PET/CT, and prostate biopsy or radical prostatectomy at participating centers will be retrospectively enrolled. Eligible participants include pathologically confirmed prostate cancer patients (cases) and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) patients (controls). Inclusion criteria include age ≥18 years, ECOG performance status 0-2, life expectancy >6 months, and availability of complete clinical data (PSA, Gleason score, PI-RADS, SUVmax, prostate volume, etc.). Exclusion criteria include prior prostate cancer treatment (endocrine therapy or radiotherapy), previous prostate surgery (e.g., TURP), severe renal insufficiency, other malignancies. Informed consent is waived for retrospective patients, while signed informed consent is required for prospective patients.

Sample Size:

Approximately 1,000 to 1,500 participants will be enrolled from six hospitals in China: Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Chinese PLA General Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Beijing Hospital and Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine.

AI Model Development:

The AI model will be developed using deep learning and radiomics techniques. mpMRI sequences (including T2-weighted, DWI/ADC, and DCE) and PSMA PET/CT images will be preprocessed, coregistered, and fused. The model will be trained to distinguish clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) from non-csPCa or benign conditions. The reference standard is histopathology from prostate biopsy or radical prostatectomy.

Outcome Measures:

Primary outcome measures include the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity of the AI model for csPCa detection. Secondary outcome measures include positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), overall accuracy, decision curve analysis (DCA) net benefit, diagnostic performance in the PSA gray zone (4-20 ng/mL) subgroup, and the proportion of patients who could avoid biopsy at 100% specificity threshold.

Statistical Analysis:

Model performance will be evaluated using internal cross-validation and external validation on data from different centers. Calibration curves and decision curve analysis will be used to assess clinical utility. Subgroup analyses will be performed for PSA gray zone patients and different Gleason grade groups.

02

Conditions studied

  • Prostate Cancer (Diagnosis)

Keywords

  • Prostate Cancer
  • Multiparametric MRI
  • PSMA PET/CT
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Non-invasive Diagnosis
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

This study will enroll patients who underwent mpMRI, PSMA PET/CT, and prostate biopsy or radical prostatectomy at six major hospitals in China: Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Chinese PLA General Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Beijing Hospital and Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine. The study population includes two groups: patients with pathologically confirmed prostate cancer (cases) and patients with pathologically confirmed benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH, controls). All participants are male, aged 18 years or older, with no prior prostate cancer treatment (endocrine therapy or radiotherapy) or prostate surgery. Patients with severe renal insufficiency or other malignancies are excluded. A total of approximately 1,000 to 1,500 participants will be enrolled retrospectively from the participating centers.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age ≥ 18 years.
  2. ECOG performance status 0-2.
  3. Life expectancy > 6 months.
  4. Underwent mpMRI and PSMA PET/CT before systemic treatment or radical prostatectomy, with original DICOM data available for export.
  5. Has pathological diagnosis from prostate biopsy or radical prostatectomy as the gold standard.
  6. Complete clinical data available, including pre-treatment PSA (tPSA, fPSA), TNM stage, Gleason score, PI-RADS score, SUVmax, prostate volume (from MRI/PSMA PET), age, and BMI.
  7. Informed consent for data use for research purposes according to each center's ethics requirements.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. History of other malignant tumors
  2. Previous prostate surgery (e.g., TURP)
  3. Prior endocrine therapy or radiotherapy
  4. Severe renal insufficiency
  5. Major organ dysfunction or life expectancy \< 1 year
04

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
1,500 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Prostate Cancer Group
  • Non-cancer (BPH) Control
05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Area Under the Curve (AUC) of the AI Model for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer

    The AUC (Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve) will be calculated to evaluate the overall diagnostic performance of the AI model in distinguishing clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) from non-csPCa or benign conditions. The gold standard is histopathology from prostate biopsy or radical prostatectomy.

    Time frame: At histopathological diagnosis by prostate biopsy or radical prostatectomy

  2. Specificity of the AI Model for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer

    Specificity (true negative rate) will be calculated to evaluate the model's ability to correctly identify patients without clinically significant prostate cancer. High specificity is a primary goal to reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies.

    Time frame: At histopathological diagnosis by prostate biopsy or radical prostatectomy

  3. Sensitivity of the AI Model for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer

    Sensitivity (true positive rate) will be calculated to evaluate the model's ability to correctly identify patients with clinically significant prostate cancer.

    Time frame: At histopathological diagnosis by prostate biopsy or radical prostatectomy

Secondary outcomes

  1. Overall Diagnostic Accuracy

    Overall accuracy (proportion of true results among all cases) will be calculated for the AI model in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer.

    Time frame: At histopathological diagnosis by prostate biopsy or radical prostatectomy

  2. Net Benefit of the AI Model for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer

    Net benefit will be calculated across a range of threshold probabilities to evaluate the clinical utility of the AI model for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer, using histopathological diagnosis from prostate biopsy or radical prostatectomy as the reference standard. Results will be compared with default strategies of biopsying all patients or no patients.

    Time frame: At histopathological diagnosis by prostate biopsy or radical prostatectomy

  3. Proportion of Patients Who Could Avoid Biopsy at 100% Specificity Threshold

    At a specificity of 100% (no false positives), the proportion of patients who would be correctly identified as non-csPCa and thus could safely avoid prostate biopsy will be calculated. Sensitivity at this threshold will also be reported.

    Time frame: At histopathological diagnosis by prostate biopsy or radical prostatectomy

  4. AUC in PSA Gray Zone (4-20 ng/mL)

    The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the AI model will be evaluated in patients with PSA levels between 4 and 20 ng/mL to assess discrimination between clinically significant prostate cancer and non-clinically significant or benign disease, using histopathological diagnosis as the reference standard.

    Time frame: At histopathological diagnosis by prostate biopsy or radical prostatectomy

  5. Specificity in PSA Gray Zone (4-20 ng/mL)

    Specificity of the AI model will be evaluated in patients with PSA levels between 4 and 20 ng/mL using histopathological diagnosis as the reference standard.

    Time frame: At histopathological diagnosis (prostate biopsy or radical prostatectomy)

Other outcomes

  1. Sensitivity in PSA Gray Zone (4-20 ng/mL)

    Sensitivity of the AI model will be evaluated in patients with PSA levels between 4 and 20 ng/mL, using histopathological diagnosis as the reference standard.

    Time frame: At histopathological diagnosis (prostate biopsy or radical prostatectomy)

06

Study locations

6 sites
  • David Geffen School of Medicine University of California, Los Angeles(UCLA)
    Los Angeles, California 90095, United States
  • Beijing Hospital
    Beijing, Beijing Municipality 100730, China
  • Chinese PLA General Hospital
    Beijing, Beijing Municipality 100853, China
  • The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
    Guangzhou, Guangdong 510120, China
  • Qilu Hospital of Shandong University
    Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
  • Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
    Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality 200127, China
07

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07690306
Lead sponsor
Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
Collaborators
Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Chinese PLA General Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, RenJi Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 8, 2026
Start date
Jan 13, 2026
Primary completion
Sep 30, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 15, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion